Wednesday, December 07, 2005

Access to Comments

My access is few, but I will try and address a couple. Refunds: My intentions are there, no promise when but I am diligent about the effort. I have many handicaps that impair me with their good intentions. This site is not the site for refunds or form, it will link you to that one if I can ever get it up. Bill Julian: He is not my concern, he was a broker whose role is finished. I do not know his promises and am not marketing his product. I offer this knowledge I do have. He is a friend to me when I have few, and his swiss backing is not a lie. As to the rest, I am not a babysitter to adults. I think one commenter said we are all accountable for our own actions. Can I be more specific: Starfish, in what way? I want to give you all I can but there has to be some realistic warfare limitations. Webpage: I hired a web designer through a friend prior to my incarceration. They swore two months at most. I am now four months past that promise and cannot get a simple draft. I have tried to get my friend to help but he apparently has his own agenda. I get people to contact them but no one seems to understand what I want. They keep offering me an answer to a question I haven’t asked. This is just a test to see how angry I can get. I’ve hired new people but they are being delayed by these slugs also. Many of my plans are contingent upon this page, so you all get inflamed by my delays. I am trying is all I can say. Collateral Estoppel: My current offer is good for me but not for you. Should I take it or be the best fiduciary I can be and not set my own interest above yours. I have three other choices developing while the webpage needs to get up. When I settle I will show you this offer and then you might appreciate my hold out.

7 comments:

wysiwyg said...

Newyorklife no = Guy
Newyorklife = fle perhaps?

wysiwyg said...

Newyorklife,

Well, ya can't blame a guy for tryin. We all need to have a little fun now and then.

wysiwyg said...

It appears that there is dirty work afoot, and the funds that are supposed to be going to clients will be absconded with by "the boys". Could this be a scenario?

WillToFight said...

This inside fighting is exactly what the enemies wants to see.

Look I don't care whether BJ had the Swiss backing before he started re-selling the plan. Nothing wrong with anticipation.

I'm am concerned with those who are already in the process, and their waiting on a response from paperwork submitted to ensure that they are in-fact a part of the process. Those questions have not been answered by anyone. Agents have not been paid to date by brokers!

I.E. there is enough S$#T slinging to go around and I know the players.

Clients/Agents/Brokers, we are in this together. Like it or not! It is not relavent whether BJ had or has the Swiss backing unless someelse wanted it and did not get it!!!!!!!!

If BJ can get the job done, I'm with BJ!

wysiwyg said...

down but not out said...
It appears that there is dirty work afoot, and the funds that are supposed to be going to clients will be absconded with by "the boys". Could this be a scenario?

newyorklife said,

Absolutely NOT! I wouldn't question Scott and/or Kurt's motives or integrity. They are stand up men and they will do what they say or promised.


NYL, I agree. I believe that Kurt and Scott are acting with intergity. What concerns me is that there might be those in the backround who don't have the best interest of the clients in mind. Of course we have no idea to what extent Kurt has control over the situation.

WillToFight said...

Look, we need to do an agent/broker conference and clear up everything that is going on. Once that is done we need to stick by what we learn and stop this type of bickering.

Some of us have no choice but to continue this process to what ever end. However, it would be nice to know what is going on between this appearance of factions back and forth. It only needs to be done in another forum, not here!

Be strong lets' get this done.

Some of you know who each other are on this blog. Let connect and discuss this!

TACO you are not envited!

neodemes said...

newyorklife said...

Here's a funny one for ya'.....

Why did Bill Julian's wife have to fork over roughly $200K at a foreclosure sale, if he told his clients he could stop foreclosures from happening?

********************************

He was in the Dorean process at that time, btw...

see Bill Julian and other foreclosure cases