Wednesday, July 25, 2007
The Truth on Trial (07-13-07)
As we have gone through the machinations of battle the trial picture has become clear. Judge Alsup is a pro at protecting the interest of government preemptively. Many have misunderstood our actions but we have been using our pro game on these pros of con. Now the trial substance behind all the procedural falderal is nothing more than a contracting process. The government bargains from a superior position like the banker with all the rules and provisions decidedly in their advantage. To us they are offering a trial completely devoid of the actual facts that will focus on our mental intent outside the environment in which it was practiced. Now we must present a defense within the four corners of the trial contract that does not include any challenge of the alleged victims claims. In this contract Judge Alsup’s opinion that a loan exist is an unrebuttable fact. Unable to challenge this fact I am left to the challenge to persuade 12 ignorant people that I believed that my challenge process was an innocent mistake. This is iffy but not impossible. This contract is shaping up to the same type of contract I’ve already challenged as unconscionable. I will not accept this contract anymore than I accepted the bank fraud contracts. Now I see most of you saying they are in power and control and there’s not a thing you can do about it. Funny I heard these same comments before Dorean creation. If this was true why am I the one being solicited? My agreement is the object of desire. I control the sought commodity. I have the power. Their stealthy attempts to steal it indicates its value. It’s up to me to create a contract that benefits me or not to do business. At this moment we are debating over the terms and conditions. I highly suspect that they cannot offer or agree to an honest trial agreement, which means there will be no trial. I have a trial contract acceptable to me in my mind and that is the only trial that will occur. I can stop them. Now they can inconvenience me, which is nothing more than a form of persuasion to reach accord. This is an evil practice far removed from justice. It is lawless, deceptive, and preys on men for the love of money. If this behavior was present in our hearts God makes it clear it is sin. Jesus has conquered sin, the system of evil. They are powerless to oppose. Any attempt would be vanity. People again think my confidence is arrogance but when Christ is the banner it professes authority, jurisdiction and victory. I merely let my banner and my champion prove Himself and His promises. On a small scale you have placed your trust in your trustees to champion your cause and are doing nothing. How much more can we find hope and comfort in Christ? If we measure the parties it becomes clear. God is forever, the US 230 years, Alsup 61, Kurt 44. The way I see the trial framing up is forever and 44 for non-trial verses 291 for trial. I like my odds and that is the truth of this trial
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
6 comments:
"I highly suspect that they cannot offer or agree to an honest trial agreement, which means there will be no trial."
________________________________
If all the damages against the banks have been claimed by Farrell & Dewey, it seems that the prosecution has stated a claim upon which relief CANNOT be granted, since no more relief is necessary based upon the charges, so why can't you just motion the Judge to dismiss the case based upon premise, or motion to dismiss based upon res adjudicata, there are no unresolved issues that HAVEN'T already been settled through the Dorean presentment.
If you don't like or agree with the terms of the new contract the prosecution is offering, purposely drafted in their favor, just reject it, and there is no need for court, since there are no reasons to debate since there is no new controversy, so what choice does the Judge have? At least this reasoning would be correct if the court is all about contracting and issues about a contract that needs a 3rd party (Judge) to rule upon. Sounds good to me if you don't want to play their game that you can just take your basketball and go home.
Since it's your basketball, they have to ask you if they can play with you. They just can't take your basketball because that would be stealing & they can't force you to play because that's unsportsmanlike conduct. Maybe the Judge or prosecution thinks otherwise & wants to display more unsportsmanlike and more unconscienable like conduct?
Haven't they shown enough bad intentions and poor faith already? When is enough, simply enough, because embarassment sets in?
Something worth noting...
LadyPrintz said...
I have been watching this entire process from the beginning and quite honestly I am dealing with a somewhat similar situation. The "Courts" and "Judges" definitely straddle the fence on who they are and what their jurisdiction is. Just a little thing for you underdog to look at. I pulled the CAFR (comprehensive annual financial report) on my county and ooohhh what did I find??? The nice partial, oops I mean impartial judge has his retirement funds held up not just in one or two banks but many banks and even the one that I am bringing action against. So he is shown to be impartial right there. I say all that to say, you may want to get a CAFR to assist you with some more information/ ammunition of truth.
"I pulled the CAFR (comprehensive annual financial report) on my county and ooohhh what did I find??? The nice partial, oops I mean impartial judge has his retirement funds held up not just in one or two banks but many banks and even the one that I am bringing action against. So he is shown to be impartial right there."
___________________________________
A friend of mine in our county discovered the same thing about judges here when he challenged a simple ticket. It was dropped.
A lot of these bastards are curropt.
Your sure don't see notrial dissent chimeing in now do you. He's a little Girl.
You sure don't see that little Girl notrial dissent chimeing in now. He knows he's wrong.
near the end said...
You sure don't see that little Girl notrial dissent chimeing in now. He knows he's wrong.
2:20 PM
****************************
tHEY ALL KNOW THEIR WRONG AND THEONLY REASON THEY COME ON HERE IS TO STIR THINGS UP.
HOW COULD ANYONE IN THEIR RIGHT MIND NOT SEE THE OUTRAGOUS ACT'S BY THE COURT ANBD THE gOV'T THAT ONLY SHOW HOW EASY THEY ARE TO DIS REGAURD SOMEONES RIGHT TO A FAIR TRIAL AND DUE PROCESS. THEY WOULD HAVE TO BE EITHER BLIND OR PART OF THE CORUPT SYSTEM THEY RALLY.
TIC TOC GOES THE CLOCK AND THE LONGER THEY DRAG THIS OUT THE MORE RIGHTS' THE STUFF THE WORSE THEY LOOK. JUST LIKE THE GONZALAS CASE AND ALL OF THAT CRAP IT'S NOT HARD TO SEE HOW THE GOV'T WILL OVERSTEP THEIR LEGAL MEANS WHEN THEER TRING TO STOP SOMETHING THEY KNOW ISN'T DOING ANY WRONG BUT THEY ARE HAVING THEIR ARM TWISTED BY POWER'S BEHIND THE SEEN.
IT SO VERY SIMPLE THE DOREAN GROUP FOUND A LOOPHOLE AND USED IT AND THE BANK'S WENT AND CRIED TO THE GOV'T AND TOLD THEM IF THEY DID'NT STEP IN AND STOP IT THEY WERE GOING TO HAVE A BIG PROBLEM ON THERE HANDS. OTHER WISE WHY WOULD'NT THE BANKS HAVE JUST USE THE LAW IN COURT TO STOP THEM? BECAUSE THEY COULD'NT FIND THE WRITEN LAW TO DO SO, THAT'S WHY
SIMPLE TO READ SIMPLE TO SEE AND OOOH SO EASY TO FIND THE ONES WHO ARE THE CROOKS IN ALL OF THIS.
YOU CAN'T WRITE A LAW AND THEN WHEN IT'S NOT WORKING OUT FOR YOU BECAUSE YOUY FORGOT SOMETHING JUST UP AND CHANGE IT AND CALL THE ONES WHO WERE FOLLOWING IT CROOKS IN THE MIDDLE.
IT'S LIKE IF I WAS IN VEGAS AT A BLACKJACK TABLE WINNING BIG AND THEY WANTED TO STOP ME BUT THEIR NORMAL ACT'S LIKE MOVING THE DEALER OR CHANGING THE DECK WER'NT WORKING SO THEY JUST CANGED THE RULES AND SAID I NEED TO HAVE 31 INSTEAD BUT THE DEALER STILL ONLY NEED 21 TO WIN.
IF YOU WRITE THEM RULE YOU SHOULD BE ABLE TO AT LEAST FOLLOW THEM EVEN IF THEY END UP NOT IN YOU FAVOR, I MEAN IT'S ONLY FAIR PLAY
NOT LIKE TRYING TO GET SOMEONE EVICTED OUT OF THEIR OFFICE OR CAUSING PROBLEMS AND RAIDING BANK ACCT. BUT WITHOUT ARRESTING ANYONE. HOW ABOUT PULLING CLIENT FILES AND NEVER HAULING ANYONE IN ( LAST i LOOKED THE TWO WERE RIGHT THERE IN THE MIDDLE OF THE ROOM IN vEGAS AT THE CONVENTIION AFTER THE RAID SO HOW HARD WERE THE TO FIND BUT YET THAT DID'NT STOP THE FRD'S FROM TAKING MONIES FROM ACCT' AND THE WARRENT THEY USED WAS IT GIVEN BECAUSE THE fbi USE THE OLD TERROR ACT TO GAIN IT AS IN A REPORT THAT SHOW HOW THEY SECURED HUNDEREDS OF THESE BY USING THE GIVEN POWER UNLAWFULY AND THERE FOR MAKING THE USE UNLAWFULL.
ARE WE TO BELEIVE THAT OUR GOV'T AND THE ALL ARE SO INCOMPETEND THAT THEY SEND TWO GUY'S TO ANOTHER STATE FOR 9 MONTHS WITHOUT ANY GOOD REASON OR AT BEST A MADE UP REASON IS MORE LIKE IT WELL THEY TRIED TO GET THER ACT TOGETHER AND FIND SOME WAY TO CONVINCE THE GRAND JURY OF WRONG DOING.
oLD aLSUP BEING THE FAIR MINDED PERSON HE'S NOT WAS THE PERFECT CHOOSE FOR THE JOB. NOT EVEN LISSENING TO THE TWO'S LAWYER SIDE OF THING'S AND ON TOP MAKING HIM PAY A FINE OF $70,000.00 FOR THE BANKS LAWYER FOR EVEN GETTING UP TO CHALANGE TO QUESTION THE BANK'S MIGHT BE WRONG.
NOW THAT'S FAIR!
THIS HOLE THING IS NOTHING BUT A RAILROAD JOB AND THEY HAVE KEPT THEM KLOCKED UP IN HOPES OF PEOPLE FADING AWAY AS MOST DO OVER TIME AND THEN THE FED'S COULD DO WHAT EVER THEY WANTED .
OPP'S GEUSS THEY DID'NT COUNT ON THIS LITTLE BLOG SITE KEEPING PEOPLE UP TO SPEED ON THE GOINGS ON BECAUSE OTHER WISE THE FACT IS THAT THE FED'S ARE VERY WELL INFORMED ABOUT HOW PEOPLE LOSE INTEREST WHEN IT';S NOT RIGHT IN FRONT OF THE FACES AND WHEN YOU PUT THAT WITH THEIR POWER TO STOP INFO AS THEY HAVE TRIED HERE WITH THE TWO GUY'S WHEN SOMEONES IN JAIL THEY HAVE VERY LITTLE AS FAR AS RIGHTS GO AND THE GOV'T AND ALL INCLUDED KNOW THIS IS A TOOL THEY CANB USE TO THEIR ADVANTAGE THAT HAS VERY GOOD RESULT'S NORMALY.
TIC TOC THIS WILL BE WHAT CAUSES THE GOV'T TO PAY FOR THEIR WRONG DOING AROUND ALL THIS, BUT IT WON'T BE THE FRIST TIME THEY HAVE PAID FOR LOCKING SOMEONE UP UNJUSTLY AND I'M SURE NOT THE LAST TIME.
WHAT'S A FEW DOLLARS WHEN THEY STOPPED THE BANKING INDUSTRY FROM LOSING SO MUCH MORE IT HARDLY TAKES A ROCKET SCIENTEST TO SEE THE NUMBERS AND HOW THAT WHAT IT'S COSTING AND GOING TO COST THE GOV'T TO STOP DOREAN IS JUST A DROP IN THE BUCKET COMPAIRED TO WHAT IT WOULD HAVE COST THEM HAD THE PROCESS BEEN LET TO RUN IT'S LEGAL COURSE.
ALL OF YOU NEYSAYING DRIP'S ONLY LOOK THE FOOL'S FOR YOUR SIDING WITH THESE LIERS AND CROOKS WHEN THE BIG PICTURE IS SEE AND IT NOT SO HARD TO SEE WITH EVEY PASSING DAY WHOO'S THE WRONG DOERS IN THIS.
BUT TO YOU NAYSAYERS EVERYTHING THE GOV'T DOSE IS O.K. EVEN IF THEY HAVE TO STOMP ON SOMEONES RIGHTS TO GET IT DONE RIGHT?
TALK ABOUT YOUR UNFAIR CROOKED MINDED AND ACTING GROUP jUSTICES777, NEO, SEEN IT IN, ND, AND ALL THE REST OF YOU WORK TO PROFIT BUNCH WHO WOULKD SAY ANYTHING WAS RIGHT AS LONG AS IT LIND YOUR POCKETS WELL DOING SO.
BROKERS, BANKER, TITLE COMPANIES AND THE HOLE LOT OF YOU ARE THE BIGGEST LIERS I HAVE EVER MEETAND HAD THE MISS PLEASURE OF HAVING TO DO BUSINESS THROUGH. YOU WOULD LIE TO YOUR OWN MOTHERS IF ITT MENT YOU WOULD GET A CHECK FROM THE LENDER IN THE END AS A RESULT.
SNAKES THE WHLOE BUNCH NOTHING LESS THEN THAT AND THE GOV'T HELP'S TO SUPORT YOU OUT OF FEAR THAT IT.
Post a Comment