I heard a quote from Wesley “Your Christ is my Devil”. I could relate to his sentiment The Christ of the gospel message is completely misunderstood by the corrupt human heart. When a true Christian has a relationship with God through Christ he is easily criticized for his obedience which is foreign to all they know as righteous. It is why so many clamored to have Christ crucified. He knew that His true professions of the Godhead would be reflected by those who garner their righteousness from the devil.
What is so despicable about the judicial system Scott and I faced and still fight is that it borrows the righteous credibility of God’s righteousness buy follows the tenets of the devil. Christians foolishly allow themselves to be duped by the profession of righteousness and presume in their ignorance that God’s will is being performed. I tell you the fact by the knowledge of Christ, The true Christ, that our judicial system is akin to witchcraft and none who practice its art can know the Lord. If they profess a relationship with Christ their Christ is the devil of the true gospel.
I have had friends and I will use that term loosely who have studied the word of God with me. Yet when the institutions of law merely make the cursory claims of God’s authority they ignore the witness they have of me and condemn me as unjust. This is the work of the devil and true Christian love cannot practice it. So when you make the profession of Christ I am not easily moved and I will judge you by whose report you believe before I call you brother.
As for the judicial system it has made an enemy with Christ in me. I have no fear of the quantity or the size of the giants God throws at my rock. They will be defeated as Goliath because the true Christ of the gospel is more than a conjurer and is not deceived by the devil’s false righteousness.
As to the battles I face I do not grow weary and have always seen the victory inherent in Christ. So if you cannot understand my determination against or contempt for all things labeled lawful fear not it is easily understood: Christ is my devil.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
4,870 comments:
«Oldest ‹Older 3001 – 3200 of 4870 Newer› Newest»Sunday, September 11, 2016
Blowing the Lid Off the Banks!
BLOWING THE LIDS OFF THE BANKS!!!
Here ye! Here ye! The team of Americans 1000 against SPS and ALL other thieves is having a a nationwide whistle blower call Monday night, September 12, 2016
Linda Alamonte, largest whistle blower on mortgage fraud in the nation, has agreed to come on board and she is blowing the whistle like you will not believe!
We ARE going to hear what the SEC and CFPB hid and it is all public now as Linda is pissed that they buried it in all the hearings and more.
BUT she has the proof and it is all in the depos and more that she was in.
Gloves are off and the truth is going to set us free, and the work Anna has done, combined with proving the departments are ALL acting through fraud upon the court is going to be the golden ticket that brings all this together!
HUGE FOLKS!
Hosted by the Adventures Into Sovereignty team and Featuring Our Investigative Journalist Rene Powers
Topics will include:
• Linda's evidence
• Group lawsuits
• FDCPA joinder or something as such
• Citizens arrests
• Whistle blower cases
• Identity theft of our estates
• Suits against DOJ, FDIC, DO Real estate et al. for failing us all!!!
• Shutting down board of supervisors based on violating county charters allowing their third party contractors, sheriff's-police-judges, to damage homeowners (Orange county houses the criminal database for recording of counterfeit docs across the country. Check to see if your county is using the S.E.C.U.R.E software owned by Orange County-Riverside-Los Angeles-San Diego counties)
CALL IN INFORMATION: (PLEASE be in a quiet place and be courteous to mute yourself with *6)
On 1,000 lines available
so get on early!
(Can't make the call? YES, we will be recording)
Free Conference Call
Conference Dial-in Number: (605) 475-4000
Access Code: 204661#
Help Support Linda who has sacrificed so much to get the word out and is still risking her and her family’s well being to help homeowners across the County:
Read more of Linda’s Story and Sacrifice in Huffington Post Here
In the Rolling Stone here
AIS is Revving Up and
We've Got More News Coming!
Subscribe to Our Newsletter
Join us On Facebook
btw, they have spelled her name incorrectly; its linda almonte,no 'a' after the 'l'
CALL IN INFORMATION: (PLEASE be in a quiet place and be courteous to mute yourself with *6)
On 1,000 lines available
so get on early!
(Can't make the call? YES, we will be recording)
Free Conference Call
Conference Dial-in Number: (605) 475-4000
Access Code: 204661#
so yo waitin fo?
CALL IN!!!!
AND ALSO....FYI
Published on Sep 10, 2016
9/10/2016 From another contact !!
The International Court, the Hague, issued a proclamation today, based on an "anonymous" writ they received, that mandates the rv/gcr be released and finalized asap, all under contract law since all countries signed off at the G20.
Basically, they said "TONIGHT" or all involved will be sanctioned under the different agreements and contracts in place. They are the int'l court of justice, they have jurisdiction.
Now, we will see if the countries abide by the mandate or suffer the consequences I use anonymous because I know where it came from' The silence has been shattered. The International Court in the Hague issued an order that overrides the Obama. Redemption codes were entered this morning and exchanges begin today. There can be no more delays.
…. Most people have heard this so many times that they are numb ... but today is the day and it cannot be stopped sanctions are very tough in this one let me be blunt, everyone is at an OH CRAP moment right now.
The Hague received a similar writ weeks ago, before the accords agreements were signed, and did nothing at that time. This time, contracts were the important factor, and the "justices" were told to show some testicular fortitude or they would have any testicualrs ever again, got me?
All countries were foisted on their own petards, so to speak
That is the end for now, we wait and see how long they are willing to dally and dance King O has been rebuffed 6 times in the Supreme Court and 14 times in the District Courts on the RV for trying to stop it. He told the Chinese G20 that the RV would not happen and they took him apart for 3 hours and told him off. I think personally that the Chinese were the driving force in getting the Hague court to act with all the evidence against him. There
hey! mongrel, r u still around???
When will I mortgages be cancelled? Kurt said they would be and his Father did to.
Kevin: Your mortgage was cancelled of record as part of the Dorean Process paperwork so Kurt & Dr. Fred were right in what they said, when a deed of reconveyance or a discharge of mortgage was filed in your County Records on your mortgage/deed of trust. The problem is that the banks don't recognize this paperwork. They call it fraudulent and the US attorneys charged them with conspiracy to commit mail, bank & wire fraud, and the brainwashed & stupid petite jury confirmed this Conspiracy charge which b gave Kurt & Scott a minimum of 20 years in prison, just on this one count, so it's probably not possible to get any Court to recognize these releases of mortgages. Every State in 2004 passed an Act which became law which gave 3rd parties the right to discharge mortgages if it could be shown that the mortgage was paid off which in essence the administrative judgment defaults proved this in the Dorean Process paperwork; the only thing that was lacking was that Kurt & Scott didn't have their own title company as the 2004 law says that title agents can discharge mortgages. Kurt & Scott as trustees of your trust were in essence an authorized 3rd party agent though acting as a bank agent or title agent in your behalf, so I can't see how their actions constituted any conspiracy, scam, or scheme as alleged by the US Attorneys as they were just following existing laws anyway. Also the court records, the court sentencing hearing proved that the banks suffered no financial loss as it was right there in the record, and the US Attorneys agreed and that's why no bank fraud was ever considered or talked about, or brought to the Jury yet the main charge that put them away, was "conspiracy" to commit mail, wire, and bank fraud. It's all kind of a glaring contradiction since federal statutes and laws which the courts must follow, basically say with no victim, and no loss, there is no crime. This is why both are 100% innocent and why all the discharges should be recognized as valid by the courts because it's already a settled matter. Your discharge is a settled matter long before any criminal charges were filed. The US Attorneys made the Jury think that the Dorean clients were the victims, as they paid money and many got foreclosed upon, as victims were a requirement to get a conviction against Kurt & Scott. The clients could never be victims because they got what they paid for, a public release of their mortgage. Clients aren't going to get their homes back, and probably not even a recognized discharge, so that only leaves a financial settlement to make the clients whole and that could only be an event in the future, and no one knows exactly when that will take place at this time, however, it's a fact that Kurt has said recently that "money is no longer a problem", so figure that out yourself what that means. Also recently Kurt hired two law firms to get some of his business resolved.
da moonage will neva b cancel, but yo may get to tast da stalemints, if not to stail fo da self life.
Mortgages are not going to be cancelled until the money is cancelled. What are you going to do with more FRNs, buy another mortgage? FRN's can't pay for anything, let alone pay for or cancel a mortgage. Money IS the problem. Why does Kurt keep dangling the rotten carrot in front of people when he knows the carrot is rotten?
"....until money is cancelled."
that may happen soon. on oct 2, the chinsense yaun goes into the currency basket and it is somewhat gold backed. the dollar is going to start taking a massive hit.
http://www.stockgumshoe.com/reviews/strategic-intelligence/is-september-30-really-d-day-for-the-u-s-dollar-as-jim-rickards-is-warning/
Even with the new currency, the US Dollar will represent 40% of the new currency, in the new basket of currencies, so the Dollar won't take the massive hit that you say, and the date of Oct. 1, 2016 is just a guess anyway. I don't see the US Dollar being replaced anytime soon.
All of these newsletters including Agora and Stansberry are wrong more than they are right. They are selling newsletters remember. If you don't have a big story, than people don't subscribe.
Currently, the SDR (Special Drawing Rights) is made up of the U.S. dollar (41.9%), euro (37.4%), Japanese yen (9.4%), and pound sterling (11.3%). As of October 1, in a move that was announced last November but delayed a bit to allow more time for the Chinese Yuan to become more freely tradeable, the makeup will be: U.S. dollar relatively unchanged at (41.73%), and weightings for the euro (30.93%), yen (8.33%) and pound (8.09%) fall to make room for a 10.92% slot for the Chinese currency.
I am told, on May 28th 2016, the Federal Reserve officially defaulted on the national debt ($19.5 trillion).
So if that's true, how does the US Dollar continue?
"so the Dollar won't take the massive hit that you say
the dollar will begin a long, slow decline.
the issue is not so much how much the $ is represented in the currency basket, as it is how the chinse yawn is gold backed, which the dollar is not. so when you accumulated enough chinyin, then you can get gold from china for it, unlike the usa, where they will just tell you to buy thier bonds with it, ie, take on even more debt riddled doolas.
I am told, on May 28th 2016, the Federal Reserve officially defaulted on the national debt ($19.5 trillion).
So if that's true, how does the US Dollar continue?
in my understianding, it is continuing internally, but something else is used for intntl biz transactions, like gold, iol, etc.
US air cover for ISIS
"“We are reaching a really terrifying conclusion for the whole world: That the White House is defending Islamic State. Now there can be no doubts about that,” the RIA Novosti news agency quoted Russian Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova as saying.
If the US and its “coalition” are, in fact, covering for ISIS, then the end for that is near. Russia issued new Rules of Engagement today, instructing its air forces and Surface-to-Air missile batteries that they are to shoot down any aircraft threatening Syrian Army forces.
So the next “mistake” by a US pilot, will very likely be the last mistake that pilot makes. Once the S-300 anti-aircraft missile system “locks-on” to an aircraft, there is no escape and no defense. The system cannot be jammed and its missiles cannot be fooled by flares or chaff. An S-300 absolutely, positively, will hit and kill any aircraft it is fired at.
god- guranateed overnight delivery (of missal), assouluty, postifly DEAD!!! LOL!!!
heres how it will go down and bo will cancel electons and stay pres, at least for a while longer after jan 20 17'
PANIC as Fuel Supplies Run-out in Atlanta, Raleigh, Charlotte, Roanoke — More Refineries SHUTTING DOWN!
Tuesday, September 20, 2016 4:32
Motorists are beginning to panic and state Governors are declaring Emergencies as fuel supplies have begun running-out in several states as a result of a still-ruptured pipeline. New Jersey and New York are only days away from similar outages.
As of 5:00 PM EDT –BREAKING! Four U.S. States Just Declared A State Of Emergency!
Atlanta, GA – Numerous gas stations in and around Atlanta, GA are reporting NO FUEL.
Alpharetta GA – (northern suburb of Atlanta) LONG lines at the few stations which still have fuel – some stations OUT OF GAS!
Sandy Springs, Georgia (20 mins north of Atlanta) most of the local gas stations were OUT of gas, and those who did have it, were up to 3.50/gal … from 1.25/gal on Friday morning.
Kennesaw, GA – Numerous gas stations now empty
Augusta, GA Many Stations reporting NO DIESEL
Summerville, GA – Many stations now empty
Dallas GA – Many stations completely empty and those that HAVE gas are acharging over $3 and close to $4 at some stations.
Fairview TN, 40 miles west of Nashville — “There has been no gas here since Sat. “This morning there is one gas station up and running and it’s packed.”
Chesnee, SC – COMPLETELY out of gas – no idea when they will get some – has diesel
Goldsboro, NC, some gas stations out; some only let you get $30.00 max at a time. “People are stocking up”
New Bern, NC, cops patrolling to make certain they know which stations still have fuel for police, fire and EMS. Many stations already empty.
Charlotte, NC many stations now empty
Forest city, NC- Numerous stations out of gas – those that do have it are limiting to 10$ per Fill-up
Hendersonville, NC – Source tells SuperStation95 “Passed 4 stations on the way to work this morning, all were out of gas.”
Wilson, NC…. the 6 stations around my house are now out of everything except diesel.
Throughout Eastern NC few stations have gas
Raleigh, NC — A radio DJ (from the #1 station) was broadcasting live from his truck where he was waiting his turn in line at a gas station with 50+ people on line … and the station ran out of gas. Radio DJ says “Gonna be full panic level here this evening.”
Chapel Hil, NC This morning, 1 station with out-of-service bags on the pumps; 1 station with cars at every pump – 2 deep – waiting.
Lenoir, NC said pumps empty at many stations.
Forsyth, Stokes and Surry counties in NC are hit or miss. At least half of the stations in said counties are out of fuel.
Source:http://www.newsprepper.com/panic-fuel-supplies-run-atlanta-raleigh-charlotte-roanoke-refineries-shutting/#.V-Ea5IiLTcs
noone taking it seriously right now, but as more states run dry with shotages ,then at some point, they will realize whats happening and poof! state of emergency will be declared. after about a dozen sates declare this, then the feds will decalre a national emergy and cancel electons.
then the feds will decalre a national emergy and cancel electons....and then obooma will slay in offs....it will be an aboma nation fo sho
Every phase our Lives are in COMMERCE.
Every phase our Lives are in COMMERCE. You need your STRAWMAN to operate in COMMIERCE. Your STRAWMAN has a LICENSE to operate in COMMERCE (i.e. Drivers License, Marriage License, Handgun License, Occupational License, Building Permits, etc.). A License is good as long as you want it to be, by your permission. When there is a FINE for misuse of your License, you need to learn how to then switch the STRAWMAN to the Living Soul with the Right to Life, Liberty, Property, and the Pursuit of Happiness.
The STRAWMAN is a TRANSMITTING UTILITY that allows you to operate in COMMERCE with a LICENSE to conduct your COMMERCIAL Affairs.
Anyone operating in COMMERCE without a LICENSE is committing a COMMERCIAL CRIME. You and I need to learn how to become the REPRESENTATIVE or AGENT for the STRAWMAN and conduct all of his/her COMMERCIAL AFFAIRS without getting involved.
All crimes are Commercial and are then regulated by COMMERCIAL COURTS. COMMERCIAL CRIMES are Murder, Stealing, Dealing in illegal drugs, Prostitution, Practicing Law or making a Legal Determination without the Permission or Consent by Assent of any party to a Contract.
All COMMERCE is ruled by CONTRACTS. All COURTS (Tribunals) are ruled by, CONTRACTS. Absent a CONTRACT, the COURT (Tribunal) will proceed to write a CONTRACT under Cause/Case #___. Will the defendant rise, what is your name. This is the signature for the Contract. How do you plead - this is the giving, of SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION and becomes part of the Consideration for the Contract. All the arguments are the Offer for the Contract and the JUDGMENT is the Acceptance for the CONTRACT. The court takes a Complaint, turns it into a CHARGE against the STRAWNMAN, tries him/her on the CHARGE and then a JUDGMENT is rendered which is a Civil Action, a Claim, and this must then be Accepted by the LIVING SOUL.
You Accept the JUDGMENT in two ways, by silence and signing the JUDGMENT or by Appealing it to a higher court (a THIRD PARTY) who will then agree with the Judgment. Why would you argue Law or Codes, Rules,Regulations, Procedure, Statutes when the CONTRACT is the LAW in your Case.
The Redemption Process or Acceptance For Value can then authorize the Payment of the JUDGMENT. The Judgment should be signed by the Court Clerk for they are the Court. In most cases the Judge will sign the Judgment hoping that you will accept the contract by one of the above two ways, by silence or signature or Appeal to a THIRD PARTY.
Another way is the Rejection of Contracts allowed under Truth in Lending and when the Contract is about
Mortgages it comes under Regulation Z and Truth in Lending.
ALWAYS REMEMBER, everything is in COMMERCE and is ruled by CONTRACTS.
Codes, Rules, Regulations, Procedure, Statutes apply only to the Corporation that they were written for. You do not Argue Codes, Rules, Regulations, Statutes in COMMERCE - you argue CONTRACTS. If there is no CONTRACT,there is no CASE. There is no CONTRACT with a Policeman, Government Official, Federal Agent, or Federal Agency, even with a License. A government or Corporation is a FICTION and cannot sign a CONTRACT or enforce one unless you enter into their Organization or Corporation as an employee and argue their Codes, Rules,Regulations, Procedure, whereby they then use these to enforce a Contract.
DISGUSTING... Listen to girl...she need to look in da the mirror for da RACIST
http://vidmax.com/video/146208-MUST-SEE-Daughter-of-a-black-man-just-shot-by-police-unleashes-a-slew-of-racist-remarks-as-she-tries-to-brand-them-murderers
Petitioner sues six Federal judges and 41 others to recover home stolen two years ago under color of authority
Link: https://supremecourtcase.wordpress.com/
The subject of this post is a comprehensive suit at equity (see post of March 18, 2016, infra, for the principles of equity) for a constructive trust based on constructive fraud, filed with the 284th District Court of Montgomery County, Texas, August 11, 2016, and amended August 16, 2016.
The root word of “constructive” is construe (not construct):
“con׳strue . . . to determine the meaning of ; interpret ; explain, as to construe a foreign language (into English) ; to construe one’s conduct ; to construe a clause or a law.” A Standard Dictionary of the English Language, Isaac K. Funk, Editor in Chief (Funk & Wagnalls Company: New York, 1903) (hereinafter “Funk & Wagnalls”), p. 404.
“constructive, adj. Legally imputed; having an effect in law though not necessarily in fact. ● Courts usu. give something a constructive effect for equitable reasons .” Black’s Law Dictionary, Seventh Edition, Bryan A. Garner, Editor in Chief (West Group: St. Paul Minn., 1999), p. 309.
A constructive trust is not an actual trust per se but an equitable remedy imposed by the court to redress wrongs and prevent unjust enrichment resulting from, among other things, constructive fraud; to wit:
“constructive trust . . . a trust set up by a court to deal with property that has been acquired by fraud or by inequitable means; specifically : a trust so formed to distribute property where distribution and enjoyment under the original transaction was against the principles of equity.” Webster’s Third New International Dictionary: Unabridged, (Merriam-Webster, Incorporated: Springfield, Mass., 2000), s.v. “Constructive trust.”
“Constructive fraud occurs when there is a breach of a legal or equitable duty that, irrespective of guilt, the law declares fraudulent because of its tendency to deceive others, to violate confidence, or to injure public interests . . . . An example of constructive, as opposed to actual, fraud involves the failure to disclose facts when there is a duty to make a disclosure. . . .” William V. Dorsaneo III, Texas Litigation Guide, Vol. 4, Ch. 55 (Matthew Bender & Company, Inc.: New York, 2016) (“Dorsaneo”), p. 55-5.
“The most important and common type of constructive fraud supporting the imposition of constructive trusts involves the breach of a fiduciary or confidential relationship . . . . When an abuse of a confidential or fiduciary relationship is alleged, the burden of proof is on the fiduciary to establish the fairness of the transaction, that there was full disclosure of all facts and circumstances, and that there was good faith and the absence of pressure or influence on the part of the fiduciary . . . .” Id. at 55-8.
“Fiduciary relationships are those that, as a matter of law, are relationships of trust and confidence. . . .” Id. at 55-9.
Every judge is a fiduciary toward the public, of which Petitioner is a part; to wit:
“ ‘Fraud in its elementary common law sense of deceit — and this is one of the meanings that fraud bears in the statute, see United States v. Dial, 757 F.2d 163, 168 (7th Cir.1985) — includes the deliberate concealment of material information in a setting of fiduciary obligation. A public official is a fiduciary toward the public, including, in the case of a judge, the litigants who appear before him, and if he deliberately conceals material information from them, he is guilty of fraud. . . .’ ” McNally v. United States, 483 U.S. 350, 371–372 (1987), quoting Judge Posner in United States v. Holzer, 816 F.2d 304 (1987).
United States District Judge Lynn Nettleton Hughes of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas, Houston Division had an equitable duty to disclose certain material facts and information to Petitioner, but failed to do so, even when expressly requested of him.
the rest at website:
Further, Defendant Hughes failed to discharge / perform a certain legal duty imposed by law (this same legal duty applies in every Federal civil case in every Federal court throughout the Union), which resulted in Petitioner’s loss of, among other things, beneficial use of Petitioner’s real property (Petitioner’s home) for the last 27 months and permanent loss of hundreds of thousands of dollars in personal property (in law, called “personalty”).
Nothing more corrupt than this!
http://yournewswire.com/obama-vetoes-bill-victims-sue-saudi-arabia-911/
President Barack Obama vetoed legislation on Friday that would have allowed the families of the victims of the 9/11 attacks to seek justice and sue Saudi Arabia for orchestrating the attacks.
Despite overwhelming public support, The White House strongly opposed the legislation, known as the “Justice Against Sponsors of Terrorism Act” (JASTA). The bill was passed unanimously by both the House and Senate, and would have given families the chance to hold authorities in Saudi Arabia accountable for their part in sponsoring the September 11 attacks.
Don't know why but it won't allow a direct link to that article. Go to: yournewswire(dot)com
Cop rapes girl
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZWhGWyX1zto
FROM AN EMAIL THAT I HAVE REC'D:
*****HAVE YOU BEEN SCAMMED BY BURLY BALL OR AN ONE OF THE MANY 'REVERSE PENSION PLAN' PROGRAMS?*****
YOU MAY BE ABLE TO GET SOME OF YOUR MONEY BACK.
GO HERE---->
http://rppremission.org/
This site has been established by a private claims administrator firm to provide information for a number of Reverse Pension Plan (RPP) programs' investors (from hereinafter referred to as members). Individuals that had investment (membership) accounts with a number of specific RPP programs that failed to complete their payout process, may be eligible to receive compensation through a process called remission.
even so, be prepared to wait years to get even 10% of your back. :-(
funny i used to call him bruly and the email calls him 'burly'
maybe my friend was poking fun at me at the same time as trying to help me to recover some lost money?
http://www.coasttocoastam.com/article/watch-armed-guards-stop-explorers-at-area-51/
lastest from winton shout:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=reSj54C22HY&feature=youtu.be
see the comment I just made under this video:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5XqdxSdv93g
Dr. Kurt: why I will never choose to vaccinate my own son and any future kids my wife and I have
Monday, October 24, 2016 by: Natural News Editors
Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/055750_vaccines_flawed_research_medical_history.html#ixzz4OCMegplA
i tawt i taw a puddy cat? i meen i tawt dat kirk was a mortage limator???? whaa???
i din no dat he was a dockor to?????
ok's.....fum know on i calls im Dr. Kirk....so nows we hafts 2 dockors...Dr. Kirk and Dr. Ira Gilac.
ho ess????
Since when does a bank forgive a mortgage note? Can you name even one person you know that had this experience? Doesn't happen unless you create unusual circumstances which the bank will never admit to. Never did get the Judge to consider and rule upon my very effective motion I filed in court over 6 months ago. That's a $250,000 due process violation totally ignoring a motion. Course the Judge couldn't really rule on that motion because it creates egg on his face too and creates a borrowers victory which creates an unwanted precedence too. I think the Judge put pressure on the bank to have them send out this letter below. The Judge told me in a closed session after he illegally issued a warrant for my arrest for "failure to appear" in a foreclosure hearing case, after I alleged that his court was a "kangaroo court" and he wanted me to prove this in the hearing that I missed. As a reult I spent two days in the County jail early this year. At the hearing after I was pulled out of the County Jail, the Judge stupidly said in a moment of weakness, telling the truth: "Banks want to get a judicial foreclosure judgment in a judicial state, because once they have that, they can petition their insurance company to pay off the borrowers loan in full." My loan is in fact paid off, but no one wants to acknowledge that. I retorted, and basically included my question in my motion, and showed I paid off the loan with an EFT, "then isn't that fraud to get paid and still foreclose and attempt to take the house as that's "double dipping" which is fraud? He never answered my question or ruled upon the motion.
Here's what the letter from Chase Bank says :
Oct. 21, 2016
Re" Account # 412590065330
205 Beachwood Dr.
Youngstown, OH 44505
"Dear B.G.
We're canceling the amount you owe on your mortgage loan with us, totalling $91,948.08.
This means, we'll cancel your debt and you'll owe nothing more on the loan. You don't need to sign or return anything for this to happen.
We'll release the lien and forward the Release of Lien to your county records office for processing.
Chase Bank
$$$ when this finally happen$, who do we contact you, dr. f, kurt, etc or will be waithing for one of the above to contact us??
still waiting for answer??
and ;youve removed my email address question. but as i already know what ive written, are you still at that email?
Y or N
"Even Kurt is amazed, so that should tell you something."
so most ppl would be ama$ed @ 7 figs or more, so $10,000,000.00 or more would amaze me!!!
i no, i no...the abuft is 8 figs, so wah??
in any cast, wehn yo git yo $$$, by sum gole yo wont be disponted!!!
Years ago, there was a blog that talked about the idea that what is decreed in Heaven, will definitely come to pass on earth as "what is bound in heaven, is also bound on earth."
isnt that backwards?? ie, that what is bound on earth shall be bound in heaven?
MATT. 18:18
"Verily I say unto you, Whatsoever ye shall bind on earth shall be bound in heaven: and whatsoever ye shall loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven."
KJV
so if yo git yo stale mints whale yo alife, yo can take it to haven wit yo. bound yo stale mints hear, and the will be fresh mints when yo git to haven
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-11-11/what-hell-suddenly-going-foreclosures
4 CLOSERS JUMPS 27%!!!!!
Have Kurt and Scott been released yet?
Have Kurt and Scott been released yet?
according to moogel, it would appear that they have not. almost there, but not quiet.
wheres the settle mints?
will we be able to eat them after tanksgiving dinner, or will they be stale mints by then??
Have Kurt and Scott been released yet?
_________________________
Soon I hope. They've been there long enough. But you know how it goes, we live in a cruel world.
hype dat yo all haft a harpy tanksgifting!!!
Trump Is Meeting with an Ex-bank Ceo Who Wants to Abolish the Federal Reserve and Return to the Gold Standard
by Bob Bryan, November 28th 2016
As President-elect's Donald Trump's transition rolls on, more and more attention is being paid to possible selections for a variety of high-ranking positions and meetings that might help decide these appointments.
On Monday, Trump will meet with John Allison, the former CEO of the bank BB&T and of the libertarian think tank the Cato Institute.
There have been reports that Allison is being considered for Treasury secretary.
Trump's has on the campaign trail questioned the future of the Federal Reserve's political independence, but Allison takes that rhetoric a step further. While running the the Cato Institute, Allison wrote a paper in support of abolishing the Fed.
"I would get rid of the Federal Reserve because the volatility in the economy is primarily caused by the Fed," Allison wrote in 2014 for the Cato Journal, a publication of the institute.
Allison said that simply allowing the market to regulate itself would be preferable to the Fed harming the stability of the financial system.
"When the Fed is radically changing the money supply, distorting interest rates, and over-regulating the financial sector, it makes rational economic calculation difficult," Allison wrote. "Markets do form bubbles, but the Fed makes them worse."
Allison also suggested that the government's practice of insuring bank deposits up to $250,000 should be abolished and the US should go back to a banking system backed by "a market standard such as gold."
Allison also argued for higher capital reserves of up to 20% of assets at banks. On the other hand, he also argued that the government should repeal three of the broadest banking regulations.
"We should raise capital standards, but it is even more important to eliminate burdensome regulations — including Dodd-Frank, the Community Reinvestment Act, and Truth in Lending," Allison wrote. "About 25 percent of a bank's personnel cost relates to regulations. Banks cannot pay the regulatory costs and have high capital standards."
This is similar to Trump's desire to roll back regulation — including Dodd-Frank — on financial institutions, though he has since backtracked somewhat.
It is unclear if any of Allison's policy views will ultimately become a part of Trump's plan, but given the unconventional nature of his ideas, the meeting is notable.
"I would get rid of the Federal Reserve because the volatility in the economy is primarily caused by the Fed," Allison wrote in 2014 for the Cato Journal, a publication of the institute.
NO!
"I would get rid of the Federal Reserve because it causes debt enslavement."
YES! AND TRUE, IT DOES!!
An email I got today:
HOW TO DISCHARGE ANY DEBT-MORTGAGE/CAR/LOAN!
Yes, we are not fooling. We have a private banker relationship that does thousands of these.
We are having a multi-generation life-changing webinar in about 10 days.
This webinar will not be repeated as we have the expert himself to go over all questions and details.
He is the only one in the country who is authorized to do this!
This is a life changer for you, your children, and your children’s children. Don’t mess this up.
IT is legal and it is real. We will be forwarding documents of mortgage discharges, etc. over the next week to show you.
This is the most exciting product we have ever had, and we have amazing products to begin with.
You MUST reserve a place by responding to this email as we only have spots for 100 people and we expect twice that many.
We look forward to sharing this wealth creation secret with our exclusive members only!
Kind Regards,
The Team at MMU
They have excellent financial products, but are real expensive. Out of the reach of most unfortunately. I'll see what they are talking about, and reserve my opinion until then.
Round two of trying to audit the fed... or is it round 3 or 4?
https://www.paul.senate.gov/news/press/sen-rand-paul-reintroduces-audit-the-fed
HOW TO DISCHARGE ANY DEBT-MORTGAGE/CAR/LOAN!
No link?
INFO ON GLOBAL SETTLEMENTS:
THE GOVT. OF FINLAND HAS NOW AGREED TO GIVE OUT 600 EUROS FOR LIFE TO THE FIRST 2000 PEOPLE PICKED IN A LOTTERY. NQA. NO QUESTIONS ASKED. INCLUDED FOR ALL, WHETHER ONE WORKS OR NOT. SOON TO SPREAD TO MANY COUNTRIES AS THE ONLY SOLUTION TO THE IMMINENT GLOBAL DEBT IMPLOSION.
MORE INFO REGARDING GLOBAL SETTLEMENTS:
NOW INDIA ON BOARD FOR FREE $$$$.
The Indian government is about to endorse giving all its citizens free money.
COMING SOON TO A THEATER (COUNTRY) NEAR YOU!!
IRAQ DINAR NEWS:
In case you nedd to exchange your iqd, iraq dinar call the CITIBANK foreign currency exchange desk @ 1-800-756-7050 Press 2 and wait for a cuservrep IQD currency code is 492
*CITIBANK will either buy your dinar or offer to sell you dinar
*NOTE: you must have an account with CITIBANK or open one simultaneously with your purchase/sale of dinar.
For discharging debt:
Contact Info:
Phone:
800-532-9690
https://www.millionairementoruniversity.com
Email:
sarah@millionairementoruniversity.com
Back in 2012 the blog said: "We are now writing our 3rd Motion to reconsider because Alsup refused to hear our 2255 Habeas Petition. Most people would go to the court of appeals or find another judge through a 2241 motion."
Now in 2017 the very tenacious, and great example of a model prisoner, Scott Heineman, is filing a 2241 motion in the California Supreme Court. The motion states a 100% innocence plea to all crimes to which the petite jury convicted upon, so the plea to the Court is to release both him and Kurt. So we'll see how that goes.
This Case Recently Filed in December 2016. In New York, Docket Case No. 1:16-CV-1490 By National Liberty Alliance Will Have All Of The NLA Habeas Corpus Cases Added To It, Including Kurt & Scott's Habeas Corpus Case, Where We Know An Administrative Default Judgment Was Already Obtained By The UUSCLGJ (United United States Common Law Grand Jury) over a year ago in Kurt & Scott's Favor, against 4 Defendants (including Judge Alsup), which basically Ordered The Northern California Federal Court To Set Them Both Free. The Northern California Federal Court Refused To File This Default Judgment And Other Documents, After A Sincere Effort To Record, Because NLA Refused To Pay For A Filing Fee And The Defacto Court Didn't Recognize The Case Number That NLA Assigned To Kurt & Scott's Habeas Corpus Case. The CALIFORNIA Defacto Federal Court Ignored What NLA Accomplished For Kurt & Scott. By the way, I have all copies of this paperwork including the default judgment for anyone that is interested. There are things being done behind the scenes that isn't being reported upon.
Here Is The Link On The New York Case That Might Prove To Be Helpful To Kurt & Scott's Interests:
Https://Www.Nationallibertyalliance.Org/Docket
NLA Is Calling It A Landmark Case So If This Case Is Successful IN FAVOR OF THE PLAINTIFFS, The Court Will Have No Alternative But To Order That Kurt & Scott Go Free And That The Northern California Federal Court Honor The ALREADY OBTAINED Default Judgment To Set Them Both Free.
If Not, in my opinion, it's possible that Some High Public Officials Or Judges could Be Ordered By Federal Marshalls who are willing to follow the Constitution Be Arrested For Treason As This Landmark Case If Successful Will Prove The Legitimacy Of The United States Common Law Grand Jury (UUSCLGJ) And All Of Their Rulings. John Darash At NLA Says He Has A Good Repoir With President Donald Trump, AND FEELS HE WILL WORK WITH NLA, So This Could Be Helpful Too In Recognizing Or Proving The Legitimacy Of The UUSCLGJ. The Lord Will See To The Release Of Kurt & Scott In His Own Due Time. There is justice eventually.
I think 2017 could be the year that things start to finally happen. There are some other very significant things that have happened but I'm not at liberty to report on that as I know the enemy is reading this blog.
from jim mccanney, MS Physics, Cornell U:
ANNOUNCEMENT ... My Paid Cast for january 19th is a MUST LISTEN as major forces are trying to disrupt the inauguration ...----->>>>>> i show by 3 mathematical methods that HRC could not have gotten more than 45 Million Votes giving a Trump victory in the popular vote of 82 million Trump to 45 million HRC ... here is the entire january schedule ... all MUST LISTEN programs ... if you have not subscribed yet ... click here to join just $3.95 per month ... less than a cup of coffee .
http://jmccanneyscience.com/
January 19, 2017 " Cyber Security - Part 2 - 11 Ways the Presidential 2016 Election Results Were Altered for a Hillary Clinton Win - False Hacking CIA Intel Claims That the Russians Somehow Affected the Election - Mathematical Analysis Using 3 Independent Methods That Hillary Clinton Could Not Have Gotten More Than 45 Million Votes - How The Rigged Election Was Not Enough For Her to Win"
As This Landmark Case If Successful Will Prove The Legitimacy Of The United States Common Law Grand Jury (UUSCLGJ) And All Of Their Rulings.
How did that work out for Terry Trussell?
Dr. Ira Gilac?
Dr. Caligari: Don't think it's fair to equate Terry Trussell with the case filed by NLA. How do you feel that the two cases are similar? Terry Trussell was charged with crimes. Has John Darash been charged with any crimes? Terry Trussell allegedly was charged with interfering with a grand jury process. How is that comparable with this Landmark Case? It's apples and oranges.
be careful when filling leans that may make you get skinny:
Pinellas judge in foreclosure case sues homeowner for 'false, fictitious, and fraudulent' filings (of liens)
http://www.tampabay.com/news/courts/civil/pinellas-judge-presiding-over-foreclosure-case-sues-homeowner/2287784
A Pinellas circuit judge presiding over a foreclosure action is suing the homeowner in that case, claiming she filed "false, fictitious and fraudulent" documents against the judge in his own court.
The lawsuit stems from the 2013 foreclosure of a Clearwater home at 3155 Hyde Park Drive in the Countryside area near McMullen-Booth Road. Homeowners Leslie and Martin Armstrong stopped making mortgage payments in October 2011, according to court records.
Circuit Judge Thomas Minkoff ruled in favor of Wells Fargo on Sept. 4.
Later that month, Leslie Armstrong, 58, filed records against Minkoff in federal court, outlining in a document titled "Criminal Complaint" a list of allegations against the judge and the bank. She demanded a jury trial in the foreclosure, Armstrong wrote, but "Judge Minkoff conspired with Wells Fargo Bank and the trespassing attorneys to steal my property."
The judge and the bank also violated "U.S. constitutional laws," her complaint says. Among them: "No law-abiding person shall be forced to do anything he does not want to do" and "No controlling agency shall harass a U.S. citizen."
She also claimed liens against the judge, the bank and the bank's attorneys, calculating that they owed a total of $2.4 million.
That kind of legal language is similar to documents used by the sovereign citizen movement, whose adherents believe that federal, state and local laws — especially when it comes to paying taxes — don't apply to them.
"The documents, with their numerous references to 'natural law,' the Constitution, and an array of imaginary crimes, do appear to be the work of a sovereign citizen," said Mark Potok, a senior fellow at the Southern Poverty Law Center, which tracks extremism. "It's possible the person who filed them doesn't adhere to all the ideas of sovereign citizens, however," he said in an email.
Armstrong, who still lives at her Clearwater home, could not be reached for comment.
The federal case she filed didn't get far. It was dismissed in June, records show.
Armstrong, however, filed the same documents in her foreclosure case in circuit court, which remains open after she filed for bankruptcy. But the judge was not amused. In a court order, Minkoff called them "improper, frivolous, and unauthorized."
"Due to her abuse of the judicial process and wasting of judicial resources, the court bars Defendant Leslie Armstrong from filing any further documents in this case unless represented by an attorney," he wrote.
Pinellas-Pasco Judicial Circuit spokesman Stephen Thompson said Minkoff filed the lawsuit because the records could "impugn his reputation as a judge."
Minkoff asked the Pinellas clerk of court to remove the offending filings from the record. In the lawsuit filed in Pinellas court on July 8, he explained that Armstrong's filings affect him due to the "false appearance of a secured debt or an outstanding lien" against him.
Minkoff is being represented by an attorney from the Office of the Attorney General, which, under Florida law, is authorized to represent public officials in state court to defend them against false liens.
Pinellas Clerk of Court Ken Burke, who is also named in the lawsuit, said the civil action is a necessary step for the records to be expunged.
"I have no authority to seal records," he said. "I need some type of direction from the court to do so. This lawsuit would give me that type of direction."
Contact Laura C. Morel at lmorel@tampabay.com. Follow @lauracmorel.
Pinellas judge in foreclosure case sues homeowner for 'false, fictitious, and fraudulent' filings 08/02/16 [Last modified: Tuesday, August 2, 2016 9:34pm]
"She also claimed liens against the judge, the bank and the bank's attorneys, calculating that they owed a total of $2.4 million.
says it all: SPLC = ZONIST
Dr. Caligari: Don't think it's fair to equate Terry Trussell with the case filed by NLA. How do you feel that the two cases are similar? Terry Trussell was charged with crimes. Has John Darash been charged with any crimes? Terry Trussell allegedly was charged with interfering with a grand jury process. How is that comparable with this Landmark Case? It's apples and oranges.
One of the things Terry Trussell was convicted of was "simulating legal process" for attempting to file in court "presentments" issued by his "common law grand jury", because a "common law grand jury" has no legal power to charge anyone with anything. Darash is apparently doing the same. He hasn't been prosecuted yet, but he would be advised to be careful.
First of all Terry Trussell does not know how to defend himself and was begging for a lawyer to help him and for the longest time couldn't even find a lawyer to help him. I don't know if he obtained competent counsel or not, probably not. If you don't know what you are doing, US Attorneys will walk all over you which apparently that is what happened.
John Darash is smart and careful enough to keep the statutory courts out of his business unlike Terry Trussell. A court of record does have power to indict. A common law grand jury judgment or indictment comes from a "court of record". And the court of record IS A SUPERIOR COURT TO THE STATUTORY COURTS and the voice of a common law grand jury is FINAL AND NOT APPEALABLE.
COURTS OF RECORD PROCEED ACCORDING TO THE COURSE OF COMMON LAW 140
“Courts of Record and Courts not of Record the former being those whose acts and judicial proceedings are enrolled, or recorded, for a perpetual memory and testimony, and which have power to fine or imprison for contempt. Error lies to their judgments, and they generally possess a seal. Courts not of record are those of inferior dignity, which have no power to fine or imprison, and in which the proceedings are not enrolled 145 or recorded". 3 Bl. Comm. 24; 3 Steph. Comm. 383; The Thomas Fletcher, C.C.Ga., 24 F. 481; Ex parte Thistleton, 52 Cal 225; Erwin v. U.S., D.C.Ga., 37 F. 488, 2 L.R.A. 229; Heininger v. Davis, 96 Ohio St. 205, 117 N.E. 229, 231.
"A Court of Record is a judicial tribunal having attributes and exercising functions independently of the person of the magistrate designated generally to hold it, and 150 proceeding according to the course of common law, its acts and proceedings being enrolled for a perpetual memorial". Jones v. Jones, 188 Mo.App. 220, 175 S.W. 227,
MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF JURISDICTIONPage 7 of 10
229; Ex parte Gladhill, 8 Metc. Mass., 171, per Shaw, C.J. See, also, Ledwith v. Rosalsky, 244 N.Y. 406, 155 N.E. 688, 689.
“Decisions of an inferior court are subject to collateral attack. In other words, in a 155 superior court one may sue an inferior court directly, rather than resort to appeal to an appellate court. Decision of a court of record may not be appealed. It is binding on ALL other courts. However, no statutory or constitutional court (whether it be an appellate or supreme court) can second guess the judgment of a court of record. The judgment of a court of record whose jurisdiction is final, is as conclusive on all the world as the 160 judgment of this court would be. It is as conclusive on this court as it is on other courts. It puts an end to inquiry concerning the fact, by deciding it." Ex parte Watkins, 3 Pet., at 202-203. cited by SCHNECKLOTH v. BUSTAMONTE, 412 U.S. 218, 255 (1973).
A court of record is a superior court. A court not of record is an inferior court. Inferior courts are those whose jurisdiction is limited and special and whose proceedings are not 165 according to the course of the common law. Criminal courts proceed according to statutory law. Jurisdiction and procedure is defined by statute. Likewise, civil courts and admiralty courts proceed according to statutory law. Any court proceeding according to statutory law is not a court of record (which only proceeds according to common law); it is an inferior court. 170
“The only inherent difference ordinarily recognized between superior and inferior courts is that there is a presumption in favor of the validity of the judgments of the former, none in favor of those of the latter, and that a superior court may be shown not to have had power to render a particular judgment by reference to its record. Note, however, that a ‘superior court’ is the name of a particular court. But when a court acts by virtue of a 175 special statute conferring jurisdiction in a certain class of cases, it is a court of inferior or limited jurisdiction for the time being, no matter what its ordinary status may be.
Amendment V: "No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless in a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury. It is in effect a 4th branch of government "governed" and administered to directly by and in behalf of the American people."
The jury has the power to bring a verdict in the teeth of both law and fact." Oliver Wendell Homes, US Supreme Court Justice 1902.
Justice Scalia: the grand jury requires no authorization from it's constituting court to initiate an investigation. United States v. John H. Williams Jr.
There is no statute or procedural rule that prevents people from convening grand juries.
The grand jury's functional independence from the judicial branch is evident both in the scope of its power to investigate wrong doings, AND IN THE MANNER IN WHICH THAT POWER IS EXERCISED." United States v. R. Enterprises
John Darash has sent a group email from National Liberty Alliance.
On December 14, 2016 the Unified United States Common Law Grand Jury filed a Common Law Action in the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York in Albany, NY, Case NO: 1:16-CV-1490 presiding Magistrate Lawrence E. Kahn for a Redress of Grievances serving the United States Supreme Court, United States Congress, the President of the United States and all fifty Governors on January 20, 2017.
Starting on Monday, January 23, 2017 we initiated a faxing and email campaign sending all filed documents to over 4000 media outlets, U.S. Supreme Court, US Congress, President Trump, Federal Judiciary, Governors (50), all State Legislators, State Judiciary, Sheriffs, US Marshall, FBI, US Attorney, Attorney General and State District Attorneys.
Under the same case number 1:16-CV-1490 WE ARE PREPARING FOR THE SEEKING AND FILING OF INDICTMENTS AND NUMEROUS TRIALS BY "UNTAINTED" JURIES AGAINST JUDGES, CLERKS, ATTORNEYS, LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENTS AND OTHERS FOR SUBVERSION, EXTORTION, RICO AND FOR WARING AGAINST THE CONSTITUTION.
This is a Landmark Case written to educate and inform the People and our servants in order to preserve our Constitution through the enforcement of the Supremacy Clause a/k/a Common Law. A list of Filed Documents can be found at www.nationallibertyalliance.org/docket for download.
JOIN US on Monday, January 23, 2017 at 9PM EST for Q&A about the case and how we expect to keep this case proceeding under the Common Law WITHOUT JUDICIARY INTERFERENCE.
so how does this all affect the dg or does it??
How do I get a hold of either Kurt or Scott ?
I have a family trust they got me into and now i need to get out of the trust
thanks
Persistancepays:
So how does this affect the DG? They already have an administrative habeaus corpus judgment in their favor for their release by the UUSCLGJ (Unified United States Common Law Grand Jury)
This judgment in essence calls for the release of Kurt & Scott and certain Defendants are already in default as they have not released them. When public officials like Judges don't honor what has been already decreed that's treason. It's up to the Sheriff or Marshalls to follow the law, when called upon to do so, and included in that oath to honor & uphold the Constitution, they must uphold their oath which includes following the Constitution, and the Constitution already establishes the legitimacy of Common Law and Common Law Grand Juries set up for the protection of We the People, and that principle has been already upheld by the Supreme Court. So this case is going to reinforce those principles, and also help the Dorean Group go free since all cases that the UUSCLGJ have ruled upon, including Kurt & Scott's habeas corpus case will be an appendage added to this one one Landmark Case. Except this time some teeth is going to come with it as I already answered the question: |"Under the same case number 1:16-CV-1490 WE ARE PREPARING FOR THE SEEKING AND FILING OF INDICTMENTS AND NUMEROUS TRIALS BY "UNTAINTED" JURIES AGAINST JUDGES, CLERKS, ATTORNEYS, LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENTS AND OTHERS FOR SUBVERSION, EXTORTION, RICO AND FOR WARING AGAINST THE CONSTITUTION."
Dear No Name: Isn't that like a lawyer to gouge you $1700 to do a few papers that you could do yourself? You don't need a lawyer to fire two trustees, give notice to two trustees and appoint new trustees to sign the asset or assets back over to yourself. And Kurt & Scott did not get you into the trust, you agreed to form a trust, so the Dorean Presentment could be sent out in your behalf by them to the bank. Take a little responsibility for your own decisions and actions. Well let's see, both are in the federal prison system. Just look them up under the Bureau of Prisons and put in a request to be on their mailing list, and send them an email or snail mail letter. There's no guarantees they will write you back though.
The below article proves that since 1991 Federal Judges are not required to make an oath to defend the Constitution of the united States, and we know that the Constitution is the Supreme Law of the Land, and all judgments and law must adhere to its principles. Since all United States Federal Court judgments since 1991 do not comply with the Judges oath to defend the Constitution, because the oath they take does not require them to defend the Constitution, then likewise all such judgments are void, which means the judgment that put Kurt & Scott in prison can easily be overturned, which also means they must be
freed immediately in the name of justice on a motion to the court giving these facts and proving that the Federal Court had no subject matter jurisdiction, nor personal jurisdiction over Kurt & Scott. Here is the link to the full article:
https://supremecourtcase.wordpress.com/author/supremecourtcase
Judge Posner said:
“‘I see absolutely no value to a judge of spending decades, years, months, weeks, day, hours, minutes, or seconds studying the Constitution, the history of its enactment, its amendments, and its implementation (across the centuries — well, just a little more than two centuries, and of course less for many of the amendments),’ he wrote. . . .” The Washington Times, quoting United States Circuit Judge Richard Posner in “Judge Richard Posner: ‘No value’ in studying the U.S. Constitution,” June 27, 2016,http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/jun/27/richard-posner-no-value-in-studying-us-constitution/ (accessed August 4, 2016).
The reason Judge Posner can get away with such apparently treasonous remarks about the Constitution without risking impeachment is that he neither is bound by oath or affirmation to support it nor has any duties under it to discharge or perform nor has any duty to preserve, protect, support, or defend it—only to carry out the duties assigned to him by his for-profit corporate employer, the District of Columbia Municipal Corporation, “a Federal corporation,” 28 U.S.C. § 3002(15), doing business as “United States,” id., and managed by the Congress of the (corporate) “United States.”
LOL!!!
Former Fed Employee Sentenced For Running Bitcoin Mining Software On A Fed Computer
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-01-30/former-fed-employee-sentenced-running-bitcoin-mining-software-fed-computer
In an amusing twist on the "fiat vs digital" money debate, a former Federal Reserve employee who tried to fuse the two, was sentenced to 12 months’ probation and fined $5,000 for installing unauthorized software on a Fed server to connect with a bitcoin network, the Office of the Fed's Inspector General said.
lllllllloooooooooooool!!! trying to mine bitcoins on FED puters!! yo can make dis sheet up!!!!
betr if yo jus prin moony oof thick hair!!!
X-22 REPORT:
Is Trump Setting His Sights On The Federal Reserve To Expose It? -
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wLSNpUzsWjY
That's quite a real stretch, besides Pres. Trump is pro-bank.
JUST EFT YOU DEBTS!!!!!!
http://stopthepirates.blogspot.com/2012/04/electronic-fund-transfer-overview.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+StopThePirates+%28Stop+The+Pirates%29
So how does this affect the DG? They already have an administrative habeaus corpus judgment in their favor for their release by the UUSCLGJ (Unified United States Common Law Grand Jury)
This judgment in essence calls for the release of Kurt & Scott and certain Defendants are already in default as they have not released them.
How did that work out? Are Kurt and Scott out yet?
who is gong to enforce the UUSCLGJ judgment?? ie, letting them go free?
Nla has made a list of law enforcement
that is on the side of the Constitution
and who support the UUSCLGJ
and I suppose it would have to be law
Enforcement to do this to uphold
this judgment like a sheriff or
US Marshall. However it appears
that there is a reluctance right
now to take that route. Other
remedies less confrontational seem to be being considered. Timing is everything.
Kurt and Scott both have their
own remedies also.
"Other remedies less confrontational seem to be being considered. Timing is everything."
true, we only have so many lifetimes to receive the benefits of our labors.
timing is everything. $100MM 200 years from now is useless for anyone alive today.
all deeze peppls draw leans w/o a lethal basis and got trow in jale.
http://www.knoxnews.com/story/news/crime/2017/02/18/records-sovereign-citizens-waged-war-paper-terror/98049782/
be carful ho yo leans. to munch to one side an yo could get barred
the govt. is gettin desparate now.. they gone afta all da soveen pepple sitadels.
soon canadial to also hand out 'free $$$$'
https://qz.com/914247/canada-is-betting-on-a-universal-basic-income-to-help-cities-gutted-by-manufacturing-job-loss/
Canada is betting on a universal basic income to help cities gutted by manufacturing job loss
ATTEMPTED JAIL BREAK
Four taken into custody; claim sovereignty
By Julia M. Dendinger, News-Bulletin Assistant Editor
Feb 10, 2017
LOS LUNAS — An attempt to liberate a man held at the Valencia County Detention Center last week ended with the inmate staying in his cell and four additional people being arrested and charged.
On Wednesday, Feb. 1, the U.S. Marshals Service brought Andrew Pankotai, 35, to VCDC to await extradition on a bench warrant out of Pennsylvania. Pankotai, and his wife, Dixie Pankotai, 34, have lived in Belen for nearly a year after he allegedly absconded from Pennsylvania after pleading guilty to one felony count of burglary.
When the date of his sentencing came on Dec. 30, Pankotai consulted with his lawyer, didn’t like what he heard and left the courtroom, county Sheriff Robert Wolfe told The Daily Item, a Pennsylvania newspaper.
Valencia County Detention Center Warden Joe Chavez said he started receiving faxes the day after Pankotai was arrested from a “Continental United States Superior Court” judge, saying Pankotai was being unlawfully held and he was to be immediately released.
“It was a pretty decent document but you don’t know who is sending what,” Chavez said.
A second fax came through from the same organization, naming three individuals who were traveling to the jail to retrieve Pankotai and would have the proper credentials to retrieve him. Chavez contacted the marshal who brought the inmate in to verify the request to release Pankotai was legitimate.
The response was the “court” was a group similar to sovereign citizen groups, which believe local laws and ordinances do not apply to them, and to ignore the fax.
“They said (these groups) try this kind of thing but to keep him in custody,” the warden said.
Chavez then received a phone call indicating the group referred to in the second fax would be at the detention center shortly to take Pankotai. He contacted the marshal again, asking someone from the agency come to the jail in case they showed up.
“So, were they really coming? Was this a case of the left hand not talking to the right hand?” Chavez said. “I wanted (the U.S. Marshals) there to validate their credentials.”
Marshals and New Mexico State Police officers went to the jail and about 10 minutes later, four individuals arrived.
“Everyone was surprised. From what I understand, no one ever shows up,” the warden said.
Two men with sidearms, dressed in polo shirts with official-looking badges embroidered on them, and two women in street clothes entered the jail through the public entrance.
Chavez instructed them to go to the rear of the facility and drive in through the sally port to pick up the detainee, where they were greeted by U.S. Marshals and NMSP, and taken into custody.
“They followed directives; there was no resistance,” Chavez said. “They were arrested and charged.”
How Tennessee Could Be About To Start A Constitutional Crisis
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-02-22/how-tennessee-could-be-about-start-constitutional-crisis
Feb 23, 2017 5:25 AM
0
SHARES
The State Senate of Tennessee has laid the legislative groundwork for something that hasn't been done in the United States of America since the Constitutional Convention of 1787 in Philadelphia. With a vote of 27-3, the Tennessee Senate has voted to call a "convention of the states" in order to draft and pass an amendment to the Constitution that would require balanced budgets to be passed every year.
For those who are little fuzzy on their high school U.S. history knowledge, the Tennessean explains that the U.S. Constitution can be amended in two ways. The first would require a two-thirds majority vote in both chambers of Congress, an unlikely outcome in today's hyper-partisan political arena. The second, on the other hand, requires that two-thirds of the states (34 in total) pass a resolution calling for a Constitutional Convention.
There are two ways to propose amendments to the Constitution. The first and more traditional method is through a two-thirds majority vote in both the House of Representatives and the Senate. Then the amendment is sent to the state legislatures, where it needs ratification by three-fourths or 38 states in order to become law. Nearly all 27 amendments have followed this path.
But the Constitution also provides a second, more populist path to amending the document. If two-thirds or 34 states pass a resolution calling for a Constitutional Convention, delegates from all 50 states will meet to draft an amendment. This is what the Tennessee lawmakers are calling for in their resolution.
Of course, calls for a convention to pass a balanced budget amendment started in the 1970s and have failed each time. That said, with Republicans now controlling 32 state legislatures, this latest effort initiated by Tennessee seems to have the best chance of succeeding so far.
And while there have been close calls for Constitutional Conventions before, each time Congress has acted preemptively to stave off the need for a convention. In 1911, for example, 28 states of the required 32 passed a resolution calling for direct election of Senators before Congress intervened and drafted the Seventeenth Amendment instead.
(cot'd at article address above)
"With a vote of 27-3, the Tennessee Senate has voted to call a "convention of the states" in order to draft and pass an amendment to the Constitution that would require balanced budgets to be passed every year."
___________________
Balanced federal reserve notes? Sorry, but it's not possible. It's not even constitutional for the states to accept federal reserve notes as a tender of payment of debt.
I've heard that two states have pending legislation to make gold and silver coins legal tender when in fact the U.S. constitution prohibits them from doing so, to wit:
https://www.infogristle.com/dave-wilber/fools-gold-is-green.php
"... Legal tender was prohibited in Art. 1, Sec 10 with the words: “No state shall pass any law impairing the obligations of contracts” AND the 5th amendment words: “… nor shall private property be taken for public use without just compensation." For an accurate description of that period of history, please see The Miracle On Main Street by F. Tupper Saussy. This book has the solution to our problem with inflation.
No person or agency, government or private, shall determine what anyone must accept as Lawful Tender! To wit: “No state shall … pass any … Law impairing the Obligation of Contracts …”
“...That all the gold and silver coins which shall be by law be current as money within the United States.” Coin Act April 2, 1792 Sec. 11.
"The terms 'lawful money' or 'lawful money of the United States' shall be construed to mean gold and silver coin of the United States." Title 12 USC, Sec. 152.
The laws for making gold and silver coin a lawful tender are already on the books. See above. The states need not do anything but do what they were always required to do.
"That all the gold and silver coins which shall be by law be current as money within the United States." Coin Act April 2, 1792 Sec. 11.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sGsFK52L0lk
Money expert Merrill Jenkins
At 7:08:
Q: Do you think we ought to have set limits on how much money will exist in the country for the next 50 years?
Merrill Jenkins: Oh no ma'am. I insist that what we have to do is gradually abolish the legal tender acts which caused this problem to come into being.
the currency issue will soon become a moot poit as bitcoin and gold/sliver continues to rise in value currency will take a huge fall
ICEMAN Wim hof
I tried this and could only hold my breath for one minute. Looks like I need to breath more deeply.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=35Ypyk57ogE
Another state (AZ) wanting to define gold, silver, and other precious metals as legal tender. In other words, they want to determine what you must accept as lawful tender, in violation of art. 1 sec. 10. “No state shall … pass any … Law impairing the Obligation of Contracts …”
http://ronpaulinstitute.org/archives/featured-articles/2017/march/05/arizona-challenges-the-fed-s-money-monopoly/
Audit the Fed is not the only focus of the growing anti-Fed movement. For example, this Wednesday the Arizona Senate Finance and Rules Committees will consider legislation (HB 2014) officially defining gold, silver, and other precious metals as legal tender. The bill also exempts transactions in precious metals from state capital gains taxes, thus ensuring that people are not punished by the taxman for rejecting Federal Reserve notes in favor of gold or silver. Since inflation increases the value of precious metals, these taxes give the government one more way to profit from the Federal Reserve’s currency debasement.
While the state of AZ is at it, why don't they include bitcoin and e-gold as legal tender. That ought speed things up. Everything is digital anyway. What is Walmart or Target going to do with physical gold or silver when banks won't accept it?
3-9-2017
Trump Plants Clues In His Office To Let The Central Bankers Know Their Fate
https://youtu.be/DatEqaeDFc0
da jug is up!!!!!
no mo printin doolaz of tin hair!!!
Trump Plants Clues In His Office To Let The Central Bankers Know Their Fate
https://youtu.be/DatEqaeDFc0
clue is that he has hung a yuuuge portait of andrew, jacks son in the oral office.
and yo rember that jacks son, not da fahdder, trie to fite the fedreal reverse bank.
an yo no wha hoppens to dose dat do?
Celente says the economy has improved...
Jeff Rense says (at 22:25) that he remembers very clearly that Trump talked about how all Americans who earned less than %50,000 or less would no longer pay income tax.
[If the income tax (for those earning less than $50,000) is taken away the price of goods and services will simply go up to make up the difference. Granted people will have more control over their spending, but my guess is that people would start to look elsewhere (like underground markets) for their goods and services.]
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5j7ohfRBfB4
Erika McKenzie... she was taking a class 4 narcotic (diet pill) that was only supposed to be taken for 3 months. The effect of having taken it for 9 years took its toll on her body. Really good story:
8:25 "It wasn't about just me, Erika. It was about each and every one of us being that very rock--that we affect each and every person, even if we never meet them."
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gMHTWyRzij8
rember in the past how they used to make a big issue of the so called debt ceiling expiring when they always knew that it wouold pass eventually.
notice how now, as of yesterday, the debt ceiling has actually expired and not even a peep in any media but the net and its really even pretty quiet there.
could it be, this time, with trump in office, that it will actually expire without being renewed?
meaning that by summer, the govt, will actually really be out of ca$h?
dont bet agaisnt this happening.
trump is a wild card for sure. doing this will also allow him to revamp the whole govt to his own suit.
also know as sheet hitting the fans fo reel!!!
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/03/09/mnuchin-calls-for-congress-to-raise-federal-debt-limit.html
"...While Congress has often delayed action until the last minute, it has always approved an increase in the debt limit rather than run the risk of a default."
REALIST NEWS - Jim Willie: We’re AT THE DOOR of the Global Currency Reset
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u12NpR_tOzo
eat some eye racky dinners!!!!
they b tasty!!
David Rockefeller dead at 101 - good riddance
http://www.daytondailynews.com/business/david-rockefeller-last-generation-family-dies-101/rfmZvLVpawCwHt8lTccREP/
The article on David Rockefeller was quite
complimentary. Wheres all the dirt
on this man? He lived to the ripe
age of 101 so he was doing some
things right. But good riddance is
probably appropriate.
he love to file his folders wit his feet....he was a big time pedal file an now dat he gone, yuou will see many more exposed, and the fake news tv media also love to file they noose reports with they feet, they big time pedal filers too, some really big tv news names you will see
frum anthter blaaaaagh....
regrading the dinar RV:
-----------------------------
regarding the diner RV.
it should now become apparent to all, that the RV does not hinge on malki,or shappy, or the U.S., IMF or burn hankys, or et's or aleins, or ???
NO!
IT SHOULD NOW BE OBVIOUS THAT THESE ARE ALL FALSE LEADS ON THE RV.
THERE IS NOW ONLY ONE (MAN) CAPABLE OF CONTROLLING THAT EXACT DATE OF THE RV.
AND YOU SHOULD ALL KNOW WHO/M THAT (MAN) IS....
HE IS A VERY POWERFUL MAN.
INDEED, HE IS THE MOST POWERFUL MAN ON THE PLANET.
NO, IT IS NOT da pressadint.
IT IS A BIBICAL MAN WHO SITS ON 7 HILLS AND VESTED IN THE ROYAL COLORS OR PURPLE AND GOLD.
HAVE ANY IDEA YET?
ONLY THIS (MAN) CAN GIVE THE OK TO PULL THE RV TRIGGER.
OF COURSE, HE WILL NOT BE CREDITED WITH DOING SO AND IN FACT CANNOT BE, BUT MUST REMAIN IN THE BACKGROUND.
Mogel said: "The article on David Rockefeller was quite
complimentary. Wheres all the dirt
on this man? He lived to the ripe
age of 101 so he was doing some
things right. But good riddance is
probably appropriate."
_______________________________________
He had the money to live well. But it's doubtful he ate well, it shows on his 101-year-old face.
The bankers have been manipulating life since god knows when. Manipulation is all around us. Even the David Icke forum has recently been manipulated to make it "private." lol
https://www.davidicke.com/article/406771/406771
Check out this giant chicken!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_6oHigzVvPw
Borrower and Creditor MUST Give Notice and Opportunity to Cure before Suing
Refer to Sandoval v. Ronald R. Wolfe & Assocs., P.L., 2017 WL 244111 (S.D. Fla. 2017) dismissal order
Jennifer Sandoval bought a Florida home with money she borrowed from Suntrust Bank and secured the debt with a mortgage. She later obtained a loan modification, and later defaulted on the loan. The creditor hired law firm Ronald R. Wolf & Associates to sue Sandoval for breach of contract and to foreclose the loan. Sandoval hired a lawyer who sent a Qualified Written Request letter to Suntrust, and Suntrust responded with a letter explaining the requirements for reinstatement. Wolf charged fees for the reinstatement to bring the loan current and dismiss the foreclosure. Sandoval sued Suntrust and Wolf in the Southern District of Florida US District Court for violating RESPA, FCCPA, and FDCPA (Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act, Florida Consumer Collection Practices Act, and Fair Debt Collection Practices Act).
Suntrust filed a motion to dismiss the case for failure to state a claim for which the court could grant relief. The court dismissed the case for two reasons:
Suntrust did not violate any of those laws in the manner Sandoval alleged; and
Most importantly, Sandoval had failed to give Suntrust a notice of grievance and an opportunity to cure it prior to suing Suntrust.
" failure to state a claim for which the court could grant relief.."
"ok, jug beans, so in ordo to cure dis, yo need to gift me da hose fo free, got it??"
First mistake alleged is that she received money from Suntrust. There is no money-- only digits and signatures.
Please don't tell me this is true. Must be his big D.
http://nypost.com/2017/03/25/huma-abedin-is-giving-marriage-with-anthony-weiner-another-try/
Borrower and Creditor MUST Give Notice and Opportunity to Cure before Suing
Refer to Sandoval v. Ronald R. Wolfe & Assocs., P.L., 2017 WL 244111 (S.D. Fla. 2017) dismissal order
Jennifer Sandoval bought a Florida home with money she borrowed from Suntrust Bank and secured the debt with a mortgage. She later obtained a loan modification, and later defaulted on the loan. The creditor hired law firm Ronald R. Wolf & Associates to sue Sandoval for breach of contract and to foreclose the loan. Sandoval hired a lawyer who sent a Qualified Written Request letter to Suntrust, and Suntrust responded with a letter explaining the requirements for reinstatement. Wolf charged fees for the reinstatement to bring the loan current and dismiss the foreclosure. Sandoval sued Suntrust and Wolf in the Southern District of Florida US District Court for violating RESPA, FCCPA, and FDCPA (Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act, Florida Consumer Collection Practices Act, and Fair Debt Collection Practices Act).
Suntrust filed a motion to dismiss the case for failure to state a claim for which the court could grant relief. The court dismissed the case against Suntrust with prejudice, and then amended the dismissal. The reader should take note of three important factors in the issue:
Suntrust did not violate any of those laws in the manner Sandoval alleged; and
Most importantly, Sandoval had failed to allege in her compliant that she had given Suntrust the statutory and contractually required notice of grievance and opportunity to cure prior to suing Suntrust.
The court amended its dismissal order as follows (emphasis added):
"The Court’s January 19, 2017 Dismissal Order is AMENDED as follows: While the FDCPA and RESPA claims against SunTrust are dismissed with prejudice, the FCCPA against SunTrust is dismissed without prejudice, with leave to provide mandatory pre-suit notice to SunTrust of the alleged FCCPA violation and an opportunity to cure, prior to initiating a lawsuit against SunTrust that attempts to state a claim for a violation of the FCCPA. Because the dismissal of the FCCPA claim is without prejudice to Plaintiff attempting to comply with the requirements of the preceding paragraph, Defendant SunTrust’s Motion for Entry of Final Judgment Pursuant to Rule 54(b) [DE 69] is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE."
Thus it becomes clear that Sandoval has no more opportunity in this matter against Suntrust in federal court, and if she decides to sue Suntrust in state court for FCCPA violations, she must first send Suntrust a proper notice of grievance and give Suntrust an opportunity to cure, because her mortgage contract requires it.
Why You Should Always Read Your Contract
The mortgage and the note comprise a single legal contract even though they exist in separate documents. Sandoval's failure to give notice and opportunity to cure constituted a breach of that contract, specifically of the second paragraph of section 20 of the uniform Form 3010: Florida Mortgage security instrument. The mortgage, in section 20, provides the following (red emphasis added):
"Neither Borrower nor Lender may commence, join, or be joined to any judicial action (as either an individual litigant or the member of a class) that arises from the other party’s actions pursuant to this Security Instrument or that alleges that the other party has breached any provision of, or any duty owed by reason of, this Security Instrument, until such Borrower or Lender has notified the other party (with such notice given in compliance with the requirements of Section 15) of such alleged breach and afforded the other party hereto a reasonable period after the giving of such notice to take corrective action. If Applicable Law provides a time period which must elapse before certain action can be taken, that time period will be deemed to be reasonable for purposes of this paragraph. The notice of acceleration and opportunity to cure given to Borrower pursuant to Section 22 and the notice of acceleration given to Borrower pursuant to Section 18 shall be deemed to satisfy the notice and opportunity to take corrective action provisions of this Section 20."
The mortgage, in Section 22, imposes a similar obligation, in bold face type, on the creditor:
"Acceleration; Remedies. Lender shall give notice to Borrower prior to acceleration following Borrower’s breach of any covenant or agreement in this Security Instrument (but not prior to acceleration under Section 18 unless Applicable Law provides otherwise). The notice shall specify: (a) the default; (b) the action required to cure the default; (c) a date, not less than 30 days from the date the notice is given to Borrower, by which the default must be cured; and (d) that failure to cure the default on or before the date specified in the notice may result in acceleration of the sums secured by this Security Instrument, foreclosure by judicial proceeding and sale of the Property. The notice shall further inform Borrower of the right to reinstate after acceleration and the right to assert in the foreclosure proceeding the non-existence of a default or any other defense of Borrower to acceleration and foreclosure. If the default is not cured on or before the date specified in the notice, Lender at its option may require immediate payment in full of all sums secured by this Security Instrument without further demand and may foreclose this Security Instrument by judicial proceeding. Lender shall be entitled to collect all expenses incurred in pursuing the remedies provided in this Section 22, including, but not limited to, reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs of title evidence. "
Notice that section 20 refers to "Applicable Law." That could refer to state law, or to federal (e.g., RESPA) law. The applicable federal law, RESPA, (at 12 USC 2605(e)) obligates the servicer to acknowledge receipt of a Qualified Written Request or answer it within 20 business days (about 4 weeks) , and to answer it within 60 business days (about 3 months). Regulation X in the Code of Federal Regulations requires the lender to acknowledge a notice of error (grievance) within 5 days (about 1 week) and correct the error within 30 days (about 6 weeks). Read 12 USC 2605 and the corresponding part of Regulation X in the Code of Federal Regulations 12 CFR 1024.35 in their entirety.
So in this case neither the borrower Jennifer Sandoval nor her attorney read or heeded the mortgage security instrument section 20. And even if they had, Sandoval did not allege in her complaint against Suntrust that she had sent the notice of grievance and given opportunity to cure in compliance with RESPA. And now not only has she lost in federal court, but also she will have to pay Suntrust's (and her own) legal fees.
Mortgage Attack hopes other borrowers learn from Sandoval's mistake.
READ YOUR CONTRACT!
"The mortgage and the note comprise a single legal contract even though they exist in separate documents."
agian, here is where the fraud is. how can it be a legal contract "even though they exist in separate documents." ????
they always get yu on stuff that is not logical nor probably legal. so now you gotta go challenge still another facet of law: ie, how can a contract exist in separate legal dox???
ans. IT CANT!!!
but now you gotta go challenge this part of the law totally which is totally irrelevnat to the origianl issue, ie mortgage fraud.
"The mortgage and the note comprise a single legal contract even though they exist in separate documents."
again, here is where the fraud is. how can it be a legal contract "even though they exist in separate documents." ????
_______________________
That's right. It's gotta be one whole document. IRS does the same thing with their liens and levies. The lien or levy should be one document, but they separate it into four different parts. It's fraud.
As one former Internet friend once said: "one form (Notice of Lien) in quadruplicate parts is irregular and introduces procedure in which error, accident, and malfeasance can pass undetected. It's impossible to have a regular Statement and Account from irregularity. "
A mortgage loan is no different- it's supposed to be one document, however, when they break it into different documents it introduces procedure in which error, accident, and malfeasance can pass undetected. There is no regularity of accounting in the Federal Reserve System.
Bank of America ordered to pay $46 million for foreclosure tactics used against Lincoln couple -
Bank of America was told to pay a $46 million judgment last week after it wrongfully foreclosed on a Lincoln couple during the recession.
The order by Sacramento bankruptcy court Judge Christopher M. Klein describes in detail how the bank improperly engaged and foreclosed on Erik and Renee Sundquist’s Lincoln residence.
The judge awarded about $1 million in actual damages to the couple. Klein gave the rest of the sum to outside entities focused on consumer law and education, including the National Consumer Law Center and several University of California law schools.
The trouble began in 2009 when the Charlotte, N.C.-based bank reportedly asked the struggling couple to default on the loan in order to obtain a mortgage modification. But the bank refused to honor that promise, according to court documents.
At that point, the Sundquists filed for Chapter 13 bankruptcy, which triggered a stay on the foreclosure process. The bank disregarded the stay and started eviction proceedings. This included sending workers to the property on multiple occasions.
“Without identifying themselves, they staked out the premises, tailed the Sundquists, knocked on doors, knocked on windows, and rang doorbells, all to the terror of the Sundquist family,” Klein wrote in a 109-page opinion for the ruling.
Bank of America eventually gained possession of the property for six months, after which it then agreed that the foreclosure had been a mistake. The company returned the keys to the Sundquists. When they re-entered their home, the major appliances had been removed and the lawn was dead, according to the court.
“Throughout, the Sundquists were acting in good faith, not realizing that Bank of America had no intention of acting in good faith,” Klein wrote.
In a written statement to The Sacramento Bee on Tuesday, Bank of America expressed regret for the “challenging experience” of the customers, adding that foreclosure processes in place at the time in 2010 were later modified.
“In early review of the decision, we believe some of the court’s rulings are unprecedented and unsupported. We are determining the appropriate way to respond,” the statement said.
The ruling can still be appealed, though bank officials have not indicated whether they will pursue that route. http://www.sacbee.com/news/bus...rticle141319308.html
da banks r a bunch of teefs!!!
here is where the fraud is. how can it be a legal contract "even though they exist in separate documents." ?
That rule is for the protection of the borrower. The borrower signs a promissory note and a mortgage, but if they were not deemed part of the same contract, the bank could sell the note to one buyer and the mortgage to another buyer and the borrower could be sued twice for the same debt.
LOLOLOLOLOOOOOOLLLOOOLLL!!!!!
"That rule is for the protection of the borrower. The borrower signs a promissory note and a mortgage, but if they were not deemed part of the same contract, the bank could sell the note to one buyer and the mortgage to another buyer and the borrower could be sued twice for the same debt."
think thats exactly what theyve been doing all these years????
only thins dat they not doon, is skewing the 'borro her".....dat would espose da fraw cumplety.
dats ho days bin kepping da shell game gong fo a berry lawn time naw. lollo
n day ain doon it fo 'production of da borro her' eether... lollloollo
" a legal contract must be complete"
othwerise i can have yo sing one paper and on the udder, yo singed away yo life to me wi/out yo no ing it.
so separate 'lethal contracks' is BS hell up by da crup corts
dublin up on da contracks... it call by udder names... ~~~~ fractionating, fartinal baking sytem, wah eva yo wanna calls it. yo sing one contrack, an we's sell it 10x ova for $$$$$ to udder fools
I love this channel, but Youtube doesn't. What else is new?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qnSQsvIhlaQ
tehy took all yo doolas, so yo cant pay wit anythins but fake doolas, so then...
here: http://stopthepirates.blogspot.com/2015/12/ucc-1-debt-elimination-12115.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+StopThePirates+%28Stop+The+Pirates%29
On May 23, 1933, Congressman Louis T. McFadden, (R-OH) Chairman of the House Banking and Finance Committee brought formal charges against the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve Bank system, The Comptroller of the Currency and the Secretary of United States Treasury for numerous criminal acts, including but not limited to, CONSPIRACY, FRAUD, UNLAWFUL CONVERSION, AND TREASON. To protect themselves from these charges both the House and the Senate, on JUNE 5, 1933, passed House Joint Resolution 192. It provided that the people, who had delivered their gold to the federal government following an illegal proclamation by President Roosevelt, would be exempt from paying their debts since their means of payment, their substance, had been taken from them. HJR 192 provided a remedy for the crime.
" It provided that the people, who had their gold stolen by the federal government following an illegal seizure as directed by President Roosevelt, would be exempt from paying their debts since their means of payment, their gold, had been stolen from them. HJR 192 provided a remedy for the crime.
fedril govt a bunch of teefs!!!! lol!
Try quoting HJR 192 to the IRS or other debt collectors and see where you get.
IRS now using debt collectors...
https://consumerist.com/2017/04/03/the-irs-is-now-using-private-debt-collectors-heres-what-you-need-to-know/
Man goes to work to become a doormat. People are objects. So true.
http://www.filmsforaction.org/watch/the-employment/
An anonymous man performs his usual trip to work, immersed in a world where the utilisation of people as objects is an everyday thing.
If HJR 192 was a remedy for paying off your debt, then we should be forced to use FRNS as money, since they represent debt. I should be able to get everything for free since I already paid for it when they stole the gold.
Everything is pre-paid per HJR 192.
I've read the law HJR 192 and it isn't so clear that this law allows us to discharge debt or that everything is prepaid or even that all the gold was stolen.
Or that the stolen gold was somehow related to this new law. The only thing I take from this law is that you couldn't demand payment in gold anymore.
So when you put out these arguments, you don't go anywhere with them.
And it wasn't you that had your gold stolen, it was your ancestors before you.
Why should you get a remedy for something that was done to others before you?
And you don't have to use federal reserve notes, you could pay by silver coin or by gold, or by Bitcoin, or by Berkshires, or by barter or by your service. The argument doesn't hold water.
And really, who do you know that has used that argument, and as actually discharged debt or actually done something of value with their life that has a story or a testimony they can share? The courts and the FBI laugh at that argument.
You sound like a socialist instead of a capitalist when you use that argument.
"I should get everything for free." LOL
OK, in what world are you talking about?
Even in the Bible, it says that "you should work and by the sweat of your brow, you will have your food." Or words something to that effect.
Where does it say in HJR 192 that everything is prepaid? Isn't that a far reaching conclusion?
Believe me, I'd like to buy your arguments, but I just don't see it. And if I don't see it, how can I convince anyone else?
mongrel has switched sides???
can $omeone be bought off???
No, I haven't been bought off or switching sides, I'm, just trying to get a cogent argument to support your position rather than someone just parrotting what they've heard. Who do you really know that has had success discharging debt using these arguments? If it's all true, than certainly you can find success.
Even in the Bible, it says that "you should work and by the sweat of your brow, you will have your food." Or words something to that effect.
________________________
I recently heard a Congressman use that biblical quote against people who apply for food stamps. He said that people who don't work shouldn't be getting gov. handouts like food stamps. What about the government- they don't work either- they live off the backs of taxpapers. Government doesn't produce anything- they take only. Maybe the government ought to apply that quote to themselves.
Our government doesn't produce anything of value. They take, take, take. It is PEOPLE that produce. Maybe the government ought to take that quote "you should work and by the sweat of your brow, you will have your food." and apply it to themselves. Freaking government needs to get the freak out of our lives, and stay there.
People are the producers. We produce the food and it should be available to everyone at all times. Yet that doesn't happen in our so-called democracy because the goverment controls every aspect of our lives. That's wrong. There is enough food to feed every person on this planet for 10 lifetimes. Fe'kin idiot congressmen.
Fek'in government can kiss my ass. Everything belongs to everyone. Fek'in freaks want to control everyone and everything. Fek'em. Fek'em real good.
Possible Foreclosure Defense:
Ownership of property is impossible through law. Wondering how the courts would view this? This means since I couldn't convey clear title to the lender and paperwork I signed such as a deed of trust giving the lender/bank legal title and a mortgage on my property is also void as I cant give something I never possessed nor can i guarantee clear title to the lender as the documents made me claim that the banks attorney drew up which I signed.
Senate Document No. 43, 43rd Congress Section 1 was passed in 1933, the same year that the United States Inc. went into Chapt. 11 bankruptcy. The Senate declared "ownership of all property is in the State." Individual so called ownership is only by virtue of government i.e. law amounting to MERE OCCUPANCY. And use must be in accordance with law and subordinate to the necessities of the State. So we are all Socialists whether we believe it or not.
Judges are obligated to recognize the law and honor the law not circumvent the law.
NO ONE CAN OWN ANYTHING INCLUDING BANKS IN THIS COUNTRY. All land was pledged to the United States in a bankruptcy. This means that the mortgage and note I signed, foolishly thinking I was the owner of my home is void. If either the note or the mortgage is void by law, than any foreclosure to oust me from the Land/property is also a legal impossibility, so any foreclosure than becomes an unlawful foreclosure for which I am entitled to financial damages. The logic is flawless and the law is clear and has never been overturned. Is this the silver bullet to prevent the bank stealing the house, theft by deception through their illegal foreclosure scam?
According to David Roach, a so called expert, judges are suppose to discharge our debt according to the 1933 bankruptcy of the United States. He cited several laws to support that assertion:
HJR 192 Now Public Law 73:10
31 USC 3113
31 USC 35312
28 USC 2041
26 USC 3
26 USC 1275
15 USC Subsection 1
12 USC 95
1 USC 8
23 USC 2045
In order to force the Judge to do this, you have to appoint the Judge as your trustee by filing the IRS trustee form and filing it in your foreclosure case record, and maybe even in the public record. And probably requesting a motion for the Judge to discharge your debt, based upon the aforementioned laws cited.
A lady did this, Sheila Pilat in Arizona and was successful in stopping her foreclosure.
Link to look up the court court case # CV2010-016616 Maricopa County, AZ
this is where Sheila Pilat made the Judge a trustee.
where she got the bank's foreclosure case dismissed
Case # CV2010-016616 Maricopa County, Arizona
Citi Mortgage Inc. v. Peter M.. Pilat, and Sheila Pilat
This is the link to get the full court case and all the filings in Sheila Pilat's successful case:
http://tinyurl.com/mmfdrov
You see when you make the judge a trustee, due to conflicts of interest issues, and the chance of personally getting sued by the borrower if the judge doesn't do things legally and correctly, the Judge then wants nothing to do with the foreclosure case, so he dismisses the foreclosure action.
Box the Judge in a corner and you will get results. I boxed a Judge into a corner, not by this method of appointing him a trustee, but using his own words against him in a motion I filed, and got a $93,000 mortgage note forgiven 5 months later. Course the Judge never decided on my motion either which is a $250,000 abuse of due process violation. It's as if he ignored the motion of mine which put egg on his face and wanted to have nothing to do with it, either in my favor, or against my favor. Even stranger was that Chase Bank vanished from all 3 of my credit reports. You would think the account should have shown "settled" or "paid in full" since it was a forgiven account, but now there is no history of this loan on any of my credit files. It's as if the "loan account" was never issued. I wonder if that was done on purpose due to the fraud I uncovered or if it's just the policy of Chase Bank to do that. Maybe someone with more expertise in this area would know. Course I owed about $130,000 if you count the interest. That was in Oct. 2016 when banks weren't really forgiving mortgage notes very often. Alot of forgiveness went on in 2013-2014 as the banks were getting a dollar for dollar credit off their billions of governmental fines to forgive debt, so the banks were forgiving alot of 2nd mortgage debt, and houses that were under water, and the worst of loans. But by 2015 the major banks probably came close to paying off their fines by the forgiveness of bad debt they had already done, and payments they had made, so come 2016, a forgiveness of a loan became much more rare. Course banks were forgiving debts that they didn't even own, and got caught doing that by the government overseers too, so I don't know how much debt forgiveness got reversed.
Can't prove for certainty that the reason I got my note forgiven and a home free & clear, was because I boxed the Judge and the bank into a corner by showing a conspiracy between the judge and the bank, but no other explanation makes sense as Chase Bank fought me for 7 years, and they were the only creditor that showed up when I filed Chapt. 13 bankruptcy 4 times within a 2.5 year period of time to save my rental home from losing it, and they were relentless, so any other reason why they got soft and gave up, makes no sense to me.
I know Kurt Johnson appointed Judge Alsup as his trustee in the federal court in CA. This private bankers instrument was in the amount of 600 Million Dollars. This instrument should have been paid through Kurt's private Treasury Account on the private side of banking. That's 300 Million to pay off the bond that attached to his criminal case, for Kurt, and 300 Million to pay off the bond attached to Scott's criminal charges too. I was surprised to understand that the bonds are really that high, but it's true, the cost is really 600 Million Dollars even though the banks suffered no loss as admitted in the court record too by the US Attorney's. LOL Theoretically, this payment which was never refused by Judge Alsup's court since it was never legally dishonored, or returned, discharged the bonds attached to his incarceration, or Judge Alsup is in violation of his duties as Kurt & Scott's trustee for not discharging this obligation. Probably both conditions apply in law. In theory, like in the game of monopoly, this should have acted as a "get out of jail free" card for both of them, as the real Bodies of Kurt & Scott's act as collateral for the court bonds that were issued and sold in the secondary markets. This is why you have to serve your prison terms, which is 24.5 years for Kurt & 21.5 years for Scott approximately, or pay your way out and file the necessary paperwork which is the other option, because these bonds exist, and are debt obligations keeping them in prison.
This issuance of a bankers acceptance instrument to the court is all in the court case record which is public information and anyone can look this up.
So yes, the courts are suppose to discharge all debt, but why aren't they doing it is the better question? Is there something missing in order to force the courts to do this is my question?
So in the end at some point in time, the damages for imprisoning Kurt & Scott illegally and creating a bogus criminal court case against the two, since all the issues were settled previously to the criminal case by the Dorean Presentments and administrative default judgments against the banks that they perfected and even secured them with UCC-1 statements filed in CA, so keeping them in prison for years illegally, is going to be scores of billions of dollars in damages awarded someday when their injustices are finally recognized. Can't wait for that day, it's coming though. There will be an accounting of all these things.
Mogel, who's paying the property tax on your free & clear home? The bank or you? Or is the tax assessor forgiving you for that every year?
Mogel said: "I know Kurt Johnson appointed Judge Alsup as his trustee in the federal court in CA. This private bankers instrument was in the amount of 600 Million Dollars."
________________________
Six hundred million Dollars????? You mean 600 hundred million FRNS. Judges don't discharge all debt because if they did they'd be discharging FRNS- the very stuff the are dependent on every two weeks. Discharing all debt is the same as discharging all FRNS. Get the picture? If they discharged all debt they discharge all FRNS. A real debt is a contract entered into and signed by BOTH parties. The bank never signs so it's not a valid contract. Judges don't discharge contracts they discharge FRNS and they have to be careful not to discharge ALL FRNS because in doing so they discharge themselves out of a job.
_______________
"You see when you make the judge a trustee,...."
suppose the judge either, refuses to become turstee, OR accepts and then immediately resings or appoinst anther person as trustee in his place??
Only in the Fek'd up Federal Reserve System can a judge become a trustee. Real judges are supposed to be independent and impartial to the case. If you make him a trustee he loses the ability to be an independent impartial.
Yes 600M FRN's is correct.
I suppose if the Judge resigns as trustee, you put your objection on the court record.
Tax assessor won't forgive the real estate taxes. I have to pay that. Although for a while the bank was paying that too. At some point, they stopped, so I owe the current real estate tax due.
it all gonna come to a end with the global currency reset which is imminent, thats why usa bombed syria, to try to start a war to prevent the gcr
"Tax assessor won't forgive the real estate taxes."
_________________
I didn't think so.
Please tell me how the judge can be both judge and trustee at the same time. If the judge becomes the trustee who becomes the judge? Without a judge what happens to the case?
"it all gonna come to a end with the global currency reset which is imminent, thats why usa bombed syria, to try to start a war to prevent the gcr"
_____
They're saying the chemical bomb that maimed and killed all those children in Syria was a false flag- it gave the President a reason to go in and bomb Syria- just as 9/11 was a false flag because they wanted to take over Iraq
I don't know how a Judge can be trustee and administrator of the case, maybe that's why Sheila Pilat got her case dismissed, maybe the Judge saw that apparent dilema too and didn't want to deal with it. How can the Judge side with the banks 99% of the time and even in some cases give advice to the banks attorney in court? They have no problem doing that.
Yea, it sure looks like a false flag in Syria pertaining to the attack yesterday. Somebody seems to want a war between Russia and the U.S. These are scary times. I hope things don't escalate. I hope the attack was just tit for tat and nothing more.
Yea, I also think the globalists want to take over Syria as the ultimate agenda, just like the U.S.'s job was to take over Iraq at the time and totally disrupt that country too. That's why the instigators are ruining the country of Syria and why you have these mass migrations from Syria now, affecting many countries and people wanting to leave Syria because it's too unsafe. Assad is getting blamed for the gas attacks on children, and even Trump is saying this, but there are those saying he's not doing it, but that it's a false flag. My gut feeling says this is true.
Problem is Russia is defending Syria, and if US goes to an all out war in Syria, whoever, you think you are fighting, you might as well declare war against Russia too because Russia's involvement will escalate too, and Russia will take that as an affront, which will only start World War III.
Who really wants that whoever is to really blame?
It's becoming more obvious that maybe Syria is going to be the epicenter for World War III. I hope I'm wrong about that.
Politics- it's all about business. Buying and selling and making money.
Trump Owned Stock in The Company He Just Helped Make a Billion Overnight by Bombing Syria
http://thefreethoughtproject.com/according-to-his-most-r-firing-59-missiles-into-syria/
The report showed that Trump also owns or has owned stock in many well-known companies including Apple, Nike, Whole Foods, Google, Philip Morris, McDonald’s, Facebook, and Morgan Stanley, among many others — including many other defense contractors who stand to make billions off Trump’s aggression.
Read more at http://thefreethoughtproject.com/according-to-his-most-r-firing-59-missiles-into-syria/#hg7WcdyulWH4CUAo.99
https://libertyblitzkrieg.com/2017/04/07/prepare-for-impact-this-is-the-beginning-of-the-end-for-u-s-empire/#more-43554
From the post, Very Powerful People in the U.S. Government Want War – This is Their Sales Pitch:
We need to understand that those who want this war will be absolutely relentless. The sales pitch will not end until they get exactly what they want. This is where all of us critical thinkers need to play a key role. We must be prepared to diligently analyze all unsubstantiated official claims, and push back against the war-mongers, because we know for certain the oligarch-owned corporate media won’t. We must be prepared to inform our fellow citizens about what’s happening so that we don’t fall victim to a cheap sales pitch with devastating consequences. Unfortunately, we must also be prepared for a possible deep state false flag if the current sales tactic falls on deaf ears.
Jordan Maxwell on the rise of machines:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fslzB35qu-g
15:45 "The U.S. as a corporation, it sort of leans into 2 subjects that I have always been fascinated by- secret societies and artificial intelligence (aka A.I.). I really think that corporations sort of mirror these 2 subjects. There's even very high place persons who have alluded to the fact that corporation is sort of like a precursor to Artificial Intelligence."
https://twitter.com/HenryMakow/status/850869982254829569/photo/1
Lord Rothschild: Bibi, Americans are complaining the bombing wasn't justified because Syria hasn't attacked America. SO YOU KNOW WHAT TO DO.
Bibi: Yes, Lord Rothschild. I'll have Mossad do another 9/11 on America, and this time we'll leave SYRIAN passports at the scene.
http://www.dailycamera.com/boulder-county-news/ci_30906805/peoples-grand-jury-accused-threatening-elected-officials-judges
https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-P3EjgMdKw0w/WOuzlQjzFHI/AAAAAAAADTM/DbsCR-rbag4tObFbX9YAVCkOXzdBppWGgCLcB/s1600/Mortgage-Elimination-Nov-2011-AtlantaB.png
Did anyone catch this??????
"....Our goal is to.....". https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=5v1yZ-7DR5w
WTF? Was this a verbal slip? .....I no...I no...Of curse it was.....
good ole uncle scam....
http://www.unz.com/tsaker/a-multi-level-analysis-of-the-us-cruise-missile-attack-on-syria-and-its-consequences/#comments
Legal aspects of the attack:
The US attack happened in direct violation of US law, of international law and of the UN charter. First, I would say that there is strong legal evidence that the US attack violated the US Constitution, Presidential War Powers Act and the 2001 Authorization of Military Force (AUMF) resolution. But since I don’t really care about this aspect of Trump’s criminal behavior, I will just refer you to two pretty good analyses of this issue (see here and here) and just simply summarize the argument of those who say that what Trump did was legal. It boils down to this: “yeah, it’s illegal, but all US Presidents have been doing it for so long that they have thereby created a legal precedent which, uh, makes it legal after all“. I don’t think this kind of “defense” is worthy of a reply or rebuttal. So now let’s turn to international law.
Most people think that crimes against humanity or genocide must be the ultimate crime under international law. They are wrong. The ultimate crime is aggression. This is the conclusion of the Nuremberg Trial on this topic:
To initiate a war of aggression, therefore, is not only an international crime; it is the supreme international crime differing only from other war crimes in that it contains within itself the accumulated evil of the whole.
So, following the long and prestigious list of other US Presidents before him, Donald Trump is now a war criminal. In fact, he is a “supreme war criminal”. It only took him 77 days to achieve this status, probably some kind of a record.
Re: the boulder-county-news/peoples-grand-jury-accused-threatening-elected-officials-judges.
Sad news indeed.
The people of the People's Grand Jury need to start listening to some videos by the late-great Buddhist philosopher Alan Watts how to get justice in a world of no justice.
Post a Comment