Thursday, May 25, 2006

Court Date (5/9/06)

The date was crowded with lawyers and defendants. After ancillary business we were handed the report from the Psyche with the intentions of performing the ferretta hearing. I took a little sidestep that appeared to me too great an opportunity to pass up. As you are aware there is a tremendous amount of drama to sell Court TV as reality. The State provided a witness and an assessment of my mental state and abilities, which is the fertile ground to verify my objective reality in my environment. Against the Judge and prosecutor's objection we managed to get a hearing to examine this witness on the 11th. I will update you on this after the fact but this is my goal; To have a 3rd party expert from the State verify I am a natural human of flesh and blood, a man with a mind that he assessed. The court's goal is to pretend the Strawman fiction is me. They do this by adhesion contract and not answering declaratory questions. I will have their witness lay the foundation for my separation from the Strawman. This petty particular is at the core of jurisdiction, which is the threshold of procedure. I cannot precede under a presumption only a fact. The good news is your trustee's are factually competent.

41 comments:

WillToFight said...

Kurt Said....

I cannot precede under a presumption only a fact. The good news is your trustee's are factually competent.
____________________

Now Mogel I know you agree! That sentence from Kurt is one of the most important facts that all of us must use on our own behalf. Otherwise we contract with them under their jurisdiction and they can proceed against you on presumtive evidence not fact!

With RFID forced vaccinations and others liberty taking actions, we don't have a lot of time folks to understand what is going on!

WillToFight said...

Oh and you will most likely loose because the deck is stacked against you!

Presumption v. Fact!

Hey Kurt

I agreed that you were and are my Trustee chosen by My wife and I!

WillToFight said...

http://www.antiwar.com/mcgovern
/?articleid=9036


Eavesdropping, Gagging, and the Constitution

by Ray McGovern
http://www.antiwar.com/mcgovern/?articleid=9036
Is the National Security Agency being "turned against the people," as the Congressional committee led by Sen. Frank Church warned might happen? We the people cannot know; it's classified.

son of a prophet said...

HEADLINE NEWS:

Wizard of Oz loses battle to STRAWMAN©


lol!

STRAWMAN SAYS..."I always knew I had a brain....the length of the hypotenuse of an isosceles right triangle is equal to the square root of the sum of the squares of the opposite sides...."

son of a prophet said...

BIRD FLU ON THE MOVE!


Authorities in southwestern Siberia have imposed quarantine restrictions in four districts after outbreaks of bird flu. The outbreak of the virus in the Omsk Region, its capital about 2,500 kilometers (1,600 miles) east of Moscow, is the first time avian influenza has been registered in Siberia this year. “Tests confirmed bird flu [virus] in four districts,” he said, adding that authorities had acted to impose quarantine restrictions in the affected areas. The official said bird flu was suspected in one more area, where ten birds had died in the last 24 hours, and that a total of 185 domestic birds had died at nine locations in seven districts since May 13.

son of a prophet said...

link for above...


http://hisz.rsoe.hu/
alertmap/woalert_
read.php?lang=eng&id=6207

WillToFight said...

SOP

STRAWMAN SAYS..."I always knew I had a brain....the length of the hypotenuse of an isosceles right triangle is equal to the square root of the sum of the squares of the opposite sides...."
__________________
lol
Just love it!

Many don't realize the Wizard of OZ
was really all about?

WillToFight said...

Jackie

I think all will be done. Relax!

There are still hurdles to cross.

get your all you paper work done. Send it in to be notarized. When you get back you whould be able to open the account.

All you need are signatures. Then you open the account.

WillToFight said...

Mogel I take that as agrement?

NO FACTS WERE PRESENTED IN THE COURT BY THE JUDGE, NOR BY THE DA. The Judge just gave his opionion & he expects me to honor it. Very strange how the Court system works sometimes. LOL

We can LOL lol but the populace must quit being in acceptance of just your situation!

WillToFight said...

Peanut

I guess there was no reason to respond to me! Although you made all those juvinile allegations?

WillToFight said...

Dog

So dg, why don't you expound point by point just how their legal argument is doodoo?

_____________

I'd like to hear that too!

WillToFight said...

Of all forms of tyranny the least attractive and the most vulgar is the tyranny of mere wealth, the tyranny of plutocracy” : John Pierpont Morgan

=
We have got rid of the fetish of the divine right of kings, and that slavery is of divine origin and authority. But the divine right of property has taken its place. The tendency plainly is towards ... “a government of the rich, by the rich, and for the rich.” : Rutherford Birchard Hayes (1822–1893),

++++

I'll tell you, if this is not exactly is going on now but on a much greater/global scale.

neodemes said...

"The court's goal is to pretend the Strawman fiction is me."

They really don't care if you are KURT F. JOHNSON or Kurt F. Johnson or kurt f. johnson.

Go ahead, try the nom de guerre argument. Can you name ONE case where somebody won using it?

All you will do is further destroy any credibility your 'process' has.

neodemes said...

"After I finished typing my name, my name automatically shows up as all Capitalized letters without me doing anything?"

Gosh, it MUST be a consipracy, moog. Good thing you noticed.

OR

The computer programmer who wrote the program that captures user input knew enough to idiot proof the program so if someone entered thIeR nAMe, the data would be saved in an organized manner as THEIR NAME.

The programmer could have chosen to format the entry as Their Name, but
the program wouldn't be able to distinguish names like McDonald or McPherson, etc., so why not standardize form input as all caps?

Would all lower case, i.e., their name, be less sinister to you?

WillToFight said...

Neodomenes Said...

Go ahead, try the nom de guerre argument. Can you name ONE case where somebody won using it?
________________________

If all charges are dropped then, effectively there was no case Neodomenes.

Think you Knome! I'll give it to you, your trying!

Furthermore, the very fact that you can define a portion of the tactic (nom de guerre) Kurt is employing gives credibility to the fact that it is a legal defense that has been used and has been effective.

Just because you wish ill upon everyone in this process, shouldn't allow you to push B.S. upon the unsucpecting! It also shows your lack of courage!

Your days of buying foreclosed and confiscated property are numbered NeoFascist!

WillToFight said...

Neodomenes Said...

Go ahead, try the nom de guerre argument.
______________________

You make that statement like someone (Kurt) should have confided in you before using this tactic!

lol!

Your an arrogant......

WillToFight said...

Gnome

neodemes said...

"gives credibility to the fact that it is a legal defense that has been used and has been effective."

OK will, show us a case where it has worked. Just one. Please.

WillToFight said...

You don't read very well Neodomens!

You don't think very well either!

WillToFight said...

Dobbs: Bush, Congress tell working folk to go to hell
By Lou Dobbs
CNN

Wednesday, May 24, 2006; Posted: 10:21 p.m. EDT (02:21 GMT) Editor's note: Lou Dobbs' commentary appears every Wednesday on CNN.com.

Lou Dobbs says President Bush and Congress are part of an "elitist war on the middle class"

NEW YORK (CNN) -- President Bush says that the installation of the new Iraqi government was a "watershed event," but at the same time warns Americans of the challenges and loss as we continue to prosecute the war against Iraqi insurgents. Sen. Harry Reid declares that legislation that would render English the national language is racist.

Thirty-seven Democrats vote for full amnesty for all illegal aliens in this country, even though nobody really knows whether the number is 11 million, 12 million or 20 million. The Senate Republican leadership demands that a "comprehensive immigration reform" plan must be passed before this Memorial Day weekend. And the president signs into law a tax cut that raises taxes on the educational funds of teenagers saving for college.

Never before in our country's history have both the president and Congress been so out of touch with most Americans. Never before have so few of our elected officials and corporate leaders been less willing to commit to the national interest. And never before has our nation's largest constituent group -- some 200 million middle-class Americans -- been without representation in our nation's capital.(Watch why Dobbs said Mexico's leader is in charge of U.S. immigration policy --

See the rest of the story!

WillToFight said...

Furthermore, the very fact that you can define a portion of the tactic (nom de guerre) Kurt is employing gives credibility to the fact that it is a legal defense that has been used and has been effective.

Ponder that for a moment NeoFascist!

WillToFight said...

If all charges are dropped then, effectively there was no case Neodomenes.

Ponder that Neo!

I have to break it down. Now if you spin this one there is no help for you!

WillToFight said...

The world is waking to the real truth of what happened almost 5 years ago. Come water and nurture the seeds of truth by visiting: http://www.UniversalSeed.org

70 Million Americans can't be wrong!!!
See the new Zogby poll here: http://news.yahoo.com/s/prweb/20060522/bs_prweb/prweb388743_4


These are two separate links to the same video. Please watch it with an open mind. http://www.HumanityCode.com http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8260059923762628848

This video and the videos on UniversalSeed are eye opening. They certainly have the potential to change the course of human history on this planet. They can only do so if, after watching them, you stand up and be heard. The best way to do that right now, is to tell others about these videos and links. Do this by forwarding this email to others and watching them with friends and family. You can also forward this email anonymously from the UniversalSeed website. Whatever it takes to get the message out...that is what should be done.

These videos are being watched in every country on every continent as you read this. Dont let it go unnoticed that you saw them!


Follow the link below for other informative videos and links. http://www.universalseed.org

KYHOOYA said...

neodemes said...
"gives credibility to the fact that it is a legal defense that has been used and has been effective."

OK will, show us a case where it has worked. Just one. Please.

So what your saying with this statment is that inorder for you use something it has to have been used before you?

That bring one question to mine for you
How is "CASE LAWS" that your saying is not on the books become Case Law in the first place?



Someone has to do it first don't you think?

No No realy DON'T YOU THINK!

neodemes said...

moogie sez:

"P.S. I'M TYPING IN ALL CAP LETTERS SO YOU & YOUR COMPUTER CAN RECOGNIZE WHO'S SPEAKING. I'M ASSUMING YOU AREN'T AS SMART AS YOUR COMPUTER. PLEASE DON'T ASSUME THAT I AM ANGRY."

Ooooh. I thought your strawman was typing. LOL.

Gosh, moog, you seem a little edgy lately. It'll be OK. Not to worry.

Let me put it this way.

If Kurt has a tight case and all his ducks in a row to nail the evil bankers and the feds down, why is he dicking around with strawman/flesh and blood/fictious bull shit?

He's like Custer at Little Big Horn...got the Indian's right where he wants them.

Can you say Massacre? Sure you can.

Its a beautiful day in the neighborhood.

neodemes said...

WillToFight
said...

Furthermore, the very fact that you can define a portion of the tactic (nom de guerre) Kurt is employing gives credibility to the fact that it is a legal defense that has been used and has been effective.

KYHOOYA
said...

neodemes said...
"gives credibility to the fact that it is a legal defense that has been used and has been effective."

OK will, show us a case where it has worked. Just one. Please.

So what your saying with this statment is that inorder for you use something it has to have been used before you?

That bring one question to mine for you
How is "CASE LAWS" that your saying is not on the books become Case Law in the first place?


Someone has to do it first don't you think?

******

Let's try to get on the same page...

willy said it has been effectively used before, I asked to be shown a case where it has worked.

I'm still waiting.

neodemes said...

WillToFight
said...

If all charges are dropped then, effectively there was no case Neodomenes.


******

If the IF is gone, then spout off, willy.

neodemes said...

moogie sez:

"IF THE COURT DOESN'T CARE, WHY WOULD THAT PUT LESS CREDIBILITY UPON HIM?"

Simply because it makes him sound like a whacko ... kinda like telling judges their houses are going to burn down.

Yetter said...

No court can make up rulings, the function of a court is to answer the question posed to it, and in order to pose a question a person needs standing. The petioner has to show that an action has occured which affects him,hence giving him that standing. The trick employed by the goverment is to get you to claim that you are an officer of that goverment giving the goverment juristiction to proceed against you via your oath.You must understand juristiction and the history behind it. Remember Jesus comanded that his followers "swear not at all". What did the goverment do to Jesus. It tried to obtain juristiction on the false oath of a witness, charging him with sedition for the out of context statement that he'd tear down the temple (burn the judges house). At that trial Jesus stood mute, refusing the oath. The judge became so frustrated that he posed a trick question " I adjure you in the name of the living God, are you the man". Jesus replied " you have so said". He didnt take the oath.Jesus tossed the false hood back where it belonged, back on the court. The court couldnt get juristiction.So are Kurts words the rantings of a Kamakazi pilot?.

WillToFight said...

Neodomenes

At this point "If" is the logical verbiage. I can't read the future can you?

I believe the question was the tactic Kurt is employing. I think YETTER explains it very well.

If you would think critically and with fact you could understand that because dom de guerre is itentifiable than it must and has been used as a defense.

What you fail to realize is that the courts have enjoyed duping us into giving them jurisdiction. You just can't seem to get it through your head.

I understand though! You only which ill on this process.

WillToFight said...

Newgurl said....

WillToFight said..get your all you paper work done. Send it in to be notarized. When you get back you whould be able to open the account. All you need are signatures. Then you open the account.

are the trustees signatures needed to open account.

_______________
No, the signatures need to be on the "Bank Resolution" form.

WillToFight said...

Jackie

willtofight I do have all my paper notarized and trustbook that dr fred send me I just have to know how to open the bank acct. but my friend is missing her trustbook she got bank paper notarized but not the trust we all did all the paper work at same time thank you.

_______________

Take the Bank Resolution form to a bank that will allow you to open a Private Trust account.

If I were you i'd look for a private bank. I think Mogel discussed that in an earlier

WillToFight said...

Neodomens idiotly said.....

Simply because it makes him sound like a whacko ... kinda like telling judges their houses are going to burn down.

__________________

What do have a BLOCK HEAD or something?

Portugeuse would sound "whacko" if you knew nothing about it!

Neo What education in Law do you have? I'm curious.

People like you with a typical "status quo" approach would make us all slaves.

I don't want any of what you say Neo!

WillToFight said...

Pauligirl

Good points. Lots of facts and info.

But, we really don't know that this is the whole of the Defense Kurt is employing. And establishing jurisdiction is not necessary a Dom de guerre argument.

Neo came up with that! We all only responded to him trying Kurt here on this Blog!

If Kurt is using this defense, then within the defense there is a body of evidence that goes along with that.

Kurt believes he is innocent because there are no facts supporting guilt .

The fact must be produced, that he in fact committed a crime.

You can not "Stand-Under PRESUMTION! That is what the court is attempting to do! Everyone should be outraged by the courts tactics!

KYHOOYA said...

GENERAL POSTING


You have got to see what I found, you won't beleave your eye's & ear's.

After many years of research it's been discovered and it was there in front of us all along.

I have used this time and time again with fantasic resultes.

It's so small but yet it pack's a powerful punch, so It is not recommended for use by small childeren or those over the age that there heart can back up the pure exhilaration this can produce.

It may not look like much but don't let that fool you, this will (not maybe, not might)it will make you feel like a million bucks! If use in connection with the correct timing as noted in the instruction. but don't over do it or the effects will start to degrade. so use it only when necessary.

Now what are you waiting for take a look and get your's TODAY!

For those time’s when nothing else will do and you can’t seem to find away to get your point across we proudly introduce…..




The “Holiday Maker”





Ahhh....,
BLOW IT OUT YOUR ASSSSS!

Please apply the where needed


Have a great weekend everyone

KYHOOYA said...

No joke everyone get out there and have a great weekend. the sun is out and look's to be a nice day!

L8R d8^)>z/\===\/
Peace

neodemes said...

mogel said...

Mr. Rogers says: "If Kurt has a tight case and all his ducks in a row to nail the evil bankers and the feds down, why is he dicking around with strawman/flesh and blood/fictious bull shit?"

That's a good question Nemo. Maybe he's going for the easy dismissal, since they can't get his flesh & blood person in Court & have jurisdiction. Without jurisdiction, he can always get an appeal just in case an insurance policy is needed. Why fight if you can get an easy win?

********************

Moogie, you recently accused me of contradicting myself.

What you are suggesting contradicts Kurt's stated game plan in which he has maneuvered the 'powers that be' into a confronational position...he's going to beat them at their own game and save the world. Remember, moog?

And a few lines down here, you contradict your previous statement above...

mogel sez:

"He only cares about fulfilling his mission as his priority, people's feelings are secondary. Once that happens, all clients who spoke ill of him, will praise him as a hero & will pretend to be with him in Spirit from the beginning."

So, pushing for dismissal on jurisdictional grounds isn't exactly taking the bull by the horns, is it moog?

Once that happens? Getting the case dismissed on jurisdictional grounds isn't going to accomplish squat. There will be no magic happening, no judgements, no damages, nada, nicht, zilch.

Not to worry, though. Patriot tactics will only add contempt charges, not dismissal.

WillToFight said...

Neodomenes said....

willy said it has been effectively used before, I asked to be shown a case where it has worked.

I'm still waiting.
___________________

You have no truth in you! Now your addig words to my statement!

Effectively used!

Like I said before, you alonely wish ill on this process.

neodemes said...

willy said:

Furthermore, the very fact that you can define a portion of the tactic (nom de guerre) Kurt is employing gives credibility to the fact that it is a legal defense that has been used and has been effective.

*******************

That's the same as saying it has been effectively used, willy.

Make sense for once, willy you?

neodemes said...

oh, and how about that case where it has been used and has been effective?

Cough up.

neodemes said...

dgwondering said...


Still waiting for a winning case eh? Aren't we all. Any of your clients sued you yet?


********

DOREAN VICTIMS UNITE