Sunday, December 19, 2010

Slow Play 11-15-10

I am innocent of the charges against me. A crime had to be perpetrated upon me to convict me. Judge Alsup knows this as well as all the other actors. I’m not complaining only recognizing what I’m up against. I have found the way within their rulings to overturn this but vile tactics prevent me from being heard. This is nothing new. I’ve found a case where they used the same tactics to steal 11 years from one guy and 19 from another. These tactics are the hatred of power freaks who want to break those brave enough to challenge their fraud. This battle is the Lord’s. I’m in, fully vested no matter the cost. God knows their plans and has given me wisdom to see it and to institute counter measures. I regret only that such evil men have power and find honor among men. If we would only turn our hearts to God His justice would advance toward us, until then these creep shows will pillage their brethren and convince ignorant accomplices to be jurors. I don’t see a way within the system to get any relief shorter than 2 years. Even this is hopefully optimistic. God can always shorten the time.

Many great rulings have come out of the Supreme Court this year that assure my victory. But procedure is their weapon not law. The judges know they can ignore me until the law absolutely won’t allow it anymore. Each evil denial steals time and tests my resolve.

Power tortures and laughs while justice and truth cry. God watches and plans to destroy the plans of the wicked. If you know how trustworthy the love of God is toward those who love Him you would be assured of our victory and confidently support until your victory arrives. No creep show no matter how much boasting exist their mouth would ever intimidate you. That is where Scott and I stand until the end.

44 comments:

judge allslop said...

"American commercial and residential real estate is wrecked for two decades. Property ownership, banks, credit unions, title companies, loans, lender loan ownership, and ability to pay are all simply destroyed." ~ Roger Weigand

Brother's Kurt and Scott you are to be saluted for having the kahonees for at least standing up against such criminal behavior and are lucky not to be found hanging in your cell. Typical crime syndicate behavior will find you serving at least half your sentence to minimize your relevance. Of course there is always the unexpected. The California train wreck is in progress, ready for climax. Economic impact from budget distress at the state and local levels is imminent. Numerous different state debt downgrades to junk level are certain. The ripple effect will be felt in WashingtonDC, where neglect is engrained. Lawsuits against Wall Street banks dominate the scene from bond fraud, the opposite of state aid or federal revenue sharing. Profound economic damage comes. States and municipalities currently have around $2.8 trillion worth of outstanding bonds, but that number is tiny compared to guaranteed pension obligations. The hidden shortfalls total up to $3.5 trillion by some estimates, plus health benefits promises. Incoming governor Jerry Brown faces a gigantic budget deficit, a situation nowhere resolved. The past actions imitated the federal delays for appropriate action, remedied nothing, and only delayed difficult decisions for massive cutbacks, such as the Calif prison system.

Joseph said...

The Smoking Gun:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/l-randall-wray/merss-smoking-gun-part-1-_b_794713.html

MERS's own manuels reveal their fraud so they could foreclose faster on people. After all time is money. MERS's own manuel proves they never had legal standing.

Here's one statement that really stood out to me:

"Even though the servicer has physical custody of the note, custom in the mortgage industry is that the investor (Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, Ginnie Mae or a private investor) OWNS THE BENEFICIAL RIGHTS TO THE PROMISSORY NOTE."

Their own manuel proves their intentions to defraud the borrower, the county governments, and the courts, as far back as 1999 and to commit securities fraud by their own policies. Never transfer the note, but get paid securititizing the mortgages, thus violating the pooling & servicing agreements that were signed with investors and giving the investors no legal rights to foreclose & also giving them an unsecured real interest, but saying that their intentions were that these investors were the parties that had the beneficial rights to the promissory note. Sounds like a bunch of double talk to me.

I think MERS and all member banks of MERS should be slapped with one big RICO lawsuit by the government. There's enough evidence to win now.

Joseph said...

NEVADA ATTORNEY GENERAL SUES BANK OF AMERICA FOR DECEIVING NEVADA HOMEOWNERS

Las Vegas: Attorney General Catherine Cortez Masto announced today that her office is filing a lawsuit against Bank of America Corporation, N.A., BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP, Recon Trust Company (“Bank of America”) for engaging in deceptive trade practices against Nevada homeowners.

The lawsuit, filed in the Eighth Judicial District of the State of Nevada, was triggered by consumer complaints and follows an extensive investigation into Bank of America’s alleged deceptive practices involving its residential mortgage servicing, particularly its loan modification and foreclosure practices.

The Complaint alleges that Bank of America is:
1)Misleading consumers by promising to act upon requests for mortgage modifications within a specific period of time;
2)Misleading consumers with false assurances that their homes would not be foreclosed while their requests for modifications were pending, but sending foreclosure notices, scheduling auction dates, and even selling consumers’ homes while they waited for decisions;
3)Misrepresenting to consumers that they must be in default on their mortgages to be eligible for modifications when, in fact, current borrowers are eligible for assistance;
4)Making false promises to consumers that their modifications would be made permanent if they successfully completed trial modification periods, but then failing to convert these modifications;
5)Misleading consumers with inaccurate and deceptive reasons for denying their requests for modifications;
6)Falsely notifying consumers or credit reporting agencies that consumers are in default when they are not;
7)Misleading consumers with offers of modifications on one set of terms, but then providing them with agreements on different sets of terms, or misrepresenting that consumers have been approved for modifications.

Because of Bank of America’s false promises, many Nevada consumers continued to make mortgage payments they could not afford, running through their savings, their retirement funds or their children’s education funds. Additionally, due to Bank of America’s misleading assurances, consumers deferred short-sales and passed on other attempts to mitigate their losses. And they waited anxiously, month after month, calling Bank of America and submitting their paperwork again and again, not knowing whether or when they would lose their homes. Whatever the consumers’ particular circumstances, they all suffered the stress and frustration of being misled by Bank of America while trying to take responsible action to modify their mortgages so they could continue to make their payments and remain in their homes.

judge allslop said...

For the laugh out loud dept, at a recent Mortgage Fraud Summit that took place in Ontario, Ca and attended by the FBI, (Follow Bankers Instructions)what became clear from the presentations and discussion is that the FBI now seems more concerned by the fraud at the bottom of the chain instead of spending their energies and resources investigating the control fraud becoming evident throughout the entire system.As William Black put it:
“[Lenders] start creating false statements, false affidavits. That means a false statement under penalty of perjury. That means a felony. That means tens of thousands of cases every month of Bank of America and other entities like it committing felonies.“
Correct me if I’m wrong, but I think that any likelihood that tens of thousands of felonies are being committed every month by major banking institutions via false affidavits should damn well get the issue off the FBI’s “concern” pile and onto the “immediate action” burner.
Compromised agent(Smith)Sharon Ormsby — chief of all financial / white collar crimes for the FBI said “Where’s the proof?” .
This "agent" has shit stuck to the bottom of her shoes and asks whats that smell?

Joseph said...

A right can't be licensed:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/l-randall-wray/merss-smoking-gun-part-1-_b_794713.html

Nebraska man wins for no drivers license & no plates.

Joseph said...

This guys affidavit proves THAT NO ONE CAN FORECLOSE ON YOU. Maybe you can use this affidavit. The current servicing or original lender can't foreclose on you because he sold the note & mortgage for value, or is only servicing the note for the real owner, so you certainly don't owe him. The fact that they don't show the original NOTE TO YOU PROVES THEY AREN'T THE HOLDER IN DUE COURSE OR OWNER WITH ANY BENEFICIAL RIGHTS to foreclose on you. And with the rampant fraud that has already been exposed, I still think it's the tip of the iceburg.

And the assignees or investors that bought these pools of mortgages can't foreclose on you either because they don't qualify as a holder in due course (beneficial legal owner) of one single mortgage and their own agreements (pooling & servicing agreements) say that they don't have the authority to foreclose:

http://www.myprivateaudio.com/AFFIDAVIT_MORTGAGE_PAID_-_MJA.pdf

You see almost all mortgages from 2001 to 2008 were securitized. 1 OUT OF EVER 5 MORTGAGES WERE SECURITIZED (2.1 trillion) THAT ARE OUTSTANDING NOW THAT PEOPLE ARE PAYING ON. Almost all these mortgages have defects in the chains of title, ESPECIALLY IF THEY ARE ASSIGNED TO MERS, SO NO ONE CAN PROVE ANY LEGAL RIGHTS AFTER MERS GOT IT. All of these mortgages were paid off through insurance, credit default swaps, GOVERNMENT BAIL OUT MONIES, etc. These credits WHICH IN ALMOST EVERY CASE EXCEEDED THE VALUE OF THE ORIGINAL LOAN TAKEN OUT BY THE BORROWER , SO BY VIRTUE OF THAT FACT, NO ONE SHOULD BE FORECLOSED UPON LEGALLY, & THESE MONIES were suppose to be applied to what the borrowers owed as per agreements which means the accounts OF THE AMERICAN HOMEOWNERS should be zeroed out.

Here is one paragraph in the affidavit that caught my eye:


In my opinion, it is unlikely that any HDC (holder in due course) exists, because of the way securitization was universally practiced within the investment banking community during 2001 through 2008. Hence the loan product sold to the subject homeowner included a Promissory Note that was evidence of a real obligation that arose when the transaction was funded but lost its negotiability in the securitization process, which thus bars anyone from successfully claiming HDC status.
The negotiability of the note was negatively affected by (1) the splitting of the note and mortgage as described herein; (2) by the addition of terms, conditions, third party obligors and undisclosed profits, fees, kickbacks all contrary to existing federal and state applicable statutes and common law (which has relevance to the TILA, RESPA and related allegations in the Forensic Review Analysis, attached hereto as Exhibit A; and (3) knowledge of title and chain of title defects in the ownership of the Note, beneficial interest in the encumbrance, and position as
EXHIBIT H

Obligee on the obligation originally undertaken by the subject homeowner.
The only party that can claim to be a Holder in Due Course (“HDC”) of the Note are those that paid value for the Note, without knowledge that there were any pending challenges to its validity and who fulfill the other requirements for HDC status. This HDC and the Third Party Sources are the only ones that could conceivably suffer a monetary or pecuniary loss resulting from non-payment of the obligation.

Joseph said...

The Dorean Process proved that there can't be a holder in due course of the note because the note was stolen by the bank with no consideration paid for it to the borrower.

If there was consideration paid for the note, than surely the bank didn't pay back the borrower for his "deposit" as the Federal Reserve Publications clearly show which means the mortgage was had by the lender through fraud and deception.

Course the courts and most of the world isn't ready to accept these truths yet, (maybe never), however, with all of the revelations coming out about the the fraud of the banks, robo signers, forged & falsified documents, the fraud of securitization, improper foreclosures, loan modifications promised but never given, illegal fees added by lenders, etc. it really isn't too far of a stretch to get there and say the borrower was cheated and deceived from day one in the original agreement, so all foreclosures are unconscienceable.

Joseph said...

What about appraisal fraud, underwriting fraud, fraud created through banks betting that their loans would go south and selling these loans to security pools at the same time, predatory lending, violations of TILA, HOEPA, RESPA, the fraud of giving graduated payment loans to people that couldn't afford them, banks giving bad product loans when the clients qualified for lower rates & better terms, not to mention the derivative trading that has made the world one big giant casino on the verge of collapse with risks, no one should ever take.

I'm sure a very long list could be made. The banks practices and greed created this financial economic down turn we are experiencing now, and the FED probably knows they can't fix things.

Too many people are financially struggling now. And if the problems we see are just the tip of the iceberg, and things are only going to get worse, because things are out of control, than God help us.

If it's going to take a minimum of 2 years for Kurt to get justice, or at least the court hearing he deserves for vindication, and that's optimistic, than certainly, the world economic down turn will last for at least another two more years at least where things are only going to get worse & not better. This seems to be a reflection of the moral thermometer of this nation.

I don't believe the Lord is any hurry to bless this land when justice is so slow and corruption still reigns in our government & courts.

Until we do justice to one another, collectively as a nation, I don't think as a nation that the Lord is going to really bless us as a nation, like he has done in the past, but allow more punishments to fall on us to humble this nation.

And I think I'm an optimist.

Anonymous said...

If it's going to take a minimum of 2 years for Kurt to get justice, or at least the court hearing he deserves for vindication, and that's optimistic, than certainly, the world economic down turn will last for at least another two more years at least where things are only going to get worse & not better.



like you said all along....in 2 years it will be 2012...concedance???

no. but dont worry, it will be long since over by them...the pole shift, planten-x, the andromedans, you name it, it will all be here... ;-)

the morgage fraud issue will be a distant memory and a very moot point.

Anonymous said...

and if yuo dont believe taht, then just sit back and watch it happen before your eyes....

near the end said...

Market is lookin good. SOB where are the Nukes thought it was already gonna happen. Negative Ned.

Anonymous said...

near the but said....


i think that your gettin' a little bit ((shaky)) my friend...


wahts the matter??

you sound like some nun ho is wistling past the graveyard...you really dont beleive what yor sayin' anymore yoslef...face it, the partys ova...yo like some nun playin' poka tring to bluff others out of the pot holdin only a pair of deuces...forgeet it!! it aint happenin....cause you dont have time on your side my frind...10 days it alrady 2011, yo runnin out of time...maybe yo should see that arnol swartsaneggs movie, 'the runnin' man'

take a cupfull of zantacs youll be ok....

dont worry, i aint goin anywahres...i still be here when you get back even if it till 2025

count on it!

LOLOL!!!

Anonymous said...

and as far as the stink market go, the lettin ppls bleef that it gong up, and then it will crash all at once so the suckas loose all they m;oney, just like bruly baaals HYIPs...


unless yo is 'awareness' what yo cant see is that while the sock makit is gong up, the hosing markeet is cumming down.

so stocks go up for a little while, in the meantime, house prices come down, and more and more, you can buy nor sell a house b/c the banks wont loan any money as they dont have any more fake credit to loan.

so now, while the stark market is breaking even, coss it never gonna see anwheres close to 14000 agian, but hover arond 11-12000, in the mean times, you have houses that had sold for say $250000 now worth about $50K if your lucky.

so how are thins getting better??

ans. theyre not.

and just to prove it, read this here:

http://www.guardian.co.
uk/business/2010/dec/
20/debt-crisis-threatens
-us-cities


100 U.S cities going to go complety broke in 2011 an dats just fo starters

Joseph said...

BofA, Lenders Face Possible N.J. Foreclosure Freeze
By David Voreacos - Dec 20, 2010
Bank of America Corp., JPMorgan Chase & Co. and four other mortgage lenders and service providers face a possible suspension of foreclosures in New Jersey by Jan. 19, under a judge's order.

The action, announced today by New Jersey Supreme Court Chief Justice Stuart Rabner, also covers Citigroup Inc.'s mortgage unit, Ally Financial Inc.'s GMAC mortgage unit, OneWest Bank and Wells Fargo & Co. The lenders were implicated in "robo-signing," the submission of hundreds or thousands of foreclosure claims without personal knowledge of their contents, Rabner said.

The six companies must "show cause why

Anonymous said...

so eventually an "honest" judge overtuns all foreclosure cases?

eventually, kurt/scoot go free?


eventaully, the dg pays the settlements as promises?


so what???

even with all that, can yuo still in a country that is run amok by a criminal enterprise also know as the federal govt.???

sorry, but here is a case that make the dg case look like suffering detention in elementary school.

at least the dg prinicpals knew what they were up against and the possible outcome of taking on the beast.

this guy never knew what hit him.


this country is done.

http://www.examiner.com
/human-rights-in-national/cointelpro-media-attack
-on-ed-steele

Anonymous said...

this country is done.

unless they totally dismantle all the ABC agencies.

they will just steal the settlemints leaving a bad taste in you moth.

Anonymous said...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player
_embedded&v=y2LSiP99QtA

Anonymous said...

jug beans sludge fund.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gKVNKCiGMpM&NR=1

OMO said...

The county's EIN is irrelevant because the county is not reporting the funds that are going into the judges' account. The judges are using the county to get the funds and the county is pretending to not know where a portion of the funds are going to. The funds that are reported to IRS do not include the slug funds. All IRS has to do is look at those same papers shown in the video and the gig is up. Maybe the IRS does know about the laundering scheme and doesn't do anything about it because the county does favors for IRS- like record its notices of liens.

OMO said...

It seems to me that any IRS audit could have detected and traced missing funds in a money laundering minute. The attorney in the video is in for another shocker- that IRS knows about slug funds and is choosing to look the other way.

Joseph said...

Joe Bannister acquitted:

http://www.conspiracyplanet.com/channel.cfm?channelid=111&contentid=2357&page=

Nice to see someone win once in a while.

OMO said...

That was a long time ago. Banister still pays his share of taxes. Individuals can't get away with it but counties can.

Anonymous said...

MERRY CHRISTMAS Y'ALL!!

Yetter said...

Like wise.

Joseph said...

That was a long time ago. Banister still pays his share of taxes. Individuals can't get away with it
______________________________

You know this how?

Are you presuming everyone owes a tax & everyone needs to file a 1040?

Everyone who has ever filed has a Master tax payers file with the IRS, which shows the years one filed & the taxes paid or years when one didn't file & didn't pay any taxes. So the IRS knows when people don't file & what years they don't file.

What percentage of the population stopped filing when they learned they weren't a taxpayer and are not mandated to file? Do you think it's as high as 30%? Is 30% of the population in federal prisons?

OMO said...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NF065ckxUIs&feature=mfu_in_order&list=UL

During this Holiday season, the street of Bainbridge Cir, Murrieta CA thought we would do something to put a smile on peoples faces. The entire neighborhood had so much fun doing this last year, we made it better this year. We have now synchronized 13 houses in the block to music, and have added 4 more songs. This is a must see as the video does not do it justice. This was a team effort with the entire neighborhood getting involved. It has really brought the entire neighborhood together, and now is bringing the entire community together. You have to see it to believe it. Check out the YouTube Video

OMO said...

"Are you presuming everyone owes a tax & everyone needs to file a 1040?"


Obviously, you do not know what I know, do you? So you shouldn't presume that I presume that everyone owes a tax & and that everyone needs to file a 1040.

Here's what I do know: if you're an individual with Tax I.D., (aka SSN), then, according to Social Security Admin. and IRS, you are an individual required to file (aka PAY). Whether IRS is successful in getting you to do that is another matter. They have the upper hand if you're an individual with an employer. Self employed individuals and individuals who live off other people have a little more freedom.

So in answer to your question, the answer is NO, I do not presume that everyone owes a tax and is required to file.

near the end said...

Sob no nukes today. Markets still looking strong.

near the end said...

Sob no nukes today. Markets still looking strong.

near the end said...

Sob no nukes today. Markets still looking strong.

judge allslop said...

The gift that keeps on giving, Bank Mortgage Fraud. Tow that piece of shit to Mr BofA, Billy Alsups fixum and fuckum shop.


Allstate Corp. sued Bank of America Corp. and its Countrywide mortgage unit over $700 million in residential mortgage-backed securities the insurer purchased, claiming Countrywide misrepresented the investments.
“Countrywide was singularly focused on increasing its market share, offloading the risk onto Allstate and other institutional investors that purchased securities backed by pools of Countrywide’s mortgages,” Allstate said in a complaint filed in federal court in Manhattan yesterday.

Joseph said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Joseph said...

Banks Found Guilty Of Foreclosure Fraud
by Matt Brockman
Stock Market Review
Posted Tuesday, December 28, 2010
www.stockmarketsreview.com/realestate/2010/12/28/banks-found-guilty-of-foreclosure-fraud


As a result of the recent investigation launched by the Florida Attorney General's office, Bank Of America, GMAC Bank, JP Morgan Chase, and others, have all been found guilty of foreclosure fraud.

Depositions by the banks employees revealed that the banks have been forging, falsifying, and fabricating documents in order to foreclose on millions of homes owned by unsuspecting American homeowners.

Additionally, Wells Fargo Bank has admitted to 55,000 counts of perjury in submitting false affidavits to the courts in its efforts to fraudulently foreclose on homeowners.

To add to this disgusting, and arrogant display of lawlessness by the banks, nothing has been done by the Justice Department, or any other federal officials in the way of civil or criminal charges against the banks, until now.

Recently, The Arizona and Nevada Attorneys General have filed a civil lawsuit against Bank Of America for fraud against homeowners seeking loan modification, and hopefully there will be more lawsuits on the way, as the Obama Administration has also launched a Financial Fraud Enforcement Task Force to investigate and prosecute financial crimes in the lending and financial markets. As bank fraud has already proved to be pervasive, lets hope that this task force has the political will and integrity to prosecute the banks, and the corrupt attorneys who represent them.

These are essentially mortgages that the banks knew they did not own, but were willing to break the law in order to put homeowners out on the streets to satisfy their insatiable greed for even more money.

In spite of clear and convincing documented evidence, in the forms of deposition testimony by bank employees, the banks have been carrying on as if nothing ever happened, and federal officials have seemingly given them the green light to continue to break the law with impunity.

Joseph said...

Until such time as the Department Of Justice, the SEC, and the Attorney Generals of each state decide to take action against these criminal banks, homeowners have no choice but to implement their own available legal strategies to fight to save their homes. Because most of these foreclosure cases involve the banks inability to produce the promissory note in order to prove they have any legal rights to foreclosure; homeowners have several legal strategies available to them in order to stop the banks from fraudulently foreclosing on their homes.

One of the more popular strategies employed of late is the "Produce The Note" Strategy. As a large percentage of mortgage loans were securitized, and sold to investors all over the world, it has been difficult, if not impossible, for the banks to produce the required documents that would establish their right to foreclosure, as those documents have been lost in the Wall Street ether. This is why the banks have attempted to forge and falsify the documents, but have been recently caught, and found guilty of fraud.

Secondly, the homeowner can also file a civil suit against the banks for fraud, and make them prove they are the rightful owner of the note who is authorized to foreclose on the homeowner's property.

Last, but definitely not least, is the latest, and possibly most powerful strategy available, which does not require a homeowner to go to court at all. It is strictly an administrative process pursuant to The Administrative Procedures Act Of 1946, by which the homeowner is legally able to reconvey the property title back into his/her name, thereby revoking any authority by the bank to foreclose on the property, and taking the property back free & clear usually within 90 days.

This effectively puts the homeowner back in control, and forces the bank to deal with the homeowner, who now is negotiating from a position of strength, instead of begging the bank for help. The bank now has to go to the homeowner to resolve any title issues.

Until such time as our government officials decide that they will uphold, and enforce the rule of law, and the U.S Constitution, and not allow themselves to be bought by the banks lobbyist, the American homeowner must be willing to fight for their constitutional rights, and homes by any legal means necessary against the Federal Reserve, the banks, and the wealthy Wall Street barons, who created this mess with the full intention of fleecing the American citizens from all of their remaining wealth in the form of equity in their homes.

Joseph said...

Here's the irony. Years ago the press touted the Dorean Process as a fraudulently way to acquire title or some sort of scheme or fraud.

Now the press is saying that an administrative process JUST LIKE WHAT THE DOREAN PROCESS DID to obtain title is a legal recourse to the homeowner.

When is the press going to take responsibility for a complete contradiction?

Instead of the borrower committing fraud through such an administrative challenge, you now hear that the major banks are and have committed massive fraud by pretending to only hold title.

Joseph said...

All of this is more evidence that the Dorean Group were prophets, metasphorically speaking, being stoned, before the world and press could ever understand their purpose or message and were falsely accused.

Now after all of this massive fraud by the banks, now being public and accepted knowledge, is it as if the words of the press are saying they were wrong all along about the Dorean Group and further proof that Judge Alsup was only a hack for the special interest of the banks.

Even the idea of taking title away from a bank is touted as an acceptable process enforced by the administrative act law of 1946 and a legal remedy.

judge allslop said...

"Kimberly Clark (symbol: KMB) as you know, makes toilet paper. And the Federal Reserve makes dollar bills. If I take a dollar bill and deposit it in my bank account, I am lucky if I earn half of 1%. If I buy Kimberly Clark, which owns big printing presses that print real usable toilet paper, I will earn a dividend yield of 4%, eight times higher."


Bailed-Out Banks Slip Toward Failure
by Michael Rapoport
Monday, December 27, 2010

Number of Shaky Lenders Rises to 98 as Bad Loans Pile Up; Smaller Institutions Hit Hardest

Nearly 100 U.S. banks that got bailout funds from the federal government show signs they are in jeopardy of failing.

judge allslop said...

When an MBS was first created, all the mortgages were pristine. None had defaulted yet, because they were all brand new loans. Statistically, some would default and some others would be paid back in full. But which ones specifically would default? No one knew, of course. If I toss a coin 1000 times, statistically, around 500 tosses the coin will land heads. But what will the result be of, say, the 723rd toss? No one knows. Same with mortgages. So in fact, it was not that the riskier loans were in junior tranches and the safer ones were in senior tranches. Rather, all the loans were in the REMIC, and if and when a mortgage in a given bundle of mortgages defaulted, the junior tranche holders would take the losses first, and the senior tranche holder last. But who were the owners of the junior tranche bond and the senior tranche bonds? Two different people. Therefore, the mortgage note was not actually signed over to the bond holder. In fact, it could no't be signed over. Because, again, since no one knew which mortgage would default first, it was impossible to assign a specific mortgage to a specific bond. Think of MERS as Frankenstein's operating table, where the beast got put together. However, legally, and this is the important part, MERS did not hold any mortgage notes. The true owner of the mortgage notes should have been the REMICs. But the REMICs did not own the notes either, because of a fluke of the ratings agencies. The REMICs had to be bankruptcy remote, in order to get the precious ratings needed to peddle mortgage backed Securities to institutional investors. So somewhere between the REMICs and MERS, the chain of title was broken.

Yetter said...

All day every day.



Sign of the Times – Foreclosure Report Rips Rubber-Stamp Notary
Wednesday, December 29, 2010 12:53 PM
Source: The New York Post)trackingBy KAJA WHITEHOUSE

The face of New Jersey’s robo-signing scandal may be a Pennsylvania notary public who signed thousands of foreclosure documents in the Garden State even though he wasn’t licensed there.
Thomas Strain, who now heads the bankruptcy team at GMAC Mortgage Corp., has emerged as a key player in New Jersey’s foreclosure mess through a damning report that swayed the state’s top judge to crack down on rogue foreclosure filings by the nation’s largest mortgage lenders, including GMAC.
Earlier this month, New Jersey’s chief justice, Stuart Rabner, announced severe measures to halt abusive foreclosure practices in the state, including rubber-stamping documents without verifying their authenticity, known as robo-signing.

paw said...

I'm am in the process of trying to get my property out of the trust(that kurt and scott set up) and back in my name. I recieved a quit-claim deed from kurt and scott a few months ago and tried to file it at the clerk and recorders office. Apparently the c&r office won't recognise the title transfer form I filed w/ the quit claim deed as a legitament document because the trust had no ein# assigned to it? The lady at the c&r office told me that I could use the last four numbers of either scott's or kurt's social security number in place of an ein# for the trust.

Can anyone tell me how to get the last four digits of either of Scott's or Kurt's ssn#?

I was hoping Dr. Fred could help me out on this matter but he has not responded to my phone calls or emails lately?

Does anyone know if Dr. Fred is OK?

It sucks that I've paid close to $400.00 to get this title transfer handled and still can't get my property put in my name.

mogel007 said...

Paw: Why don't you just file for an EIN# for your trust? You can still do that.

Go to www.irs.gov

You can get a number online within 20 minutes after filling out the IRS form.

Then go back to the recorder, give her the number & get the document recorded.

Don't know why you are making things harder.

mogel007 said...

Don't forget to make copies of what you get online where the IRS issues you your FEI #.

mogel007 said...

Paw: Send me your email address to: mogel007@yahoo.com
and give me your phone number too. I can walk you through all of the steps you need to do or I can do it for you over the phone if you can't do this on your own.

Unknown said...

Is there absolutlely ANY WAY WHATSOEVER you would so kindly email me in private so I can ask JUST ONE QUESTION, That I have been seeking the answer to desperately!! My next hearing is in mid Jan and I need to get some other records that I have comeup with dead ends to obtain... if you can PLEASE email me azfightsbackals.club.officelive.com
or
http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=138181799554668