Sunday, September 10, 2006

Class in Session: Lesson 3

Definitions can have particular meanings specifically in legal settings. Let’s look at a few from the UCC and remember in your reading that the UCC absorbs many principles of law. If you have a trustee considered a person relevant to the UCC than all the principles of trust law are already factored into these statutes. You don’t get to make up your own story outside the guidelines. Whether judge, prosecutor or president you are not above the law. This of course is law to them binding by their public offices.

Aggrieved Party: means a party entitled to pursue a remedy.

Agreement: as distinguished from “contract,” means the bargain of the parties in fact, as found in their language or inferred from other circumstances, including course of performance, course of dealing, or usage of trade as provided in section 1-303

Contract: as distinguished from “agreement,” means the total legal obligation that results from the parties’ agreement as determined by [The Uniform Commercial Code] as supplemented by any other applicable laws.

Creditor: includes a general creditor, a secured creditor, a lien creditor, or any representative of creditors, including an assignee for the benefit of creditors, a trustee in bankruptcy, a receiver in equity, or an executor or administrator of an insolvent debtor’s or assignor’s estate.

Fault: means a default, a breach, or wrongful act or omission.

Good Faith: except as otherwise provided in Article 5, means honesty in fact and the observance of reasonable commercial standards of fair dealing.

Person: means an individual, corporation, business trust, estate trust, partnership, limited liability company, association, joint venture, government, government subdivision, agency, or instrumentality, public corporation, or any other legal or commercial entity.

Remedy: means any remedial right to which an aggrieved party is entitled with or without resort to tribunal.

Representative: means a person empowered to act for another, including an agent, an officer of a corporation or association, and a trustee, executor, or administrator of an estate.

Right: includes remedy.

Signed: includes using any symbol executed or adopted with present intention to adopt or accept a writing.

Unauthorized Signature: means a signature made without actual, implied, or apparent authority. The term includes forgery.

Now these are some of the definitions that governed my actions. Where is the fault? We were honest to the standards of fair dealing pursuing our right and remedies without a tribunal as authorized agents of the aggrieved party based upon agreements and contracts having collected faults and verified who was the true creditor. We obeyed this law and cannot be made criminals for doing so. You think we are fools? Try and make that work as a prosecutor. Petty detractors with worthless opinions doesn’t change the law, not even judges are above the law. Soon the game will be up and then we will be laughing out loud. LOL, Ha Ha, he he, ROFLMAO

17 comments:

neodemes said...

Kurt,

Your case is resting on aquiesence by silence being recognized by the court.

Good luck with that.

neodemes said...

kaz4541 said...

nobody still hasn't told us what happened on 5th. how soon will we be laughing??

**************************************

I don't know about you, but, I'm already laughing.

Filed Sept. 6

;-)

Stillwaiting3 said...

Kurt,
This is great info and quite possibly for some of us it is info we already know and for others it maybe new. This is the info that should have been given to us long ago. Long before you put us into a contract with the DG. Long before you took our money. Long before you took our dreams. Long before people lost their homes.
This is the info you should have provided us upfront. This is the info we should have been blogging before we spent any money or changed important personal paperwork.
Now you want to give us all of this information after the fact. A lesson that we should have been given before the test. Had you done it that way, educated people first, then asked for money to keep the process alive that would have been understandable and we would have made an educated decision at that time.
In fact, you did not know the outcome of the event. If you thought they were going to roll over with out a fight then you are sadly underestimated your enemy. Read the Art of War.
If you needed an army of people and the funds to attack you should have recruited us that way. Instead you "taxed us" no different than those you are now fighting.
The truth upfront is what people want and leaders provide.
September 5th is now passed and again like last December/January has now passed.....and now these dates mean nothing.

Anonymous said...

September 5th is now passed and again like last December/January has now passed.....and now these dates mean nothing.


Be ready from another update from Dr. Fred, stating how "glorious" the last court date was and what it produced.

Yetter said...

you clients are embarrassing. Why don't you spineless wonders start a whiners blog and sit at the feet of that pillar of wisdom, neo.

son of a prophet said...

WARNING!!! WARNING!!! WARNING!!!

DO NOT TALK ABOUT/GO SEE THIS MOVIE UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES, OR YOU WILL COME UNDER SUSPICION BY THE DHS FOR TERRORIST ACTIVITIES!!!


(google search-"V FOR VENDETTA")



Plot Outline: A shadowy freedom fighter known only as "V" uses terrorist tactics to fight against his totalitarian society. Upon rescuing a girl from the secret police, he also finds his best chance at having an ally. (more) (view trailer)

User Comments: Riveting and Exciting. (more)

User Rating: 8.3/10 (62,217 votes) top 250: #131

Cast overview, first billed only:

Natalie Portman .... Evey Hammond

Hugo Weaving .... V

Stephen Rea .... Inspector Eric Finch

Stephen Fry .... Gordon Deitrich

John Hurt .... Chancellor Adam Sutler
Tim Pigott-Smith .... Creedy
Rupert Graves .... Dominic
Roger Allam .... Lewis Prothero
Ben Miles .... Dascomb
Sinéad Cusack .... Delia Surridge

Natasha Wightman .... Valerie
John Standing .... Bishop Lilliman

Eddie Marsan .... Etheridge
Clive Ashborn .... Guy Fawkes
Emma Field-Rayner .... Guy Fawkes Lover
(more)


Also Known As:
V for Vendetta: At the IMAX (UK) (IMAX version)
V wie Vendetta (Germany)
MPAA: Rated R for strong violence and some language.
Runtime: 132 min
Country: USA / Germany
Language: English
Color: Color
Sound Mix: Sonics-DDP (IMAX prints) / DTS / Dolby Digital / SDDS
Certification: UK:15 / New Zealand:R13 / USA:R / Italy:T / Philippines:R-13 (MTRCB) / Argentina:16 / Australia:MA / Switzerland:14 (canton of Vaud) / Japan:PG-12 / Colombia:12 / Singapore:M18 (cut) (original rating) / France:U / Sweden:15 / Ireland:15A / Germany:16 / Singapore:NC-16 (edited version) / Singapore:M18 / Brazil:16 / Malaysia:18SG / Netherlands:16 / Chile:Y7 / Finland:K-15 / Canada:14A (British Columbia/Ontario) / Norway:15 / Portugal:M/16 / Israel:PG / Hong Kong:IIB / Switzerland:14 (canton of Geneva)

Trivia: V's pseudonym, "Rookwood", is the last name of another conspirator at the 1605 Gunpowder Plot. (more)

~~The Swami~~~ said...

Natalie Portman .... Evey Hammond



Would ya ?

son of a prophet said...

"...drink too much of anything and you'll throw it up. "



except one thing: you can drink all you want from the fountain of life and will never throw up; as yeshua said..."drink from the fountain of everlasting life..."


also known as "the gospel"

habakkuk said...

Its not unusual for innocent, righteous men to be falsly accused....If we follow in our Lord's footseps and stand up for what is right then we shouldn't be suprised. The Lord did and so will we.

Matthew 5: 9-11

9"Blessed are the peacemakers, for they shall be called sons of God.

10"Blessed are those who have been persecuted for the sake of righteousness, for theirs is the kingdom of heaven.

11"Blessed are you when people insult you and persecute you, and falsely say all kinds of evil against you because of Me.

So let them talk....TRUTH will have the last word.

neodemes said...

Is NOTHING sacred?

son of a prophet said...

jim maccanney said...


September 12, 2006 posting ... in pre world war II germany the intellectuals were put on lists and removed ... this has been happening and now is becoming more public ... the latest evidence is with public ridicule of university professors who show evidence of government complicity with the 911 event ... they are singled out and attacked ... calls are made behind the scenes to remove them from effective positions ... seems they were doing fine until they breached this topic ... there are topics you just do not talk about in spite of so called tenure and academic freedom ... who really controls our colleges and universities and what they teach ??? ... like mostly everything i talk about ... but make no mistake ... their biggy is to keep the public from understanding the true history and scientific nature of items coming from outer space ... join me again thursday evening as i talk about these topics ... jim mccanney

Yetter said...

SIU.The fraud has been detailed to the banks in every detail in the commercial presentment.The banks have ignored it. Silence is acceptance. If the IRS sent you an official document for payment and you ignore it, guess what happens. You owe it without recourse.The strategy for the dual refi worked. Utah and the feds took the bait.it is unfortunate that people were foreclosed on. I don't know about you but if a train is coming shouldn't you get out of its way?I don't mean to be insensitive, but there were those who were in massive problem's before they entered the program. The good news is that the fat lady has yet to sing and these people will be made whole after thr process is over.The main battle for Scott and Kurt right now is not giving their authority and rights over to Bill Alups juristiction so that he can make make up any damn ruling he wants to.He will not be fair and law will have nothing to do with his presumed decision.

Yetter said...

Dejavu. If you don't know your rights then you don't have any.

neodemes said...

whatdoyoumean said...

"The lack of response is an agreement. Companies do it all the time."

What companies, please? In detail.

Yetter said...

Neo. How about the UNITED STATES gov't Corporation to start with.

WillToFight said...

Yetter said.....

you clients are embarrassing. Why don't you spineless wonders start a whiners blog and sit at the feet of that pillar of wisdom, neo.
_________________________

I'm certainly with Yetter.
______________________

neo said.....

Kurt,

Your case is resting on aquiesence by silence being recognized by the court.

Good luck with that.
__________________________

Complete idiocy again and again and again....Neo. What is it that you don't get? When will you realize that there are checks and balances.

When will you see that we must, for the sake of the continuation of this country follow the law?

I don't expect an answer from one who can not see, one who refuses to look, one who is programmed in ignorance and following or doublespeak, instead of being bold in thought and study, erudition!

Unknown said...

hey everyone kaz4541 is pedo hes a pedo pedo pedo