Class in Session: Lesson 1

The UCC is beyond potent by its own confession. The UCC is supplemental law in that it absorbs the principle of equity and common law but is primary in commerce. Though these principles supplement the UCC they may not supplant. The UCC pre-empts any principle of common law or equity that are inconsistent with the UCC. How did we go from the Common Law as Supreme to being supplemental? You must understand in context. It is a parenthetical context. “The Common Law is (the UCC is public in fiction) the private law of reality.” If you play in the public monopoly game of fictional entities and currency the UCC rules and considers some of the principle of reality but in no ways is bound if it interrupts the game. If you are in reality the UCC is only a fictional restatement of the principles of honesty and fair dealing inherent in equity and common law. Your remedy is in reality. Now the court wants us to think it is functioning in reality because it uses common law and equity principle but uses fictional characters and currency. It is completely subject to the UCC and very bad at it on purpose. We’re being persecuted by the villains of the UCC for relying upon it. This is the dead end they have been pursuing from the beginning. We have executed the UCC upon the banks with precision, upon Alsup with precision, the FBI, the DOJ, the BOP and others. Obeying the law (public) cannot be made a crime (public). Now if the principles of equity are enfolded into the UCC and I followed the UCC in my presentment to the banks then equity was preserved and observed and no loss (victim) can be claimed. Our criminal charges rest on an equity violation. The bank must have been subjected to a loss or potential loss. No inequity no crime. Obedience to UCC no crime.