It appears to me that a few whiners have found their great opportunity to blame me for their woes. I was not there when you signed your mortgage. I didn’t create the fraud in the contract. I did accept $1,000.00 or $1,500.00 from you to intervene in your own slide into destruction. You have paid me well to remove all your personal accountability. In fact I actually paid you by advancing you a $3,000.00 Family Estate Trust. You need to get off your self-pity sluggard asses and truly figure what I did for you, and how you can defend it. I am incarcerated and still in the fight. What’s your excuse? You are apparently so wise that you have judged me as a fraud. Please pursue your options. Kevin V. Ryen U S Attorney General needs you and all your tears for the witness stand. Make sure your hypothesis is sound because I will cross-examine you if you are on the stand. I am giving you educational materials. There is a document on the Internet by Mary Elizabeth Croft that should help. I will not be with you at your foreclosure or profit from it but keep the Kleenex coming when you think of me and ignore your true enemy. In fact from a blog for Dorean Victims until the vats of your grief are all full. All I tried to do was help. "It’s not fair for me to be in jail. I miss my wife, everybody has turned on me, I hate the ungrateful clients, the government can’t be beat, and I will quit." See how stupid that sounds. To be continued…
PS:
HOW I CLOBBERED EVERY BUREAUCRATIC CASH-CONFISCATORY AGENCY KNOWN TO MAN... a Spiritual Economics Book on $$$ andRemembering Who You Are
http://www.freedomfiles.org/war/pentagon.htm
Also remember the new DVD’s will be soon in hand, take advantage of "The Early Bird Special" send a blank Money Order for $70.00 to
DVD C/O 125 E. Sunnyoaks Ave #207
Campbell, CA. 95008
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
16 comments:
Also remember the new DVD’s will be soon in hand, take advantage of "The Early Bird Special" send a blank Money Order for $70.00 to
DVD C/O 125 E. Sunnyoaks Ave #207
Campbell, CA. 95008
Umm, could I possibly get a free copy considering I've already shelled out several thousand dollars?
GODLY GOVT.???
September 02, 2005 posting ... have you noticed a complete lock down of any real information about the real situation in the south ... we have approximately 3 million or more homeless people and NO NEWS !!! fema and the now invisible 'homeland security crew" are obviously outclassed by this event ... they had "control" for maybe a few hours in name only ... they are paper tigers and do not ever expect them to come to your aid in case of emergency ... you are on your own as we have seen proven conclusively in the wake of hurricane katrina ... the alleged "relief" promised by the pres is pitifully insufficient and people are dying from lack of water and basic food on the streets of new orleans ... an estimated half million people still remain in new orleans and the mayor sent out what he called his final SOS plea ... the pres is getting ready for his 9/11 PR press photo op event while finishing out his late summer vacation ... and now again the news swings its attention ... not to the devastation or the people in dire need of attention ... but to the phony aid ploy of bill clinton and his old drug boss from the mena arkansas cocaine trafficing days george bush senior ... listen to my show this week for more details ... jim mccanney
www.jmccanneyscience.com
son - of - a - ?
We all know the gov't is corrupt. What does that prove? Only that the gov't is corrupt. Does that mean God is not in control? NO! It was God, Himself, that raised up the Chaldeans to accomplish His purpose in the discipline of the house of Israel. The fact that the gov't is evil is not contradictory to the fact that God reigns. Scripture says to "fear not evil tidings". It also says "fear not" in general. Be wise, be aware, but fear not!
While your posts do share some information they seem more focused on encouraging the fear of man. You act like the rest of us have our heads in the sand - just because we are not reacting the way you do does not mean that we are not aware. I do not know you, except for your posts, maybe you are scared . . . maybe you just really believe that you are the only one who has your eyes open. Either way, it would be nice if we could just get back to the purpose for this blog. This is not the "Endtimes Update" or "Terror Awareness" blog - it is the Mortgage Elimination blog. And, I for one would appreciate finding the majority of the posts to be encouraging. So, quit hitting the panic button, we all have your web-address and IF we want to visit - we will. Not to mention that this last post of yours sounds like a personal advertisement, certainly not the purpose for this blog.
Let's get back to what this blog was originally meant for - the exchange of helpful information concerning mortgage elimination and encouraging each other wherever we find ourselves in the process.
Kurt -
Thank you for continuing to post even though you find yourself in a most difficult situation. Our entire family is continuing to pray for you and Scott and the rest of the team daily. Thank you for staying focused and standing firm to the task. May God grant you victory sooner than you expect!
Psalm 9:9-10
fyi2u
So are you saying that the title companies will not insure title even if the property is taken out of the trust? I need to know because I have a buyer for my property that will get me out of foreclosure.
PLEASE PROVIDE ANY INFORMATION YOU CAN
CLEARLY SPOKEN:
Just to correct some mis (dis?) info, I am not the author of those articles, nor the administrator of the refferred to site.
I am just someone who thought it was useful info, as it indirectly applies to everyone, whether or not they are involved with the DG.
After all, IF the end is coming, what difference if your mortgage is firgiven OR not??
Also, as I have said, as the principals are currently in 'depose' as they say, there is no useful info being presented in this blog other than pure speculation.
When I see substantive info being put out, rest assured I will cease posting these types of articles here.
You people have ranted and raved since the beginnign of this blog and used every type of vulgarity known to man, and here YOU are going to tell me that I cannot post here???
As they say, "it aint happenin'.
Peace.
Son of a Prophet
Here! Here! Here! Good going!
The chumps come out at night! The chumps come out at night!
These flunky whinners!
Dog wondering! Dogs don't wonder! They mainly coware!
Seen Somthing in Utah schitzobastard, we always new you were apart of the fraud!
I've said it and I'll say it again. Do not argue or even respond to the ElmerFuddFucks! This is all they want to see. They are getting paid to disrupt this site.
Don't even try to tell me not to post any word I want to address these adwares/spywares/malware programmed to the system asswholes!
Hang in folks we'll get there!
I read yesterday Larken Rose was convicted of five counts of willful failure to file. You can read about it here: http://triallogs.blogspot.com/.
I cannot understand why Larken felt the need to teach those twelve people about section 861. I also don't understand why he felt it necessary to bring evidence when the us attorney didn't bring evidence.
Who cares what section 861 means when it's impossible to prove the "constitution" and "code" is applicable?
More to the point, the issue of standing, as far as I'm aware, was not addressed. The supreme court has consistently held,
“[c]ourts must look behind names that symbolize the parties to determine whether a justiciable case or controversy is presented.” United States v. Interstate Commerce Commission, 337 U.S. 426 at 430 (1949).
There was been great success in asking "Is there evidence of a complaining party?" to exploit several fatal flaws in the "system", such as there is no "state" or "United States." This is NOT to say if Larken asked this question (among many others) his case would have been kicked out. However, it would have established facts to prove he was not being informed so he could understand and properly defend himself. Do not get caught up in having the questions answered, they don't have to; not answering is an error in a matter which they have no discretion.
If some lawyer claims to "represent the United States", then let him prove it. Ask him to produce tangible evidence in open court. Again, who cares about 861 when no lawyer claiming to represent a "state" or "United States" can produce evidence of a client? The burden of proof is supposed to be "beyond a reasonable doubt" and the "law" requires "courts [to] look behind the names that symbolize the parties..." This means just spewing, "The United States" is not enough; not even close.
Just recently, in admittedly a less grave situation, a friend had a traffic case kicked out for a failure to prosecute because no less than four "state" attorneys would answer "yes or no" if there was evidence of a complaining party. What if the "judge" jumps in? Then obviously this black-robed wonder lawyer is incapable of providing a fair trial. To really turn the screws on the robed one I would ask the following questions:
Am I entitled to a fair trial?
Yes.
Can I get a fair trial if there is a conflict of interest?
No.
If there was a conflict of interest would you recuse yourself?
Yes.
Who do you [the judge] represent in these proceedings?
I believe Larken can still ask these questions. I'm sure his wife can because her trial has not started. This, in my experience, is far more effective than trying to teach twelve people about section 861.
SeensomethinginUtah/Elmerfudd
Study Study Study Study. My above post as well!
There are so many reasons for having a voluntary society as opposed to the violent, involuntary society we have now; vote fraud is just one. I found this video http://www.iwilltryit.com/fixed1.htm on Frank Whelan's site www.franklyspeakingradio.com/home.html. While new technology has given vote fraud more attention, vote fraud is nothing new and is only part of a much larger fraud, politics itself.
Consider the difference between political voting as opposed to economic voting. Political voting accomplishes nothing productive and only gives legitimacy to a gang of killers, thieves and liars; men and women incapable or unwilling to provide a service people will voluntarily pay for. The people who vote politically have no power because they have no real choice whether or not they want the services provided by government. Political democracy is a scam; it's called a false choice.
But what about economic voting, or economic democracy? In a voluntary society where the protection of life, liberty and property is still provided by men and women, though on a mutually voluntary basis. In the involuntary society we have now the protection of life, liberty and property is NOT provided and you are shot if you don't pay for it.
Could there be vote fraud in a voluntary society? Let's presume in a voluntary society the mediums of exchange would probably follow the thousands of years tradition of using precious metals such as gold and silver, as opposed to worthless pieces of paper we are forced to use now. Do you know anyone who has to be forced to accept silver and gold?
A company protecting life, liberty and property in a voluntary society gets votes in the form of precious metals, not pieces of paper or computer keystrokes that cannot be verified. In other words, in a voluntary society a company in the business of protection must turn a profit. It has to do this by doing what? That's right, by providing PROTECTION (remember, "states" are not here to protect). In a voluntary society if such a company refused or failed to protect their customers they could not force MORE money from their customers as happened here after 9/11. Such a company would have to provide the service it promises and do so better and more efficiently than it's competition. Companies that cannot go out of business as they should.
Yes, a company can falsely report profits, just as they do now. But for how long? How would they pay their debts and employees? Borrowing will only last so long and there would be a profit motive for the lender. In a voluntary society a lender would be a true lender, not the pathetic, criminal system called "banking" we have now.
It's clear who has the power in a voluntary society, the people. Hundreds of millions of people whose vote actually counts because they are not forced to spend their money. With economic democracy each member of society, men, women, children, whether black, white or whatever, is free to choose who and what they'll vote for and where they'll spend their money. If they don't like the service or are not getting what was promised, then they can stop paying instead of waiting four years hoping they can get their guy in. No more life time appointments - get it?
Why won't politicians put their guns down and provide their wonderful services on a voluntary basis like normal people? Why don't you call one up and ask them? The answer is in the previous paragraph. Politicians and bureaucrats can't stand the idea of not being able to control others and tell them what to do. The thought of people freely choosing what services they pay for must chill them to the bone. If you do question one, when you get the typical answer: "Not everyone will pay." You can respond by telling him/her not everyone pays now. If that's a reason not to have a voluntary society, then it's a reason not the have the involuntary one we have now.
It's a no brainer. Let's see, you want to protect me, but if I pay you then you won't protect me? Can't I get the same service by not paying? Oh, you'll shoot me if I don't pay?
If politicians put their guns down, then their pretended customers, i.e., citizens, would walk away laughing. As they should.
posted by Marc Stevens @ 4:29 PM 1 comments
Wednesday, August 03, 2005
Governments control, not protect
I'm back; I spent a few days in the police state of Kalifornia. I really hate the fact some of the worst bureaucrats live in places like Newport Beach. I wish they could be content to live in places like New York and Chicago.
A very close friend of mine was the victim of the fearless drug warriors this past weekend. Thank goodness no one was hurt and those faithful protectors of life, liberty and property noticed my friend had a license plate light out; who knows what would have happened if those brave cops had not stopped him? Can't see a logical connection between a license plate light and drugs? Let's examine this "routine traffic stop."
First, keep in mind the drug warriors have no duty to protect anyone and the single professed purpose of "states" is to protect people's rights i.e., life, liberty and property. So when these warriors saw my friend traveling down the street, their decision to stop him was not to protect anyone or their rights. Let's assume the cop's only wanted to give a ticket for a license plate light being out. Would the cops have standing to complain on that issue? Unless the ticket alleged a legal right was being violated that caused loss, harm or injury, then no, the cops lacked standing to complain. If the only professed purpose is to protect rights, then standing in court require the violation of someone's rights.
So without any standing to complain about the issue for which they stopped my friend [already an "illegal stop"], these police decided to do something where they would never reciprocate - they searched my friend's van without permission. Could you imagine what would happen if you tried to do that to a cop? Yeah right, pull a gun and inform a cop you're going to search his car whether he wants you to or not.
Keep in mind the cops have no idea what they are looking for, they're just looking for anything "suspicious." At the time these pretended "public servants" decided to search the van, could they identify the rights allegedly being violated? Oh, that's right, none; how silly of me, the cops are not here to protect.
Now we can see the logical connection between a license plate light and a search for non-existent drugs - CONTROL. It was just another pretense for control. Oh Marc, you cynic, why would they only be interested in control? Let's see, government is from the root word govern. And we know govern does not mean protect, it means control.
When will the majority of people realize governments CONTROL, they do not protect?
This is why we can not currently win. We will win, when people get up and realize the lies that have been told us.
The programs that have been inserted in our brains to "just go along" they would not harm us!
Wake up people. Let's get these "refuse to take the green pill" idiots off this site.
Let them look from a distance. But get away! Until you can look at facts, not speculation, get away. We do not need your help!
We the people who believe in Dorean (Soveriegn Freedom) will help ourselves out of this mess, this fraud, this demonic judicial, governmental, mind controlling, destructive institution.
The people will prevail.
It is a Human Cause!
Where are my witnesses?
We are with you Kurt & Scott, Farrel & Guy, Sheps and all others who are fighting for change!!!!!!!
A friend just emailed me a note:
GODs JUDGMENT?
(Blank),
did you know that Aug 31st was supposed to be the start of the "Southern Decadence" festival?
(No. I did not know this)
Did you know what goes on there?
(I can just imagine from the name of it.)
Guess what day the hurricane hit?
(We already know it was the 31st of Aug.)
go to www.southerndecadence.com and see for yourself.
(I will pass thank you. My imagination works just fine. I dont need to see it in print or pix.)
Peace.
When will we see that the California Judiciary along with Utah are only exerting CONTROL over these individuals (Soveriegns). There has been no attempt to get to the truth of the matter, for all to see!
WAKE UP!
I'll look at the site SonofProphet!
I think I already know as well!
That desaster was soooo convenient!
No comment
Son-of-a-?
Yes, I was aware of the Southern Decadence celebration of disgust that was suppose to begin the day Katrina hit. Very interesting and definately NOT a coincidence! I am not interested in seeing it in print or pics either.
And for your information - I have never used any valgurity on this site or elsewhere - so please keep you accusations specific to the offenders.
God reigns!
Hi, Can someone please tell me how to get in touch with Dr. Fred? I need his address and especially his phone number. Or if you can tell me how to go about getting my deed back in my name? My e-mail is marka.peeples@yahoo.com.
Thank you,
Marka
Post a Comment