Indictment Equals Victory

I once said in a television interview with Fox News in South Carolina that the dumbest thing they could do was to bring criminal charges. Well, thank your government for being patently stupid. The bankers would have been better off playing the hit and miss of civil jurisdiction using high priced lawyers and every kinky trick in the book to stall our success. Having moved to criminal they have guaranteed us victory. This will be a little lengthy and you should get a copy of the indictment for your reference. It was filed as CR05-00611 DLJ in the Northern District of California Federal Court. I shouldn’t give the prosecution such a heads up but I am confident his case is un-winnable and besides I want to expose him to his corrupt self who having knowledge of innocence will still prosecute for job security and political demand. I want him to realize evil has a high price on all participants. Remember they can bluff you uneducated clients out of your rights but not me. So let the games begin. The indictment has 46 counts but only 1-12 really matter. These are the criminal elements and the rest is the overt acts. The acts are listed merely to create a presumption that 1-12 occurred. If 1-12 fail, 13-46 fail automatically. I will focus on 1-12 for this reason. Pay attention Mr. Keller!

1. Yada Yada! Foundation agreed to in most part.
2. More foundation.
3. Foundation for conspiracy and artifice means nothing without scheme.
4. First meaty accusation: line items 22, 23 are the key proofs “falsely alleging” did or did I not have authority? Can prove I did hands down. “repaid” wrong word and can’t prove. Accurate description is prepaid. “appearing” fluff word to make them feel good. If real there is no appearing about it. They will have to bring the witnesses who can swear out they did not authorize. There are only few in each corporation who qualify. Of these I can get all to admit to felonies by cross-examination. What felonies you ask, Mr. Keller? Do your homework. I’ll do my job. This will impress the jury when proceedings have to stop so the state’s witness can be informed of his rights not to incriminate himself. Will they continue? Most executives will not. Oops! What if this happens to 2, 3, 5 state’s witnesses what would you think as a juror? Mr. Keller is going to put Dorean on the map as the most innovative layman legal theorist of modern time and personally should shock the mortgage industry whose fraud was exposed through the reverse engineering of a federal criminal trial. Thank you!
5.6. More foundation for wire fraud. All means nothing if you can’t prove the basic elements.
7. “Debt Elimination” This is an important mis-characterization in that it does not truly reflect our mortgage challenge process and when a debt cannot be proven what happens to your “debt elimination scheme theory”? The trust is a typical estate planning and will draw no real energy in trial.
8. “Claim” Line 15 easily supported by documentation. 16: “Demand the lender prove the validity of the loan” Oh what a crime! 17: “unilateral satisfaction of Dorean” Now here’s the big heap of poo poo that the prosecutor steps in. If the satisfaction has sound legal basis completely outside of the Dorean psyche, lender’s become the bad guys. 18: “Purport” if the offer is real what then? 20: “Holds no substantial assets” Here another dead end. They would like to prove the bond had no substance. Impossible! Save that bombshell for later. 22: “Borrower” not going to be able to prove that nature of the party. Oops! No borrower? What’s that do to loan theory or debt theory? 26: “Tacit assent and default” I think he means tacit procuration and fault based on performance. Which when proven means the government is trespassing on contracts. If I can find the law that justifies these elements, why can’t he? Because truth is too good for these evil rat bastards. 27: “In accordance with mortgage agreements” First off, this agreement is superseded but if it comes into play I will use it to prove the elements of fraud in the loan and again states witness is the bad guy.
9. “at least 10 days has elapsed” Hey finally a free testimony. We did what we said and bound ourselves to the contract. I hate it when that happens.
10. “Acting purportedly on behalf of the lender as its agent” I can prove I was no problem if they knew anything about contract law they would fold this hand. These cards are a loser. Line 16 “when such loan has not been fully paid” can prove it was paid 3 times and was not a loan. Another big problem. “Signed and recorded fraudulently” This requires intent even if I was legally wrong. Pay attention every corrupt county recorder because my prevailing here makes you all liable for commercial trespass, practice of law and punitive damages. Thank you feds!
11. 22 “appearing to be free and clear “28” not fully paid” reiterations of unprovable claims. Wouldn’t want Mr. Keller’s job. Do you think a rookie FBI agent Matthew Ernst who doesn’t know shit about banking and commercial paper even knows the questions to ask in his collection of evidence?
12. This is the meat and their biggest problem. “knowingly conspire” and “well knowing”. Who and how are they going to prove an evil mental state? I’ve been publicly speaking on this subject for almost 2 years, wrote memorandums of law, educated lawyers, and documented my intent in thousands of public records. Even with corrupt trial practices and deliberate orders from an evidence controlling judge they will still not be able to keep this out. All said and done, “Make my Day!”