Wednesday, April 05, 2006

Minus the Sidetracks (3/27/06)

We are now before the troublemaker. Utah was not an originator, the feds created that. They were a scout that failed. I have done my best to give us the best chance of prevailing. There are no more delays of any substance. Every appearance accomplishes something even if it appears only to be a continuance to you. Judge Alsup has an agenda, which is smarter than the prosecutions. Each time we wrestle or grapple for preeminence. Now that our message from Christ has been completed the transversing can cease. It is all brass tacks from here. I do not have a vain imagination they will say “uncle” willingly so I must ever be present for tactical advantage. I am certain of this one thing. I will not be passively lulled into an argumentative discourse taking years. Those of you who pray and have the ear of God I thank you. I am certain your faithfulness has been a large measure of my strength and wisdom. Know that He who hears your prayers and has delivered in part will finish the work and bring you the deserved reward of victory. Imagine this temptation: I accuse you of fraud and all the discovery I provide proves me wrong. Would you argue? Wisdom is different than common sense. Remember Satan’s temptation of Christ, He never argued even though there was obvious reason to, but merely stated fact. Think on this when the fraudulent judiciary and their bar hacks accuse you in the future.

18 comments:

habakkuk said...

Dito to that

WillToFight said...

Kurt said.....

Imagine this temptation: I accuse you of fraud and all the discovery I provide proves me wrong. Would you argue? Wisdom is different than common sense. Remember Satan’s temptation of Christ, He never argued even though there was obvious reason to, but merely stated fact.
_________________
WillToFight said....

So this is the way it has been going! All these naysayers accussing us of fraud, with no evidence to back it up!

What a witch hunt.

Force there hand Kurt & Scott. Keep the faith!

What up Big O?

habakkuk said...

Peanut Gallery said...

Hab,

Will you be doing a Seder on Wednesday?

YES, I WILL BE:)

habakkuk said...

Yes, Baruch HaShem....Blessed is G-d!!

Yetter said...

continue to wonder.

Unknown said...

Previously, I stated...

"desperation sure is ugly"

I stated this because I know all about desperation. I can't get a date to save my life.

son of a prophet said...

lol.....maybe the DG should open a 'branch office' in mayheeco, as even the mayheecans realize that the banksters are no good......heheheheheheeee..........


--------------------------------




MEXICO CITY (Reuters) - The leftist front runner to become Mexico's next president said its top business leaders and bankers make up an elite "mafia" that has cozied up to government to win favors at the expense of the masses.

Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador delivered the scathing attack during his morning television show on Monday and in a weekend campaign swing among peasants in the Gulf state of Veracruz, in a departure from his earlier conciliatory attitude toward big business.

"We face a mafia, a gang, people who have dedicated themselves to taking advantage of the government and putting it at the service of a minority ruining the country," he said on Monday.

Asked to specify, he said he was referring to "the biggest business people in Mexico, who were not even business people. In the strictest sense they are speculators, influence mongers."

He said President Vicente Fox has been manipulated by special interests, betraying promises to clean up government after his 2000 election ended 71 years of rule by the Institutional Revolutionary Party, or PRI.

Lopez Obrador, who leads the polls in the July 2 vote, is a former Mexico City mayor popular for his promise to end two decades of free-market reforms and put the poor first. He has caused some fear in business circles that he would introduce populist programs that could wreck Mexico's financial stability.

He has repeatedly said he is not an enemy of business, calling for a combined public and private investment in Mexico's future. But his new hard line comes as he faces fresh attacks from conservative rivals over his record as mayor.

Lopez Obrador told indigenous supporters at the weekend that Mexicans are still paying for the government's $100 billion bank bailout in 1995 when an economic crisis devastated Mexico's financial sector.

"Do you know what the banks live off of? The interest we are paying (for the rescue)," he said. The crowd shouted back: "They keep us poor, the thieves."

Critics say more money was handed out than the banks needed, and Lopez Obrador says Fox has continued such favors to big bankers who backed his campaign.

He said he would "clear things up" with the banks if elected president, although he has been reluctant to meet with them during the campaign.

son of a prophet said...

mr. lopez said.....

"He said he would "clear things up" with the banks if elected president, although he has been reluctant to meet with them during the campaign."

---------------------------


dear mr. lopez,

i have read your article with much interest, and in that light of wanting to help you 'clear things up in mayheeco, i would like to suggest that we initiate the opening of a branch office of the DG right there in your home state of mayheeco. the ppl there will be well pleased at us trying to fight the banksters. i would like to open the first satellite office in mayheeco city and will hire many brokers and together we can rid mayheeco of the corrupt banksers.

wha do yo thinks 'bout this idea?

sincerely,

/S/

son a prophet

/S/

habakkuk said...

tictoc says.....

I hope he knows what he's doing but his statements here on the blog
create doubts of his sanity.

Law schools even Law itself is based on logic not superstition.

___________________________________


Well, lets hear what the Bible says about it...Which i hold up higher then what men think:

"I know very well how foolish the message of the cross sounds to those who are on the road to destruction. But we who are being saved recognize this message as the very power of God. As the Scriptures say,

'I will destroy human wisdom
and discard their most brilliant ideas'

(I'll have to get back to u on the exact chapter and verse)

habakkuk said...

I corinthians 1:18

habakkuk said...

I Corinthians 1:21

21 For since, in the wisdom of God, the world through wisdom did not know God, it PLEASED God through the foolishness of the message preached to save those who believe.

___________________________________

By the way, we are NOT snake charmers.

habakkuk said...

TicToc says...

The issue is: Does Kurt have his religion under control? He sounds like a fanatic. Is he? Can he deal rationally in court?

___________________________________

THe point i was trying to make about the scriptures i quoted was that theres a diffirence between
G-dly Wisdom (only available thru the Holy Spirit) and worldly wisdom
(Man's fleshly reasoning which does not please G-d). If Kurt is using the Word of G-d as the standard (which is also the foundation of most of our laws) and he speaks using that in his talking points then I say..SO BE IT. What he speaks is truth...right. If you think he will end up sounding like a nut in court then thats your opinion...Lets see what the results are.

We all know that the Judges and prosecutors know they are not crazy.....They are just conspiring against them to make it look like they are so the real issue doesnt come to light. But no judge on earth can stop the ALL POWERFUL JUDGE (G-d) from excecuting justice in a matter once HE decides to do so.

Its just like Yeshua, they knew HE wasn't crazy (although human reasoning would say he was).Heck, the pharisees probably even knew He was the son of G-d but they were so driven by their greed and hunger for power that they wanted HIM gone...no matter how. But they had NO POWER OVER HIM...HE LAID HIS OWN LIFE DOWN.

My point: God is the ultimate authority behind this whole matter and HE will bring justice...sooner or later. I like Kurt because he at least recognizes that and he's got the balls to stand up before a judge and declare that...even if it makes him look crazy. These are the kind of men G-d is looking for to represent him. Not a bunch of wimps who fear men....but men who fear G-d.

habakkuk said...

tictoc says...

In order for this program to work we need a Clarence Darrow not a Jim Jones.

___________________________________

True....And u need the Holy Spirit to help u tell who is truly representing HIM and who is the wolf in sheeps clothing (i.e. jim jones). Thats why people who dont have the Spirit of G-d living inside them are susceptable to being deceived. Even those who do have the HS can ignore G-d's warning and be deceived at times. In my spirit i believe Kurt's motivations are sincere. If they were not...believe me... he would have cracked in jail months ago. I believe its nothing but the Holy Spirit that has given him and Scott the physical and mental strength to get this far.

son of a prophet said...

from Timothy....."a form of Godliness, but, they deny its Power...."

----------------------------------


NOW HERE IS HOLY SPIRIT WISDOM....

the above verse from the Book of Timothy is referring to the Holy Spirit; ie., the "Power".

the power that it being denied is the Power of the Holy Spirit.

AND YET, YOU WILL NOT FIND A BIBLE ON P-L-A-N-E-T THAT STATES THIS FACT.

it must have been removed by the ptb a very long time ago. but when reading taht verse many years ago, the HS revealed that to me; ie., that the power that is being denied is the power of the Holy Spirit.

when one is given HS wisdom, one can go 'above' the printed bible (so to speak) to retrieve what was taken out by the ptb that they do not wnat chrisians to know.

this is what the unlimited wisdom of the HS can do. how many church pastors know this????

none.

ask them 'to what power are they referring to in that verse?'

all will just say the power of God, or of Yeshua. in some sense, they would be correct, but THE EXACT ANSWER IS "THE POWER OF THE HOLY SPIRIT" TO......TO SAVE, TO HEAL, TO FORGIVE, ETC. ETC. ETC.

UNLIMITED POWER.

OBVIOUSLY, YOU CANNOT ASK TO HOLY SPIRIT TO PRINT MONEY, ETC...

BUT HE CAN HELP ONE DEBTS GET PAID.

THAT IS NOT UNREASONABLE TO ASK.

son of a prophet said...

MOST CHRISTIANS PUT "LIMITS" ON THE POWER OF THE HOLY SPIRIT, SO IN ESSENCE, THEY UNDESTANDING OF THE HOLY SPIRIT POWER IS LIMITED.

ONCE ONE UNDERSTANDS THAT THE HS POWER HAS NO LIMITS, THEN WHAT CAN BE ACCOMPLISHED BECOMES "UNLIMITED".

SUCH IS THE POWER OF THE HOLY SPIRIT.

"BEHOLD, I GIVE YOU THE POWER TO TREAD ON SNAKES,(MORTAGE LENDERS) AND SCORPIONS, (BANKERS) AND OVER ALL THE POWER OF THE ENENMY, AND NOTHING BY ANY MEANS SHALL HURT YOU.."

son of a prophet said...

also, i want to comment that i see no problem whatsoever with using/quoting scripture in the court proceedings...


my admonition against using scriptural relevancy was to posting it on this blog, not to using it in the courtroom.

habakkuk said...

SOP,

Well spoken;)

son of a prophet said...

1. Under the Laws of Commerce, Truth is Sovereign
The foundation of the Uniform Commercial Code (U.C.C.) is Commercial Law. The foundation of Commercial Law is based upon certain universal, eternally just, valid, moral precepts and truths. The basis of Commercial Law is the Law of Exodus (i.e. The 10 Commandments) of the Old Testament and Judaic (Mosaic) Orthodox Hebrew Commercial law. The Laws of Commerce have remained unchanged for at least six thousand years and form the basis of western civilization, if not all nations. This law of commerce therefore applies universally throughout the world. Real Commercial Law is non-judicial and is prior and superior to, the basis of, and cannot be set aside or overruled by the statutes of any government, legislature, governmental or quasi-governmental agencies, courts, judges, and law enforcement agencies, which are under an inherent obligation to uphold said Commercial Law. Commercial Law is a “War of Truth” expressed in the form of an intellectual weapon called an Affidavit. An Affidavit is merely a written list of facts or truths signed under penalty of perjury and usually notarized. The person composing and signing an affidavit is called the “affiant”. It is “survival of the fittest” where the last unrebutted stands triumphant.

In the Laws of Commerce, the eternal and unchanging principle of the law are:

1. A workman is worthy of his hire. Authorities: Exodus 20:15; Lev. 19:13; Matt. 10:10; Luke 10:7; II Tim. 2:6. Legal maxim: “It is against equity for freemen not to have the free disposal of their own property.

2. All are equal under the law (God’s Law-Moral and Natural Law). Authorities: Exodus 21:23-25; Lev. 24:17-21; Deut. 1:17, 19:21; Matt. 22:36-40; Luke 10:17; Col. 3:25. Legal maxims: “No one is above the law.”; “Commerce, by the law of nations, ought to be common, and not to be converted into a monopoly and the private gain of a few.”

3. In commerce, truth is sovereign. See Exodus 20:16; Psalms 117:2; John 8:32; II Cor. 13:8. Legal maxim: “To lie is to go against the mind.” Oriental proverb: “Of all that is good, sublimity is supreme.”

4. Truth is expressed in the form of an Affidavit. See Lev. 5:4-5; Lev. 6:3-5; Lev. 19:11-13; Num. 30:2; Matt. 5:33; James 5:12.

5. A matter must be expressed to be resolved. See Heb. 4:16; Phil. 4:5; Eph. 6:19-21. Legal maxim: “He who fails to assert his rights has none.”

6. An unrebutted affidavit stands as truth in commerce. See 1 Pet. 1:25; Heb. 6:13-15. Legal maxim: “He who does not deny, admits.”

7. An unrebutted affidavit becomes a judgment in commerce. See Heb. 6:16-17. Any proceeding in court, tribunal, or arbitration forum consists of a contest, or “duel,” of commercial affidavits wherein the points remaining unrebutted in the end stand as the truth and the matters to which the judgment of the law is applied.

8. He who leaves the field of battle first (does not respond to Affidavit) loses by default. See Book of Job; Matt 10:22. Legal maxim: “He who does not repel a wrong when he can occasions it.”

9. Sacrifice is the measure of credibility. One who is not damaged, put at risk, or willing to swear an oath on his commercial liability for the truth of his statements and legitimacy of his actions has no basis to assert claims or charges and forfeits all credibility and right to claim authority. See Acts 7, life/death of Stephen. Legal maxim: “He who bears the burden ought also to derive the benefit.”

10. A lien or claim, under commercial law, can only be satisfied by one of the following actions. See Gen. 2-3; Matt 4; Revelation. Legal maxim: “If the plaintiff does not prove his case , the defendant is absolved.”

10.1. A rebuttal Affidavit of Truth, supported by evidence, point-by-point.

10.2. Payment.

10.3. Agreement.

10.4. Resolution by a jury according to the rules of common law.

Because truth is sovereign in commerce and everyone is responsible for propagating the truth in all speaking, writing, and acting, all commercial processes function via affidavit certified and sworn on each affiants commercial liability as “true, correct, and complete,” attesting under oath re the validity, relevance, and veracity of all matters stated, and likewise demanded. Usually in written matters, such as on an IRS Form 1040, 8300, etc., voter registration application, driver’s license application, notary form for document certification, application for a Treasury Direct Account, and on nearly every document that those who run the System desire anyone to sign in a commercially binding matter, signature is required under penalty of perjury “true, correct, and complete.” In a court setting, however, testimony (oral commercial affidavit) is stated in the judicial equivalent by being sworn to be “the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth, so help me God.” As well the need for asserting all matters under solemn oath of personal, commercial, financial, and legal liability for the validity of each and every statement, participant must provide material evidence, i.e. ledgering/bookkeeping, substantiating that each fact or entry is true, valid, relevant, and verifiable. Without said acceptance of liability and facts provided to support one’s assertions, no credibility is established.