Tuesday, December 27, 2005

My Staff Infection

For those of you that were in Vegas you saw my tears of pride for my staff. I wish they could have remained. The tears remained but the cause has drastically changed. That selfless staff became infected with every evil and betrayal. The GOO I mentioned way back when was a direct quote if I paid to have them finished. I paid them and became a fugitive. I could not supervise. Later I was told 350 was almost complete just a little more money. I paid! Now 210 are almost done and they will do the rest for free if they can have more money. I’m being extorted and betrayed by those I loved and served. They are stealing my equipment, work and my good intentions. This is some of the handicap I must overcome while incarcerated. I think hiring the FBI would be more efficient. The banksters are easy to deal with in comparison. I have never been abused by friends or enemies to this extent before. I have no hope of redemption; this infection is fatal and has killed any relationship that existed. This is one of the reasons the victory party will be sparsely attended. I will be hiring and I will look for the most evil people I can find. In this I will be comforted by the upgrade of personnel. There are but a couple exceptions and if you are reading this your honesty and love will be richly rewarded.

25 comments:

tcob247 said...

WOW........it must be tough dealing with people who promise to do something and then dont do it.

hockeydonn said...

It's amazing how some people just don't get it, Hu Taco. After reading your post, WOW is right.

Wake up Taco.
Wake up little buddy.
Wake up.
Anybody in there?
Cocka-doodle-doo!
Rise and shine!
Your scam is falling apart.
Get a clue.
Don't delay.
Hurry fast.
Your looking more and more like an idiot every day.
Wake up.
You can still come back to reality.
I have faith in miracles.
All things are possible.

sruly said...

Hi how are you ?

sruly said...

BioPerformance Inc. has introduced their exclusive product, BioPerformance Fuel. This product can give consumers up to 35% or more savings on fuel. The company does not in any way guarantee anyone any income, and it doesn't guarantee anyone any results using the product. If you so desire, people can simply use the product and see first-hand what kind of results they will get. The same is true with building a business with BioPerformance, Inc.

http://www.GasProfits.com/iperl

Tony Tuba said...

Taco Said:

"Which way did he go George.......Which way did he go?"




Yeah that pretty much sums Taco up!

tcob247 said...

So I take it you guys are all OK with paying $3,000 for a "free and clear mortgage" that you keep making payments on and Kurt owning your home through the quit claim thereby messing up the Title of the home.

If you are OK with that then I see why you are upset at me for stating the obvious.

You deserve each other.

Congrats on getting the charges dropped. Is he free and clear now?

When does he get out of jail to free up your mortgages?

Solvo said...

tcob247 said... So I take it you guys are all OK with paying $3,000 for a "free and clear mortgage" that you keep making payments on and Kurt owning your home through the quit claim thereby messing up the Title of the home.

REPLY: I think we answered this question once a month for you since the inception of this blog, and the answer is obvious.

tcob247 said... If you are OK with that then I see why you are upset at me for stating the obvious.

REPLY: It's how ofter you ask this question that makes us upset, so please get your memory capacity checked, so you don't ask us this again next month.

tcob247 said... You deserve each other.

REPLY: Thanks, and you deserve NeMo and JRB. Relationships made in heaven.


tcob247 said... Congrats on getting the charges dropped. Is he free and clear now?

REPLY: One down and one to go....

tcob247 said... When does he get out of jail to free up your mortgages?

REPLY: Sit in the corner next to NeMo rubbing your legs like a cricket, because it will happen.

What up Big "O" and Will?

cat2411 said...

Taco faith is believing what you can not see. I'm just sorry you don't get that.

cat2411 said...

Taco Faith is believing in something you can not see. I'm just sorry you don't understand that. I have faith in Kurt and Scott and I'm not alone. What the banks and our government is doing is wrong and someone needs to let the people know.

Bless you Kurt and Scott

Elmer Fudd said...

LoL all the Agents trying to justify "CACA" and gang up on someone who really tells it like it is...Dorean Agents = Really good cheerleaders...Dorean Agents = Bad Liars Priceless......Hey Clue get back in the closet before Dada Finds out.

imbigo said...

IM STILL WATCHING THAT DVD, ITS PRETTY AWSOM!!!

tcob, MAYBE YOU SHOULD GET A COPY, IT MAY OPEN YOUR EYES SOME, THATS IF YOUR WILLING TO LEARN!

ZUP WILL AND SOLVO.

BIG"O" 1+1+1=1

SEE YOU AT THE TOP!!!

verboy said...

tcob

Tony Tuba said...

Can someone tell Doug Cameron that Rasmus Lonbro is still an asshole.

WillToFight said...

What up Big O, What up Solvo!

And we're headed down the stretch!

You guys TACO is really really confused now.

Which way do I go, Which way do I go! Attribute that to his faulty programming.

Big O gave him a hint. Study, Study, Study. You might be able to think for yourself!

Ask the question, then question the answer!

WillToFight said...

ElmerFudgepieceofsh$t

How's life at the Municipal water treatment plant (the suer)? Your really not worth a response.

helplongpastdue said...

Kurt, your very words give you away as lying. Have you not been reading these posts?

People now have access to the California Sec. of State and can see the 300 plus UCC documents that have been completed by Douglas John Cameron, apostiled and assigned to First Mutual Trust in Switzerland by Douglas John Cameron.

Kurt come on, quit bullshitting everyone here, come clean and tell everyone the REAL reason for the delay. Or would you like us to expose the truth for you?

Peanut Gallery said...

helplongpastdue said,


Kurt come on, quit bullshitting everyone here, come clean and tell everyone the REAL reason for the delay. Or would you like us to expose the truth for you?


So, why don't you expose the truth for us? So many people post here who claim they have the truth. Rather than hold back, let loose with the information. It would be very helpful to those seeking peace of mind.

Solvo said...

helplongpastdue said...
Kurt come on, quit bullshitting everyone here, come clean and tell everyone the REAL reason for the delay. Or would you like us to expose the truth for you?

I would like for you and whomever else makes up "us" to "expose the truth", because I know everything going on, and I would love for you to tell me what I don't know about...

mogel said...

One thing that hurt the Dorean Group is when clients ran into trouble, the trustees would file a petition on their behalf. The Courts would say that a trustee (non-attorney) can't represent their clients in court if they aren't licensed attorney's, however, such a ruling is really unconstitutional & how can a trustee do his job when the Courts don't allow this? Herein lies another claim for many clients-denial of due process.

DENIAL OF NON-ATTORNEY COUNSEL VIOLATES CIVIL RIGHTS

Denial of Defendant's desire for a non-attorney of his choice is also a deprivation of his Civil Rights under color of law, in violation of
Defendant's fundamental Rights as protected by 42 U.S.C. 1983, 1985,
and
1986. See *Owens v. The City of Independence*.

Any denial of Counsel is an attempt to accomplish that which is specifically prohibited by the Sixth Amendment. The Right recognized therein says
nothing about only "court-approved counsel," and that fundamental Right is in no way qualified or limited.

The U.S. Supreme Court held in *Miller v. Milwaukee*, 272 U.S. 713, 715,
that if a statute is part of an unlawful scheme to reach a prohibited result, then "... the statute must fail ...."

This was again upheld in *McCallen v. Massachusetts*, 279 U.S. 620,
630.
Legislators, whether Federal or State, may not restrict the Courts to attorneys only in order effectively to deny Counsel to any Defendant who evinces a desire to be represented or assisted by a "friend" in preference
to a licensed "attorney." What cannot be done by the front door cannot be lawfully done by way of the back door.

Legislators who pass laws do not have to be attorneys, nor do those who execute the law, i.e. Sheriffs, Governors, Presidents, etc. Even the Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court need not be licensed attorneys. To exclude the People from defending their "friends" in the Courts turns said
Courts into a playground for the legal establishment, and is a blatant violation of the Defendant's fundamental Right to Counsel of choice, due
process of law, and equal protection under the law. Justice Brandeis said:

Discrimination is the act of treating differently two persons or things under like circumstances. *National Life Insurance Co. v. United
States*,
277 U.S. 508, 630.

As far back as 1886, the U.S. Supreme Court was concerned with the unjust and illegal discriminations which were running rampant. The Court frowned
upon law administered with an "unequal hand":

... so as practically to make unjust and illegal discrimination between
persons in similar circumstances material to their rights, the denial of equal justice is still within the prohibition of the Constitution.
*Yick Wo v. Hopkins* supra

Therefore, the Courts cannot be the exclusive territory of a legal
"elite corps," but must be open to all the Sovereign People alike on an equal basis, providing due process of Law and equal protection under that Law.

The Ninth and Tenth Amendments also prohibit the denial of Counsel of choice. Nowhere has Defendant or his predecessors delegated such restrictive
powers to the United States or to any of the Union states, and if the Court will closely examine the Ninth and Tenth Amendments, it will find that the Right to Counsel of choice, such as Defendant herein claims, is also
secured in the penumbra of these Amendments, particularly the Ninth Amendment, which
is protected in the states. *Roe v. Wade*, 41 L.W. 4213 (1973);
*Shapiro v.
U.S.*, 641, 394 US 618 (1966); *Griswold v. Connecticut*, 381 U.S. 479
(1964).

Speaking of controlling Constitutional law, as opposed to mere statute law,
Chief Justice Marshall said:

Those then, who controvert this principle, that the Constitution is to be considered in court as a paramount law, are reduced to the necessity of maintaining that courts must close their eyes on the Constitution and see only the law.

And the Court concluded that:

This doctrine would subvert the very foundation of all written
constitutions. *Marbury v. Madison*, 5 U.S. 137, 176

The United States Supreme Court also pointed out in this decision that, in declaring what should be the supreme law of the land, the Constitution itself was first mentioned and "... not the laws of the United States generally ...."

The attorneys who sit in our State legislatures and in our Congress
have no right to pass laws which infringe upon, or abolish, our fundamental Rights
under the Constitution for the United States of America, as lawfully amended, and such unconstitutional laws which purport to do so must be
declared null and void and not binding upon the Courts. See *Miranda v.
Arizona* supra, at 491.

mogel said...

In discussing a defendant's right to counsel, the U.S. Supreme Court
has held:

... [H]is right to be heard through his own counsel is UNQUALIFIED.
Chandler
v. Fretag, 348 U.S. 3 (emphasis added)

In consulting Noah Webster's 1828 dictionary, the word "unqualified" is defined as:

Not modified, limited, or restricted by conditions or exceptions; ....
(Noah
Webster's First Edition of an American Dictionary of the English
Language,
1828, republished in facsimile edition by Foundation for American
Christian
Education, San Francisco, California, second edition, 1980)

It is undeniable that the explicit use of the word "counsel" in the
Sixth Amendment was intended to mean someone other than an attorney, as well as an
attorney. This view is upheld by a U.S. District Court when it recognized an accountant as counsel, and reprimanded an IRS employee:

Yet while he was informing the prospective defendant of his Right to Counsel, he was simultaneously requesting that the Defendant's Counsel leave the interrogation. In effect, the investigator informed Tarlowski that
he might have his attorney present, but NOT his accountant.

Ruling in favor of Tarlowski's motion to suppress, the Court said:

For a government official to mouth in a ritualistic way part of the
warning about the right to counsel, while excluding the person relied upon as
counsel is, in effect, to reverse the meaning of the words used. U.S.
v.
Tarlowski, 305 F.Supp. 112 (1969)

Defendant also asks the Court to take Judicial Notice of the use of the word "COUNSEL" in the 17th century:

... and in all courts persons of all persuaisions [sic] may freely
appear in their own way, and according to their own manner and there plead their
own causes themselves, or if unable, *by their friends* .... Fundamental Constitution for the Province of East Jersey (1683) [emphasis added].

To have a "friend" act as Counsel was a Common Law Right and was
recognized as such in the Bill of Rights when the term "counsel" was used instead of the term "attorney".

WillToFight said...

Daaang

Mogel, don't stop doing what your doing! But, I got to cut an paste you info. It good and informative. It really goes along with Kurt latest post.

Thanks Mogel

WillToFight said...

HELPLONGPASTDUE

Sounds like Neodomenes! Just about what he'd write? Must be one of those bad hair days?

Elmer Fudd said...

WillToFight said...
ElmerFudgepieceofsh$t

How's life at the Municipal water treatment plant (the suer)? Your really not worth a response.

Dunno douchebag never been to your neck of the woods yet...

Wealth-Man said...

For all you ass---- out there that have not done any research on this matter should before you open your mouth about something you don't know what your talking about.

I have faith in Kurt and Scott and I'm not alone. What the banks and our government is doing is wrong and someone needs to let the people know.

Wealth-Man said...

All you need to do is some research on the website. All the info for what the banks are doing to us and backed by our Govermnet is there, read it study it and shut your mouths....

Thank you
The Wealth Man
Yes I got my Mortgage free and clear from this..