Tuesday, October 21, 2008

Kurt's - New Address

KURT F JOHNSON 13177-081
FCI HERLONG
FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
P.O. BOX 800
HERLONG, CA 96113

47 comments:

near the end said...

Wow; Kurt must be a high profile individual for them to keep moving him around like this.

dr. ira gilac said...

"Wow; Kurt must be high..."





YO WOOD BE 2 IF YO HAD TO KEEP INHALIN' ALL DOSE BUS FUMES TWICE A WEEK..BETTA 2 STAY PUT!

LOLL!!

habakkuk said...

Its a joke what these criminals are doing to him

dr. ira gilac said...

...an jus' in case yo bust get cawt speddin' in the 'feeway', yo can take car of dat too!!


www.ticketslayer.com/



Ticket Slayer. . .
   "The 'Number One' Common Law
       Method to 'Beat' a Traffic Ticket!"




"Why Ticket Slayer is the Best at Slaying Traffic Tickets"
Ticket Slayer is the number one common law method to beat a traffic ticket!
Our common law default nullifies the state's claim against you!
Ticket Slayer's method reduces a lot of the stress of fighting a traffic ticket!
Our default does most of the work for you to get your ticket dismissed!
With our default method you won't spends hours researching vehicle code!
Hundreds of Ticket Slayer customers have had their traffic ticket dismissed!
We guarantee your satisfaction with our default process!




Ticket Slayer's proven common law default process has been used successfully hundreds of times in traffic court to beat traffic tickets of all kinds, including – red light camera tickets, seat belt tickets, and scores of type other types of traffic tickets. Our common law traffic default process works in all states.

 The Ticket Slayer Common Law Traffic Ticket Default Process is the most successful method of getting traffic tickets dismissed in traffic court that we are aware of. Our Traffic Ticket Default Process has saved people tens of thousands of dollar in traffic fines and added insurance costs over the past few years.



How the Ticket Slayer "Common Law Default Process"
gets traffic tickets dismissed in traffic court . . .

  Ticket Slayer cuts traffic tickets off at their knees by legally barring the prosecutor from pursuing the charge(s) against the defendant with our unique common law default method. In our common law default process the prosecutor is served by the defendant with a legal document in affidavit form, called an Affidavit of Truth.

  The defendant states a limited number of specific legal claims counter of the prosecutor proving defendant is not subject to the prosecutor's or the state's claim(s) against him.

  Because the defendant's legal claims in his affidavit are so well established in natural and common law, the prosecutor will be unable to truthfully rebut the defendant's legal claims. The common law holds that, the prosecutor must truthfully rebut all factual legal claims made by the defendant in his affidavit, or by default he loses all legal right to pursue a claim against the defendant.

  At the defendant's traffic court trial; the judge, upon reviewing the legal documents establishing the fact that the prosecutor has legally defaulted in this case, is left with no legal option other than, to dismiss the case against the defendant.

  If about now you are asking yourself, why the court must honor the common law default? ...it is because you, like the vast majority of people have not been enlightened about the common law. Quite simply, the answer is; the judge must honor the common law default because, the common law is superior law.

  The Constitution of the United States of America is a common law document and being framed in the common law, the constitution is rightfully considered to be the law of the land. No law passed by a legislative body in our county is valid unless it meets with the requirements of the constitution.

  The common is held to be legally superior law, and for this reason the common law must take legal president over laws passed by acts of a legislative body. The next page contains more information about the common law.

dr. ira gilac said...

The Common Law Traffic Ticket Default Process

  The Ticket Slayer common law traffic default method consists of four legal documents. The four documents are filed in three steps with the prosecutor's Office and the Traffic Court Clerk as outlined in our easy to follow instructions. You will need approximately 25 days before the date of your trial to complete the filing process. If you have less than this amount of time before your trial date, then in most cases you can simply call the traffic court clerk and ask for a postponement of your trial. Generally, the court clerk is authorized by the court to allow you a one time postponement of your trial. The court clerk can usually grant a postponement of up to 30 days, and in some cases he is authorized to grant even more time.

  STEP ONE: The common law traffic default process begins when you serve your Declaration of Status upon the prosecutor and filing a copy with the court clerk. The Declaration of Status is your sworn statement declaring who you are. Who you are of course, is a flesh and blood man or woman and not the ALL CAPS person or legal fiction the state is addressing in your traffic case. In the declaration you also state; you have no contract with the county or the state, you say you are a sovereign, a creation of God, and are not subject to administrative law (referencing Yick Wo v. Hopkins). The prosecutor by law has X amount of time (usually ten calendar days to rebut your claims made in your Affidavit of Truth or he is in default.

  STEP TWO: Filing of the Acceptance of Oaths of Office and Constitutions. Every federal and state public office holder is required by the united [sic] States Constitution for America and the every state’s constitution to take an oath of office to uphold the constitution and to file their written signed copy of their Oath of Office with the proper federal or state office.

  The Oath of Office is a contract with We the People that the office holds swears to abide by in upholding the constitution and your rights as protected by the constitution. The law of contracts holds that; there are two basic elements to a binding contract, - the offer and the acceptance. No contract can be held to be legally valid without there first being an offer to contract and then the acceptance of that offer. This is why an Acceptance of Oaths of Office document is included in the default package, it legally binds the prosecutors and the judges to their contact with you, one of We the People.

  STEP THREE: Filing of the Affidavit of Truth. The Affidavit of Truth is also your sworn statement testifying to the fact that; you served the prosecutor with your sworn Declaration of Status and the prosecutor failed to timely rebut the facts in your declaration and is now in default. In the Affidavit of Truth you give the prosecutor X amount of time (usually ten calendar days to rebut your claims stated in your Affidavit of Truth.

  STEP FOUR: Motions to Dismiss. You have to move the court to do what it is you wish the court to do. If you wish for the court to dismiss your case you move the court for dismissal of your case by serving the court with a written motion to dismiss. You can also verbally motion the court for dismissal but, it is often much more desirable to motion for dismissal in writing before your court case. This is especially true with the common law traffic default method. At the time of your trial the judge should already received and read all of your documents. Having a written motion to dismiss before him, provides the judge the opportunity to just state at the time of your trial that, he is dismissing your case without you having to say a word.

  The prosecutor defaults when he fails to rebut your sworn statement of facts, which attests to the fact that you are a sovereign; not subject to laws derived by governmental bodies. This fact is supported biblically, by common law and by the United States Supreme Court in the case of Yick Wo v. Hopkins. Together, these three foundations in support of your claims effectively create a legal claim so strong it becomes an almost certain legal impossibility for the prosecutor to rebut your claims.

  When you arrive in traffic court for your trial, the traffic court judge should have already received and read a copy of all of your documents. The judge seeing that the prosecutor has defaulted, has no choice legally, but to dismiss your case as the prosecutor by law lost all right to prosecute you when he defaulted.

  The Ticket Slayer Common Law Traffic Default package comes with a 'READ ME' file that explains in detail how to prepare, serve and file your legal documents with the prosecutor and the traffic court. The 'READ ME' file also contains information what to do in various situations in court and tips, suggestions, and strategies about how to force the judge to dismiss your case and much more!

  The 'READ ME' file is your survivors guide book on how to get your traffic case dismissed in court. Ticket Slayer provides email and phone support too. If you don't understand something about our documents, our common law traffic ticket default procedure, the courts, or anything else related to your traffic case just ask us.

On the next page we discuss Traffic Court.

dr. ira gilac said...

jug beans:

CASE CLOSED!!!

dr. ira gilac said...

habakkuk said...

Its a joke what these criminals are doing to him


on da otter hans, deeze gees relly shud go to jayle....
--------------------------





Oct. 20, 2008

Defendants Allegedly Preyed on Homeowners Desperate to Avoid Foreclosure

TRENTON – Attorney General Anne Milgram today announced the filing of lawsuits charging a total of 37 mortgage loan providers, mortgage industry employees, lawyers and other defendants with consumer fraud and civil racketeering for using predatory “foreclosure rescue” schemes to persuade desperate homeowners to sign over their homes.

Enlarge Graphic

The state alleges that the defendants obtained at least $13.5 million worth of fraudulent loans to further their foreclosure rescue schemes. In addition, the state alleges that defendants stole at least $3 million in homeowner equity.

In two separate but related state complaints, the defendants are charged with exploiting the financial hardship and fear of homeowners by convincing them to surrender their homes to third-party or “straw” buyers as part of complex “sale/lease-back” transactions. Homeowners were told that, by signing over their property titles to third-party buyers, they would be able to still live in their homes as renters while repairing damaged credit, and then, in the future, buy back their dwellings.

In reality, the state lawsuits charge, the solvency and renewed home ownership promised by such deals did not materialize. Instead, defendants collected most of the sale/lease-back proceeds for themselves, thereby stripping the homes of their equity value. Struggling homeowners were left with few or no means to pay rent or re-establish their credit. Some of the homeowners have been evicted from their homes, while others remain and continue to pay rent. In some instances, defendants continue to collect the rent but do not apply the rent payments to the mortgage, leaving the homes once again in foreclosure.

“The conduct charged in these lawsuits is unconscionable. These defendants preyed on people who were facing foreclosure and searching for a lifeline that would enable them to get back on their feet and remain in their homes,” said Attorney General Milgram. “Having placed their hope and trust in these defendants, victims ended up far worse off than they were before. It is critical that we root out this kind of fraud and protect consumers who go seeking help from finding complete financial ruin instead.”

Filed on October 15 in New Jersey Superior Court in Bergen County, the state’s lawsuits are against Vest Financial LLC, formerly of Paramus, along with 16 other defendants, and JP Global Property Management, Inc., of Bloomfield, along with 19 other defendants. Five defendants are common to both complaints.

Together, the two complaints allege violations of both the New Jersey Consumer Fraud Act and the New Jersey Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act involving a total of 48 properties. The properties are located in 14 counties including Atlantic, Bergen, Burlington, Cape May, Essex, Gloucester, Hudson, Mercer, Middlesex, Monmouth, Ocean, Passaic, Somerset and Union.

The state alleges that defendants in the Vest complaint stole at least $1.25 million in homeowner equity, while defendants in the JP Global case stole at least $1.75 million in homeowner equity.

As a result of the defendants’ conduct, at least $4 million in fraudulently obtained rescue loans are in default.

The Vest Financial lawsuit names as defendants five corporations and 12 individuals. The JP Global Property Management complaint names as defendants three corporations and 17 individuals.

Among other things, the lawsuits seek court-imposed penalties, restitution for consumers and permanent injunctions banning companies named as defendants from offering foreclosure rescue or credit repair services to consumers. The lawsuits also seek to have the records of the defendants impounded, and the assets of each defendant frozen, with no ability to dispose of any assets.

The two lawsuits are:

Milgram v. Vest Financial, L.L.C: The State’s four-count complaint charges Vest and the other defendants with soliciting consumers facing foreclosure or otherwise experiencing money troubles that could lead to losing their homes.

According to the lawsuit, the defendants advertised “foreclosure rescue” services over the Internet and radio, and by word-of-mouth within the real estate and mortgage broker communities.

The defendants are accused of falsely leading homeowners to believe that surrendering the titles to their homes would save them from foreclosure when, in fact, entering into such a straw-buyer arrangement would only imperil them further while enriching the defendants.

Among other things, the defendants are charged with civil racketeering. Predicate offenses listed in the racketeering count of the lawsuit include theft by deception, forgery, bank fraud and money laundering. The suit also charges violations of the Consumer Fraud Act including unconscionable business practices and making false promises; misrepresentations and knowing omissions of fact; and violation of state advertising regulations. The alleged conduct took place between 2005 and early 2008.

Defendants other than Vest Financial named in the lawsuit, all but one of them from New Jersey, include:

Metropolitan Mortgage Services, Inc., of Cliffside Park; Alex Armani of Cliffside Park; Sohrab Moussavian of Englewood; Anthony Scordo III of West Orange; Felix Nihamin, an attorney who resides in Franklin Lakes and practices in New York City; Francis A. Ciambrone, an attorney with law offices in Paramus; Rhys A. Herrmann, of Belleville; JP Global Property Management LLC of Bloomfield; Peter H. Eckhardt, Jr. of Livingston; Philip Altieri of Flemington; Kristopher Pilone of Manalapan; DBK Realty Investments LLC of Edison; Tom A. Andriopoulos of Washington Township (Bergen County); Settlement Source, LLC of Edison; Vivian M. Ruiz of Hillsdale and Glen B. Thompson, New York City.

Milgram v. JP Global Property Management, Inc.: The four-count JP Global Property Management lawsuit, while encompassing more property transactions than the Vest complaint, charges essentially the same fraudulent and collusive conduct in duping distressed homeowners with “foreclosure rescue” schemes. Again, homeowners facing foreclosure were presented with a way to continue living in their homes by signing over their titles to a third-party buyer. Ostensibly, homeowners would pay “rent” to the new owner while repairing their credit, then would be in a position to buy back their home in the future.

The schemes were typically facilitated, the lawsuit charges, through loan applications and other documents containing false information.

Homeowners often never met the purchaser of their homes and, once having committed to the sale/leaseback transaction, were presented with monthly “rent” terms more costly than their original mortgages. Also, victims typically received no money at closing despite prior assurances the equity in their homes would be theirs to keep.

The defendants are charged with civil racketeering including predicate offenses such as theft by deception, forgery, issuing false financial statements, deceptive business practices and money laundering. The suit also charges violations of the Consumer Fraud Act , including failing to properly conduct settlement proceedings, forging consumer’s names on documents, refusing to provide consumers with copies of sales contracts and other loan papers, making false promises misrepresentations and , knowing omissions of fact, and violation of state advertising regulations. The alleged conduct took place between 2004 and early 2008.

Defendants other than JP Global Property Management named in the lawsuit, all but one of them from New Jersey, include:

Jeremy P. Sorvino of Waldwick; Jeffrey M. Malen of Ringwood; Peter H. Eckhardt, Jr. of Livingston; Christopher William Eckhardt of Washington Township, (Bergen County); Anthony Scordo III of West Orange; Felix Nihamin, an attorney who resides in Franklin Lakes and practices in New York City; Michael J. Andalaft, an attorney with law offices in Cedar Grove; Capital Hill Mortgage, Inc.; Stanley Capital Mortgage Company, Inc. of Englewood Cliffs; Rhys A. Herrmann of Belleville; Brendan Joseph Flynn of Fort Lee; Maryann E. Sorvino of Ridgewood; Frances B. Benna of Elmwood Park; Vincent F. Latorre of Kenilworth; Jennifer R. Kortman of Livingston; Rebecca A. Kortman of Chatham; William McVeigh of Wharton; Mauricio V. Almeida of Colonia and Glenn B. Thompson of New York City.

Attorney General Milgram thanked Deputy Attorney General Megan Lewis, Chief of the Affirmative Litigation Section; Deputy Attorney General Wendy Leggett Faulk of the Affirmative Litigation Section; Assistant Attorney General James J. Savage; and Supervising Investigator Jennifer Micco of the Division of Consumer Affairs, for their hard work on the foreclosure rescue fraud investigation and lawsuits.

www.nj.gov/oag/newsreleases08/pr20081020c.html

notorial dissent said...

Way to go Kurt, I see the court has just bounced your latest round of nonsense on its way to handing you your head on the latest round of charges.

Just one more in an ever growing list of failures.

mogel007 said...

Dr.Ira,

Ticket slayer HAS NO GUARANTEE, and it does not work. You won't get your money back if found guilty, hence no real guarantee worth a hill of beans.

The reason why it doesn't work is that Traffic court Judges are corrupt and they have a financial incentive to find you guilty, even if the Judge is wrong in his decisions or even the law, assuming he uses law to find you guilty. He'll probably just say that the arguments you use are frivilous without the need to back up his statement. After all, you are helping him fund his retirement by your fees you pay the court. Sure that's a "conflict of interest", & the case should be dismissed, simply due to this financial conflict, but so rarely are traffic fines ever dismissed.

Maybe you should save your money & ask the Judge point blank if he has a financial interest in the hearing. If he says no, than try to get him on perjury charges if he continues the case. Seek testimony from the Clerk of court or someone else of authority that part of the fines go to his retirement & show a paper trail or testimony. If he says yes, than ask for a dismissal. If he doesn't grant it, obviously the Judge is an idiot. If he says "nothing" than you accuse the Judge that he is hiding something of relevance to the case & do whatever is necessary to embarass him. There is no silver bullet in these things.

habakkuk said...

"Maybe you should save your money & ask the Judge point blank if he has a financial interest in the hearing. If he says no, than try to get him on perjury charges if he continues the case."

YEP, THESE CROOKS ARE FUNDING THEIR RETIREMENT WITH A PORTION OF THAT FINE MONEY HERE IN MICHIGAN. A FRIEND OF MINE TOOK THAT APPROACH AND IT GOT DISMISSED.

mogel007 said...

Notarial Dissent says: Way to go Kurt, I see the court has just bounced your latest round of nonsense on its way to handing you your head on the latest round of charges.

Just one more in an ever growing list of failures.
______________________________

No, just one more in an ever growing LIST OF PROOF that the court system can't be honest, trusted, or even do the right thing!! The Dorean Process was an administrative process & was intended to stay out of court because you CAN'T WIN IN COURT. We don't need the opinion of the courts to accomplish our objectives. Your definition of failure isn't mine.

You can't tell the Emperor that he is naked. It's not tolerated, it isn't even legal to do so.

Notarial dissent, I don't think a loser or failure like yourself, judging Kurt to be a failure really even gets his attention in the very least. He doesn't care what you think since you are of no consequence to him & certainly you are no one he respects even a little bit. In other words your words are like water off the feathers of a duck. The duck is not bothered by getting wet. LOL It's his habitat you know. Skeptics and crocidiles (CROC FOR SHORT), like yourself, comes with the territory of the lake.

All I can say to your rhetoric is, WHAT A CROC!!!!

dr. ira gilac said...

Ticket slayer HAS NO GUARANTEE, and it does not work. You won't get your money back if found guilty, hence no real guarantee worth a hill of beans.





i agree and disagree....


agree/ the 'system' is corrupt


disagree/ still it is worth trying


it is certainly easier to get a traffic case dissed by this process than to open up a can of pizza by asking if you are funding jug beans retryment?

if da jug beans is that crupt, then yo mite wine up in jail too!


no, yo better off spending the $75 doolas on the 'notrial process' than payig a speddin tix fo dat amount in my pinion...


an of corse they cant grantee it....


notrial process aside, yo no ho many idoits are out there???

they will buy the book and dun have a clue to use it ritely, an could possilby even wine themself up in jayel for a spedding tixet.

they can even sing they name cortly on a doxyment.

dr. ira gilac said...

The reason why it doesn't work is that Traffic court Judges are corrupt and they have a financial incentive to find you guilty, even if the Judge is wrong in his decisions or even the law, assuming he uses law to find you guilty. He'll probably just say that the arguments you use are frivilous without the need to back up his statement








and by your largic, then the DG wood of never gotten off the rug

dr. ira gilac said...

LOL!!!



ok....i gonna right them an tole dem dat i got a fren name mongrel an he say that yo sytem 'dont works'....



.....he say dat yo shud change da name of yo website to:

www.ticketpayer.com

dr. ira gilac said...

Testimonials

Amber in Morehead City, NC - Thank you Ticket Slayer your common law default got the prosecutor to ask the judge for dismissal of my traffic ticket. The prosecutor told the judge he was asking for the dismissal because my traffic ticket improperly written.




Byron in Bakersfield, CA - I drive a delivery truck in downtown Bakersfield, where the cops write traffic tickets like no tomorrow. Ticket Slayer's material successfully got all four of my traffic tickets dismissed that I had gotten over a one year period.


Caprice in Honolulu, Hawaii
- A customer told me about Ticket Slayer's money back guaranteed method to get traffic tickets dismissed. I am not quite sure yet why your material works so well, but it certainly did for me.


Jason in San Diego, CA - Your material worked just as you said it would. I got my ticket dismissed without having to say a word in Traffic Court. I had received three traffic tickets in about eighteen months and had two points on my driving record, when I got another traffic ticket. I wasn't eligible for traffic school and I would have lost my driver's license if it had not been for Ticket Slayer. Ticket Slayer you really saved my life.


Mark in San Jose, CA - Thank you Ticket Slayer! You saved me over $500.00 in traffic fines, not to mention how much money you saved me on my insurance rates, which would have gone though the roof had I lost my case. You Common Law Traffic Ticket Default Process worked as promised. I didn't have to say a word in Court. The Judge called my name and said my case was dismissed.


Nikki in Denver, CO - 'You're the Bomb' Ticket Slayer! Your material worked just as you said it would. I got my ticket dismissed without having to say a word in Traffic Court.

Elizabeth in Trenton, NJ - Not having been to traffic court or any other court before, I was very nervous about the prospect of fighting my ticket in traffic court. Just the thought of going to traffic court gave me an anxiety attack so; I had made up my mind to just pay the ticket. I really didn't want to especially because I really didn't deserve the ticket and the cop was such a jerk.

I told Stacie, a co-worker that I was going down to the courthouse on my lunch hour to pay my traffic ticket and asked her if she could cover for me if I were late getting back to work. Stacie told me she had recently gotten a traffic ticket and found this company on the internet called TicketSlayer.com to beat her traffic ticket and because of the way their legal process works she didn't have to say a word in court. Stacie practically insisted that I use Ticket Slayer for my traffic ticket. I am happy to say that I got my ticket dismissed using your legal material without having to say a word in traffic court just like Stacie did.

I can't thank Stacie, my friend and co-worker and Ticket Slayer enough for what you did for me. Not only that, Ticket Slayer you revealed to me the whole fraud behind the system, for which I will be forever grateful to you. I now tell everyone I know about Ticket Slayer.

Steve in Atlanta, GA - When I got to traffic court the citing officer was sitting in back of the courtroom, so I knew there was a good chance that the judge may not have read the legal documents I had filed. Because TicketSlayer had prepared me with what to do in this situation I didn't get all panicky. I just read back over the instruction TicketSlayer provided me with to prepare me with on how to handle the judge in this situation.

When the judge call me and the officer to the stand I immediately asked the judge if he had read my legal document that I had filed with the District Attorney and the Traffic Court Clerk. The judge said he had not. So, I asked him to please take a moment to read through them as they were crucial to my case. He said, OK and took some time to read though them.

After reading the papers the judge looked at me asked me if I how I thought these documents would help my case? I told him the District Attorney failed to answer my Affidavit of Truth citing for one thing the U.S. Supreme court case of Yick Wo v. Hopkins which firmly states that I am a sovereign not subject to the laws passed by the legislature. The law holds that when the District Attorney failed to answer my claim that I was a sovereign not subject to the law, then he is in legal default and must accept my claim as the being true. So, Your Honor, the District Attorney has no legal grounds to prosecute me, since he by legal default has to accept my claim as true. The District Attorney having lost all grounds to prosecute me leaves this court with no legal choice, but to dismiss my case.

The judge sat there with this totally stunned look upon his face without saying a word for what seemed like an eternity. I know he wasn't prepared for the answer I gave him. Finally, the judge says; sir your case is dismissed. I knew he didn't want to pursue the issue with me any further and just wanted me out of his courtroom in a hurry at this point.

dr. ira gilac said...

Byron in Bakersfield, CA - I drive a delivery truck in downtown Bakersfield, where the cops write traffic tickets like no tomorrow. Ticket Slayer's material successfully got all four of my traffic tickets dismissed that I had gotten over a one year period.






well lookie here!

mongrel already has a 'cousin' use the system!

dr. ira gilac said...

I told him the District Attorney failed to answer my Affidavit of Truth citing for one thing the U.S. Supreme court case of Yick Wo v. Hopkins which firmly states that I am a sovereign not subject to the laws passed by the legislature. The law holds that when the District Attorney failed to answer my claim that I was a sovereign not subject to the law, then he is in legal default and must accept my claim as the being true.






i gone on '00s of leegal websites, from sue joorist to sadm to famgordian etc.



i am statring to see the ONE common thread here:

sovrinty

but more than that, where the claim fo sovinty cums frum....


the yick ho or ho yuck or whaver...is the KEY CASE



that any/all chareges can be fawt using the yucky ho soocreem cort case.....

i no dat it wood all cums down to a ho somewhere.....

mogel007 said...

According to Kadifi, Obama is a Muslim, but yet, wasn't his preacher friend that embarassed him by his comments, a Christian & Obama was a follower of that sect or congregation for some time. Romney being a Mormon, was apparently a political hindrance for him, & became a relevant issue, yet I wonder if being Islamic in a mostly Christian country like the US also be a hindrance if you are running for President? See this link:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ojgJuxD87FU&eurl=http:
//www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=78309

mogel007 said...

Dr. Ira,

I speak by personal experience when I say "Traffic Slayer" DOESN'T WORK. I can write you a personal testimony if you like, SINCE YOU BELIEVE THAT ABOVE ALL ELSE even if a testimony contains no last names or phone numbers to verify. The Judge will dismiss all arguments as "FRIVILOUS" & WON'T GIVE A REASON OR LAW FOR HIS CONCLUSION. He will also set up a hearing despite the fact that the DA has been defaulted. The Judge doesn't care. It does come down to a Ho, and the Ho is the Judge. Here cums the Judge.

dr. ira gilac said...

are you saying that all those test moneys are a frawt???

and that you have tried it and it flailed??

i dun understnad why yo wood be against a notrial process and avocate just being a 'ticketplayer'???

near the end said...

ND your a nigger lovein Obama supporter are u not. I feel sorry for you.

Scott from Vineland said...

dr. ira gilac said...
Defendants other than Vest Financial named in the lawsuit, all but one of them from New Jersey, include:...
________________________________________________
Whew, no one from Vineland in there! I'm glad to see Vinnie and Guido are keeping a low profile like I taught them!

dr. ira gilac said...

ya....they seem to be a lot of eye talons in dat list, huh??

dr. ira gilac said...

maybe they should get a copy of 'fixitpayer' .coms book.....

dr. ira gilac said...

or go see tom hagen, and say...

"Tom, can yo get me off da hook, fo ol' times sake?"

an then he say da famished words:

"Sorry Sal, cant do it..."

notorial dissent said...

Moogian reality, or I think I’ll hold my breath and turn blue until I get what I want
No, just one more in an ever growing LIST OF PROOF that the court system can't be honest, trusted, or even do the right thing!!

Oh, so I guess I understand now, if you don’t get the verdict you want, then the court system is corrupt, guess I should have known that would be the next excuse. Well, considering that the jury, not the court, convicted dim and dimmer, I would say that the court system is humming along quite nicely.

furhter Moogian delusion
The Dorean Process was an administrative process & was intended to stay out of court because you CAN'T WIN IN COURT.

The Dorean process was a crock, for the simple reason that our legal system doesn’t operate that way, there is no contemplation in law of your so called “administrative process”, and that is why it didn’t work, and the two dimbos are now in jail for what will probably be the rest of their lives.

and further deluded Moogie
We don't need the opinion of the courts to accomplish our objectives.

You are so very wrong, and so very confused, and you do, however, have to be within the bounds of the law, which again is why dim and dimmer are sitting in prison cells.

Moogie on a bright note
Your definition of failure isn't mine.

Thank goodness for that small favor at least.

Moogie nattering on
You can't tell the Emperor that he is naked. It's not tolerated, it isn't even legal to do so.

What isn’t legal, is signing documents you have no authority to sign, getting loans with fraudulent documents, or using the mails to commit these crimes, that is what isn’t legal, as dim and dimmer found out.

and Moogie sputters on
Notarial dissent, I don't think a loser or failure like yourself, judging Kurt to be a failure really even gets his attention in the very least.

Again, going on about something you know nothing about, but then that has long been your hallmark, and a duly constituted jury, actually two of them now, have judged Kurt for what he is, I merely repeat what is public record, and what is painfully obvious from the facts presented. In truth Moogs, the only person’s opinion I care even less about than Kurt’s is yours.

~~The Swami~~~ said...

Ticket Slayer has my stapler!

~~The Swami~~~ said...

Obama Crimes
Press Release: Obama & DNC admit all allegations in Berg v. Obama
Tuesday, 21 October 2008 11:05 administrator Obama & DNC Admit All Allegations of Federal Court Lawsuit - Obama’s “Not” Qualified to be President
Obama Should Immediately Withdraw his Candidacy for President
For Immediate Release: - 10/21/08 - Complete contact details and pdfs of this press release and motions filed by plaintiff Berg today are at the end of this article

(Lafayette Hill, Pennsylvania – 10/21/08) - Philip J. Berg, Esquire, the Attorney who filed suit against Barack H. Obama challenging Senator Obama’s lack of “qualifications” to serve as President of the United States, announced today that Obama and tbe DNC “ADMITTED”, by way of failure to timely respond to Requests for Admissions, all of the numerous specific requests in the Federal lawsuit. Obama is “NOT QUALIFIED” to be President and therefore Obama must immediately withdraw his candidacy for President and the DNC shall substitute a qualified candidate. The case is Berg v. Obama, No. 08-cv-04083.

Berg stated that he filed Requests for Admissions on September 15, 2008 with a response by way of answer or objection had to be served within thirty [30] days. No response to the Requests for Admissions was served by way of response or objection. Thus, all of the Admissions directed to Obama and the DNC are deemed “ADMITTED.” Therefore, Obama must immediately withdraw his candidacy for President.

OBAMA - Admitted:

1. I was born in Kenya.
2. I am a Kenya “natural born” citizen.

3. My foreign birth was registered in the State of Hawaii.
4. My father, Barrack Hussein Obama, Sr. admitted Paternity of me.

5. My mother gave birth to me in Mombosa, Kenya.
6. My mother’s maiden name is Stanley Ann Dunham a/k/a Ann Dunham.

7. The COLB [Certification of Live Birth] posted on the website “Fightthesmears.com” is a forgery.
8. I was adopted by a Foreign Citizen.

9. I was adopted by Lolo Soetoro, M.A. a citizen of Indonesia.
10. I was not born in Hawaii.

11. I was not born at the Queens Medical Center in Hawaii.
12. I was not born at Kapi’olani Medical Center for Women and Children in Hawaii.

13. I was not born in a Hospital in Hawaii.
14. I am a citizen of Indonesia.

15. I never took the “Oath of Allegiance” to regain my U.S. Citizenship status.
16. I am not a “natural born” United States citizen.

17. My date of birth is August 4, 1961.
18. I traveled to Pakistan in 1981 with my Pakistan friends.

19. In 1981, I went to Indonesia on my way to Pakistan.
20. Pakistan was a no travel zone in 1981 for American Citizens.

21. In 1981, Pakistan was not allowing American Citizens to enter their country.
22. I traveled on my Indonesian Passport to Pakistan.

23. I renewed my Indonesian Passport on my way to Pakistan.
24. My senior campaign staff is aware I am not a “natural born” United States Citizen.

25. I am proud of my Kenya Heritage.
26. My relatives have requested changes to the portion of my birth certificate that identifies my first name.

27. My relatives have requested changes to the portion of my birth certificate that identifies my last name.
28. My relatives have requested changes to the portion of my birth certificate that identifies my place of birth.

29. I requested changes to the portion of my birth certificate that identifies my first name.
30. I requested changes to the portion of my birth certificate that identifies my last name.

31. I requested changes to the portion of my birth certificate that identifies my place of birth.
32. The document identified as my Indonesian School record from Fransiskus Assisi School in Jakarta, Indonesia is genuine.

33. I went to a Judge in Hawaii to have my name changed.
34. I went to a Senator and/or Congressman or other public official in Hawaii to have my name changed.

35. I had a passport issued to me from the Government of Indonesia.
36. The United States Constitution does not allow for a Person to hold the office of President of the United States unless that person is a “natural born” United States citizen.

37. I am ineligible pursuant to the United States Constitution to serve as President and/or Vice President of the United States.
38. I never renounced my citizenship as it relates to my citizenship to the country of Indonesia.

39. I never renounced my citizenship as it relates to my citizenship to the country of Kenya.
40. I am an Attorney who specializes in Constitutional Law.

41. Kenya was a part of the British Colonies at the time of my birth.
42. Kenya did not become its own Republic until 1963.

43. I am not a “Naturalized” United States Citizen.
44. I obtained $200 Million dollars in campaign funds by fraudulent means.

45. I cannot produce a “vault” (original) long version of a birth certificate showing my birth in Hawaii.
46. My “vault” (original) long version birth certificate shows my birth in Kenya.

47. The only times I was to a Hospital in Hawaii was for check-ups or medical treatments for illnesses.
48. Queens Medical Center in Honolulu, Hawaii does not have any record of my mother, Stanley Ann Dunham (Obama) giving birth to me.

49. Kapi’olani Medical Center for Women and Children in Honolulu, Hawaii does not have any record of my mother, Stanley Ann Dunham (Obama) giving birth to me.
50. I was born in the Coast Province Hospital in Mombasa, Kenya.

51. I represented on my State Bar application in Illinois that I never used any other name other than Barack Hussein Obama.
52. I went by the name Barry Soetoro in Indonesia.

53. My Indonesian school records are under the name of Barry Soetoro.
54. I took an Oath to uphold the United States Constitution when admitted to the State Bar of Illinois to practice Law.

55. I took an Oath to uphold the United States Constitution when I was Sworn into my United States Senate Office.
56. I hold dual citizenship with at least one other Country besides the United States of America.

DNC - Admitted:

1. The DNC nominated Barrack Hussein Obama as the Democratic Nominee for President.
2. The DNC has not vetted Barrack Hussein Obama.

3. The DNC did not have a background check performed on Barrack Hussein Obama.
4.The DNC did not verify Barrack Hussein Obama’s eligibility to serve as President of the United States.

5. The DNC admits Barrack Hussein Obama was born in Kenya.
6. The DNC admits Barrack Hussein Obama is not a “natural born” United States citizen.

7. The DNC admits Barrack Hussein Obama was not born in Hawaii.
8.The DNC admits they have not inquired into Barrack Hussein Obama’s citizenship status.


9. The DNC admits they have a duty to properly vette the Democratic Nominee for President.
10.The DNC admits Lolo Soetoro, M.A., an Indonesian citizen adopted Barrack Hussein Obama.


11. The DNC admits the Credentials Committee has been aware of this lawsuit since August 22, 2008 as the lawsuit was faxed to our Washington D.C. Office on August 22, 2008.

12. The DNC admits their Credentials Committee failed to verify and/or inquire into the credentials of Barack Hussein Obama to serve as the President of the United States.

13. The DNC admits their Credential Committee’s Report failed to address the issues of Barack Hussein Obama’s ineligibility to serve as President of the United States.
14.The DNC admits Howard Dean, Chair Person has and had knowledge Barack Hussein Obama was born in Kenya and ineligible to serve as the President of the United States.

15. The DNC admits Plaintiff and all Democratic citizens of the United States have been personally injured as a result of not having a qualified Democratic Presidential Nominee to cast their votes upon.
16. The DNC admits Plaintiff and all citizens of the United States have a Constitutional Right to vote for the President of the United States and to have two (2) qualified candidates of which to choose from.

17. The DNC admits Plaintiff and all citizens of the United States have a Constitutional right to have a properly vetted Democratic Presidential Nominee of which to cast their vote.
18. The DNC admits an FBI background check is not performed on the Presidential or Vice Presidential Candidates.

19. The DNC admits the United States Constitution does not allow for a Person to hold the office of President of the United States unless that person is a “natural born” United States citizen.
20. The DNC admits they collected donations on behalf of Barack Hussein Obama for his Presidential campaign.

21. The DNC admits Plaintiff and Democratic citizens donated money based on false representations that Barack Hussein Obama was qualified to serve as the President of the United States.
22. The DNC admits if Barack Hussein Obama is elected as President and allowed to serve as President of the United States in violation of our Constitution, it will create a Constitutional crisis.

23. The DNC admits Barack Hussein Obama took an Oath to uphold the United States Constitution.
24. The DNC admits allowing a person who is not a “natural born” citizen to serve as President of the United States violates Plaintiff’s rights to due process of law in violation of the United States Constitution.

25. The DNC admits allowing a person who is not a “natural born” citizen to serve as President of the United States violates Plaintiff’s rights to Equal Protection of the laws in violation of the United States Constitution.
26. The DNC admits the function of the DNC is to secure a Democratic Presidential Candidate who will protect Democratic citizen’s interests, fight for their equal opportunities and fight for justice for all Americans.

27. The DNC admits the Democratic National Committee has been promoting Barack Hussein Obama’s Presidential election knowing he was ineligible to serve as President of the United States.
Our website obamacrimes.com now has 50.7 + million hits. We are urging all to spread the word of our website – and forward to your local newspapers, radio and TV stations. Berg again stressed his position regarding the urgency of this case as, “we” the people, are heading to a “Constitutional Crisis” if this case is not resolved forthwith.
Philip J. Berg, Esquire
555 Andorra Glen Court, Suite 12
Lafayette Hill, PA 19444-2531
Cell (610) 662-3005
(610) 825-3134
(800) 993-PHIL [7445]
Fax (610) 834-7659
philjberg@obamacrimes.comThis e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it

~~The Swami~~~ said...

Could you imagine the sh*t that would hit the fan if Obama has to pull out of the race because he is not a US citizen! Oh man...............that would be some serious sh*t!!!!! Unfortunately, I think that would lead to serious race riots. Truly.......that would be the October surprise!!!!!!!!!!

~~The Swami~~~ said...

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ELECTION 2008
Obama 'admits' Kenyan birth?
Campaign doesn't respond to claims in lawsuit over birth certificate

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted: October 21, 2008
9:22 pm Eastern


By Drew Zahn
© 2008 WorldNetDaily



Philip J. Berg

Pennsylvania Democrat Philip J. Berg, who filed a lawsuit demanding Sen. Barack Obama present proof of his American citizenship, now says that by failing to respond Obama has legally "admitted" to the lawsuit's accusations, including the charge that the Democratic candidate was born in Mombosa, Kenya.

As WND reported, Berg filed suit in U.S. District Court in August, alleging Obama is not a natural-born citizen and is thus ineligible to serve as president of the United States. Though Obama has posted an image of a Hawaii birth certificate online, Berg demands that the court verify the original document, which the Obama campaign has not provided.

Now Berg cites Rule 36 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, which states that unless the accused party provides written answer or objection to charges within 30 days, the accused legally admits the matter.

Since Obama has only filed motions to dismiss and has not actually answered the charges in the lawsuit, Berg claims, according to Rule 36, Obama has legally admitted he is not a natural-born citizen.

Now Berg is asking the court for a formal declaration of Obama's admission and asking the Democratic National Committee for another presidential candidate.

In a statement released today, Berg argues that he filed Requests for Admissions on Sept. 15, meaning Obama had until Oct. 15 to answer or face the consequences of Rule 36.

"Obama and the DNC 'admitted,' by way of failure to timely respond to Requests for Admissions, all of the numerous specific requests in the Federal lawsuit," Berg's statement reads. "Obama is 'not qualified' to be president and therefore Obama must immediately withdraw his candidacy for president and the DNC shall substitute a qualified candidate."



(Story continues below)




Berg's original lawsuit leveled several charges at both Obama and the DNC – accusing the former of lying about his place of birth, faking his birth certificate and fraudulently running for office; and accusing the latter of not properly vetting its candidate.

Though it hasn't given Berg the evidence he seeks, the Obama campaign has publicly answered allegations that the candidate was born in Kenya and faked his Hawaii birth certificate.

"Smears claiming Barack Obama doesn't have a birth certificate aren't actually about that piece of paper," says the "Fight the Smears" section of Obama's website, "they're about manipulating people into thinking Barack is not an American citizen.

"The truth is, Barack Obama was born in the state of Hawaii in 1961, a native citizen of the United States of America," the campaign website states. It also includes images of a Hawaii birth certificate bearing the name Barack Hussein Obama II.

Berg has also taken the controversy public through his website and through repeated public offers to revoke the lawsuit if Obama will produce legal documents that establish his citizenship.

Without those documents, Berg has chosen to file two additional motions in district court in Philadelphia. The first asks the court to notify Obama and the DNC of what Berg understands they have now legally "admitted," and the second asks for an expedited ruling, given the quickly upcoming Nov. 4 election.

"It all comes down to the fact that there's nothing from the other side," Berg told Jeff Schreiber for his blog, America's Right. "The admissions are there. By not filing the answers or objections, the defense has admitted everything. He admits he was born in Kenya. He admits he was adopted in Indonesia. He admits that the documentation posted online is a phony. And he admits that he is constitutionally ineligible to serve as president of the United States."

~~The Swami~~~ said...

More Proof!!!!!!!
Obama has got to go !


http://www.snopes.com/politics/obama/citizen.asp

near the end said...

OK OK Obama is not a Nigger I was a little Drunk when I posted that.

near the end said...

OK OK Obama is not a Nigger I was a little Drunk when I posted that.

mogel007 said...

Dr. Says: ok....i gonna right them an tole dem dat i got a fren name mongrel an he say that yo sytem 'dont works'....
_______________________________

Ok, let's get even MORE PERSONAL then, since my own experience & testimony still doesn't convince you for some STRANGE reason.

I tried the system, thought I was plain enough before about that fact. The Judge didn't dismiss like the System is suppose to do out of fear, & the Judge didn't dismiss out of procedure which he is suppose to do, and the Judge said the arguments were frivolous, without any good legal argument, and the System suspended my license. I DON'T HAVE A LICENSE ANYMORE, & haven't had one for 2 years at least. CAN'T GET ONE UNLESS I PAY THE FINES, all of them!!!!!!!! I WILL NOT PAY THE FINES. I'm tired of being extorted!!! I drive on a suspended license always looking over my back, cautiously and carefully & I obey all traffic laws, not giving any officer a reason to pull me over. Eventually my great luck will probably run out. Odds are 10 to 1 against me that I will get caught illegally driving on a suspended license before the statute of limitations runs out on these fines. How's that for my personal unsuccessful testimony with this system? Impressed?

You are somehow equating the Dorean Process with Ticket Slayer which I think is a far leap. Are you insinuating I can sell this administrative judgment I have since I defaulted the DA? Good!!! You sell it for me since you are the expert & let me know & we'll split the monies & from those monies, maybe I'll pay the fines, BUT I DOUBT IT. Until then, PLEASE SHUT UP, YOU DON'T KNOW WHAT YOU ARE TALKING about & you have no experience whatsoever with the Traffic Slayer; I do. You can send that testimony to Traffic Slayer. They won't get back with you, refund any monies, or give any support, because they don't give a rats ass!!!! It's all about the money with Traffic slayer, they have no other higher motives, just like it's all about the money with Traffic Court. Have I been personal enough? I can go deeper down the rabbits hole if you like.

mogel007 said...

Dr. Ira:

Did I mention the bench warrant out for my arrest in a specific County of this Country??????

Somehow I forgot to mention that material fact in the last post!

Should I feel the system works & Traffic Slayer is successful?

If I'm mistaken in anything I've said so far, please enlighten me if you can.

mogel007 said...

Notarial dissent said: "Oh, so I guess I understand now, if you don’t get the verdict you want, then the court system is corrupt, guess I should have known that"
_______________________________

WRONG AGAIN! YOU UNDERSTAND NOTHING. NICE TRY, BUT NO COOKIE! I FELT THAT WAY BEFORE I JOINED THE DOREAN PROCESS & BEFORE ALL OF THE DOREAN VERDICTS. HAD PERSONAL EXPERIENCES WITH THE COURT BEFORE. SPENT TIME IN JAIL TOO FOR PETTY NONSENSE WHICH WAS MADE INTO BEING A CRIME ALSO. SO BEFORE YOU TELL ME, LET ME SAY IT FOR YOU FIRST......... NOT SURPRISED!!!

mogel007 said...

Dimwit said: "Well, considering that the jury, not the court, convicted dim and dimmer,"
________________________________

Judge Alsup convicted, demeaned, the Dorean Group by his lies & words, & prejudice long before the petite jury came on the scene. then he controlled the petite jury by his control. lies, & bad jury instructions & WILLFULL CONTROL OF WHAs aLLOWED TO BE REAL LAW, THE TRUTH & EVIDENCE THAT COULD BE PRESENTED TO THE PETITE JURY. iT'S NO WONDER OUT OF DECEPTION & PREJUDICE, THEY CAME TO A PREJUDICAL JUDGMENT & DECREE.

Course it's like you, not TO TELL THE WHOLE TRUTH!!!! wHY AM I NOT SURPRISED?

mogel007 said...

Dimwit said: Well, considering that the jury, not the court, convicted dim and dimmer, I would say that the court system is humming along quite nicely.
_______________________________

In other words, since the Court rendered the decision that YOU WANT, than the System is humming quite nicely??? No words about justice and fairness, just the system works nicely because they were convicted and in accordance with WHAT YOU WANT & in accordance with what you believe?

Sorry, justice has nothing to do with what you think or with what you want, & what you want has nothing to do with a system humming & running smoothly and right. Apparently, you haven't been watching the news lately about the fraud in the banking crisis & current events of banking failures due to this. Why am I not suprised?????????

Here's some news for you. The system AIN'T HUMMING AND DOING WELL & THERE'S NOTHING NICE ABOUT WHAT'S GOING ON DUE TO THE FRAUD OF THE BANKING SYSTEM & THE COURT SYSTEM ISN'T GOING AFTER THE REAL CRIMINALS EITHER!!!!!! Even my brother who is not an avid Dorean supporter would agree with me there, that they aren't going after the real white collar criminals!!!! Sure they might have a token trial coming up, but that is hardly justice. Billions & trillions have been confiscated & you want to poke fun at the Dorean Group? You should be ashamed, but of course, that statement of mine is asking too much obviously & being ashamed is not something that you would ever understand, because that assumes you have a conscience.

mogel007 said...

Could you imagine the sh*t that would hit the fan if Obama has to pull out of the race because he is not a US citizen!
_____________________________

He has DUAL CITIZENSHIP. Don't you think that citizenship must be proven before you could even run for President? Or do you believe the nominating System to be that inept or somehow miss that important legal requirement? Don't you think that scenario has already been prevented by paperwork requirements beforehand? You don't just decide to run for President of the U.S. without a vetting process.

mogel007 said...

Swami said: Could you imagine the sh*t that would hit the fan if Obama has to pull out of the race because he is not a US citizen!
________________________________

Not a citizen, or not a "naturally born citizen"? Seems to be an important difference or distinction there. Is there any leeway for a "naturally born citizen" as the legal definition?
Where is Bill Clinton when you need a Clintonion definition on a subject such as "sex" or "citizenship"?

Course it's too late now to pull out of the race even if he wanted to because voting is already being tabulated.

If you are correct any any form, how about all of the Senators, congressmen & supporters who have supported Obama such as the Clintons, etc. Will this put egg on their face that can't be removed? How will all the supporters look if some sort of disqualification took place if Obama is elected? Most polls say he will get elected. Are the polls wrong too?

mogel007 said...

Swami:

Here's a scenario you didn't list.
If you obtain millions of campaign funds & KNOW FOR A FACT you aren't a naturalized citizen, & not eligible to run for President, isn't that fraud by intent? Can't really hide such a material fact. The material facts don't go away either even if elected. Does that mean that Biden could be President by default?

mogel007 said...

Notarial said: "you do, however, have to be within the bounds of the law,
________________________________

If the Courts present LAW or make precedences, based upon lies, is it still good law by definition that can & should never be overturned? I would think you believe that. Maybe that's the "humming along nicely" you were referring to?

notorial dissent said...

And Moogie’s off and running at the mouth again
HAD PERSONAL EXPERIENCES WITH THE COURT BEFORE. SPENT TIME IN JAIL TOO FOR PETTY NONSENSE WHICH WAS MADE INTO BEING A CRIME ALSO. SO BEFORE YOU TELL ME, LET ME SAY IT FOR YOU FIRST......... NOT SURPRISED!!!

I’ll just bet you did, and I am equally sure that your warm and endearing personality helped your case along.

rant on Moogie
Judge Alsup convicted, demeaned, the Dorean Group by his lies & words, & prejudice long before the petite jury came on the scene. then he controlled the petite jury by his control. lies, & bad jury instructions & WILLFULL CONTROL OF WHAs aLLOWED TO BE REAL LAW, THE TRUTH & EVIDENCE THAT COULD BE PRESENTED TO THE PETITE JURY. iT'S NO WONDER OUT OF DECEPTION & PREJUDICE, THEY CAME TO A PREJUDICAL JUDGMENT & DECREE.

Your opinion, obviously not shared by anyone who matters. Juries are marvelous things, they have this talent for doing what they feel like is right, and they obviously weren’t impressed with dim and dimmers BS, and since this makes two juries that have convicted, you’ll pardon me if I take their opinion over yours.

and further blather
In other words, since the Court rendered the decision that YOU WANT, than the System is humming quite nicely??? No words about justice and fairness, just the system works nicely because they were convicted and in accordance with WHAT YOU WANT & in accordance with what you believe?

Moogs, what I want is hardly at issue here, I would have been appalled if the jury hadn’t convicted, but then I wasn’t there to hear all the evidence or see what went on, I would have coped one way or the other. As to justice and fairness, they got far more than they deserved, and they were convicted in accordance with what the jury considered justice.

Moogie baffled
Apparently, you haven't been watching the news lately about the fraud in the banking crisis & current events of banking failures due to this. Why am I not suprised?????????

And your self imposed ignorance continues on. Moogs, I have never said there weren’t problems in the banking industry or that there weren’t problems, but committing one crime because you think something else is criminal isn’t the way it works.

Moogie bewildered
If the Courts present LAW or make precedences, based upon lies, is it still good law by definition that can & should never be overturned? I would think you believe that. Maybe that's the "humming along nicely" you were referring to?

Is this supposed to make sense, if so it fails miserably.

Scott from Vineland said...

~~The Swami~~~ said...
Ticket Slayer has my stapler!
___________________________________
They came by the flea market this past weekend and bought it from me.

Scott from Vineland said...

near the end said...
OK OK Obama is not a Nigger I was a little Drunk when I posted that.
___________________________________
Is that you, Mel Gibson? ;-)

Scott from Vineland said...

Careful everyone... Moogie's on a roll!
***************************************************
Back up, back up
Moogie, whatcha gonna do now

Keep rollin' rollin' rollin' rollin'
Rollin' rollin' rollin' rollin'

Scott from Vineland said...

Moogie the outlaw... who knew?

Moogie's theme music...

Woman, don't try to love me,
Don't try to understand;
A life upon the road is the life of an outlaw man.