Saturday, October 22, 2005

Indictment Equals Victory

I once said in a television interview with Fox News in South Carolina that the dumbest thing they could do was to bring criminal charges. Well, thank your government for being patently stupid. The bankers would have been better off playing the hit and miss of civil jurisdiction using high priced lawyers and every kinky trick in the book to stall our success. Having moved to criminal they have guaranteed us victory. This will be a little lengthy and you should get a copy of the indictment for your reference. It was filed as CR05-00611 DLJ in the Northern District of California Federal Court. I shouldn’t give the prosecution such a heads up but I am confident his case is un-winnable and besides I want to expose him to his corrupt self who having knowledge of innocence will still prosecute for job security and political demand. I want him to realize evil has a high price on all participants. Remember they can bluff you uneducated clients out of your rights but not me. So let the games begin. The indictment has 46 counts but only 1-12 really matter. These are the criminal elements and the rest is the overt acts. The acts are listed merely to create a presumption that 1-12 occurred. If 1-12 fail, 13-46 fail automatically. I will focus on 1-12 for this reason. Pay attention Mr. Keller!

1. Yada Yada! Foundation agreed to in most part.
2. More foundation.
3. Foundation for conspiracy and artifice means nothing without scheme.
4. First meaty accusation: line items 22, 23 are the key proofs “falsely alleging” did or did I not have authority? Can prove I did hands down. “repaid” wrong word and can’t prove. Accurate description is prepaid. “appearing” fluff word to make them feel good. If real there is no appearing about it. They will have to bring the witnesses who can swear out they did not authorize. There are only few in each corporation who qualify. Of these I can get all to admit to felonies by cross-examination. What felonies you ask, Mr. Keller? Do your homework. I’ll do my job. This will impress the jury when proceedings have to stop so the state’s witness can be informed of his rights not to incriminate himself. Will they continue? Most executives will not. Oops! What if this happens to 2, 3, 5 state’s witnesses what would you think as a juror? Mr. Keller is going to put Dorean on the map as the most innovative layman legal theorist of modern time and personally should shock the mortgage industry whose fraud was exposed through the reverse engineering of a federal criminal trial. Thank you!
5.6. More foundation for wire fraud. All means nothing if you can’t prove the basic elements.
7. “Debt Elimination” This is an important mis-characterization in that it does not truly reflect our mortgage challenge process and when a debt cannot be proven what happens to your “debt elimination scheme theory”? The trust is a typical estate planning and will draw no real energy in trial.
8. “Claim” Line 15 easily supported by documentation. 16: “Demand the lender prove the validity of the loan” Oh what a crime! 17: “unilateral satisfaction of Dorean” Now here’s the big heap of poo poo that the prosecutor steps in. If the satisfaction has sound legal basis completely outside of the Dorean psyche, lender’s become the bad guys. 18: “Purport” if the offer is real what then? 20: “Holds no substantial assets” Here another dead end. They would like to prove the bond had no substance. Impossible! Save that bombshell for later. 22: “Borrower” not going to be able to prove that nature of the party. Oops! No borrower? What’s that do to loan theory or debt theory? 26: “Tacit assent and default” I think he means tacit procuration and fault based on performance. Which when proven means the government is trespassing on contracts. If I can find the law that justifies these elements, why can’t he? Because truth is too good for these evil rat bastards. 27: “In accordance with mortgage agreements” First off, this agreement is superseded but if it comes into play I will use it to prove the elements of fraud in the loan and again states witness is the bad guy.
9. “at least 10 days has elapsed” Hey finally a free testimony. We did what we said and bound ourselves to the contract. I hate it when that happens.
10. “Acting purportedly on behalf of the lender as its agent” I can prove I was no problem if they knew anything about contract law they would fold this hand. These cards are a loser. Line 16 “when such loan has not been fully paid” can prove it was paid 3 times and was not a loan. Another big problem. “Signed and recorded fraudulently” This requires intent even if I was legally wrong. Pay attention every corrupt county recorder because my prevailing here makes you all liable for commercial trespass, practice of law and punitive damages. Thank you feds!
11. 22 “appearing to be free and clear “28” not fully paid” reiterations of unprovable claims. Wouldn’t want Mr. Keller’s job. Do you think a rookie FBI agent Matthew Ernst who doesn’t know shit about banking and commercial paper even knows the questions to ask in his collection of evidence?
12. This is the meat and their biggest problem. “knowingly conspire” and “well knowing”. Who and how are they going to prove an evil mental state? I’ve been publicly speaking on this subject for almost 2 years, wrote memorandums of law, educated lawyers, and documented my intent in thousands of public records. Even with corrupt trial practices and deliberate orders from an evidence controlling judge they will still not be able to keep this out. All said and done, “Make my Day!”

5 comments:

son of a prophet said...

WILL YOU SURVIVE TO SPEND ALL THE $$$$ YOU WILL GET???

(not if the govt. can help it) lol!


'Code Red' Vaccine Alert -
Another Deadly Deception
Road To Destruction Paved With Good Intentions
For Immediate Release
Contact Jackie Lindenbach
tetra@tetrahedron.org)
208-265-8065
10-21-5

SANDPOINT, ID -- "This is incredibly serious," wrote Ingri Cassel, National Vaccination Liberation Organization (VacLib) director. "So serious that the National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC)," led by President, Barbara Loe Fisher, issued a red alert on the Senate HELP Committee's passage of the "Biodefense and Pandemic Vaccine and Drug Development Act of 2005."

The bill, nicknamed "BioShield 2" is expected to pass in the Senate by year's end. In its technically accurate assessment, the NVIC warns the legislation will "strip Americans of the right to a trial by jury if harmed by an experimental or licensed drug or vaccine that they are forced by government to take whenever federal health officials declare a public health emergency."

Ms. Cassel issued the "CODE RED alert" for health groups nationwide to launch a concerted effort to stop Richard Burr's Republican bill co-sponsored by Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist (R-TN), Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee Chairman Mike Enzi (R-WY), and Senate Budget Committee Chairman Judd Gregg (R-NH).

According to Cassel everyone should oppose this bill by calling and e-mailing their senators to make them aware. The bill: a) undermines drug safety laws; b) violates the constitutional right to a trial by jury in case a vaccine or drug causes injuries; c) keeps the public in the dark about every aspect of vaccine research, development, injuries, and deaths resulting from the partnership between government and the pharmaceutical lobby; and d) forces mandatory compliance with public health proclamations demanding vaccinations and/or drugs be taken by anyone declared at risk, not necessarily infected.

"This is the latest deception and distraction issued by government and grassroots activists espousing public protectionism," said Dr. Leonard Horowitz, author of 15 books including the national bestseller, Emerging Viruses: AIDS & Ebola--Nature, Accident or Intentional? http://www.tetrahedron.org. "There is nothing new in this legislation that hasn't already been politically dictated."

Technically, Dr. Horowitz is also correct. Drug safety laws have been violated since their inception. The constitutional right to a jury trial fell years ago in cases brought against all federal officials including those engaged in public health practice. The National Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, co-sponsored by NVIC and initially promoted by Ms. Fisher, shielded drug companies from vaccine injury lawsuits. The public, even medical doctors, have always been in the dark about "proprietary" pharmaceutical intelligence, the nitty-gritty on drug testing for FDA approval, and vaccine injury data. And following 9-11, the Model State Emergency Health Powers Act passed by most states forced compliance with public health vaccination/intoxication mandates.

The only message worthy of social, not political, activism at this point is, "WAKE-UP! At least half of the world's population is targeted for elimination under the global elite's depopulation agenda," Dr. Horowitz insists. "Avian flu over the cuckoos nest. DO NOT, UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES, GET VACCCINATED WITH ANYTHING!"

Russian dissident Alexander Solzhenitsyn wrote the opening quote in the aforementioned bestseller. He claims, "To do evil, a human being must first of all believe that what he's doing is good. . . . Ideology is the social theory which helps to make his acts seem good instead of bad in his own and others' eyes, so that he won't hear reproaches and curses but will receive praise and honors."

This offers a great explanation of why "the road to destruction is paved with good intentions."

See also: http://www.drlenhorowitz.com
http://www.healingcelebrations.com
http://www.tetrahedron.org
http://www.originofAIDS.com

Tetrahedron Publishing Group
Health Science Communications
206 North 4th Avenue, Suite 147
Sandpoint, ID 83864
208-265-2575
208-265-2775 Fx

neodemes said...

Mogel babbled:
>>so they conned the borrower to allow the so called lender to have a lien on THEIR property.

If Kurt opens his mouth and starts spouting your usual convoluted logic, he might as well just shoot himself.

LOL

WillToFight said...

Mogel made alot of sense to me Neodomesfuckface.

You can't respond to Kurts post with any fact of defense for the bank.

Your a sucker neodomes

WillToFight said...

Good Post

SOP!

neodemes said...

Mogel babbled again

...

Byron, I don't know what papers you signed(if you ever even bought a house)3 days before signing a promissary note.

In my state, a warranty deed from the seller conveys ownership to the buyer. That occurs regardless of the payment method.

If a promissary note is involved, the terms of same are described in the Deed of Trust, with the borrower conveying ownership of the property to the Trustee until such time as the payment of debt, promised by the buyer, has been fulfilled.

No matter how many times you apply your pretzl logic, the reality is the money borrowed from the bank and paid to the seller is what buys the house.

Period.