Wednesday, September 10, 2008

All or Nothing (8-25-08)

Most certainly all we can know of God comes to us through the miracle of divine revelation in a small and close intimacy. This is not ever intended to narrow our vision or faith. On the contrary it is designed to be our launching pad into the vast and spacious expanse of God's person and character. First we look to the things He has done but this is still not the intimacy of a son. A son can know something of his father by reputation but what will he know of him by seeking him out in relationship? The miracles of the book of Acts are inspiring but God wants to know of you now in this generation. Is it not said that He who freely gave His son will not freely give to you? Look, human thought and imagination cannot capture the vastness of God's goodness or His mercies. You are the one that needs to expand your faith and petitions. God wants to do a new thing. Your testimony of the great works faith and prayer have wrought is the testimony this generation seeks. Moses and the Egyptians will only add relevance to a God they discover is alive and ruling today. Christianity is potent because of historical facts. Is not your life His story? What facts are apparent in your life. What prayers are answered? What have you conquered? What miracles have you witnessed? Why exactly do you suspect God called you to this Dorean mess and the truth of credit? Is there not a His story He is writing with your life? Do you want a boring story of existence or a great power and might. Jesus lives forever to make intercession for you. Can you understand what can be accomplished if the simple tears of your prayers are joined to this cataract of potential? Jesus said of the cross "I am trouble but for this very thing I came into the world." Your troubles came into your world for the same reason, to show Christ as the all in all. Wake up to your opportunity and get to praying for "all things" "whatsoever" and "anything." I want Alsup saved, family healed, clients prosperous and wise full of the knowledge of Christ, victor over the lie of the bankers and His will done on earth as it is in heaven, and I won't quit until I get it all and more!

12 comments:

mogel007 said...

This case in NC was filed & appealed in Feb. 2008 by Fremont & the Court of Appeals affirmed the the lower courts opinion that the first lienholder (Household) had the PRIORITY lien over Fremont, the later lien filed, even though the Household lien was cancelled by the Dorean Group & unpaid:


http://www.aoc.state.nc.us/
www/public/coa/opinions/
2008/070362-1.htm

What is bothersome from this court case is that the Judge said that there was no need or legal obligation to respond to the administrative demand by the Dorean Group as if the whole administrative demand was based upon fraud & hence could be ignored.

It would be interesting if Fremont wanted to take this case all the way to the Supreme Court to see if they would also agree assuming the Supreme Court would even hear the case.

Scott from Vineland said...

And if the Supreme Court upheld the ruling, what would that say to you?

Judge Roy Bean said...

Why is it bothersome? There has never been a legitimate requirement to respond to these kinds of scams no matter when they were filed.

Fremont got screwed but even they admitted it was a scam; they just tried to hang it on Household as something they should have been aware of at the time. Bad timing.

judge allslop said...

Any bets on which bank will fail after 5pm Friday? Wamu,Lehman,Merrill?
Who will get a bail out this weekend? GM, an airline perhaps. Which "scam" to you refer to Bean?

notorial dissent said...

Moogs is bothered .... and bewildered it would seem....
What is bothersome from this court case is that the Judge said that there was no need or legal obligation to respond to the administrative demand by the Dorean Group as if the whole administrative demand was based upon fraud & hence could be ignored.

Gee Moogs, two whole civil court cases, both saying exactly the same thing, and it still alludes you that nonsense is nonsense??? What part of it is total and complete nonsense don’t you get? You now have both a federal and a state court ruling that Dorean was a crock, and you’re bothered.

more Moogie ponderings
It would be interesting if Fremont wanted to take this case all the way to the Supreme Court to see if they would also agree assuming the Supreme Court would even hear the case.

Interesting only if you’re looking for more confirmation of crockery.

It is not like this isn’t all long settled matters of law. Fraud does not vitiate reality, no matter how hard you want to believe it does, and a release created by fraud is not a valid release, and never has been, yet this come as a surprise to you.

Yetter said...

hahahahaha.You must be referring to the law of JUST-US.

dr. ira gilac said...

i see dat juggles is still here 'in the end.....'

mogel007 said...

Judge said: Fremont got screwed but even they admitted it was a scam; they just tried to hang it on Household as something they should have been aware of at the time. Bad timing.
_________________________________

Actually your perceived facts are incorrect.

Fremont was very aware of the Dorean Process presentment FOR QUITE SOME TIME. As a matter of fact, the first Dorean client, Sarah Magoon, had Fremont as her lender & Fremont was the FIRST LENDER to cause problems.

Fremont did not admit the Dorean Process was a scam. The "scam" part was assumed or decreed by the Judge as a pretext & HE DID NOT BASE THAT OPINION UPON ANYTHING in his ruling. He just assumed that the Dorean Group did not have proper power of attorney or proper authorization to release any mortgages.

What Fremont said was that Household should have informed Fremont of Household's alleged wrongful mortgage cancellation by the Dorean Group. Household went to great lengths to say that they WEREN'T EVEN AWARE OF THE HOUSEHOLD'S MORTGAGE CANCELLATION UNTIL MANY DAYS AFTER FREMONT HAD EXTENDED A LOAN, so HOUSEHOLD COULDN'T EVEN BE CONSIDERED NEGLIGENT, EVEN IF HOUSEHOLD HAD SOME OBLIGATION TO INFORM FREMONT OF SOME CHANGE OF THE COUNTY RECORDS, THEY COULDN'T HAVE. If you have no opportunity to minimize financial damages to a 3rd party, than certainly you aren't liable in any way, form, or fashion is the argument.

Fremont was saying that Household didn't respond to the Administrative remedy, & hence lost their priority lienholder status. If anything, Fremont is saying that the administrative demand HAD LEGAL MERIT AND POWER and that Household should have lost their lienholder rights due to their inactions. Here is the exact wording: "Fremont next contends that Household's failure to respond to the Administrative Demand should preclude Household from having its Deed of Trust reinstated as the superior lien." Isn't it EXTREMELY strange for any lender, much less Fremont, to use that argument if they truly believed that the dorean process IS ENTIRELY A SCAM?

The Judge went on to say that the presentment was CONFUSING, yet look how succintly he understood and presented the intent of the dorean presentment WITHOUT ANY CONFUSION as to the events that would transpire if the challenge was not timely rebutted:

"The Administrative Demand purported to, among other things, create a self-executing agreement whereby Household automatically appointed Heineman as “attorney-in-fact” for Household, and authorized Heineman and Johnson to prepare and record all necessary documents for “proper reconveyance” of the Lambeth Property if Household, within 10 days, did not rebut “point for point” a so-called “Affidavit of Truth” contained therein."

Admittedly AND OBVIOUSLY THERE IS NO CONFUSION THERE, YET BOTH LENDERS ARE TRYING TO CREATE CONFUSION to preserve their own selfish interests.

So even the lies of record to justify the Judge's ruling, are not even closely believable at all.

When you LIE TO SUPPORT YOUR POINT OF VIEW, YOU INVARIABLE GET CAUGHT.

The Judge's conclusion isn't believable based upon the lies that he told to support his conclusions. The lenders 2 faced arguments aren't any more believable.

Why must a court hearing be based upon who can tell the best lies & have people buy them?

mogel007 said...

"Furthermore, Household did not actually learn of the Unauthorized Cancellation until 26 October 2004, four days after Fremont extended its loan to Lambeth."
___________________________________

If you believe that lie, than maybe you will also believe the lie that Kurt & Scott are criminals.

mogel007 said...

“the existence of the mortgage elimination scheme was not well known to mortgage companies such as Household and Fremont at the time” the Administrative Demand was delivered to Household. As it would not have occurred to anyone of ordinary business judgment and prudence to make any inquiry into the information contained therein,"
________________________________

Are we to conclude from this statement from the Judge, that mortgage companies/lenders are of "ORDINARY business judgment" only?

Nothing extraordinary or oustanding about them as far as their prudence & judgment? Are their mortgage agreements also ordinary and prudent, with nothing of cunning or of a devious or deceptive nature too?

mogel007 said...

I think an EXAMPLE OF CONFUSION is trying to read those dyslexic letters in the box that you must read & type accurately, in order to get access to post on this site.

Can't google get a less complicated & confusing system?
I have to try at least 3 or more times in order to finally get it right.

Anyone else have this same problem?

dr. ira gilac said...

Can't google get a less complicated & confusing system?
I have to try at least 3 or more times in order to finally get it right.





huh?


yo relly need to get keepass or robofrom....save all yo pisswards fo yo....