The Enemy (Post #2)

At first glance it would appear the government is the enemy, but they are merely the effect and at best the most faithful agent of the cause. There has crept a malevolent doctrine into the soul of the American People. An illusion like a mirror which reflects the opposite of the truth, the reality standing before it. Morality is twisted into justifications of expedience. Take the story of Robin Hood, a moral story about a man who in force resisted tyranny and tested the looters to return property back to the victims. This corrupt doctrine sells the story as neutered statements, eunuchs to serve in the palaces of poled propaganda. “Prince of Thieves” or “Stole from the rich to give to the poor”. How do we want to deal with the masses? Are they welfare beggars, we’ll use the rich to the poor agenda? Are they in search of nobility, we’ll focus on Prince? Are they hard on crime, we’ll focus on stole and thieves? The masses are huddled like a giant shadow around the single candle power looking for moral direction and tremble in fear that the insufficient warmth and light might go out and they’ll be in the dark. A dark morass like tar that sticks to you not as an individual but as a collective. Brilliance the brightness of the individual, the purposeful, self-respecting, objective, virtuous, responsible is now a sin it shames our candle and we can’t have that. In expedience men of independence are persecuted, blasted in the media, killed or jailed. Not for truth but the reflected opposite. Until the brilliance of the individual, the American pioneer returns to lay stake or claim upon the land and is again willing to fight the savage or tyrant, we shall diminish into that social state of loathing until we hate each other and life. I am of the essence of Robin Hood and the story has modern players but your response is either truthful or a reflection, individual or collective, a brilliance or candle power, of fear or knowledge. Why are you being made to feel guilty for the virtue of property ownership and truth in contracting? All I can say is check the premise. “Want something for free” flickers out of the candle a retort from the banker to shame you for challenging or duplicating his action of getting something for free. How about using what you did get for free, your freedom and your brilliance.