Monday, January 09, 2006
People vs. The Banks
I saw a long comment posted by John Ruiz about our association. I would also like to confirm our only association is by revelation and spirit. I am glad for him and think the world would be much different if there were more like him. I’m not certain how misinformation and mischaracterization seems to follow Dorean. John, no offense but you offered way too much opinion concerning us after having admitted no real knowledge of us. My process was designed to bury a thorn so deep into the flesh of the bankers it could not be ignored. I consider you efforts noble and charitable but I was not called to pester the crooks for a sudden turn in virtue. Ours was a win/win scenario well plotted. I had to put my life on the line but the battle was clear from the beginning. We would seize victory or they would make us criminals. The worst mistake they could make. They must prevail with crooks as their witnesses. This is not a civil case where they can palm the judge to accept affidavits of lost note. A man’s life is more than equity. Real or fraud is going to appear. Also my bond was solid. It will take somebody smarter than the flower shop investigator to not be confused. Two years of government vengeance and no charge against the bond. Perhaps their investigators are better trained. I’m not being punished for doing what the bankers do, that would make my indictment a self-indictment for them. Read it and see what is really going on. Keep up the good fight and don’t get discouraged by their evil; truth always wins in the end if men are tough enough to get there.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
15 comments:
Tell them like it is Kurt!
Tell it like it is SD!
We gonna build this thing til it expodes in everybodies face, whether they like it or not!
Keep Studing ya'll!
To the good fight!
He who has been stealing must steal no longer, but must work, doing something useful with his own hands, that he may have something to share with those in need.
Ephesians 4:28
Maybe Kurt will make you a Mogel007 vanity plate?
Heck, maybe you will get a chance to make your own before its over.
"If this blog was a discussion about landing on the moon you two would be the first ones to find some BS argument against it. You two would say, yeah we can see the moon but its too far away; nobody could ever reach it. You'all are just a bunch of dreamers. yada, yada yada."
BTW-
no one did land on the moon. It was a 'Hollywood' movie produced in England.
As the space agencies admit that there is no atmosphere on the moon, this means that there is no air pressure, this means that anything put there would expand slowly until it exploded.
The only thing that could withstand -0- psi pressure would be at least 1/4" thick steel. So, unless the astro'nots' wore a steel suit, (which they did not) they would have expanded slowly and exploded on the moon.
simular to a balloon placed in a decompression chamber; expands slowly until it explodes; nothing to contain the internal pressure. A human has 29-30 psi all around it. It it goes to less than this, it cannot function.
Now, you may say that the spacesuit was pressurised. OK, but what kept the spacesuit exterior from exploding? Nohting, because it never happened. Nobody ever landed on the moon.
so, why the BIG lie?? Same as everything else. CONTROL.
world is round O
witches, aka/big bro/govt. hiding under bed watching/listening you!
big banksters counting your money and planning on how to give you less of it. lol!
now for the erudite, amongst us..
Fractals
From Gary Lammert:
George, when will the fat lady sing? Soon. Too soon. It would be much preferable for the people of the world if the Federal Reserve and World Banks could continuously monetize all of the enormous debt, pension, and entitlement obligations that has been created by the historically anomalous continuous yearly positive GDP growth that has linearly occurred through debt expansion during the last fifty years- but that will and cannot not happen. As long as there is a significant private sector subject to the conditions of profit need, ongoing consumption of goods and services, employee wages, and their own pension obligations - self feedback macroeconomic corrections will inevitably occur.
GM is the prototype of of a formerly great private enterprise undergoing feedback collapse. Its debt burden and pension obligations are too great; its profit margins are collapsing as Asian engineers produce a better product, competitive even with the added cost of transoceanic shipping. The overproduced housing industry will soon follow as ongoing consumption of its widgets is being limited by the wages of entry level service workers who must pay annual property taxes on overvalued domiciles. Debt must be serviced and the co-conditions of the wages, cost of living, and debt load of bottom feeders who provide the pyramidal base support for the various speculative bubbles will effect the immutable feedback that rights the imbalances.
The ghostly fat lady, reminiscent of previous fat ladies throughout economic history, is on stage, up to the mic and clearing her ample throat, as the equities rise to their inevitable weekly fractal apogee. This inevitable and deterministic action will conclude the positive valuation activity of great right shoulder to March 2000's summation's head. Last week a terminal maximal x/2.5x/2.5x weekly growth fractal was identified. That 30/75/75 maximal weekly fractal is set to reach its apogee .... this week - not last week. Verification of this 30/75/75 weekly pattern can be accomplished by looking at the TMWX weekly charts on the 3-4 year durations- and counting the weeks contained within the individual growth fractals as determined by nodal lows. The first 30 week duration is weighted summation of 34 and 23 week bases.
The timing of this weekly apogee matches two other major daily fractal apogees. For the sake of argument assume that optimal growth for the March 2000 right shoulder is destined to follow an ideal, nonstochastic, and deterministic x/2.5x/2.5x maximum weekly growth fractal. Support for this notion is justified by the recurrent theme of near perfect x/2.5x/2.5x maximal growth for smaller unit fractals occurring throughout the right shoulder's evolution. To reach the optimal 3rd fractal growth of 75 weeks, starting with a first base of 56 days beginning in August 2004, a transposition was necessary for the third sub fractal.
The ideal sequence with a base of 56 days would be 56/140/140. The second growth fractal did indeed end exactly on day 140. However, the third sub fractal began with a base of 31 days. The ideal growth fractal of this sequence would be 31/77/62-77. 7 July,2005, the day of the misguided British Islamic youth attacks, did have a lower low than the first 31 day base. This occurrence attests to the perspective that major world events can have small, transient -but unsustained effects - on market trading and fractal evolution. The next low occurred exactly as fractally expected on day 77 in October 2005. The Wilshire is currently on day 60 of 62-77. Notice that the first high of the third sub fractal occurred, also as ideally expected, on day 31, 25 November 2005.
The other concomitant daily fractal growth sequence is the often identified 11-12/29-30/20-21 of 24-30 day maximal daily sequence. It appears that the final blow-off for the right shoulder will involve the simultaneous conclusions of the major weekly growth fractal pattern and the natural ends of the two dominant daily sub fractal growth patterns. The European and Nikkei equity market are also marching to their own near time ideal fractal growth conclusion with a different base sequence.
Every day of valuation growth toward the maximal natural fractal growth paradoxically, in relation to the devolution in 1929, shortens the overall decay pattern. The fat lady will most likely be an unbearably off key and shrill soprano, singing a very short piece as compared to the 32 month devolution in from 1929 to 1932 and 2000 to 2003. Be prepared . Expect the unexpected.
Gary Lammert
I stand corrected. I had mixed up the units. I meant 29-30" of mercury, or as you say 14.7 psi sea level.
Nonetehless, I stand by everything else I have said.
Peanut Gallery said...
SOP,
You stand on the physically impossible
9:40 AM
maybe for you my son....but physics has nothing to do with it, or the Spirit....lol
grammar
hahahaha! hehehehe!
What up Big O!
pa-tay-toe pa-tah-toe
People, stop the BS. Just ask the obvious question. Kurt/Scot/Dr.F can you or can you not cancel our mortgages and provide us with the windfall of money like you said. My guess is I will not see an answer from any of them and the rest of you will continue to write about the moon, PSI and God. Let the three Muskateers answer and stop filling the blog with stuff that doesn't pertain to the real question. Unitl the I am forever stillwaiting.....
Peanut Gallery said...
SOP said,
maybe for you my son....but physics has nothing to do with it, or the Spirit....lol
So you are going to ignore the physical laws of the universe, that God Himself created?
WRONG! God created the universe; man defined it by 'physical' laws (physics, mathematics, etc.)
ALL PHYSICAL LAWS WILL SOON FAIL, IE., NO LONGER APPLY.
Or does the "spirit" tell you they no longer apply.
I ALREADY ANSWERED THIS QUESTION. BUT DONT WORRY, YOUR KNOWLEDGE OF THE 'SPIRIT' WILL BE TESTED SOON, MY 'FRIEND'. HOPE YOURE UP TO THE CHALLENGE. HOWEVER, I FEEL THAT YOU WILL HAVE A LOT TO LEARN, AS AN AMATEUR.
BTW, don't condescend by calling me son.
I wasnt being condescending, for you speak as a immature son in matters of the Spirit for which you seem to know little.
Toco said:
(Kahooey...how is the consterktion business going?)
Oh! I'm so very sorry, Was there a miss spelled word in my last post? I must have overlooked it Thank you, It was so kind of you to point that out for me. I will make the correction right away! Plz forgive me, I can't beleave that someone of your intelect would stop what I'm sure is a grulling schedule to show me the errors I have made. This is such a great honor. Again please forgive me and I will do better in future post. I don't feel like such a complete Ass now that you have how it is that one word can realy fuck up the Hole post.
LOL In a BIG WAY!
Right! what a little tiny tiny speck of a man you must be.
By the way I'm still waiting for tat e-mail you were said you send. Like I think your going to do it but here go's for third time.yackntrack you know what to put here hotmail. & that thingon the end com.
you know I wouldn't want some seeking program to pick it up on here. so there you go for the Third Time.
Put up or shut up!
Constructed SPECK!
P\/c
son of a prophet said...
Peanut Gallery said...
SOP said,
maybe for you my son....but physics has nothing to do with it, or the Spirit....lol
So you are going to ignore the physical laws of the universe, that God Himself created?
WRONG! God created the universe; man defined it by 'physical' laws (physics, mathematics, etc.)
ALL PHYSICAL LAWS WILL SOON FAIL, IE., NO LONGER APPLY.
I just read some finding about how some of histories events biblical; & non and how these could of happendin the more physical than the magical way. all though in witchever way they did happen I'm sure it was a site to see. here are the finding's in my word's because I can find the site. Some have thought that when "GOD" cast down his will on earth that instead of bing a Magical or unexplained event, It is more of a phyisical display andis only limited by earth's power and that that is limited only by to that that make up this planet. (plz let's not get into some big debate on the many areas that this topic touches on. This is just for the FYI and not to start a debate about what God can or Can not do) after reading the above post I thought it would be interesting to share this.
Take it as you will . What was said was this, the stories throughout history show in them that "God" was who gave us the laws of earth and in doing this God was also limited by those same laws. So when we hear of stories like the"Red
Sea"or the "Ark and many proclaim then as Magical or unexplainable, Know dought they were something to see. as time go by the big ??? has shifted to more of haw he did thing other than if he did them or was real. The Egghead's of the world have come up with some interesting thoughs on it. Example the Red Sea is now thought to have open by the wind blowing at 65mph against a reef that is in the same place that the Bible tell of. The reef was much larger at the time but they have done some models of the wheather around the at time and it was common to have a wind that was substained for a long time and blowing against that reef could of created a Wall of water very high as in the story it could have be long enough to have the Jews walk accross and just as the Romans started to follow the wind could of stoped so there you have it this is only one of many stories like it in the same read it was thought that as I stared with this . That God did make this thing happen by his power but that he can only do the thing that can be done here on earth and is limited by it rule of the physical bounderies (but we can see thatis more than enough to drive hi point home)
I also read about the Ark being spoted on top of the montain in Turkey by a S.A.T a shadow thatis the right size and shape and tha there has been sent a team to core sample for carbon dating to the spot. we have not been able to go up there do to the "Cold War" and the thought that we might be using it as a way to spy on USSR. So how about that seem's taht "faith" might get a little help soon and that some might want too check themself's if all the story are found to be true what you think?That is it, I'm done. I working on the short story these day's in the hope of driving my point with more understanding. It's like this I think alot faster than I could type , you get the picture. He but good thing I have old TOCO aaaaround to make sure I don't leave any mistake's, Thank godness for that. What would we do without him? Now there's a thought
P\/c all L8r
STOP POSTING ANNOYING MESSAGES ON THIS BLOG WITHOUT USING YOUR REAL NAME, -OR- GO TO JAIL!!!
GO DIRECTLY TO JAIL
DO NOT PASS GO
DO NOT COLLECT $200
FOR REAL, NO KIDDING!!!
Annoying someone via the Internet is now a federal crime.
It's no joke. Last Thursday, President Bush signed into law a prohibition on posting annoying Web messages or sending annoying e-mail messages without disclosing your true identity.
In other words, it's OK to flame someone on a mailing list or in a BLOG as long as you do it under your REAL NAME. Thank Congress for small favors, I guess.
This ridiculous prohibition, which would likely imperil much of Usenet, is buried in the so-called Violence Against Women and Department of Justice Reauthorization Act. Criminal penalties include stiff fines and two years in prison.
"The use of the word 'annoy' is particularly problematic," says Marv Johnson, legislative counsel for the American Civil Liberties Union. "What's annoying to one person may not be annoying to someone else."
It's illegal to annoy
A new federal law states that when you annoy someone on the Internet, you must disclose your identity. Here's the relevant language.
"Whoever...utilizes any device or software that can be used to originate telecommunications or other types of communications that are transmitted, in whole or in part, by the Internet... without disclosing his identity and with intent to annoy, abuse, threaten, or harass any person...who receives the communications...shall be fined under title 18 or imprisoned not more than two years, or both."
Buried deep in the new law is Sec. 113, an innocuously titled bit called "Preventing Cyberstalking." It rewrites existing telephone harassment law to prohibit anyone from using the Internet "without disclosing his identity and with intent to annoy."
To grease the rails for this idea, Sen. Arlen Specter, a Pennsylvania Republican, and the section's other sponsors slipped it into an unrelated, must-pass bill to fund the Department of Justice. The plan: to make it politically infeasible for politicians to oppose the measure.
The tactic worked. The bill cleared the House of Representatives by voice vote, and the Senate unanimously approved it Dec. 16.
There's an interesting side note. An earlier version that the House approved in September had radically different wording. It was reasonable by comparison, and criminalized only using an "interactive computer service" to cause someone "substantial emotional harm."
That kind of prohibition might make sense. But why should merely annoying someone be illegal?
There are perfectly legitimate reasons to set up a Web site or write something incendiary without telling everyone exactly who you are.
A law meant to annoy?
FAQ: The new 'annoy' law explained
A practical guide to the new federal law that aims to outlaw certain types of annoying Web sites and e-mail.Think about it: A woman fired by a manager who demanded sexual favors wants to blog about it without divulging her full name. An aspiring pundit hopes to set up the next Suck.com. A frustrated citizen wants to send e-mail describing corruption in local government without worrying about reprisals.
In each of those three cases, someone's probably going to be annoyed. That's enough to make the action a crime. (The Justice Department won't file charges in every case, of course, but trusting prosecutorial discretion is hardly reassuring.)
Clinton Fein, a San Francisco resident who runs the Annoy.com site, says a feature permitting visitors to send obnoxious and profane postcards through e-mail could be imperiled.
"Who decides what's annoying? That's the ultimate question," Fein said. He added: "If you send an annoying message via the United States Post Office, do you have to reveal your identity?"
Fein once sued to overturn part of the Communications Decency Act that outlawed transmitting indecent material "with intent to annoy." But the courts ruled the law applied only to obscene material, so Annoy.com didn't have to worry.
"I'm certainly not going to close the site down," Fein said on Friday. "I would fight it on First Amendment grounds."
He's right. Our esteemed politicians can't seem to grasp this simple point, but the First Amendment protects our right to write something that annoys someone else.
It even shields our right to do it anonymously. U.S. Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas defended this principle magnificently in a 1995 case involving an Ohio woman who was punished for distributing anonymous political pamphlets.
If President Bush truly believed in the principle of limited government (it is in his official bio), he'd realize that the law he signed cannot be squared with the Constitution he swore to uphold.
And then he'd repeat what President Clinton did a decade ago when he felt compelled to sign a massive telecommunications law. Clinton realized that the section of the law punishing abortion-related material on the Internet was unconstitutional, and he directed the Justice Department not to enforce it.
Bush has the chance to show his respect for what he calls Americans' personal freedoms. Now we'll see if the president rises to the occasion.
Biography
Declan McCullagh is CNET News.com's Washington, D.C., correspondent. He chronicles the busy intersection between technology and politics. Before that, he worked for several years as Washington bureau chief for Wired News. He has also worked as a reporter for The Netly News, Time magazine and HotWired
SO STOP ANNOYING US! lol ;-)
So, this blog area is a place where you write about the government and religion. Correct? This area has nothing to do with what Scot and Kurt were trying to do but couldn't. All that is written is very interesting to read but has nothing to do with the facts or lack there of in this case about our mortgages. Even at the top of this page it reads, "Mortgage fraud and People vs. the banks" I don't see where it says let's write about the government or the Bible/God etc. I have to believe that not a one of you or maybe a very small number of you haven't sat down and asked God to help you with this issue we are all going through. I think if I am not mistaken that if we are posting here it is because we are all in the same boat with our mortgages that includes the money we spend and the problems we are all having. And when I say I am still waitng it is passive to the extreme. In closing I do believe that the system is wrong and is stealing the life from us all. Think of it this way, Sign up with the DG: $2000 plus, Litigation/now bad credit and possible loss of your home; $Hundreds of thousands, breaking the code and winning: PRICELESS!!!
Post a Comment