Wednesday, July 20, 2005
This is a test of the emergency blowhard system
We are running a little test. This is only a test! I don't believe the federal government can prosecute me because they have already blown the case with jury tampering, they can't prove criminal intent, they are violating their own codes and statutes routinely, and they can't find a banker willing to perjurer himself on the record. I think they know I will ask all the right questions. Maybe Kevin V. Ryan can answer the question why when a referral for criminal prosecution came from Judge (I don't want to hear the truth) Alsup he filed civil. What happened Grand Jury tell you to go get evidence? I will transfer my criminal case from Utah to your court and you can have at it! Of course you don't want to dismiss it because you blowhards have been libeling me as a crook for some time now and that is your justification of all your actions. What will you do with my test?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
7 comments:
Would the real Kurt please regain control here?
You know as well as anyone that they can prosecute. In any case the issue is whether they can prevail. Spare us the bullet-proof stance; you've been through the machine before. And lost.
If you have a bona fide defense to the charges and a REAL attorney you haven't blind-sided with the "expert" theory, you may even be able to keep yourself out of another visit to prison.
As it stands, with this BLOG thing you're only adding to the credibility of your opponents.
I shouldn't give this advice to the perpetrators of a scam, but it's time to get off the net and shut the hell up or you'll only drag more people down with you.
Might I point out the successes some of your enemies have had - simply because they listened to professional (and sound) advice about "managing outcomes?"
The perpetrators of lending and servicing schemes have had the wherewithall to hire professional image and legislative shaping firms. They are my enemies - and you are giving them ammunition in addition to aid and comfort. Countless victims of their system are being rolled over because they raise the bogus arguments you espouse.
Your do-it-yourself style and having rabid pit-bulls like Farrel drive the message is contributing to your downfall and making it even harder to fight them.
Wouldn't it be something if Judge Bean was really Judge Alsup!
J udge
U ndermines
D orean
G roup
E fforts
I'm still hearing voices when I drive. I heard some more on the way home from work. Also, it appears I've gone through some type of vortex because the clock in my car is now flashing 12:00 like my vcr clock.
I'm considering legal action against Taco Bell. I recently walked out of the local Taco Bell yelling "I'M FULL".......and promptly got arrested for disturbing the peace. My claim is their commercial is misleading since the people on television didn't get arrested, but I did.
Kurt,
I need your help! At one point in time I was an MA client, and was one of the first clients that MA sent to you back in March of 2004.
I got my Family Trust and Quitclaim deed recorded and that was the extent of my dealings with your company and my purported mortgage.
Since that point in time I have done my own homework / research and came up with my own plan of action.
I have come into a situation that may cause me some serious problems. My mortgage company is now suing me, and they are claiming that I am part of an “Internet Mortgage Elimination Scam”. They cite you and Scott as the ringleaders in this purported scam and make the association to me because you are named as the trustees on my Family Trust.
The Family Trust and Quitclaim have nothing to do with what I have filed, or the complaint that I have filed against them. It’s just left over Oxford / MA paperwork for them to use against me in their case. Which should have been cleaned up when Oxford and MA parted ways.
I talked to Scott about this back in mid 2004 and he referred me to Jay N., but I could not get a hold of Jay via phone or email. I then sent a request via US mail to your old office back in February, and I never got a response. I also had one of your agents try to talk to someone there and that was a dead end as well.
How can I get my property quitclaimed back to me?
I currently understand that this may not be possible because of the restraining order that you are now under?
Can I use some sort of administrative procedure to get this done? Any other ideas would be greatly appreciated.
Sincerely,
The Warding Eye
Kurt, I joined Dorean in April 2004 before there were brokers. Are pre-broker clients in the first 500 you spoke about last night? Also, I know someone else that joined before the brokers and neither of us received the last two e-mail fast blast from Dorean. How do we know if our files were taken or not in the FBI raids and if we are still in the mix? Just not sure how the pre-broker clients are being dealt with or tracked.
Thanks
Judge, it is not a bulletproof stance, it is simply a stance. I went to prison on a strict liability charge last time and that is another animal all together than an intent case. Prosecutors don't take chances on case as big as this one politically unless they have a reasonable high 90's percentage chance to win. Imagine if they prosecute as you say and fail. All the credibility for their harassment goes out the window and now damages become recoverable. We’re talking big numbers if mortgageman is remotely close.
Post a Comment