Monday, April 03, 2006
We are Grasshoppers (3/27/06)
Men of faith and the faithless will always be severed by their perspective. Some will look at the Federal Government as a giant too great, making them grasshoppers in self-thought. Others can see a promise making the giant appear as grasshoppers. Few it can be said can find the courage to stand against the forces of evil. Even if you are honest with yourself you will recognize how you vacillate even as a spectator to this battle. Try standing in front of a Federal Judge who is intent on your peril and staying on your feet. Think you can do it? Ever tried it? Would you pay someone $1,000 to do it for you? Every time I go before this beast your claim is present. They are always trying to quash it and I am forever attempting to sustain it. This is battle and one claim will perish in the end. Tell me is it more crazy to tell a man his house is on fire and to be glad God extended his mercy or to defy the principle of your agency who happens to be the living God? How can one explain the tactics of warfare to civilians? Just know soldiers who knew the cost took the trustee job without ever feeling they were grasshoppers to any foe.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
22 comments:
Justice7777777 said...
Kurt!!!
Your bank is on fire in Latvia!!!!!!!
Well well welll look mwho just could'nt stop from posting. Just like any SOAP on t.v. you can't stop can you.
The freeway's calling you
& hey U-Haul how about answering those ???? I ask last post? what no good answer or you just taking time to come up with a good zingger to put me in my place? I'm sure what ever it is it woun't have anything to do with the questions it will be somrthing to do withspelling, grammer, what time you eat dinner last night anything but the topic and the answers to question put to you ans your's
Banking and the pit you work in
Nothung but snakes ....
Son of a P Said:
NASA The head of NASA just got cought with child porn on his Gov. computer ....
That's great SOP but noy realy the point that I was getting at,as I'm sure you no. I was just using as an example to show that Forest Mims III was a very repu. person in regard to cred. for the post about the 90% Elim. guy. Again if F. Mims III said this and it not a miss print or somehow there is something missing than that Prof. is a big proplem and should not be taken lightly. The past has show us that he would'nt be the first Prof. to snap remember the UN-BLOW SHIT UP WITH A LETTER GUY? HE WAS A PROF. Cal Berkley and just got tired of all the corp's fucking him and grew a beard quit his job and moved to a little cabim in MT then started writing leeter to the one's in those Corp's I would have to beleave that this guy has the accesss to the kind's of shit that would if releast in the popu. would kill a hole lot of people.
So again if true we should be writing sen,/ in wash. left and right.
I'a going to check and see about the story my self and if what you say is true mins will have wrote to some people in wash as well I just have to find this book I had of this guy , it had a way to contact him I no he is in Texas .. anyway l8r
What's up Imbigo you going to visit tommorrow 3-4-06 hey I don't no where your going to be coming from but if your passing the east bay let me no if you would like to bring a little gift that I've been wanting to get to kurt he'll laugh his as off over it . let me no on this mail it's hot and yes I'm going to break it up so iyt dos'nt get spamed to death
ot mal. u no what go 's there
the first part wouls be yack and theres a n and then the last i track all one word as any would be so pu that all as one and e me with your time and route and maybe we can hook up so you could bring this thing to kurt with you I would do myself but I'm just to busy and lazy to get the paperwork done and the likly hood is that he'll be out before I got it all done. Hey but if you want to pick up that from him for getting on the list that would be a little more of a chance to get it done. All with the thought that Kurt and Scott would like another visiter that's of a poss adt. nature let me no?
I'll give you a hint it title is THE FINAL WORD and I've had it about 15 yr.
L8r q8^)>
To Imbigo from last post just in case you did'nt read if your going to visit tomorrow and will be passing the east bay let me no? I have had this gift for Kurt that would be great to get to them about this time in the story . I'm sure they both would get a kick out of it . hit me back here with way to contact or e- me at yack then there's is a N then theree is track alll one word of course then the AT and HOT blank blank then the DOT COM AT the end.
just send me a place to send you my number and we can hook up to give you it to bring with .. thank L8r q8^)>..... Yack
The following allegations from page 5 of Sean Mortons Delphi Associates News Letter,Issue #15, dated March 10,2006:
"Bank of America and Compass Bank managers(probably all other U.S. Banks,too)have been instructing their employees In the last few weeks on how to respond to customers In the event of a collapse of the U.S. economy-specifically telling employees that only agents from the Dept Of Homeland Security will have the authority to decide what belongings customers may have from their safe deposit boxes-and what precious metals and other valuable will not be released to U.S. citizens. The Bank employees have been strictly prohibited from revealing the Banks new "guidlines" to anyone.
Another resource.
http.//bellaciao.org/en/article.php3?id article=10012
I have checked with my Bank Manager and all he would say is a memo to this effect does exisit.
Selective justice 7 and Neo, this doesn't apply to you of course.
"... Dept Of Homeland Security will have the authority to decide what belongings customers may have from their safe deposit boxes-and what precious metals and other valuable will not be released to U.S. citizens. The Bank employees...."
-------------------------------
geez, i better go get all my gold that i have stored in the bank (un)safe-deposit box.
guess the bankers need more money, so they will raid everyones box and get the gold, just like they did in '33. lol
i had actually posted that bellaciao article here months ago when they first posted it.
btw, is today the day taht they pick a shrink to x-amine the defendants??
and then i guess that the shirnk will xamine da judge too??
and btw, who get to xamine the shrink hisself to c if he loonytoons???
dun woory, just have another Paxil©,
the illminati mind control tool. that guy in seattle was on that stuff and they progammed him to kill.
and on and on it go................
the pop recucton story has now reached alex jones prison planet.
story here-->
http://www.prisonplanet.com/
articles/april2006/
030406massculling.htm
just more good stuff frm you govt.
----------------------------
admits electons were rigged. why am i not surprised??
"The key thing here is that this "secrets revealed" stuff will go one for some while yet. This biggest secret (still being pushed under the rug and glossed over) is that ****Florida 24th District Congressional Candidate Clint Curtis**** says yes, he helped design and build vote-stealing software:
"I am a former Republican who became a whistleblower that came forward and testified to Congress under oath, regarding the request from a sitting congressman to
//////build a computer program that could, without detection, flip your vote in an election. This manipulation would allow a person or political party to take control of voting machine and decide who wins the election, regardless of the true vote count./////
In March of 2005, I passed a polygraph test as to the accuracy of my statements. "
Former Head Of Star Wars Program Says Cheney Main 9/11 Suspect
Official version of events a conspiracy theory, says drills were cover for attacks
Paul Joseph Watson & Alex Jones/Prison Planet.com | April 4 2006
The former head of the Star Wars missile defense program under Presidents Ford and Carter has gone public to say that the official version of 9/11 is a conspiracy theory and his main suspect for the architect of the attack is Vice President Dick Cheney.
Good Point, Seen it in Utah.....
I for one would like to see an address, a name of a person or bank that allowed the process. If it were my mortgage that got cancelled I would relish the opportunity to share that with everyone. But K and S can't provide that nor can anyone else. Plus K and S will come up with every excuse and biblical rason why they can't. I wish when I had been told about DG that I had asked the question, "Have they completed the process and how many times"? But I didn't and when I did ask later I was told that we were funding them to do the research, the process and so on.
Now when I read this blog it has nothing to do with cancelling mortgages nor does it provide conversation about the subject of cancellation. What it does provide is a not so good interpetation of the bible and how it fits the the DG/KS BS.
When people do studies, research in looking for a cure they may infact ask for money to help support the research program. That was not told in this case. Scott and Kurt can't produce a solution because the system either won't allow it or there is no solution. The no solution has been sought by many and all with the same results. Clients that feel they have wasted there time and money.
Seen it in Utah said...
Kahooey: I think Neo answered your question about title insurance very well. Idiots mess up titles to property all the time. We end up trying to fix and clean up messes--such as the messes Dorean leaves behind. As to your rant about mortgage brokers--ask a mortgage broker.
Nice side step Seen it but the question still stands' no one has answered it so here again the title on a refi that's is only a year old and you do a title search right away when you get it from the broker so you no full well that the prop. that come's back with no change from the last time is not incomb. what so ever so why is it that you charge full price ? Why don't you offer up to the customer a discount?
You go on and throw that b.s out there fro everyone eles pal! Broker or no broker you no just as well as I do that there is plenty of diseption and you help the broker in doing so because it line's yuyour pocket's
Now you tell me that you don't have any nollage about this what so ever when you reply if you do and then you will have just proven my point, because there is no way you can't I have had brokers tell methat they have the title ag. in there pocket "Don't worry we got the title agent in our pocket" I wacht these so called pro. do thuing like stall in hope that the customer would be that much more late or in trouble so that they could get more $$$$$ out of them and set them up for the next loan (refi) and so on and so on so tell me all about it there Seen it and I might just give you a ED. that's from my own exp. so don't go putting this of on Neo as you ride his coat tail's because in fact Neo never answered my ?? at all at least not to my nolg.
So what you have to say ( and try being staight about it ) you no just the point no other side stepping no teaching
I await your reply
l8r
Seen it in Utah said...
Still Waiting: I feel for you. When people were solicited to cough up the cash for the process they were greatly misled. Have you aso noticed how initially the Doreanites claimed that they would simply eliminate the mortgage. Then later, they would send a "challenge" to the lender? The claims have changed over time and the success rate has not--still a big goose egg. I believe that many people involved would not have anted up the cash if there were told honestly and ahead of time that it was UNPROVEN and that there were NO successes to date. You would not have, would you?
i'M SURE YOU DO sEEN IT AND I'LL JUST BET IF THEY NEED IT YOU WOULD BE OH SO HAPPY TO HELP THEN OUT . FOR A FEE THAT IS RIGHT ??
The point of not be told honestly is something that I would have to say was done and was not the right thing to do. so I wil agree on that point . Now on the other hand let's look at at the shit that is advertised on t.v. everyday that is not true but we buy it up and if it not's wahat it said most lickly we chaulk it up to exp.
So when THE BROKERS TOLD THE LIE ABOUT THE SUCCESS RATE THEY WERE WRONG But doing what most every add ex.co . do everyday. maybe not to that extent but close in some cases .
you seem to lean on the point along with NEO about the fact of not telling about the success rate corectly right ? so in regaed to that I will say that the BANKS DON'T TELL YOU THE TRUTH ABOUT THE LOAN NOR SDO THE BROKERS NOR DO THE TITLE CO. AND SO ON AND SO ON ,
You would think out of all those people that just one would tell you the complete story about your loan but noooo! they don't they would rather spend there time and your money to lobby the law maker to tell them (look these people are to stupid to understand the way a loan work if tell them the truth ,they will just get lost and then not go through the loan deal will cancel and we will lose all that mopney and then it will hurt everyone bull shit there lieing to keep the truth from getting out and them have to compete on a honestly Oh no there might be a few less mortgage brokers out there What a loss not!
so thiunk about that Seen it how honest or the bamks and why should they get to hide thing's and not answer for them like we do.
l8r
Hockeydon
I don't think UTAH can come back to that Truth!
He knows no truth only who is paying the bills! His master is money!
Katherine Albrecht, Co-Author of "Spychips: How Government Will Track Your Every Move By RFID" -- will be interviewed on Gianni Hayes Radio Show, April 5, 2006, 8:00-9:00PM, EST -- 1-800-433-1429 -- www.theamericanvoice.com
I am an idiot as well. I regret ever doubting the dorean process and once Scott and Kurt are free, I am moving to Lativa.
Yada, yada, yada. Wishful thinking isn’t going to stop the banks or the judges. And it sure isn’t going to save your house or the Dorean scammers from spending the next couple of decades in prison. Think about that.
utah---"Shall not all these victims of his greed take up a taunt against him(utah) and in scoffing derision of him(utah) say, Woe to him(utah) who piles up that which is NOT his! How long will he possess it? And WOE TO HIM(utah) WHO PILES UP PROMISSORY NOTES FOR USURY! Shall your debtors not rise up suddenly who shall bite YOU(utah), exacting usury of YOU(utah), and those awake(become educated) who will vex you (toss you too and fro and make you tremble violently)? Then YOU(utah) will be BOOTY FOR THEM. Hab2--Amp
Forgot to state that you should stay in school and don't do drugs, which is the exact opposite of what I did.
LADIES, CANT PAY YOU MTG/RENT?
DUN WORRY! YOU CAN W-O-R-K IT OUT.
SAN FRANCISCO
In Atlanta, an online ad offers a room in exchange for "sex and light office duty." In Los Angeles, a one-bedroom pool house is free "to a girl that is skilled and willing." And in New York City, a $700-a- month room is available at a discount to a fit female willing to provide sex.
On the widely used Web site Craigslist.org, some landlords and apartment dwellers looking for roommates are offering to accept sex in lieu of rent.
"They have to be attractive. I don't let just anybody come into my house," said Mike, a man who answered the phone at the New York City listing but declined to give his last name _ and refused to say whether he has, in fact, collected the rent under the sheets.
The offering of shelter for sex is older than, well, real estate itself.
But the online come-ons are franker than anything you might see in the newspaper classifieds, because they are not edited by Craigslist, and perhaps also because the anonymity of the Internet often causes people to shed their inhibitions.
Trading housing for sex is a form of prostitution. But the police aren't kicking down doors.
Paul J. Browne, a deputy police commissioner in New York, said investigators have found that the Craigslist ads are frequently "little more than a form of voyeurism that didn't result in an actual exchange of sex for rent."
Craigslist provides mostly free classifieds for apartments, used cars and just about everything else in more than 200 cities in 35 countries.
"I usually rent the room for 600, but if you are really ticklish and willing to trade being tickled for the extra rent then we have a deal," writes a gay man offering a $350-a-month room in the San Francisco Bay area.
An ad for a townhouse near Bradenton, Fla., seeks a "female that likes to be nude. Nothing more expected."
It is unclear how much success people have had with their rent-for-sex ads.
One man said he became friends with a bisexual man who answered his ad but did not end up taking the room. The same user said a man visiting from Russia answered his ad and they shared dinner and a bottle of wine, but that was it.
"This is only a silly sideline adventure of mine," the man, who would not give his name, wrote in an e-mail. "I feel a little embarrassed about it."
The Associated Press e-mailed more than two-dozen other people who placed ads, but most declined to be interviewed.
Jim Buckmaster, chief executive of San Francisco-based Craigslist, said the company forbids ads that break the law, but his staff of 19 could not possibly police all postings. Craigslist instead relies on users to flag ads they find offensive. If enough people agree, the ad is removed.
"Tens of millions of users are a much more powerful force in examining the more than 8 million classified ads per month than any staff could be," Buckmaster said.
Mike, who offered the room in New York, said his ads are frequently flagged and removed, resulting in a cat-and-mouse game in which he puts them back up.
Tenants rights groups have accused Craigslist of skirting fair housing requirements. In February, a group called the Chicago Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law sued the Web site for publishing housing ads that excluded people based on their race, religion and sex.
But legal experts say Craigslist is shielded by a 1996 federal law that protects online service providers that merely pass along unedited information provided by someone else.
And in most states, prostitution laws apply only if the ads are followed by e-mails, phone conversations or other acts that advance the proposition.
"The mere posting itself is absolutely not illegal," said Anthony Lowenstein, a defense lawyer in San Francisco, "unless the guy who posts it or the person who answers it does something that makes it a little closer to happening."
___
On the Net:
http://craigslist.org
give 'em time, they jus' wakin' up in mexifornia......
The truth is Dorean advertised 100 successes, when there were NONE.
Post a Comment