Monday, February 18, 2008
What I believe (February 6, 2008)
It seems Scott from crimeland wants to know what I believe. I will venture to answer this though I will say I am spending credits from our childhood and not from your great show of friendship on this blog. I don't believe in blowhards who use their own judgment as God's. I don't think the modern church is Christian. I don't think what has become the model Christian in today's western culture would recognize Jesus. I believe the way they behave and their ignorance of His kingdom dynamics is proof positive. I see some sincerity about your faith in what you express but I see way too much retarded Christianity. You think I'm judgmental because I tell you the truth. No that would be love. Love always speaks the truth whether popular or not. Here is how I judge you and the other retards on this blog. First I measure you against the word of God. John 5:30 As I hear, I judge; and my judgment is just, because I seek to do not my own will but the will of him who sent me. " John 112:49-50 "/or / have not spoken on my own, but the Father who sent me has himself given me a commandment about what to say and what to speak. And I know that his commandment is eternal life. What I speak, therefore, I speak just as the Father has told me." You'll say I have a messiah complex because I use the words of Jesus, but I ask you how am I supposed to be different? Do I have the freedom to speak my own words? You use this freedom as one bold enough to substitute your judgment for Christ. That is why I oppose you and the fruities of this world. Christ does not change as you acknowledge and as He spoke against this arrogant self worship in the past He continues to speak. Do you know what God is doing with the UNITED STATES as a master? No! Do you know how the FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM fits into end time prophecy? No! Do you know where God is taking the world and what targets He is hitting? No! Do you understand the interplay between the government and the church within the ministry of Christ to this world? No! Do you know what God would require of you as a family man in the midst of all this global prophecy? No! I do know all these things and they were all factored into my work with Dorean. These truths effect all my decisions because I never want to bet against God. You bet against Him all the time and then are fool enough to ask Him to bless it. You have enough sense for me to pose this question. If Christ is the one and only true God whom presented Himself to humanity and bore them as His own, do you think that this whole exercise might just be about bringing Him all the glory, honor, and praise? I can hear you say "yes" here. Good then let me ask you this. Every Christian has an individual walk with the Lord. He stands in every instance naked before His God. He will either be shamed like Adam in his nakedness or will find a covering of grace that removes his shame. I suspect you have found this grace. Why is it then that you pontificate about my waywardness when I speak of secrets only heard in this private place? You don't repent because you love God. Repentance is loving God. I have been in this relationship with Christ a time and half longer than you and you think you are my teacher? Don't be a fool. I've forgotten more than you've even learned yet. You probably think I am making my boast which makes you a judge wiser than me. That is my point. You can't even understand the spirit of my speech because you have not been taken to the places in Christ I have, which I can tell because I've been everywhere you've been. I can map your future on principle alone. I am only entertaining you because I believe God caused our paths to cross for good reason. You have started in faith but have picked up too much pious bullshit and are bogged down. God knew I would love you enough to show you the ropes so to speak. That I will, but you will not listen until you see with your eyes my victory. That is evidence of your immaturity. If you really knew what God was doing in this age you would be my supporter. Instead you make yourself look good to a bunch of strangers as though you have an advantage over me. I'm in prison for my obedience but you are in prison by your ignorance. I know I am incarcerated but you do not. How are you going to function in the community of the saints when you haven't learned to love yourself. Loving yourself is loving God. How can you repent when you've convinced yourself that your wrong is right by religious traditions. God is so much bigger than your puny ethics. You think you can systematize God down to a formula that will please Him? You haven't begun to know him until you trust Him enough to humble yourself in faith. Not run from the pain of the exercise, not finding a martyr's resolve for eternity, but living in all the risk between His promises and their fulfillment. Getting along in this world is a sure bet you're a coward not a Christian. I believe I had no option other than to take my cause to the mat. As a man I want to get along in this world. I want comfort. I want to be with my wife like you. My God doesn't have that for me at the moment. Because He can't trust you with such a call you ridicule me! Give up your wife, reputation, and wealth. Could you do it? If you're honest I bet you'd say "no". Until you are willing to go there you will never know what I know in Christ. When you learn this fact your ears will be opened and your mouth will be shut. Faith, Hope and Love are essential and yet the greatest of these is love. You don't love me and you don't love the Christ who love me. If you were in Christ you would love me. You would know that I am about my father's business. Christ's body doesn't feed on itself. All members nurture and bear up the weak. If you were part of that body you would gladly receive strength from me. You would delight in the work I've been called to do. You would be in the throne room praying the appropriate word of God over my situation. You would likewise be confident in God's victory. You would support my faith and share in it. Instead you are regurgitating sermonettes of milk from twenty years of baby walk. You don't know how to apply these scriptures you quote because you don't know the context in which Christ spoke them. Do you know how many stages were prophesied over the church and what stage we are in currently? Do you know if your ideas are compatible with this prophecy? No! Do you know if the church and the government are supposed to conflict prior to God's return here in AMERICA? No! Don't you find if funny that you think Bush is a Christian more than myself? I live my walk and he like you talks in wonders and miracles. How are you going to distinguish the truth from a lie? If you can't see it in your friend that God brought again before your attention what will happen if an angel of light comes a calling? I do purposely trick you. I do purposely test you. I do purposely love you. You can't figure out how to write to me and get on with the business of why God brought us back together again because you're afraid? Why would God throw you to the wolves. You quote the lilies, and the birds scripture but you don't understand it. I know who I am in Christ and I know who you are. I have no fear especially when I can easily discern when God lights my path. You wouldn't be such a blowhard retard on here if you followed God's lead and actually attempted to get to know me and be a friend. Maybe I needed your friendship just now and your selfish little ass decided to rob God by being His master. Perhaps He better clear His plans better with you next time. I believe in a God much larger than the one you know. If you want to truly know what I believe you will now be obedient to what you've already been told and perhaps obedience will be a common denominator that rekindles our friendship and you will find the Christ in me and the Christ in you are the same mediator. Until then if you can't figure out what I believe from this you may never be able to.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
26 comments:
Comes now the Bilge Report for February 6, 2008
In which Kurt delivers his so educated, knowing and studied opinions on the church and Christianity in general. Once again trying to cloak his fraud and deceit under a cloak of pseudo religious nonsensical ramblings.
Pardon me while I am not impressed. I have a really hard time taking anything seriously from a proven liar and fraud who is a serial blasphemer.
Has anyone seen that interview with Charlie Manson? Almost as scary...
LIKE WISE.
I thought it was only me, but apparently others see it too. As the day of reckoning draws nearer, the facade cracks and Kurt seems to become ever more shrill and desperate for someone, anyone, to believe he is not a deluded idiot, but the living, breathing messenger of God, preaching to the unappreciative masses.
Sorry, Kurt, but that doesn't work for me.
I don't know whether I believe in God, but I know anyone who can set out to deceive and defraud as many people as you have, under the color of piety and perverted reason cannot be a representative of good. Hearing voices in your head, maybe. but getting messages from God on your own private wavelength, sorry, 'fraid not.
The mighty Department of Justice got their marks and all was well with the world. Not quite, ruled the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. Much to the chagrin of the Assistant United States Attorneys, it appears the over zealous prosecutors and judge in the 2004 trial failed to allow Pamelas testimony regarding her state of mind as to her intent to break the law to be heard during the trial. As has happened in other AAA trials the government, and in some cases the defense attorneys, took all precautions to keep the defendants from telling their story. It appears this inconvenient truth threatened their desired outcome, for if the juries were allowed to hear defendants argue that there was no willfulness or knowledge of breaking any law they would be found not guilty. The Morans being good law abiding folk only wanted to help others less fortunate than themselves or help those more fortunate to find tax deferment advice from the CPA staff. Tax avoidance is not the same as tax evasion and is an acceptable practice sought out by people every day all over this country.
Unlike those victims/defendants that were tried before them, the Morans, with the assistance of Michael Minns, his daughter Attorney Rain Minns, Peter Mair and John Zulauf, heard angels singing when all counts of the indictment received a not guilty verdict. The IRS skein of convictions stopped when the Jury of 12 citizens heard the truth and exposed the callous disregard the tax enforcers have for honest people looking for investment advantages. More importantly the acquittals proved that everyone in the organization below the Moran’s level, including those that promoted the program never had any knowledge that the program was anywhere near illegal, a point that the IRS or the DOJ has not bothered to prove. In fact, the prosecutions occurred because the people involved did not hold elite status as determined by government bureaucrats.
Let's put our slogan out in front of the public so the government cannot suppress the information on direct un-apportioned taxes anymore. The government's fraudulent claim that the prohibition was overturned by the 16th Amendment, is rebutted by the STEWARD case, 24 years after the 16th Amendment was passed. Nothing has changed that since 1937.The last direct apportioned tax was in 1861.
Everyone should put the slogan on direct taxes on their signature lines. That is the issue.
No direct un-apportioned tax confirmed by the US Supreme Court rulings in CHAS. C. STEWARD MACH. CO. v. DAVIS, 301 U.S. 548, 581-582(1937)
We have a million lawyers, and are left without the Rule of Law. Trial lawyers will ultimately have to answer to God.
May we defeat the Enemies of our Constitution.
Full story on IRS's defeat:
http://www.newswithviews.com/Snook/edward5.htm
Interesting comments and parallel's between this trial & the Dorean Group trial:
"Much to the chagrin of the Assistant United States Attorneys, it appears the over zealous prosecutors and judge in the 2004 trial FAILED TO ALLOW Pamela’s TESTIMONY regarding her STATE OF MIND AS TO HER INTENT TO BREAK THE LAW to be heard during the trial. As has happened in other AAA trials the government, and in some cases the defense attorneys, took all precautions to keep the defendants from telling their story. It appears this inconvenient truth threatened their desired outcome, for if the juries were allowed to hear defendants argue that there was no willfulness or knowledge of breaking any law they would be found not guilty.
More importantly the acquittals proved that everyone in the organization below the Moran’s level, including those that promoted the program NEVER HAD ANY KNOWLEDGE THAT THE PROGRAM WAS ANYWHERE NEAR ILLEGAL, a point that the IRS or the DOJ HAD NOT BOTHERED TO PROVE."
Son of Sam thought he heard God, too.
Turned out to be the neighbor's dog.
God has a perfect plan for this world and an outside entity correcting the economic woes and injustices isn't it.
As the end times play out, it will be up to believers to recognize the anti-christ and turn away from the beast.
That choice will result in death...and then LIFE!
To live is Christ, to die is gain and the Dorean fiasco is a meaningless waste.
Fred did you a disservice in rearing you up in delusion, Kurt.
So sad.
One teensy weensy little problem here Moogs, the great win here is of we’re too stupid to walk and chew gum at the same kind, and this particular defense, Cheek, only works on tax cases. Basically, the Morans worked for a collections of con artists, sound familiar? in this case Anderson’s Ark, which was a huge ponzy scheme set up to defraud the IRS, and they were employees. What got them off eventually was that they claimed they were too stupid to know that what they were doing, tax fraud , was illegal or tax fraud. They should have been allowed to present that at trial and they weren’t, so in the end it got tossed. They ultimately were acquitted, because the jury thought they were in fact too stupid to walk and chew gum at the same time and so they were acquitted on conspiracy charges. Roughly the same acquittal Snipes got, he was too stupid to know he as committing a crime, doesn’t change the fact that he still has to pay the taxes and penalties, plus some jail time for failure to file. A pyrrhic victory at best, and of no use to the dim duo. Additionally, since the supreme dumb one has already been convicted of fraud once before it would be a stretch to claim he didn’t know what he was doing, and in any event, it won’t fly for this type of crime. Particularly since the any reasonable person rule says they should have known they were doing something wrong.
Nice try Moogie, you must have had to hunt really hard for this one, but still no cookie. Incidently, saw the great motion that dim and dimmer filed, more hogwash, and thoroughly trashed in the opinion. More nonsense, and not even particularly good nonsense at that.
Neo, you talkin out your ass again. Your the sad one pard.
Notarial dissent: I think the court case I cited is applicable since the criminal trial didn't show the mal intent of the Dorean Group nor did the prosecution show by witnesses that they intended to break the law from the very beginning.
You say that Kurt is a two time offender, however, you haven 't shown that he has done anything different than what the banks do.
The Dorean business plan showed that they were basing their model & challenge ON THE LAW & reasons why they believed their challenge was legitimate.
Also, those that promoted the program NEVER HAD ANY KNOWLEDGE THAT THE PROGRAM WAS ANYWHERE NEAR ILLEGAL, a point that the the DOJ HAD NOT BOTHERED TO PROVE TOO. All they alleged was that clients were involved in mail fraud because there was a belief the banks were affected, but in reality no bank fraud or damages were ever proven or shown, if that makes any sense to anyone. If there was a conspiracy of some kind by the Dorean Group, all doubt needs to be removed, and there is still too many reasons to show that they had good intentions from the very beginning & truly believed even now that the banks were the ones committing bank fraud, mail fraud, wire fraud & conspiracy.
Even now, even after the guilty verdicts of the defendants, there is still alot of doubt that exists as to the good intentions and full disclosure of the banks themselves.
Like taxation & getting straight answers from the IRS, it has been equally difficult to impossible, getting straight answers and cooperation from lenders as to validation of the debt, where the monies come from, getting bookkeeping ledgers, getting original promissory notes unaltered, and full disclosure from the lenders.
In this difficult and confusing environment, the lenders have created a distrusting relationship between lender & borrower that in essence fostered the unavoidable court trial battle and the sincere belief and loyal following that the Dorean Group is still fighting the good fight.
JD opening admits he doesn't know if he believes in God, but than concludes he knows how God works, for example Kurt couldn't be listening to God's direction.
Then JD concludes he knows that Kurt set out to intentionally deceive & defaud even though he gives no real evidence of such. Maybe that conclusion as to Kurt's integrity is as strong as his belief and knowledge of the existence of God.
JD, what you don't understand, is the same thing that you can't appreciate or don't appreciate. What you don't understand is what makes you an idiot, and what makes you shrill, deluded, and pious and those are just the nice and true things I have to say about you. LOL
Dont worry....The banks and those that help them are about to experience a BIG BOOMERANG effect.
Mooogs, Kurt is a twice convicted fraud artist. Since the crimes he was convicted of, both times, had nothing to do with financial, your remark, as usual is pointless and irrelevant. In any event, there is not even the pretense that the banks have gone around filing false documents, so again pointless.
The Dorean business plan was a blueprint for massive fraud, and nothing more. There was no legal basis for any of the actions taken as was proven in the civil case when their documents were labeled and declared to be an official crock.
There was nothing legal about anything that AAA was doing, anymore than there was anything legal, moral, or ethical about anything the dim duo was contemplating, and what they were contemplating was massive fraud, and those were the only charges brought. In any event, the Dorean dimbos were not convicted of anything other than mail fraud, so as usual, the rest of you argument is just more hot air and nonsense.
Even now, the intentions of the banks are and were irrelevant, since they were not part of the mail fraud charges, so again more of your hot air and nonsense. What the banks did or didn't do is irrelevant to dum and dummer filing fraudulent documents, for which they were convicted.
1) dim and dimmer had no standing to be demanding or requesting anything, and two mortgages operate under a different set of laws, so again more nonsense to cover up the actual intention. 2)The banks didn't have to pay attention to the nonsense. and 3)the arguments are totally bogus, and in any case irrelevant to the validity of the mortgage. The loan documents, copies of which the clients/victims had in their possession were validation of the debts.
Bs, the unavoidable court battel was the result of the two dimboids filing bogus documents and in trying to defraud the banks, as well as their clients/vicitims.
Give it up Moogs, your excuses are getting lamer, and Kurt is just getting shriller and more appalling as this farce proceeds to it's inevitable and unpleasant end. A very very long jail term.
Moogums says:
Then JD concludes he knows that Kurt set out to intentionally deceive & defaud even though he gives no real evidence of such.
____________________________
Geez, Moogs. did you miss the whole Trial thing, there??
You're correct; I don't know if I believe in God, nor, for the record, do I claim to know how he (or she) works, if in fact he(or she) exists.
What I do know is that, as I said earlier to Kurt (not you), anyone who can set out to deceive and defraud as many people as you have, under the color of piety and perverted reason cannot be a representative of good.
Perhaps you missed that the last word there is "good", not "God".
Notarial Dissent said: "dim and dimmer had no standing to be demanding or requesting anything,"
_____________________________
So you must also believe that a trustee has no legal rights or interest, or standing either. You must also believe that a trustee doesn't have the legal authority to look after the best interests of the trust either.
Not when the trust is bogus, and the intent is to defraud.
That aside, again, what they were requesting was outside the requirements of any legal process or action and so, like them was void as to law, fact, and reality. If there had been any legally valid complaint, then the correct and lawful course would have been to go to court and get a legal determination. That wasn't done, for the simple fact that there was no justicable complaint, and they knew it.
The final intent was to commit fraud.
Notarial Dissent said: "the correct and lawful course would have been to go to court and get a legal determination. That wasn't done."
________________________________
You forgot about the dozen civil cases where a civil determination or precedence of some kind in their favor was attempted by the Dorean Group where Spielbauer was denied any victory.
So you believe that a lawful determination or settlement can't be had outside court through arbitration or mediation? You're such a black or white thinker, and many times this type of thinking shows you have no imagination whatsoever.
Are you saying arbitration or mediation, aren't considered lawful, binding, or correct? This silly statement from a man who has 20 years of experience in banking, business & law. Courts encourage settlements outside of court, or were you sleeping when this option was discussed in the classes & experience you took. Maybe you should go read a book on arbitration or mediation and administrative procedures.
If the Dorean Group was truly a scam from the very begining, why would they take both alternatives to achieve justice, (1) the court through the Civil cases that were lost & also (2) the administrative approach, where they believed and hoped court would not be necessary to accomplish their objectives.
If the Dorean Group was only interested in longevity in staying in business, which Judge Beanhead says the longevity issue was a major shortcoming in making alot of money, why did they do it? If the Dorean Group would have avoided the civil courts all together, they wouldn't have run into Judge Alsup & hence they would have had more clients & would have taken in more money & would have known that this court exposure or loss in the courts, would bring them down quicker.
Due to the strategy they took, the only reasonable conclusion is that money wasn't the main motivation. If money isn't the main motivation, than labeling the Dorean Group as scam artists is a far stretch.
Moogey’s latest rationalization
You forgot about the dozen civil cases where a civil determination or precedence of some kind in their favor was attempted by the Dorean Group where Spielbauer was denied any victory.
You never cease to amaze with your lame attempts at rationalization Moogs, if it wasn’t so pathetic it would be even more funny than it already is.
I don’t forget anything, although I’m sure you would like everyone to forget that Speilbauer was stupid enough to go into court with what he had to know was a fallacious argument, even he isn’t that stupid or ill trained that he couldn’t have known better, but when you are on the sinking end of a mediocre career, I guess you’ll grab at anything. Spielbauer didn’t have an arguable case, and he knew it when he went into court, and as he found out when it got tossed in court and he and the dim duo got sanctioned. It is a guaranteed career ender for a lawyer to bring a case based on fraud into a court, and particularly a Federal court and expect to get out with his hide intact. A case based on pure concocted fraud is not going to be precedential, because it is going to get tossed, just as this one did. If the dim duo actually believed in what they were doing they would have appealed the verdict when they had the opportunity, they didn’t, and didn’t for the simple fact that they would have lost, and any lawyer trying to appeal it would have been sanctioned for abuse of process. It was crap then, and it still stinks now.
Moogey twisting some more
So you believe that a lawful determination or settlement can't be had outside court through arbitration or mediation? You're such a black or white thinker, and many times this type of thinking shows you have no imagination whatsoever.
Moogs, there is a great deal of difference between imagination and hallucination, something you have yet to figure out. In order for something to be “lawfully” determined, it first must fit within the confines of the law, and must either be by agreement between the parties, or else as determined by “legal” court “process”, otherwise it is just the vaporings of a pair of idiots.
The big difference is that I happen to know what the legal processes are, and bothered to actually check to see what could or couldn’t be done, I didn’t just make it up out of whole delusion and then pretend it was real. Again, something you haven’t mastered.
Moogey trying to misconstrue
Are you saying arbitration or mediation, aren't considered lawful, binding, or correct?
Please feel free to quote me stating anything of the kind, or else pack it in. The only thing silly is you trying to twist something that wasn’t even said to justify a failed position.
Moogey just trying
If the Dorean Group was truly a scam from the very begining, why would they take both alternatives to achieve justice, (1) the court through the Civil cases that were lost & also (2) the administrative approach, where they believed and hoped court would not be necessary to accomplish their objectives.
If there had been even the littlest bit of legitimacy to the Dorean process, they would have gone into court at the outset instead of when they ran out of other options. I’m still impressed that they were able to find a desperate enough hack lawyer willing to risk his license to push what even an incompetent like Spielbauer had to know was a guaranteed loser. This does not speak of legitimacy, but of over blown ego and just plain stupidity. Since the so called “administrative approach” has no legal validity whatsoever, it too was an exercise in deceit.
Moogey trying a rationalization again
If the Dorean Group was only interested in longevity in staying in business, which Judge Beanhead says the longevity issue was a major shortcoming in making alot of money, why did they do it?
The long and the short answer is general ineptitude and overweening ego. Kurt is a blowhard who cannot/couldnot conceive of the fact that anyone could see through his “cleverly wrought scheme” and therefore he was in no danger of getting caught. That too proved to be as baseless as all his other pronouncements. Again, plainly and simply, incompetence and ego are the answers. That and the fact that there weren’t enough sufficiently stupid people available to hand over their last little bit of money.
Moogie’s last gasp
Due to the strategy they took, the only reasonable conclusion is that money wasn't the main motivation.
The only strategy the dim duo had was to rip off as many people as they could, and they just weren’t good enough at it to get much money and they were too stupid to bail when things started to cave in. Those Moogey boy are the marks of ego and stupidity, not planning and intention.
"they were too stupid to bail when things started to cave in." Yet he was also accused of running and hiding before he was arrested too. What do the naysayers really believe?
"Kurt was too smart to know he didn't concoct a scam". Yet he has sacrificed family, & liberty to do this. How smart is this if there is no higher purpose?
Moogey blather
"they were too stupid to bail when things started to cave in." Yet he was also accused of running and hiding before he was arrested too. What do the naysayers really believe?
The original statement is quite simple and clear. They were too dumb to bail before it collapsed, and waited until it was falling in around their ears, AND THEN they took off. Is that clear enough for you Moogs? They fled AFTER the roof caved in, can it be said any simpler than that? The rats ran AFTER the ship of fools had sunk.
more Moogey blather
"Kurt was too smart to know he didn't concoct a scam". Yet he has sacrificed family, & liberty to do this. How smart is this if there is no higher purpose?
No one, except you, ever said it was smart, it was pure ego on Kurt’s part, and he is real good about sacrificing other people, he has shown a marked and consistent lack of concern for anyone but Kurt in all of his dealings, as witness the original cast off family. Yep, a real humanitarian there Moogs, just the sort of person for you to idolize and emulate.
kurt said...
It seems Scott from crimeland wants to know what I believe. I will venture to answer this though I will say I am spending credits from our childhood and not from your great show of friendship on this blog.
_____________________________________
Why do all of your "spending credits" comments imply that I'm the debtor in our childhood relationship? Why do I owe you a greater measure of trust or respect than you owe me?
kurt said...
I don't think what has become the model Christian in today's western culture would recognize Jesus.
_____________________________________
This is such a pointless argument. When Christ returns again, He will be recognized... by everyone. Why do some Christians constantly try to use this comment to judge the walk of other Christians? Or to insinuate that "I know Jesus better than you"?
kurt said..
You don't love me and you don't love the Christ who love me. If you were in Christ you would love me.
_____________________________________
Presumptuous words, Kurt. You know as little about me after 30-some odd years as I know about you. Do you ever wonder why I continue in all of this? Do you think it is because of all the kindness YOU have shown ME since I showed up here? You're obligated by your mission to continue on this blog. I can walk away anytime I want to. So why don't I?
kurt said...
If you were part of that body you would gladly receive strength from me...
___________________________________
It would appear that it's OK for you to presume that I am not part of the body of Christ but if I question your sincerity, I'm a retard and a tool.
kurt said...
You would support my faith and share in it...
__________________________________
I can't support something that I don't believe any more than you can. This cuts both ways, Kurt.
kurt said...
You don't know how to apply these scriptures you quote because you don't know the context in which Christ spoke them.
_____________________________________
You, on the other hand, know exactly what God is saying. So I need your interpretation? I'm sure our friend SOP would counsel me against this. It sounds a little too much like the Roman Church to me. SOP, what do you think?
God is not willing that any should perish but that all should come to repentance. So why would He make His words difficult for us to comprehend? "I am the Way, the Truth and the Life. No man comes to the Father except through Me." No Kurt, I completely get it.
kurt said...
Don't you find if funny that you think Bush is a Christian more than myself?
_____________________________________
When did I say this? What makes you think you know me so well?
You wouldn't be such a blowhard retard on here if you followed God's lead and actually attempted to get to know me and be a friend. Maybe I needed your friendship just now and your selfish little ass decided to rob God by being His master. Perhaps He better clear His plans better with you next time. I believe in a God much larger than the one you know. If you want to truly know what I believe you will now be obedient to what you've already been told and perhaps obedience will be a common denominator that rekindles our friendship and you will find the Christ in me and the Christ in you are the same mediator. Until then if you can't figure out what I believe from this you may never be able to.
___________________________________
Maybe I haven't decided if I WANT be your friend again. If you had shown me the same level of kindness as kids that you show me now, I probably would have done everything in my power to avoid hanging around with you. If you needed my friendship just now, why have you said and done everything in your power to try to sabotage that? I don't think either of us can say for sure why our paths crossed again after so many years. I will continue to be obedient to what I believe God wants me to do and we will see what happens and whether or not I ever figure you out.
Post a Comment