Tuesday, October 25, 2005
Back to Cali
The federal court in Oakland has issued a Habeas to bring us there on the 26th. If this judge has more pull than Alsup, whose Habeas were ignored, we are on our way to California. I think because these are criminal and Alsup was a madman lost in the euphoria of presumption that they may be recognized. Utah, the federal ass kissers, are acting sheepishly which is another indicator. It’s too bad because the false witness Doug Ledeax would have been fun to publicly humiliate. I will just have to resort to my private remedy for those who misuse their office. This just leaves me and the Big Mouth between you and your victory. On the table (realistic) is 30 years for me and 3 trillion fannie mae fraud, congressional embarrassment and scandal, 10 trillion of voidable bank contracts, a setback of 30 years of progressive theft. I have little at stake in comparison so I like being at this table. Knowing the odds of my cards has me even more excited. I said on T.V. that the worst thing they could do is bring criminal charges. I wasn’t joking or blinking. The blind lust of people who are used to their roar making people turn and run never stopped to think about the consequence of running into two men with courage. Now that cards are dealt, the chips can’t be taken off the table. They only go to the victor. Bring me my plane ticket, I got a game to play.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
9 comments:
Mogel wrote: “…but when you present a ridiculously untrue financial figure & enjoin it with inflaming words to manipulate people’s minds, I definitely think that is morally wrong.”
Speaking of ridiculously untrue financial figures: Less than 20 refi’s you say? Huh. That’s not what DG promotional material led everyone to believe. I’m relying on memory here, but didn’t you/they claim 4,000 clients and a “successful, proven” process? Let’s do the math: 20 refi’s into 4,000 clients computes to a one half of one percent “success” rate. That doesn’t seem very successful to me and it sure doesn’t “prove” much. So, I guess the $64 Million question is: Mogel, as a Dorean broker, are you lying now, or were you lying before?
P.S. please do us all a favor and avoid use of the word “moral”, or any of its derivatives, when you promote Dorean’s fraudulent, dishonest, royal screw[ing] of a SCAM.
Partysecured wrote: “I guess you all thought that Kurt had this elaborate scheme to take your $1500 and get as many as he could to go for it while the getting was good (even while his partner was in jail never forseeing that this would too be his fate soon) spend oh maybe 40 - 50 years in the klink give or take for good behavior then slip back out into the free world to spend all of you poor sap's money?”
No, I figure the ex-con and his gullible sidekick either…
a) Are so incredibly narcissistic that they actually believe they have stumbled upon a flaw in the banking system and/or contract law that heretofore has gone undetected by millions of smart and educated folks including, but not limited to, attorneys, bankers, accountants, judges, economists, businesspeople and Nobel prize winners.
b) Figured they would throw the brokers on the front line to take the fall, but the plan backfired.
c) Were so engulfed with greed that they miscalculated the precise moment they should have blown town.
I can’t decide which.
So...judging by those responses, I guess neither of you fall into the "smart educated folks" category.
Mogel wrote: “How many violations does the Dorean mortgage challenge include? Certainly much more than what was included in the case precedence above. Hence, how unreasonable is it for clients to expect their discharge also and have it upheld.”
The Dorean mortgage challenge does not include any identified violations of TILA. Anyone that believes a lending transaction was in violation regulation’s requirements can invoke their rights under TILA. BTW, the process is rather simple and does not include paying anyone a fee, nor does it require that the borrower transfer their property to a trust. It also does not say the borrower should present a phony bond (or a valid one for that matter) to the lender and it certainly does not include the requirement that the borrower file counterfeit mortgage releases.
FYI, the regulation also says…”the right to rescind shall expire 3 years after consummation, upon transfer of all of the consumer's interest in the property, or upon sale of the property, whichever occurs first.” Meaning, of course, that if any of your clients actually HAD a valid complaint under TILA, they gave up all their rights to remedy when they transferred their property to the trust. Pity.
Mogel wrote: "Since you are "relying from memory" & you don't really know who said that statement for sure..."
On June 30th, 2005 Whistleblower wrote: "I have been to battle now in over 4000 mortgage transactions".
When all else fails...backpeddle.
Here Here Mongel & PartySecured!
I could not agree more!
What Up Solvo
Gr8peApe wrote:
No, I figure the ex-con and his gullible sidekick either…
a) Are so incredibly narcissistic that they actually believe they have stumbled upon a flaw in the banking system and/or contract law that heretofore has gone undetected by millions of smart and educated folks including, but not limited to, attorneys, bankers, accountants, judges, economists, businesspeople and Nobel prize winners.
b) Figured they would throw the brokers on the front line to take the fall, but the plan backfired.
c) Were so engulfed with greed that they miscalculated the precise moment they should have blown town.
Gr8ape Ape
Has is occurred to you that many people you mentioned that should have seen the fraud from the banks, did see that fraud.
However, they did not have to use the fraudulent financial formula of the banks. They have most likely large amounts of money was able to use your money to or cash to purchase or a secured loan against cash.
They would not have the same contract as you or I. In any of the cases I describe they walked away with Title to the property and they are not subject to a mortgage agreement as most of us are?
Get It?
McCanney always puts out good stuff....www.jmccanneyscience.com
October 25, 2005 posting # 2 ... on "laws and intent" ... if laws had an original intention and were sold to the public under one guise ... then extended and used outside the original intent and purpose ... are they still legitimate laws ??? how about vaccines that could be mandated to "protect the public from bird flu" but also secretly have a micro-coded ship in them ... how about the efforts now to legitimatize torture ... but just by the CIA (as if they were some kind of honorable group that can monitor themselves) and just for those "detainees" in foreign countries ... as other new "laws" redefine that american citizens can easily be defined as "terrorists" the implication is clear ... you can now be arrested and tortured and your constitutional rights taken away if you oppose the stance of the clowns in office who claim that they are the government ... or how about the "department of defense" which now could not defend this country against anything but is being used to defend private corporation interests all over the globe ... how about the alleged tax amendment #16 that was only supposed to be temporary in 1917 to pay for world war I and then abandoned ... they said that it would never go over 4% (they did not include that figure since they felt that the public would be so outraged at 4% that it would never have passed) ... growing evidence shows that it actually never was ratified as an amendment ... and it has no legitimacy even if it were ratified as it over-rides the fundamental nature of the constitution itself ... so there are huge issues today as we look down the barrel of the coming century ... with a good governmental system but a bad monetary system with essentially crooks and cockroaches in every corner of the government ... laws and intent ... this is a HUGE topic that spans the science world as well as we look now at private multi-national corporations doing "research" without boundaries as well as black ops research which holds no boundaries ... jim mccanney
October 25, 2005 posting # 1 ... there is a science to economics ... the very concept of wealth money that was designated by the constitution (and has now been replaced by the debt ridden federal reserve note in its place) had in its inherent design the fact that there would be no such thing as an unbalanced budget ... since this would mean that the workers produced more value and therefore congress would have the right to create more value money to pay them ... this is not inflation ... it is wealth creation ... this topic is a necessary diversion from my conversations about science ... and in fact under this system the private entrepreneurs like Burt Rutan and others would be paid for creating value by congressionally mandated value money allotments ... this would replace the guaranteed debt funding of overstuffed federal organizations like NASA that drive us all deeper in debt and produce no value or results for decades ... scientists who produced would be paid based on results ... not disney cartoons of what they perceived would be great like going to the moon and mars based on empty promises ... listen to my show thursday night to learn more about this and other science topics of the day ... jim mccanney
October 24, 2005 posting ... early this morning as i went outside ... a CIA helicopter (the short square bladed kind built by Ball Aerospace for the CIA central and south american drug trade business) came low over the trees above my head ... this has happened many times to me and i am familiar with their tactics ... when they get close like this ... it is their way of trying to tell me they did not approve of my latest postings regarding the age old bush clinton CIA business partnerships (yes and it does include hillary) ... i politely waived at the helicopter to let them know i saw them and they slowly passed out of sight ... so in honor of their statement i have made a new posting on the thought of the day page ... be sure to check out the Oct 23 Thought of the Day posting and others going back to September (including Sept 18) which prompted their little warning ... jim mccanney
Mogel wrote: “…the battle isn't over, so stop concluding an outcome.”
The battle isn’t over because there never was one in the first place. You’re pushing a SCAM, Mogel (aren’t you bound by a restraining order to stop promoting the Dorean process?), which means the outcome isn’t a conclusion of MINE, it’s a foregone conclusion.
As for backpedaling – that’s exactly what you’re doing. As a Dorean broker you’ve splattered your drivel all over the internet. Are you absolutely sure you want somebody to “find out exactly what was really said, what date it was said, and who really said it?” Think carefully before you answer, Mogel.
You’ll be flattered to know you’ve officially been added to my morning routine: let the dog out, have a cup of coffee, check my e-mail and Google your name to see if you’ve been arrested yet.
Post a Comment