Tuesday, November 18, 2008

The King of Zion (10-26-08)

“Zion.” The name “Zion” signifies a “distant view” (speculam). And the church is called “a distant view” (specula), not only because it views God and heavenly things by faith (that is, a far off), being wise unto the things that are above, not unto those that are on the earth: but also, because there are within her true viewers, or seers, and watchman in the spirit,...” Martin Luther.

Jesus is a threefold King. He is King over His enemies, He is King within His church, and He is King for His Father. Many have ridiculed me for my distant view. Though we have the same King our relationship is very different. They plan and scheme in rebellion to throw off His authority though His yoke is easy and His burden is light. Psalms 2 makes it clear that God holds these in derision. They are so unaware of the insignificance of their intent that the heavens laugh at them. This does not mean they are ignored. On the contrary, God will enter in, to destroy their plans and ultimately them. There is a difference with having a king within you and one over you. One is a state of blessedness, the other will never know. People may think I am harsh on these retards because I tell them the true state of affairs. My friend Scott thinks because he prays daily to some entity named “Jesus” that it is the king within. My question is if so why do you not have the distant view? Why is your view so earthly, so shortsighted? I am not prepared to condemn you my friend as you have me but you must understand why I join heaven in their laughter. LOL heaven is laughing. All the kings and judges of this world can devise a scheme to knock me off the holy hill of Zion but my King holds them in derision. Psalms 1 makes the force of this blessedness clear. “His fruit in his season.” In such a case expectation is never disappointed. Fruit is expected, fruit is borne, and it comes also in the time in which it should come. A godly education, under the influences of the divine spirit, which can never be withheld where they are earnestly sought, is sure to produce the fruits of righteousness; and he who reads, prays, and meditates, will ever see the work which God has given him to do; the power by which to perform it; and the times, places, and opportunities for doing those things by which God can obtain most glory, his own soul most good, and his neighbor most edification.”- Adam Clarke

It is simple wisdom to know a tree selected by God and placed within the nurturing of the river of life that it will bare fruit in its season, yet you all mock because you lack a distant view. It may not be 90 days from now but it is a certainty. Christ as my King planted me in the midst of the mortgage problem of His time to bare fruit in his season. Keep being retarded but the blossoms have already appeared and the fruit is destined. Judge Alsup is no threat and neither are his prison guards. When my time arrives their vanity will be revealed. My neighbor will be edified, God glorified, and my soul delighted.

24 comments:

dr. ira gilac said...

anther 'boner' from jutch dogslop...







Posted on Nov. 18, 2008

Sponsor:

http://RidleyReport.com -


Keene, New Hampshire

District Court Judge Edward Burke decides to start yelling within a minute of entering his courtroom. What sets him off? A man STANDING while he enters....then taking six seconds to follow a sit-down order. Ian Freeman - a civil disobedience activist on trial over minor code violations - received 30 days jail for this infraction alone. The video was shot 11/14/08 by the pool photog from http://candid-world.com and first uploaded by me 11/15/08.

First 3 min of raw vid:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RlcT-3...

If you want to help you can write the defendant:

Ian Freeman Bernard c/o Cheshire County DOC 160 River Road Westmoreland, NH 03467

The story's almost on the front page of Digg but needs your help:

http://digg.com/odd_stuff/90_days_in_...

If you wish to commission an ad like the one in this video...the cost as of 11/08 is three cents per video view. But views beyond the 1st week are free, and your link in the video descrip is free. Give me a shout through this site, or e-mail me: RidleyReport at... live period com

Additional Keywords: free state project libertarian court prison jail henry david thoreau government talk radio rush limbaugh al franken neal bortz neil keene alex jones john lynch free talk live ian freeman bernard julia live free or die penn and teller jillette mark edge dave ridley report ridleyreport westmoreland freedom civil disobedience mahatma gandhi martin luther king jr. joe the plumber sarah palin john stossel ayn rand judge police abuse .... Please thank our sponsor by visiting ...... RIDLEYREPORT.COM

TO VIEW VIDEO CLICK ON:

http://www.pyrabang.com/contenteditor.php?ps=

6391&pd=4268&org=3585&target=http://www.

youtube.com/watch?v=J5TCnMnCwVY

dr. ira gilac said...

District Court Judge Edward Burke decides to start yelling within a minute of entering his courtroom.

What sets him off?



jus like beans, he must of had sumting 'pokin' him in da end'

BigO said...

To GOD be the glory for the thinks He has and is doing the lives of them that beleive, and I have the vision of the church.

My Mother asked a very interesting question the other day, She asked,
"If the goverment has come out and admitted to doing the American people wrong, by doing all of the faulty loans, and your friends are in Jail for exposing them (the gov..) Why are your friends still in jail?"

Just so you know Kurt and Scott "Mama" is praying that your release comes soon ( and Mama is a serious pray warrior) SEE YOU SOON!!!!!!!!!!

GOD BLESS YOUR MINISTRY!!!!

BIG"O" 1+1+1=1

SEE YOU AT THE TOP!!!!!!!!!!

BigO said...

That's Prayer warrior ******

habakkuk said...

Great question Mama:-)

dr. ira gilac said...

ok boys....here it CUMS!!


jug beans will 'play with it' until afta the organation, den he will dis qualfy booma...natch den, da noose pres will be from da BMR/balonian misery relgion

injoy....wile yo still can...


------------------------



Nov. 18, 2008

Supreme court ruling on Obama's eligibility for presidency

http://origin.www.supremecourtus.gov/docket/08-570.htm

(SEE BELOW)

Supreme Court Of The United States (SCOTUS) Justice David Souter has agreed that a review of the federal lawsuit filed by attorney Phil Berg against Barack Hussein Obama II, et al., which was subsequently dismissed for lack of standing is warranted. SCOTUS Docket No. 08-570 contains the details.

A review of that docket and the Rule 10 of the Supreme Court makes abundantly clear that Justice Souter's granting of a review on the Writ of Certiorari is not a right entitled to citizen Phil Berg, but rather is a matter of judcial discretion based upon a compelling reason. That compelling reason is the Constitutional requirement that "No person except a natural born citizen

...shall be eligible to the office of President..."

What this means is that on or before 1 DECEMBER 2008 Barack Hussein Obama II must respond to the writ of certiorari, and since the Berg v Obama case hinged primarily on the question of Obama's place of birth, it is almostinconceivable that Barack Obama will thumb his nose at the Justices of the Supreme Court and he is absolutely compelled to provide a vault copy of his original birth certificate.

Another very salient fact to consider at this time is that, despite all of the pronouncements of the print and broadcast media, Barack Obama is not yet the President-elect of the United States. Barack Obama can only become the President-elect after the Electoral College convenes on 15 DECEMBER 2008 in their respective state capitals around the nation and cast their votes to elect the President and the Vice President. As you can see this election day occurs two weeks after the required response to the Supreme Court granted Writ of Certiorari.

The bottom line is this: the presidential election of 2008 remains an ongoing process, the outcome of which remains undetermined, and all talk about a potential Constitutional crisis in the United States are at least 36 days premature.

The inevitable constitutional crisis regarding President-elect Obama, of course, revolves around his inability (or unwillingness) to produce an authentic Hawaiian birth certificate with the raised certificate stamp that the Federal Elections Commission can independently verify.

Here are some of the unanswered issues hanging over the head of President-elect Barack Obama and the question of his American citizenship:

· The allegation that Obama was born in Kenya to parents unable to automatically grant him American citizenship;

· The allegation that Obama was made a citizen of Indonesia as a child and that he retained foreign citizenship into adulthood without recording an oath of allegiance to regain any theoretical American citizenship;

· The allegation that Obama's birth certificate was a forgery and that he may not be an eligible, natural-born citizen;

· The allegation that Obama was not born an American citizen; lost an hypothetical American citizenship he had as a child; that Obama may not now be an American citizen and even if he is, may hold dual citizenships with other countries. If any, much less all, of these allegations are true, the suit claims, Obama cannot constitutionally serve as president.

· The allegations that "Obama's grandmother on his father's side, half brother and half sister claim Obama was born in Kenya," the suit states." Reports reflect Obama's mother went to Kenya during her pregnancy; however, she was prevented from boarding a flight from Kenya to Hawaii at her late stage of pregnancy, which apparently was a normal restriction to avoid births during flight. Stanley Ann Dunham (Obama) gave birth to Obama in Kenya, afte which she flew to Hawaii and registered Obama's birth."

· The claim could not be verified by inquiries to Hawaiian hospitals since state law bars the hospitals from releasing medical records to the public;

Even if Obama produced authenticated proof of his birth in Hawaii, however, the suit claims that the U.S. Nationality Act of 1940 provided that minors lose their American citizenship when their parents expatriate. Since Obama's mother married an Indonesian citizen and moved to Indonesia, the suit claims, sh forfeited both her and Barack's American citizenship.

From: spiker77@comcast.net

DOCKET FOR 08-570
No. 08-570
Title:
Philip J. Berg, Petitioner
v.
Barack Obama, et al.
Docketed: October 31, 2008
Lower Ct: United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Case Nos.: (08-4340)
Rule 11
~~~Date~~~ ~~~~~~~Proceedings and Orders~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Oct 30 2008 Petition for a writ of certiorari before judgment filed. (Response due December 1, 2008)
Oct 31 2008 Application (08A391) for an injunction pending disposition of the petition for a writ of certiorari, submitted to Justice Souter.
Nov 3 2008 Supplemental brief of applicant Philip J. Berg filed.
Nov 3 2008 Application (08A391) denied by Justice Souter.
~~Name~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~Address~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~Phone~~~
Attorneys for Petitioner:
Philip J. Berg 555 Andorra Glen Court, Suite 12 (610) 825-3134
Lafayette Hill, PA 09867
Party name: Philip J. Berg
Attorneys for Respondents:
Gregory G. Garre Solicitor General (202) 514-2217
United States Department of Justice
950 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
Washington, DC 20530-0001
Party name: Federal Election Commission, et al.

http://origin.www.supremecourtus.gov/docket/08-570.htm

mogel007 said...

Kurt said: My friend Scott thinks because he prays daily to some entity named “Jesus” that it is the king within. My question is if so why do you not have the distant view? Why is your view so earthly, so shortsighted?
___________________________________

I think the answer is obvious. Scott from Vineland, does not "ask with a sincere heart with real intent, in his prayers & has no real faith". Scott from Vineland does not seek the Spirit of the Lord seriously & cannot therefore have the Spirit, & truly doesn't have the serious power to be able to listen to that Spirit because he lacks the necessary tools of preparation, otherwise, there would be no opposition to you.

Logic tells you, the Lord does not inspire two people in different opposing & conflicting paths. If so, He would be the God of confusion and one who sanctions division & contention. Even Abraham Lincoln understood that a "house divided against itself cannot stand, but will EVENTUALLY fall & FAIL. This is not the God that either of you worships or imagines, a God of confusion & division.

"And when ye shall receive these things, I would exhort you that ye would ask God, the Eternal Father, in the name of Christ, if these things are NOT TRUE; and if ye shall ask with a SINCERE heart, with REAL INTENT, having FAITH IN CHRIST,, he will manifest the truth of it unto you, by the power of the Holy Ghost.
5 And by the power of the Holy Ghost ye may know the truth of ALL THINGS"

3 Nephi 11:29

29 For verily, verily I say unto you, he that hath the SPIRIT OF CONTENTION IS NOT OF ME, but is of the devil, who is the father of contention, and he stirreth up the hearts of men to CONTEND WITH ANGER, one with another.

mogel007 said...

Scott from Vineland by his postings on other sites has made his position very clear that Kurt CANNOT be an instrument from God in his view. He among others have joined in the mockery of condemning the work of Kurt, but ironically enough, at the same time always remembers his childhood friend & the old times as good in a peaceful spirit as if he thinks he knows Kurt & his intentions even now & seeks the same closeness he had before BY WANTING TO CONNECT WITH KURT'S FAMILY AGAIN.

The spirit of contention and the spirit of contention is the spirit of anger, & is not compatible with the peace & spirit of the Lord.

Here are two scriptures about peace :
"For God is not the author of confusion, but of peace," (1 Corinthians 14:33).

"For verily, verily I say unto you, he that hath the spirit of contention is not of me, but is of the devil, who is the father of contention, and he stirreth up the hearts of men to contend with anger, one with another."

"Behold, this is not my doctrine, to stir up the hearts of men with anger, one against another; but this is my doctrine, that SUCH THINGS SHOULD BE DONE AWAY" (3 Nephi 11:29-30).

Scott from Vineland said...

mogel007 said...
Kurt said: My friend Scott thinks because he prays daily to some entity named “Jesus” that it is the king within. My question is if so why do you not have the distant view? Why is your view so earthly, so shortsighted?
___________________________________
Hey moogie, did Kurt say "Moogie, why do YOU think SFV does not have the distant view"? Did he say Moogie, why do YOU think SFV's view is so earthly, so shortsighted"?

No, he didn't, did he? Your opinion was not requested here... you just like to hear yourself talk, don't you Moogs?

Scott from Vineland said...

I think fewer are impressed by your wisdom than you want to believe.

Scott from Vineland said...

Moogie oversteps...

(He) seeks the same closeness he had before BY WANTING TO CONNECT WITH KURT'S FAMILY AGAIN.
___________________________________
A wise man does not comment on situations he knows NOTHING about, Moogs. You may know Dr. Fred but I suspect your knowledge of the rest of Kurt's family is exactly zero. And I will say no more about that here. It was probably a bad idea to go there in the first place.

mogel007 said...

The future of Citigroup remains in doubt. Probably the next mammoth of a bank that could have some serious financial problems:

http://www.reuters.com/
article/marketsNews/
idUSN1931130720081119

Federal Reserve fears that we could be in a deflationary spiral. Look at what the price of gasoline has done in the last month alone?
A very bad day in the stock market today. Can't afford to have many days like today. The confidence level in the economy keeps sinking to new lows. Federal Reserve will cut interest rates again next month is very likely to combat more problems coming next year.

mogel007 said...

Scott from Vineland said: A wise man does not comment on situations he knows NOTHING about, Moogs.
_______________________________

Is that your best attempt at an apology & your attempt of insinuating that you aren't a wise person?

dr. ira gilac said...

Oklahoma Declares Sovereignty Under Tenth Amendment


H/T Don’t Tread on Mike

Oklahoma passed a resolution reaffirming the state’s rights under the Tenth Amendment of the Constitution and informing the Federal government to essentially back off with their unconstitutional power grabs and mandates. Let’s see if they actually stand behind it. We need to start seeing more of this.

This is the text of House Joint Resolution 1089

STATE OF OKLAHOMA

2nd Session of the 51st Legislature (2008)

HOUSE JOINT RESOLUTION 1089 By: Key

AS INTRODUCED

StartFTA Joint Resolution claiming sovereignty under the Tenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States over certain powers; serving notice to the federal government to cease and desist certain mandates; and directing distribution. EndFT

WHEREAS, the Tenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States reads as follows:

“The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.”; and

WHEREAS, the Tenth Amendment defines the total scope of federal power as being that specifically granted by the Constitution of the United States and no more; and

WHEREAS, the scope of power defined by the Tenth Amendment means that the federal government was created by the states specifically to be an agent of the states; and

WHEREAS, today, in 2008, the states are demonstrably treated as agents of the federal government; and

WHEREAS, many federal mandates are directly in violation of the Tenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States; and

WHEREAS, the United States Supreme Court has ruled in New York v. United States, 112 S. Ct. 2408 (1992), that Congress may not simply commandeer the legislative and regulatory processes of the states; and

WHEREAS, a number of proposals from previous administrations and some now pending from the present administration and from Congress may further violate the Constitution of the United States.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES AND THE SENATE OF THE 2ND SESSION OF THE 51ST OKLAHOMA LEGISLATURE:

THAT the State of Oklahoma hereby claims sovereignty under the Tenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States over all powers not otherwise enumerated and granted to the federal government by the Constitution of the United States.

THAT this serve as Notice and Demand to the federal government, as our agent, to cease and desist, effective immediately, mandates that are beyond the scope of these constitutionally delegated powers.

THAT a copy of this resolution be distributed to the President of the United States, the President of the United States Senate, the Speaker of the United States House of Representatives, the Speaker of the House and the President of the Senate of each state’s legislature of the United States of America, and each member of the Oklahoma Congressional Delegation.

dr. ira gilac said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
dr. ira gilac said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
dr. ira gilac said...

A very bad day in the stock market today.



noneless yo was short :-) ...like crotch say to be rite now.....

judge allslop said...

Well shit howdy besides war and casino's (wall street and main street)here is another growth industry the goverment crime syndicate is involved with.
Associated Press
Wednesday, November 19, 2008; Page A11
McALLEN, Tex., Nov. 18 -- Vice President Cheney and former attorney general Alberto R. Gonzales have been indicted on state charges involving federal prisons in a South Texas county that has been a source of bizarre legal and political battles under the outgoing prosecutor.The indictments, returned Monday and made public Tuesday, have not yet been signed by the presiding judge, and no action can be taken on them until that happens.The seven indictments issued in Willacy County also targeted some public officials connected to District Attorney Juan Angel Guerra's own legal battles.Cheney is charged with engaging in an organized criminal activity related to the vice president's investment in the Vanguard Group, which holds financial interests in the private prison companies running the federal detention centers. Cheney is accused of a conflict of interest and "at least misdemeanor assaults" on detainees because of his link to the prison companies.Megan Mitchell, a spokeswoman for Cheney, declined to comment, saying that the vice president had not yet received a copy of the indictment.The indictment accuses Gonzales of using his position while in office to stop an investigation in 2006 into abuses at one of the privately run prisons.Willacy County has become a prison hub with county, state and federal lockups. Guerra has gone after the prison-politician nexus before, extracting guilty pleas from three former Willacy and Webb county commissioners after investigating bribery related to federal prison contacts.

mogel007 said...

Scott From Vineland said: Hey moogie, did Kurt say "Moogie, why do YOU think SFV does not have the distant view"? Did he say Moogie, why do YOU think SFV's view is so earthly, so shortsighted"?

OF COURSE WE AGREE ON THAT. KURT HAS TOO MUCH CLASS TO DO SUCH A THING. AS HE SAYS, HE WILL NOT JUDGE YOU AS YOU'VE JUDGED HIM. COURSE THAN AGAIN, HE WOULDN'T ADDRESS ME AS 'MOOGIE' EITHER. HE WOULD RESPECTFULLY CALL ME BY MY FIRST NAME, GIVEN AT BIRTH.

No, he didn't, did he? Your opinion was not requested here... you just like to hear yourself talk, don't you Moogs?

AGAIN, NO DISAGREEMENT THERE, BUT AGAIN A MOOT POINT. I DON'T ENJOY HEARING MYSELF TALK AS MUCH AS MUCH AS YOU THINK SO. YOU DON'T KNOW ME AS WELL AS YOU THINK YOU DO. I JUST ENJOY SEEING YOU SQUIRM LIKE A WORM. IT WAS YOUR OWN COMMENT OF RECONNECTING WITH THE FAMILY THAT CAME FROM YOUR OWN WORDS, NOT MY CONJECTURE AS YOU LIKE TO INSINUATE. EVEN YOUR OWN ADMISSION WAS: "THAT WAS PROBABLY A BAD IDEA". YOU SEEM TO BE A MASTER OF MAKING A NON-ISSUE AN ISSUE. COURSE THAT'S JUST A WAY TO AVOID THE REAL FACTS & THE REAL ISSUES. IT'S SUCH A CHILDISH DISPLAY. I EXPECT MORE FROM YOU, BELIEVE IT OR NOT.

SPEAKING OF A WISE MAN, A WISE MAN KEEPS HIS MOUTH SHUT & DOESN'T JUDGE THINGS HE KNOWS NOTHING ABOUT; SOMETHING YOU HAVEN'T LEARNED YET. HOW FUNNY THAT THIS IS YOUR JUDGEMENT AND THE VERY THING YOU FAULT ME WITH, NOT BEING WISE BY JUDGING THINGS I KNOW NOTHING ABOUT. ALL I CAN SAY TO YOU IS JUST LOOK IN THE MIRROR AND HOPEFULLY YOU'LL SEE YOURSELF IN ALL OF THE THINGS YOU FAULT ME WITH, BUT THEN AGAIN, THAT IS PROBABLY ASKING TOO MUCH & EXPECTING TOO MUCH FOR YOU TO HAVE THAT SORT OF EPIFANY. IT IS SO COMMON TO SEE OUR OWN FAULTS IN OTHERS.

PUT TWO PEOPLE WITH THE SAME FAULTS IN THE SAME ROOM, AND SEE IF BOTH PEOPLE DON'T GET ALONG & IF BOTH PEOPLE DON'T COMPLAIN TO EACH OTHER ABOUT HAVING THE SAME FAULTS. IT'S HUMAN NATURE.

I HAD LUNCH TODAY AT PONDEROSA. I SAT NEXT TO A TABLE WHERE A LADY SPENT THE ENTIRE MEAL COMPLAINING ABOUT OTHER PEOPLE TO THE LADY SHE WAS WITH. AT FIRST I THOUGHT, NO SHE'LL EVENTUALLY SAY SOMETHING POSITIVE SOON & STOP COMPLAINING ABOUT EVERYONE IN HER LIFE. SURE ENOUGH, I WAS WRONG!!! THE ENTIRE TIME SHE SPENT BITCHING ABOUT OTHER PEOPLE IN HER LIFE & HER COMPLETE COMMUNICATIONS WERE NEGATIVE & HER DEMEANOR WAS ONLY ABOUT JUDGMENT, NO MERCY, NO COMPASSION, NO DOUBT ABOUT THE INTENTIONS OF OTHERS. NOW, I DON'T KNOW THIS LADY, ANY BETTER THAN I PROBABLY KNOW YOU, BUT I DETERMINED I DIDN'T WANT TO KNOW HER ANY BETTER THAN I DID AFTER LISTENING TO HER FOR 20 MINUTES. I ALMOST ASKED THE WAITRESS TO MOVE ME TO ANOTHER TABLE, BUT I WAS TRULY HOPING SHE WOULD SAY SOMETHING POSITIVE AFTER 20 MINUTES. IT DIDN'T HAPPEN.

dr. ira gilac said...

....anther slam bank down jones day....at this rate, if it go down anymo, there will be 'nobody left'...cept jimmy noone da is....

dr. ira gilac said...

now fo dose ho are 'no trially distended"...impotant infirmation....




Nov. 20, 2008

The UPU (Universal Postal Union) in Berne, Switzerland, is an extremely significant organization in today’s world. It is formulated by treaty. No nation can be recognized as a nation without being in international admiralty in order to have a forum common to all nations for engaging in commerce and resolving disputes. That is why the USA under the Articles of Confederation could not be recognized as a country. Every state (colony) was sovereign, with its own common law, which foreclosed other countries from interacting with the USA as a nation in international commerce. Today, international admiralty is the private jurisdiction of the IMF, et al., the creditor in the bankruptcy of essentially every government on Earth.

The UPU operates under the authority of treaties with every country in the world. It is, as it were, the overlord or overseer over the common interaction of all countries in international commerce. Every nation has a postal system, and also has reciprocal banking and commercial relationships, whereby all are within and under the UPU. The UPU is the number one military (international admiralty is also military) contract mover on the planet.

For this reason one should send all important legal and commercial documents through the post office rather than private carriers, which are firewalls. We want direct access to the authority—and corresponding availability of remedy and recourse—of the UPU. For instance, if you post through the US Post Office and the US Postmaster does not provide you with the remedy you request within twenty-one (21) days, you can take the matter to the UPU.

Involving the authority of the UPU is automatically invoked by the use of postage stamps. Utilization of stamps includes putting stamps on any documents (for clout purposes, not mailing) we wish to introduce into the system. As long as you use a stamp (of any kind) you are in the game. If you have time, resources, and the luxury of dealing with something well before expiration of a given time frame, you can use stamps that you consider ideal. The most preferable stamps are ones that are both large and contain the most colors. In an emergency situation, or simply if economy is a consideration, any stamp will do. Using a postage stamp and autograph on it makes you the postmaster for that contract.

Whenever you put a stamp on a document, inscribe your full name over the stamp at an angle. The color ink you use for this is a function of what color will show up best against the colors in the stamp. Ideal colors for doing this are purple (royalty), blue (origin of the bond), and gold (king’s edict). Avoid red at all cost. Obviously, if you have a dark, multi-colored stamp you do not want to use purple or blue ink, since your autograph on it would not stand out as well if you used lighter color ink. Ideally one could decide on the best color for his autograph and then obtain stamps that best suit one’s criteria and taste. Although a dollar stamp is best, it is a luxury unless one is well off financially. Otherwise, reserve the use of dollar stamps for crucial instruments, such as travel documents. The rationale for using two-cent stamps is that in the 19th Century the official postage rate for the de jure Post Office of the United States of America was fixed at two (2) cents. For stamps to carry on one’s person for any kind of unexpected encounter or emergency use, this denomination might be ideal.

Use stamps on important documents, such as a check, travel documents, paperwork you put in court, etc. Where to put the stamp and how many stamps to use depend on the document. On foundational documents and checks, for instance, put a stamp on the right hand corner of the instrument, both on the front and on the back. The bottom right hand corner of the face of a check, note, or bill of exchange signifies the liability. Furthermore, the bottom right hand corner of the reverse of the document is the final position on the page, so no one can endorse anything (using a restricted endorsement or otherwise) after that. You want to have the last word. If you have only one stamp, put it where you are expected to sign and autograph over it cross-wise. In the case of a traffic ticket, for instance, put a stamp on the lower right hand corner where you are supposed to sign and autograph across the stamp at an angle.

Autographing a stamp not only establishes you as the postmaster of the contract but constitutes a cross-claim. Using the stamp process on documents presents your adversaries with a problem because their jurisdiction is subordinate to that of the UPU, which you have now invoked for your benefit. The result in practice of doing this is that whenever those who know what you are doing are recipients of your documents with autographed stamps they back off. If they do not, take the matter to the US Postmaster to deal with. If he will not provide you with your remedy, take the matter to the UPU for them to clean up.

The countries whose stamps would be most effective to use are China, Japan, United States, and Great Britain. Utilizing these countries covers both East and West. However, since the US seems to be the point man in implementing the New World Order, one might most advisably use US stamps.

If you put stamps on documents you submit into court, put a stamp on the back of each page, at the bottom right hand corner. Do not place any stamps on the front of court paperwork since doing so alarms the clerk. By placing your autographed stamp on the reverse right hand corner you prevent being damaged by one of the tricks of judges these days. A judge might have your paperwork on his bench, but turned over so only the back side, which is ordinarily blank on every page, is visible. Then if you ask about your paperwork he might say something like, “Yes, I have your paperwork in front of me but I don’t find anything.” He can’t see anything on the blank side of a page. If you place an autographed stamp on the lower right hand corner you foreclose a judge from engaging in this trick.

In addition, when it comes to court documents, one side is criminal and the other is civil. Using the autographed stamp that you rubber-stamp with your seal (bullet stamp) on the back side of your court documents is evidence that you possess the cancelled obligation on the civil side. Since there can be no assessment for criminal charges, and you show that you are the holder of the civil assessment, there is no way out for the court.

Also, in any court document you put in, handwrite your EIN number [SS# w.o. dashes] in gold on the top right corner of every page, with the autographed stamp on the back side.

Use of a notary combined with the postage stamp (and sometime Embassy stamps) gives you a priority mechanism. Everything is commerce, and all commerce is contract. The master of the contract is the post office, and the UPU is the supreme overlord of the commerce, banking, and postal systems of the world. Use of these stamps in this manner gets the attention of those in the system to whom you provide your paperwork. It makes you the master of that post office. Use of the stamp is especially important when dealing with the major players, such as the FBI, CIA, Secret Service, Treasury, etc. They understand the significance of what you are doing. Many times they hand documents back to someone using this approach and say, “Have a good day, sir.” They don’t want any untoward repercussions coming back on them.

If anyone asks you why you are doing what you are doing, suggest that they consult their legal counsel for the significance. It is not your job to explain the law, nor explain such things as your exemption or Setoff Account. The system hangs us by our own words. We have to give them the evidence, information, contacts, and legal determinations they require to convict us. The wise words of Calvin Coolidge, the most taciturn president in US history, are apt. When asked why he spoke so little, he replied, “I have never been hurt by anything I didn’t say.”

The bottom line is that whenever you need to sign any legal/commercial document, put a stamp (even a one (1) cent stamp) over where you sign and sign at an angle across it. Let the recipient deal with the significance and consequences of your actions. If you are in a court case, or at any stage of a proceeding (such as an indictment, summons, complaint, or any other hostile encounter with the system), immediately do the following:

1. Make a color copy of whatever documents you receive, or scan them in color into your computer;

2. Stamp the original of the first page of every document with the ARFV stamp, put a postage stamp in the signature space, and autograph across it at an angle with your full name, using purple or blue ink, handwritten with upper- and lower-case, with your gold-ink bullet stamp (seal) on the upper left-hand portion of the postage stamp;

Make a color copy of the stamped, autographed pages and/or scan into your computer;

3. Put a stamp on the lower right-hand-corner of the back of every page and bullet-stamp and autograph it;

4. Have a notary send each document back to the sender, with a notarial certificate of service, with or without an accompanying/supporting affidavit by you;

5. If you have an affidavit, put an autographed stamp on the upper right hand corner of the first page and the lower right hand corner of the back of every page.

People who have engaged in this process report that when any knowledgeable judge, attorney, or official sees this, matters change dramatically. All of these personages know what mail fraud is. Since autographing the stamp makes you the postmaster of the contract, anyone who interferes is tampering with the mail and engaging in mail fraud. You can then subpoena the postmaster (either of the post office from which the letter was mailed, or the US Postmaster General, or both), and have them explain what the rules are, under deposition or testimony on the witness stand in open court.

In addition, most of the time when you get official communication it has a red-meter postage mark on the envelope rather than a cancelled stamp. This act is mail fraud. If the envelope has a red-meter postage mark on it, they are the ones who have engaged in mail fraud, because there is no cancelled stamp. It is the cancelled stamp that has the power; an un-cancelled stamp has nothing. A red-meter postage mark is an uncancelled stamp. If it is not cancelled, it is not paid. One researcher has scanned everything into his computer, and has more red-meter postage marks than he “can shake a stick at.” Officials sending things out by cancelled stamp is a rarity—perhaps at most 2%.

With the red-metered postage you can trace each communication back to the PO from which it was sent, so you can get the postmaster for that PO, as well as the postmaster general for the US, to investigate the mail fraud involved. It is reasonable to conclude that canceling a stamp both registers the matter and forms a contract between the party that cancels the stamp and the UPU. Using a stamp for postage without canceling it is prima facie evidence that the postmaster of the local PO is committing mail fraud by taking a customer’s money and not providing the paid-for service and providing you with the power of a cancelled stamp, as required under the provisions of the UPU. When you place an autographed stamp on a document you place that document and the contract underlying it under international law and treaty, with which the courts have no jurisdiction to deal. The system cannot deal with the real you, the living principle (as evidenced and witnessed by jurat). Nor can officials, attorneys, judges, et al., go against the UPU, international law, and treaty. In addition, they have no authority/jurisdiction to impair a contract between you (as the living principal) and the UPU (overseer of all world commerce).

You cancelled the stamp by sealing it and autographing across it. You did so in capacity of being the living principal, as acknowledged by your seal and the jurat on your documents.

If you are in a court case, bring in your red-metered envelopes in court and request the judge to direct the prosecutor to explain the red-meter postage stamp. Then watch their jaws drop. Doing this is especially potent if you also have asked the prosecutor to provide his bar number, since most attorneys in court—especially in US—are not qualified. An attorney in federal court had better have a six-digit bar card or he committed a felony just by walking in and giving his name.

Lastly, if you are charged with mail fraud, subpoena the prosecutor(s) to bring in the evidence on which mail fraud is being alleged, as well as the originals of all envelopes used for mailing any item connected with the case. Then the mail fraud involved was committed by the postmaster of the PO in which the envelope was stamped.

dr. ira gilac said...

like frite conleone said:

im not dum, im smot....

so...waht do it meen??




Today, international admiralty is the private jurisdiction of the IMF, et al., the creditor in the bankruptcy of essentially every government on Earth.

dr. ira gilac said...

so, den if every singel govt. is bankrup, den?????

Scott from Vineland said...

Henceforth, I shall address Mr. Byron Gashler by his new nickname, Twister.