In the federal system they have tried to coral all your Habeas Corpus rights into a restricted privilege through Title 28 U.S.C. section 2255. This has to be filed within the year after your appeal is final. That is about early August for us. I have already filed mine though I don’t suspect it will be readily received. There are still some games they wish to play with their procedures.
I learn quickly from these pirates. They have a fantastic confidence game going that they call justice. The facts at issue in any case brought to the game are for game proposes whole irrelevant. So right and wrong means nothing, truth and lies mean nothing, facts don’t matter. So if you have any intentions of winning the game you need a couple tools.
1. Willing to suffer loss, check 2. Be able to disconnect from the facts, check. 3. Study the game and nothing else, check 4. Develo0 a strategy to win the game while forgetting the issue that invited you, check. 5. Be patient and vigilant, check.
The four questions I posed to Alsup’s court in the 2255 are all about the game. All the facts I’m concerned with are game procedures. Not trial procedure or any fact mechanism. All I want to know is did you invite me improperly to your game? If you did it tampers with your image in the confidence business. So if you want to keep the game going you have to let me quit.
The next four blogs will be the questions I posed. The first three deal with the right of the government to bring me to the game. The last only deals with the ridiculous sentence. These are not the argument just the questions.
While everyone tries to make moral arguments about facts that don’ matter these perverts laugh at our foolishness. You might not understand the game but perhaps the questions will help.
13 comments:
State BRIEFLY every ground on which you claim you are being held unlawfully. BRIEFLY summarize the facts supporting each ground.
And these jokers are going to render an impartial opinion? I can already hear the stamp hit the paper. DENIED.
The next four blogs will be the questions I posed. The first three deal with the right of the government to bring me to the game. The last only deals with the ridiculous sentence. These are not the argument just the questions.
--------------------------
now they on the rite tack.
question is tho, did they allow the govt. to "bring them into the game"???
an they gonna find uot that the anweer is "yes"
how?
like sudden sam kendy yoze to say:
DONT SING ANYTHING!!! EVER!!!!!
cause once yo do, yo yo gauss cocked!!
YOU HAVE NOW ENTERED INTO A CONTRACT PER UCC/ADMIN LAW
IMO, they wwere better off sticking to they guns and fighting this from the UCC standpoint and admiralty law
of courst they still gonna lie, cheet and steal. but they doon that now, and it dont matta, so they were better off fightin it from the UCC/USC 72.11 venue.
"IF I ANSWER ANY OF YOUR QUESTONS, AM I ENTERING INTO A CONTRACK WITH YO???"
YO DISHONOR SAY: "STATE YO NAME FOR THE RECORD...are yo capt. kirk?"
"NO, I AM NOT"
"WHAT IS YO NAME?
'WAHT IS YO NAME JUDGE?
"I AM JUDGE BEANS"
"WERE YO BORN WITH THAT NAME?"
"IF I ANSWWER YO QUESTONS, AM I......"
"LET THE RECORD SHOW THAT I AM TRUSTEE/GRANTOR AND SCREWED PARTY CREDITOR/UCC-1 FOR "CAPTIN KIRK"
ETC
ETC
IMO, they were better off sticking to they guns and fighting this from the UCC standpoint and admiralty law
__________________________
They were denied to bring up the UCC period & this was determined in a court hearing by the Judge even before the trial started.
Judge ruled that the UCC had nothing to do with the United States Code, the statutes that originated or justified the so called mail & wire fraud charges.
To save the court time, the Judge ruled that anything in the UCC was irrelevant to the criminal charges & would only waste the court's time if the Defendants brought anything up pertaining to the UCC as a defense, SO THEY WERE NOT ALLOWED TO DO SO. Doing so, would only have the Judge say, "over ruled, irrelevant, Jury must pay no attention to this argument."
This tactic by the Judge is one of those "game procedures" to give the Defendants no way to attack the game of the US Attorneys fairly to make it a fair fight.
The Court wants to maintain the image that the game is fair, and either party has a fair shake or ability to win, but it isn't, and facts don't matter, it's all about how well you can play the game.
It's like in traffic court, when I mentioned that according to the USC (United States Code), it defined what a "motor vehicle" meant or what it really means. When I brought this up, the Judge was quick to say, that code is irrelevant to the case since I was in the jurisdiction of a State Court, and not a Federal Court. Yet the statute that talks about a "motor vehicle" is is relevant so all parties can know what a motor vehicle is, because I was charged with operating a "motor vehicle" without a license. If I wasn't operating a motor vehicle, than obviously no license is required, and the charge was bogus. That was the crux of my defense which I could prove I wasn't operating a "motor vehicle". So in order to know whether you are even operating a motor vehicle, you need the federal statute in order to prove the original and specific meaning of what a "motor vehicle" really is.
The Judge was quick to say you can't use federal law or federal definitions in a State court. This tactic is just another way to confuse what real definitions really mean of words.
If you can pervert a "word" to mean whatever you want it to say, you have the ability to make the person guilty in many ways. Not fair, it's not about what "real intent" means or what the original intent of the law really means.
The original intent of "mail fraud" was suppose to be applicable only to the banks when people of old were cheating the banks with bad paper, when this law was originally made. When the bank fraud charges were dropped, there could be no mail fraud based upon the original intent of this law and why it was passed into law in the first place.
It's all about cheating and perverting words to make definitions mean whatever the court wants it to mean. They won't even be consistent if it serves to convict. That's how you know you are being screwed & not charged with a real crime.
The Court's inconsistency and limited scope, and inability to look at all the facts, wherever they are found, proves that it's all about the game, and not about justice.
Kurt,I am one of your clients from the past. I need a quitclaim from you and Scott to proceed with the sale of my house. How can I get in touch with you and Scott to complete paperwork?
Raise the debt ceiling because we [the Congress] do not want to be blamed for defaulting on the debt [that we created].
"In a withering speech before members of the Russian Academy of Science in Moscow, Prime Minister Putin [photo top left] branded the United States current monetary policy as “hooliganism” and stated, “We, thankfully or not, cannot print a reserve currency. But what are they (the Americans) doing? They simply spit nails, turn on the printing press and throw money to the world, in order to resolve their urgent problems.”
http://www.whatdoesitmean.com/index1501.htm
They were denied to bring up the UCC period & this was determined in a court hearing by the Judge even before the trial started.
---------------------
da jugs may have bin rite on dat on.
UCC battles ARE NOT FAWT IN A COATROOM.
they are fought using no tries and admin law, not coatrooms.
the judge denying has/would have had no baring on da case.
they would have had to do like dat hand sum guy did a fill lean afta line aganst every nun, jugs, coat clerk,, prosector..evry nun and paster too.
would it have mattered if they did?
probly not.
but it would up not mattering anyway, as they still wind up in jail.
it like, 'pick yo pison' as they say.
eether way, it stink.
lokk at jerry kane did??
he was starting to win case afta case using change of the turstees, from da bank to anther trustee.
and it was starting to catch on.
so wah hoppens?
they catch up with him on a highway and shoot him dead for nothing.
but at least he was winning the battels showing that that was the way to do it.
Housing prices to fall another 20% over the next two years causing people underwater on their homes to go from 23% to 40% thanks to excess inventories on the market. Seems to me the credit repair business should be flourishing right now:
http://finance.yahoo.com/blogs/daily-ticker/20-drop-housing-cause-recession-2012-says-gary-161445494.html
Moody threatens to downgrade the credit of the U.S. government due to their possible default on August 3, 2011. A default is almost un-imagineable in the short term, but what if:
http://news.yahoo.com/moodys-warns-may-downgrade-us-credit-rating-214447495.html
Higher interest rates? They seem to be inevitable. We have been spoiled by low interest rates for such a long time, that rising interest rates almost seem to be something we can't or won't even consider or accept. We can't pay the payment on the low rates we have now. Can you imagine the government having to pay twice the interest rate on government backed bonds due to a lower credit rating or interest rates rising? The deficit could skyrocket just due to the increased interest due. Many Buyers of these bonds have quit buying them completely due to the low interest rate offered & the risk associated with them, so does the federal reserve & government really have a choice anymore at maintaining low rates? Seems like the party is going to end soon, maybe by next year sometime. Now the FED say's they are going to do more "quantitative easing", like they stopped doing that like only a few weeks ago supposedly, but you can probably know it hasn't stopped and the printing presses are on 24 hours a day overload. The system will be flooded with paper notes until it collapses on it's own.
FLASH MOBS IN SPAIN PREVENTING FUCLOSERS!
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-07-13/dial-a-crowd-confronts-debt-laden-spanish-banks-by-thwarting-foreclosures.html
But while gold may continue to ascend toward the $2,000 (and well above levels can't be ruled out) there's another problem at hand: The risk of government confiscation.
Not only was gold ordered confiscated in April of 1933, but in addition (and lesser known) was the confiscation order for all silver in private hands embodied in Executive Order 6814 which was enacted in August of 1934.
Just released today, the SECRET LOCATION of a New Federal Reserve Property. In a densely wooded area in Richmond Virgina lies the heavily guarded office building. According to a report, "Information about the function and location of the property are classified by the Federal Reserve System, and employees are prohibited from discussing the site with anyone outside the organization."
VIEW HERE
http://www.activistpost.com/2011/07
/secret-federal-reserve-location.html
July 11, 2011
Post a Comment