Saturday, September 19, 2009

Who is this King of Glory (8-7-09)

Psalms 24 asks and answers this question. Many people use the name of Jesus generically to identify the fictional deity of their imaginations. There is the cosmic Jesus which is the great spirit within all of us. There is the prosperity Jesus whose worth and blessings are apportioned for this temporal existence. Jesus the good and wise teacher and the many others . These are not the King of Glory discussed in this Psalm.

As I studied this Psalm I imagined the city to have 2 allegorical parallels to run with the actual city of Jerusalem topiced within. One is the New Jerusalem (Heaven) receiving this ascended conqueror. The other is the city of our heart. I began to imagine King David with the ark singing this song possibly in a round or a rhetorical between singers and a choir. The procession would be long, jubilant, full of pomp, and glorying in triumph. David being the shadow type of Christ. I could see the angels singing as Christ enters leading captivity captive. Likewise the majesty of who entered my heart to dwell began to fill my heart with awe.

Have you really contemplated who chose to enter and dwell? This is the Lord of Host. None greater or with more power. Regal in the highest order yet condescend in love to you. This contemplation was changing my views on prayer, authority, victory, and battle. Just at this time I received news of my sister’s cancer miraculously improving. This great King was invited into the city of this need and He proved Himself to be worthy of all the honor and as potent of reputation repeated.

There is no difference between sin, bankers, judges, or cancer. They all defy this King and speak of death but who is this King who defeats them all? He is the Lord mightily in battle. He is the real Jesus. Lift up your heads and be lifted up and let this King of Glory enter.

84 comments:

BigO said...

AAAAAAAMEEEEEEEEEN !!!!!!!!

sopsback said...

Vaccine Deaths Aiming At Natives!

Sept 19/09



The Mask Slips, for Those with Eyes to See:

Preparing for the Real Pandemic

by Kevin D. Annett, M.A., M.Div.

Last week, many of the aboriginal people in the remote west coast village of Ahousaht were innoculated with the tamiflu vaccine. Today, over a hundred of them are sick, and the sickness is spreading.

In the same week, body bags were sent to similarly remote native reserves in northern Manitoba that have also received the tamiflu vaccine.

On the face of things, it appears that flu vaccinations are causing a sickness that is being deliberately aimed at aboriginal people across Canada, and this sickness will be fatal: a fact acknowledged by the Canadian government by their "routine" sending of body bags to these Indian villages.

Before you express your shock and denial at the idea that people are being deliberately targeted and killed, remember that murdering Indians with vaccinations is not a new or abnormal thing in Canada. Indeed, it's how we Europeans "won the land", and it's one of the ways we keep it.

sopsback said...

murdering Indians with vaccinations is not a new or abnormal thing in Canada.


and it not fo the usa eether...nope, they dun it beefo too....


just axe sum fo the indeens ho were cold and given blanket by da us govt....yea, they gave da indeens blankets with the toxoid virus in them....smallpox...real nice of 'em, eh?? yep, our good ole' us gvt at works....

sopsback said...

ill bet that they even had a "champlin' fo they soliders too then....

sopsback said...

yea, ill bet that they were "prayin' with da champlin dat the toxid virus wood kill a lot of da indeeens....

so much injustice our 'christian' govt has done....


corse soliders have been branswashed to bleef they are doing "gods works"...


LOLOLOLOL!!!!!!!

sopsback said...

"....for behold, the day will come when they will put yo out of the sinagag and kill yo, thinking that they ARE DOING GODS WORK..."


it there...looks it up.

yeshua said it.

sopsback said...

yea, they a lot of ' misguided 'soles' today doon a lot of evil thins, thinking that they are doing gods work.....these ppls do this beecoss they cant possibly do gods work coss they cant possible know gods work coss they dont have WHAT???


da HS

sopsback said...

thinking that they are doing gods work..



a lot of deese is in eye rack and if i can stand....if not, i sit.....

mogel007 said...

HOW TO BEAT CRIMINAL CHARGES IN ADMIRALTY COURTS

Case on Point
JUDGE: Bail is set at $50,000. (for a previous case)
Judge to Bailiff….Next case….
************************************************************************************
BAILIFF: ---- People vs. “SMITH”. (in upper case letters)
The charges are two counts of operating houses of ill-repute:
3 Counts of armed robbery;
2 Counts of murder in the 1st degree;
5 Counts of indecent exposure while dancing in the rain and
30 Counts of bigamy.
JUDGE: (he sees the strawman's name "SMITH" in his file, and that’s how he is addressing him)
---- State your name. ----
THE ACCUSED Smith: ----- Your Honor, I will be glad to state my name if you can show me any presentments with my name on it for me to accept. ----
JUDGE: ---- Accept? ---- What are you talking about? -----
THE ACCUSED Smith: ----- The court is looking for an ACCEPTOR, as the PRINCIPAL has the primary obligation to pay or discharge any instrument presented for acceptance.
See ACCEPTANCE under 3-410 of the Uniform Commercial Code.
JUDGE: --- Mr. you are accused of some very serious crimes. ---- Now how do you plead?
THE ACCUSED Smith: I will plead guilty to the facts, but not the crimes, but first I need to make sure there is an ACCEPTANCE BOND.
JUDGE: What do you want a bond for?
THE ACCUSED Smith: Whoever filed the complaint is making a CLAIM on me and in the Jurisdiction of Admiralty you can not make a CLAIM unless you BOND your CLAIM.
JUDGE: Well what about that prosecutor?
PROSECUTER: I'm not sure about that...no, no bond.
THE ACCUSED Smith: What about a BID BOND? Do you have the bid bond?
JUDGE: (pretending not to know)
What's that?
Tid-bit for Court Page 1 of 9
THE ACCUSED Smith: --- [Because] A BID BOND is what gets [then] filled out and if the defendant (or accused) does not close, settle, pay or discharge the claim he defaults or dishonors the court. The BID BOND, PERFORMANCE BOND and PAYMENT BOND gets sold to the U.S. District Court where these bonds are bought up by Insurance Companies and then sold on the open market, mainly to the Japanese and Chinese, which becomes the primary [collateral] source of our economy.
JUDGE: Oh, ----- THAT BID BOND. (acting as if he had inadvertently forgot about that)
PROSECUTER: Judge this is ridiculous. This man is charged with multiple counts of crimes and the state is asking for the max.
JUDGE: What about sir?
THE ACCUSED Smith: ---- Your honor, is this a TORT action or a COMMERCIAL CRIME?
If it’s a TORT, then where is the INJURED PARTY or if it’s a COMMERCIAL CRIME, then where is the CONTRACT?
PROSECUTER: Your honor, this is an outrage!!! This guy is accused of murder.
JUDGE: --- NO…… HE IS NOT!
---- Prosecutor… You have no CLAIM against him.
---- It isn't his responsibility to BOND YOUR CLAIM(S).
---- Sir…..You’re free to go.

near the end said...

Mogel what do you think the result would be for someone who signed Trust paperwork then quitclamed property to K and S with incomplete legal description and then K and S deeded property back to you with same incomplete legal description.

I can't see how there Attorney can fix that since there in jail and there is no proof of a Trust ever being in place; other than the quit claim saying on it that the property was in the Smith's family Trust.

sopsback said...

whadoseitmeens.cum


Obama Warned By CIA, “Surrender Or Join Kennedy”




sumho, i dun thins dat they are talking about teeching obooma ho to do 1099 OID tacks forms here.....????

sopsback said...

if dat was da case, den all he need to do is listne to kendys program tonite on rbn @ 8pm est.

mogel007 said...

This is all real disturbing, but yet still very convincing evidence since the lady seems very sure in her convictions & beliefs based upon her 1st hand experience in these things:

http://labvirus.wordpress.com/

I guess SOP was right after all.

mogel007 said...

Mogel what do you think the result would be for someone who signed Trust paperwork then quitclamed property to K and S with incomplete legal description and then K and S deeded property back to you with same incomplete legal description.

YOU ALREADY KNOW THE RESULT, YOU GET A MESSED UP CHAIN OF TITLE. COURSE THAT ISN'T THE PROBLEM, THE PROBLEM IS NOT FIXING THE PROBLEM. I THINK YOU FIX THE PROBLEM BY TYPING UP ANOTHER QUIT CLAIM DEED WITH THE CORRECT & FULL LEGAL DESCRIPTION WHERE KURT & SCOTT AS TRUSTEES OF YOUR FAMILY TRUST, QUIT CLAIM THE HOME BACK TO YOUR PERSONAL NAME. THE COUNTY RECORDER CAN GIVE YOU EXAMPLES OF PROPERLY WORDED QUIT CLAIM DEEDS, BUT OF COURSE, THEY DON'T GIVE LEGAL ADVISE, AS I AM NOT GIVING LEGAL ADVISE EITHER. LOL

I can't see how there Attorney can fix that since there in jail and there is no proof of a Trust ever being in place; other than the quit claim saying on it that the property was in the Smith's family Trust.

THE EASIEST WAY I BELIEVE IS TO PREPARE A NEW QUIT CLAIM DEED, A DEED WHERE KURT & SCOTT AS TRUSTEES OF YOUR FAMILY TRUST ARE QUITCLAIMING THE PROPERTY BACK TO YOU & HAVE IT MAILED TO DR. FRED BY MAIL. DR. FRED WILL CHARGE YOU A FEE FOR DOING ALL OF THIS LEG WORK, SO EMAIL HIM & ASK HIM WHAT THAT FEE WILL BE. BUT IT'S CHEAPER THAN HIRING AN ATTORNEY DOING THIS FOR YOU. DR. FRED WILL SEND IT TO SOMEONE THAT CAN LEGALLY SIGN FOR KURT & SCOTT, WHO OBVIOUSLY ARE IN JAIL. NOT A PROBLEM. SO YOU NEED DR. FRED'S COOPERATION RIGHT NOW. BE NICE. LOL

ONCE YOU GET THE EXECUTED QUIT CLAIM DEED BACK TO YOU, HAVE IT RECORDED AT THE COUNTY RECORDER WHERE THE HOUSE IS. THAN GO TO YOUR LENDER & GIVE THEM A COPY OF IT & ASK THEM IF THAT SOLVES THE TITLE PROBLEM. DON'T LEAVE THE RECORDER'S OFFICE WITHOUT GETTING A COPY OF THE RECORDED QUIT CLAIM DEED. THEY'LL GIVE YOU A COPY, BUT THEY'LL MAIL THE ORIGINAL TO YOU LATER I BELIEVE.

sopsback said...

put it dis ways...anynone in da dg program, then yo crazee to get a flew shoot...then if yo do, then mak sho dat yo haf a turst benficary fo yo money, coss yo wont bee around long enuf to spend it.

sopsback said...

dan blak just rit his noo book. "da found cymbal"


do it make a bang???


o is he just wroking with dat other guy....


I. Lou Minotti ???

sopsback said...

btw, dat Minooti guy, wha his first name?

is it Israel or Ishmail??


i awlay wunda bout dat???

sopsback said...

i no dat he must be none of dose BIG CEOs...coss they always rit they names with they first intail, insted of they fist names....

sopsback said...

wha is da "freemansons"

i thawt they let out "squicky" from coss she refusse to stop doin quiclams in jial. she just love dose quickie clams...but charly freemanso not so lucky...he still doon slo clams fo a long time to come....



Dan Brown a patsy or just a willing pawn?

New book should have been called "The Gospel According to Freemasonry"
Posted: September 17, 2009
9:11 am Eastern


SPRINGFIELD, MO – There’s a conspiracy, all right, and Dan Brown is in on it. "The Lost Symbol," his follow-up to the 2003 best-seller, "The Da Vinci Code," is out this week – and if you’ve read it, you know the Freemason’s have nothing to worry about. "Symbol" is about as threatening to The Brotherhood as a box of chocolates, two-dozen roses and a love card.

In fact, if you’re anything like me, you’ll come away from this overblown drivel with the curious feeling that we’ve all been had—that the "jitters" Freemasons were claiming to be experiencing in the lead-up to "Symbol" was really an elaborate sales gimmick between Brown and his occult buddies at 16th Street in Washington DC. The problem is, these folks are not just selling books. They’ve amassed under the guise of a "thriller" a profound apologetic for the occult aspirations of the Order of the Quest.

Set aside for a moment the fact that I’ve never had so many cliffhanger let-downs in a single night before. Over and over, page after page "Symbol" leads you to believe you’re finally on the verge of some great discovery only to then be handed a "revelation" that any two-year-old with a computer could have Googled in five minutes on the internet.

Frankly, the one truly extraordinary thing about this book is what it doesn’t reveal! One would have thought with Brown’s resources he could have come up with at least a single fascinating tidbit. But, alas… I encourage you to stick with the Googling.

Better yet, read Apollyon Rising 2012: The Lost Symbol Found and the Final Mystery of the Great Seal Revealed when it comes out in late November, as it actually presents heretofore unknown and startling information about the Freemasons and the future of the world. I know, because I met with the real people Brown fictionalizes in the opening scenes of his book. They gave me the two coins, and I can tell you unequivocally that there are substantive reasons to be concerned, especially now that Brown has joined the "Order" to sell the Great Deception.

Let me give you an example.

sopsback said...

When the main character of Brown’s novel, Robert Langdon receives a frightening video of an initiate of the 33rd Degree of Scottish Rite Freemasonry drinking wine (or blood) from a human skull during a ritual in the Temple Room at the House of the Temple (detailed in the upcoming book Apollyon Risisng 2012), Langdon considers what would happen if the video were made public. "No one would understand," he thinks to himself. Then in a scene that can only be described as pure propaganda, Brown continues:

The truth will be twisted, Langdon knew. As it always is with the Masons. The truth was that the brotherhood’s focus on death was in fact a bold celebration of life. Masonic ritual was designed to awaken the slumbering man inside, lifting him from his dark coffin of ignorance, raising him into the light, and giving him eyes to see…. Masonic initiations were startling because they were meant to be transformative…. Masonic teachings were arcane because they were meant to be universal…taught through a common language of symbols and metaphors that transcended religions, cultures, and races…creating a unified "world wide consciousness" of brotherly love (The Lost Symbol, pg 437).

So, there it is. The truth is always twisted when it comes to Masons. Drinking red substance from a skull in a dark room with a noose around your neck under a blood oath of horrific repercussion including having your throat slit, eyeballs pierced, tongue torn out, feet flayed, body hacked into pieces, and so on if you give up the wrong information, is a celebration of life, a unified effort by transendent souls who only want to lift the rest of us empty-headed twits from our dark coffins of ignorance into a unified world of brotherly love.

sopsback said...

troothis dat probly da freemansons started out as a good thins...

yo no, yo a stone mason or sum kine of crapsman or perry mason and then yo teech yo son to be a crapsman and then he teech his son to be a crapsmen an on an on until one day theys too much crap and da sh*t finlay hit da fan.....


in udder words, everthins dat organly start out fo good, turn out evil becoss WHY????


BECOSS IT BE FILTRATED BY EVIL


WHY??//



COSS HOSE KINGDUM IS THIS????

PPLS JUST REFUSE TO GET THIS POINT.

EVERY BENFOOLENT ORG EVENTUALLY BE FILTRATED WITH DOSE HO WANT TO USE IT FO THEY AGENDA, WHICH IS EVIL.

BECOSS DIS IS STANS KINGDUM.

sopsback said...

So, there it is. The truth is always twisted when it comes to Masons. Drinking red substance from a skull in a dark room with a noose around your neck under a blood oath of horrific repercussion including having your throat slit, eyeballs pierced, tongue torn out, feet flayed, body hacked into pieces, and so on if you give up the wrong information, is a celebration of life, a unified effort by transendent souls who only want to lift the rest of us empty-headed twits from our dark coffins of ignorance into a unified world of brotherly love.

sopsback said...

noose around your neck under a blood oath of horrific repercussion including having your throat slit, eyeballs pierced, tongue torn out, feet flayed, body hacked into pieces,




only thins they forogt to do is cut yo tentacles off and stuff them in yo mounth.



dats wha they shoud do to sum of doese crimnals in the govt. responsible fo all dis.

mogel007 said...

SOP: I was just wondering how you justify that the earth is Satan's kingom in light of this scripture:

Romans 13: 1-8

It says "God ordains the rulers to be" In essence it says that those rulers are God's choice & to follow them, unless you believe that scripture is totally inaccurate & mistranslated? Course the rulers ordained don't always follow God, but as a Christian we are told to honor & follow them. Almost sounds like a contradiction, huh?

sopsback said...

God ordains the rulers to be




god also created satan no?

rember,if god truly wanted no evil at all, then wdhy he create satan at all??


yes, based on what i know, then i do have to questsioin who/when this was put in the bible.

as i do not have the origianl manuscripts.

so god is saying obeyance to a criminal govt??

i seriously doubt taht god would have said that.

so obeyance to kill inocetn ppls in iraq who did nohting wrong?


i have not done any study on this particualcr verses but offhand, i would say that perhaps there was some corruption in this chapteronly because teh HS would not tell one to kill innocetn ppl just because the govt. said to.


so, yes i would tend to agree with yo on this.

the verses just do not add up to what the HS wuld tell me to do.

i could certanly not kill innocetn ppl just becasue my govt.told me to.

sopsback said...

and more evidence still would be taht if that is true, then the Son Himself then would not be in obeyance to the Father as jesus himself was in opposition to rome and the governing joos of the day.

so haviing thought of this, then i now defintely say that this chapter was crated out of "hole cloth" ie, fabricated by the ptb at the time to perhpas get subserbvience from the ppls

sopsback said...

and still yet anther reason, jesus was prpbly talking about a 'god fearing' govt.

yo haf to ask yoslef?


do we today haf a 'god fearing' govt?

or a govt. ho thnks they are god?

sopsback said...

da same thins here apples:


yo da deth row warden

yo schedule to pull the swithch on the 'letric char fo a prizner on ded row

yo clam to be a chirstian.

can yo do yo job?



NO!!

yo cannot obey yo govt tell yo to letricute da guy


WHY??


becoss yo no dat heys dyin becoss of the UCC code

he an admiralty prisner.


no matta wha he done, yo killin him based on a false pretends/premiss da emeralty law.


so like it o not, yo haf ta let him go free

just like da monply game,

"GET OUT OF JAIL FREE" card


but if yo christian, then yo no dat he was put ther in da first place on a fphony law da UCC CODE


Sso must more evidence that jesus could not hafve written to obey a non god fearing govt.

it was proble writt by da poop at the time it was ritten

sopsback said...

yes, teh all powful BMR relgion....


MISERY- BMR THE 'GRATE"


coss eventually it will be like being put thru a grate....yo will be goorund up like humburger....

mogel007 said...

god also created satan no?

YES GOD CREATED ALL THINGS, HOWEVER, SATAN IN THE BEGINNING WAS NOT EVIL; HE WAS REFERRED TO AS LUCIFER, AN ANGEL OF LIGHT. LUCIFER WAS PROBABLY #4 IN POSITION & GLORY BEFORE THE WORLD WAS. HE WAS CAST OUT OF HEAVEN. HE CAME FROM HEAVEN, SO HE COULD NOT HAVE BEEN EVIL IN THE BEGINNING.

rember,if god truly wanted no evil at all, then wdhy he create satan at all??

AGAIN CREATIONS IN THE BEGINNING ARE ALWAYS GOOD. GOD CREATED ALL THINGS & SAID "IT WAS GOOD", REMEMBER? OR MAYBE YOU DON'T BELIEVE IN THE BOOK OF GENESIS EITHER? I UNDERSTAND THAT THERE MUST BE OPPOSITION IN ALL THINGS. EVIL HAS A PURPOSE, BUT THE FATE OF EVIL PEOPLE I THINK WILL NOT ENDURE TIME. THEY ARE DESTINED TO BECOME LOSERS & OF NO CONSEQUENCE BY THEIR OWN POOR CHOICES.

sopsback said...

AGAIN CREATIONS IN THE BEGINNING ARE ALWAYS GOOD



yes, but rember dat god nose da futre, so he nose teh ultimaete result of his crations

so he crated evil coos he no dat lucyfer wood turno out evil

and even then, he haf a 2nd chance, he cood of destory stan if he wnat to

mogel007 said...

so he crated evil coos he no dat lucyfer wood turno out eviL

YES, I BELIEVE ACCORDING TO HIS FOREKNOWLEDGE OF ALL THINGS, HE KNEW THAT SATAN WOULD MAKE POOR CHOICES.
GOD CANNOT CREATE EVIL, SINCE THAT WOULD MAKE HIM EVIL AS THE AUTHOR OR CREATOR OF SUCH. GOD GIVES ALL OF HIS CREATIONS FREE WILL OR FREE CHOICE. THE POWER OF EVIL HAS ALWAYS EXISTED. THE POWER OF GOOD HAS ALWAYS EXISTED.

and even then, he haf a 2nd chance, he cood of destory stan if he wnat to

EVIL CAN'T BE DESTROYED ANYMORE THAN A SPIRIT CAN BE DESTROYED. EVIL SPIRITS CAN BE BANISHED OR PUT IN THEIR PLACE, OR IMPRISONED, BUT I DON'T BELIEVE THEY CAN BE TOTALLY DESTROYED. SATAN IS AN EVIL SPIRIT. EVIL COEXISTS WITH GOOD & HAS ALWAYS EXISTED. THERE IS NO BEGINNING & THERE IS NO END OF EVIL. ALL THERE IS, IS SEPARATION OF GOOD & EVIL IN THE END OF TIMES OR A SEPARATION OF EVIL PEOPLE & GOOD PEOPLE.

TIME IS NOT MEASURED UNTO GOD, SINCE HE LIVES IN ETERNITY, ONLY MAN MEASURES TIME OR IS CONCERNED WITH TIME.

CAN MATTER BE CREATED OR DESTROYED? DON'T BELIEVE SO. ISN'T THAT ONE OF THE LAWS OF PHYSICS?
MATTER CAN ONLY BE REORGANIZED OR CHANGED. THE ELEMENTS OF MATTER ARE NEVER DESTROYED. MAYBE SATAN WILL REVERT BACK TO HIS SIMPLEST FORM IN THE BEGINNING SINCE HE NEVER MET THE HIGHEST PURPOSE OF THE MEASURE OF HIS CREATION & INDEED CAN NEVER CHANGE TO BEING A GOOD PERSON SINCE HIS PROGRESS IS DAMNED BY HIS OWN CHOICES & LIMITATIONS HE IS UNDER FOREVER & EVER. HE KNOWS HIS TIME IS LIMITED BEFORE HE IS PERMANENTLY BANISHED BY GOD.

sopsback said...

CAN MATTER BE CREATED OR DESTROYED? DON'T BELIEVE SO.



are yo saying that god cannot create thins????


i would certanly bet this view would be in conflick with kurt and dr. fraid.



aer yo saying that ther are thins that god cannot do???


agian, i will bet that kirk and scoot dont agree with yo there.


can god crate a rock so hevy taht he cannot lift it???

sopsback said...

matta cannot be crated???

are yo sayng that god did not crate the yoonyverse???


den yo bleefs in da big bank theery???

da feral reverse...greenscam yose to bleef in dat too......an now even burnt hanky.....LOLOLOO!!!

sopsback said...

while you wait for you dg payout....


take a chance to win $10K USD

there is a contest going on for the first to solve a series of clues based on things like Dan Browns new book: The Lost Symbol, but mainly on an upcoming book Apollyon Rising:2012 The Lost Symbol Found

it deals with the esoteric mystery symbols like the All-Seeing Eye and the like

for the first to solve a series of clues, they grand prize winner will receive $10k usd

the clues will be given by a website each week

the first one is out

the next will be given on nov. 9 so you have plenty of time

i took a quick look at it, and its not easy

contest here:
(watch the youtube video to the right first)

http://www.grandnationalchallenge.com/



GOOD LUCK!!

sopsback said...

Final details on receiving the FREE gifts will be published when Apollyon Rising 2012 is released and in the final (11th) clue. There will be no cost for the FREE items and they will be included at the time Apollyon Rising is shipped.




is released and in the final (11th) clue.

fo corse...yo cood of gussed it.....not 10 or 12 cloos....

sopsback said...

it deals with the esoteric mystery symbols like the All-Seeing Eye and the like




HA!!


da all saying i gut nuttin' on me...

...coss everytime i get some one doola bills for my pockits, then i take all the doola bills and then take a shop pensil and poke a hole in da all seeng eye and blind dat mofo.....now he aint see sh*t!

sopsback said...

LOL!!!



There were rumors and rumblings last night OBAMA had been given until noon today to resign, then WE heard it was extended till 6p.m. tonight.

WE now hear the Supreme Court and the World Court have today ruled that OBAMA is to be charged with 36 counts of theft, embezzlement, fraud, etc. including TREASON, a Capital Offense. And, that we will return to the Constitution and Article III Courts at midnight tonight. And, that the Corporation is dissolved and no longer exists.
WE hear that OBAMA has been notified he is no longer President.

WE hear OBAMA told both Courts to kiss his ass and that he would claim its all about race.

WE hear the Supreme Court will make announcements tomorrow.

sopsback said...

tell yo' nuttin?


ho put out dis sh*t??

ho??

sopsback said...

WE hear that OBAMA has been notified he is no longer President.



im sho dat he just say:

"..ok, whay my coat at?"

mogel007 said...

Great legal defense! A silver bullet for many. MERS cannot legally foreclose because they don't have the necessary documents and are merely a STRAWMAN with no legal interest in the loan transaction. This affects 60 million people. The mortgage loan is ineffectual when the note holder also does not have in its possession the original deed of trust also:

http://www.webofdebt.com/articles
/mers.php

mogel007 said...

are yo saying that god cannot create thins????

CREATE = ORGANIZE. GOD ORGANIZED THE WORLDS THAT ARE OUT THERE. HE TOOK WHAT HE HAD & CHANGED THINGS BY HIS POWER OR BY HIS WORDS.

ELEMENTS ARE NOT CREATED. THEY ARE COEXISTANT WITH GOD HIMSELF.

mogel007 said...

den yo bleefs in da big bank theery???

WE DON'T KNOW EXACTLY HOW GOD CREATED THE WORLDS. WE KNOW THAT ALL THINGS OBEY HIS VOICE AND HIS COMMANDS.

mogel007 said...

aer yo saying that ther are thins that god cannot do???

YES, GOD CANNOT SIN, OTHERWISE, HE WOULD CEASE TO BE GOD. A HOLY BEING WOULD NOT CONSIDER SUCH THINGS, NOR ARE SUCH THINGS TEMPTING TO THEM.


agian, i will bet that kirk and scoot dont agree with yo there.

MAYBE.

"Man was also in the beginning with God. Intelligence, or the light of truth, WAS NOT CREATED OR MADE, neither indeed can be.

All truth is independent in that sphere in which God has placed it, to act for itself, as all intelligence also; otherwise there is no existence.

Behold, here is the agency of man, and here is the condemnation of man, because that which was from the beginning is plainly manifest unto them, and they receive not the light.

And ever man whose spirit receiveth not the light is under condemnation.

For man is spirit. The ELEMENTS ARE ETERNAL, and spirit and element, inseparably connected receive a fullness of joy;

And when separated man cannot receive a fullness of joy.

The elements are the tabernacle of God; yea, man is the tabernacle of God, even temples; and whatsoever temple is defiled, God shall destroy that temple.

The glory of God is intelligence, or IN OTHER WORDS, LIGHT AND TRUTH.

Light and truth forsake that evil one.

Every spirit of man was innocent in the beginning."
_________________________


can god crate a rock so hevy taht he cannot lift it???

GOD DOES NOT CONCERN HIMSELF WITH SUCH SILLY THINGS. GOD'S POWER COMES FROM HIS KNOWLEDGE OF ALL THINGS. THERE ISN'T ANYTHING SO HEAVY THAT HE CAN'T LIFT IT. ALL MATTER, LIVING OR NOT OBEYS HIM. HE KNOWS ALL THE LAWS OF THE UNIVERSE.

YOU MAKE A FALSE ASSUMPTION SINCE GOD HAS ALL POWER, SO YOU COME TO A FALSE CONCLUSION. GOD CAN DO ALL THINGS WITHIN THE BOUNDARIES OF THE ETERNAL LAWS THAT EXIST. THERE IS NO SPACE WHERE THERE ISN'T
LAWS.

mogel007 said...

"That which is governed by law is also preserved by law and perfected and sanctified by the same.

That which breaketh a law, and abideth not by law, but seeketh to become a law unto itself, and willeth to abide in sin, and altogether abideth in sin, cannot be sanctified by law, neither by mercy, justice, nor judgment. Therefore, they must remain filthy still.

All kingdoms have a law given.

And they are many kingdoms, for there is no space in the which there is no kingdom; and there is no kingdom in which there is no space, either a greater or a lesser kingdom.

And unto every kingdom is given a law; and unto every law there are CERTAIN BOUNDS ALSO AND CONDITIONS.

All beings who abide not in those conditions are not justified.

For intelligence, cleaveth unto intelligence; truth embraceth truth, virtue loveth virtue; light cleaventh unto light; mercy hath compassion on mercy and claimeth her own; justice continueth its course and claimeth its own, judgment goeth before the face of him who sitteth upon the throne and governeth and EXECUTED ALL THINGS.

He comprehendeth all things and all things are before him, and all things are round about him; and he is above all things, AND IN ALL THINGS, and is through all things, and is round about all things; and ALL THINGS ARE BY HIM, and of him, even God, forever, and ever.

And again, verily I say unto you, he hath given A LAW UNTO ALL THINGS, by which they move in their times and their seasons;

And their courses are fixed; even the courses of the heavens and the earth, which comprehend the earth and all the planets."

mogel007 said...

OBAMA had been given until noon today to resign, then WE heard it was extended till 6p.m. tonight.
________________________________

COME ON! THIS SOUNDS TOO MUCH LIKE THE BANK HOLIDAY THAT DIDN'T HAPPEN ON THE DATE YOU SAID.

SURE THERE ARE PEOPLE AFTER THE PRESIDENT TO GET HIM TO RESIGN, BUT I THINK THOSE PEOPLE ARE ALSO SPREADING FALSE THINGS & FALSE HOPES. EVEN THE COURT CASE IN CA TRYING TO DETERMINE IF HE WAS BORN IN THE US WILL PROBABLY BE PROLONGED UNTIL THE END OF OBAMA'S FIRST TERM BY THE JUDGE, SO ANY VERACITY OR FORCE OF THE TRIAL WILL BECOME MOOT REGARDLESS OF THE OUTCOME.

YOU'RE GETTING LIES ON BOTH SIDES.

mogel007 said...

SOP: Can God REDEEM SATAN or the sons of perdition, or Satan's evil angels?

No, he cannot. they are a law unto themselves to REMAIN FILTHY STILL, outside the blood atonement of Christ.

mogel007 said...

What did Jesus say about THOSE WHO ARE NOT ABLE TO BE REDEEMED who who are "filthy still" or those that have committed "the unpardonable sin.", or those that "deny the Holy Ghost" or those who are partakers to be the "sons of perdition", all the same set of beings that are sent to the permanent hell that hath no end:

'it would have BEEN BETTER that they would never had been born and that a millstone was put around their neck & they were drown in the sea."

Hey that almost sounds like a Masonic rite, or ritual huh? LOL

Doesn't sound like these people can be "born again."
Doesn't sound like a very good fate at all!!!

Can Satan or his cohorts be redeemed by God? No, there must be a point of no return called "eternal damnation" for some. If God could redeem them, why hasn't he?

sopsback said...

mongol,

dont worry abaout the criminal govt...the ET's are cumming to 'take them out'....


LOLOLOLO!!!!!


(or is it???)

sopsback said...

BigO said...

AAAAAAAMEEEEEEEEEN !!!!!!!!





.....oh, yea....i rember dat guy....eaty ameeeeen......wasnt he da pres. of like niggeria or sumting????

sopsback said...

NYPD Police Commissioner Ray Kelly disrupts FBI's False-Flag Operation and there is now a war between the FBI and the NYPD

Sept. 21, 2009

This is unfolding as we speak. Here is what happened:

The FBI on 9/10 alerts the NYPD to an upcoming "terrorist attack." But they went too far with their hype. They tell the NYPD that they are on the trail of something really big, "on the scale of September 11th" or something to that effect. They describe to the NYPD a Denver-based al Qaeda terrorist cell of Afghanis and Pashtuns in the employ of Osama bin Laden who are about to strike, providing some details about the men but little in the way of what they are planning. The important element is the timing and the hype. BIG BIG TERROR ATTACK BY OSAMA BIN LADEN AND AL QAEDA ON 9/11 ANNIVERSARY!!!

The purpose of this false-flag was to stampede public opinion in favor of the disastrous war in Afghanistan, which now requires 40,000 more troops according to General McChrystal. This is why all of the patsies are reported as being Afghanis and Pashtuns.



this bog limit the story to only 4000 cockters so the rest can be red here;

www.iraq-war.ru/article/206264

sopsback said...

FBI = FALSE FLAG


no surprise there....perhpas teh tailban shoud pay the fbi billding in dc a visit...show em' ho its really done...as the fbi is really just a crimnal enterprise anyway...

sopsback said...

..as the fbi is really just a crimnal enterprise anyway...coss they haf dat guy worksing fo dem: "al-bin filtrated"


sumtime ho he spill his name difftly like dis:

"all-been filtrated" with moles

sopsback said...

da sh*t gettin close to hittin da fan.....

z guy wit da BIG B@@LS cums out with this story:


Zbig Brzezinski: Obama Administration Should Tell Israel U.S. Will Attack Israeli Jets if They Try to Attack Iran

Sept. 20, 2009

The national security adviser for former President Jimmy Carter, Zbigniew Brzezinski, gave an interview to The Daily Beast in which he suggested President Obama should make it clear to Israel that if they attempt to attack Iran's nuclear weapons sites the U.S. Air Force will stop them.

"We are not exactly impotent little babies," Brzezinski said. "They have to fly over our airspace in Iraq. Are we just going to sit there and watch? ... We have to be serious about denying them that right. That means a denial where you aren’t just saying it. If they fly over, you go up and confront them. They have the choice of turning back or not. No one wishes for this but it could be a 'Liberty' in reverse."

The USS Liberty was a U.S. Navy technical research ship that the Israeli Air Force mistakenly attacked during the Six Day War in 1967.

Brzezinski endorsed then-Sen. Obama's presidential campaign in August 2007, which at the time was portrayed in the media as a boost to Obama's foreign policy cred. The Washington Post reported: "Barack Obama, combating the perception that he is too young and inexperienced to handle a dangerous world, got a boost yesterday from a paragon of foreign policy eminence, Zbigniew Brzezinski."

Brzezinski was never an official campaign adviser, but Republicans jumped on the endorsement to push the meme that Obama wouldn't be a friend to Israel, as Brzezinski's views of Israel attracted criticism from some quarters in the American Jewish community.

“Brzezinski is not an adviser to the campaign,” former Ambassador Dennis Ross, then a senior adviser on Middle East affairs to the Obama campaign, said at the time. “There is a lot of disinformation that is being pushed, but he is not an adviser to the campaign. Brzezinski came out and supported Obama early because of the war in Iraq. A year or so ago they talked a couple of times. That’s the extent of it, and Sen. Obama has made it clear that on other Middle Eastern issues, Brzezinski is not who he looks to. They don’t have the same views.”

Brzezinski plays no role in the Obama administration; the White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Brzezinski's comments come within the same week that the White House distanced itself from comments made by former President Carter, who said he thinks "an overwhelming portion of the intensely demonstrated animosity toward President Barack Obama is based on the fact that he is a black man."

-jpt

UPDATE: Russian President Dmitriy Medvedev told CNN that Israeli President Shimon Peres assured him that Israel would not attack Iran.

"This is the worst thing that one can imagine," Medvedev said. "What would happen afterwards? A humanitarian catastrophe, a huge number of refugees. And Iran would want revenge, and not only over Israel, but over other countries as well. The events in the region would become completely unpredictable. I think the scope of such a disaster would not be comparable to anything. Therefore, before taking the decision to launch any attacks, you need to think the situation through. It would be the most irrational way to deal with the situation. But my Israeli colleagues told me they do not plan to do that. And I trust them.`

blogs.abcnews.com/politicalpunch/2009/09/zbig-brzezinski-obama-administration-should-tell-israel-us-will-attack-israeli-jets-if-they-try-to-a.html

sopsback said...

ysssir...yo sho are a man with Z BIG B@@LS to say this...specially since yo proble no dat da mustard have filtrated agents everywhre...i hope da yo haf loyal bodygards now dat yo say dis....mosstad be looking fo yo now...yep, they like mustard, they everywhere since teh days of rahab and da 2 spys...the original mossad agents...they so good, they can even get to you mudda and fadda to sole yo out...be carful...the us govt is all filtrated by them too....

Yetter said...

NEAR THE END. While your clearing title,investiagate this.On August 28, 2009 the Supreme Court of the State of Kansas rendered an opinion based calmly on existing law and relentlessly applying it to the chagrin of all participants in the securitization scheme. MERS was the appellant seeking to invoke due process rights which it said were violated when they failed to get notice of the fact that their “interest” was being wiped out. The Court said simply that MERS — or any nominee” didn’t have any interest and proves its point by reference to simple statements in the documents and the simplest of laws and interpretation of the role of MERS and the requirements of recordation. The splitting of the note and mortgage creates an immediate and fatal flaw in title.

mogel007 said...

"The splitting of the note and mortgage creates an immediate and fatal flaw in title."
__________________________________

Seems to me in the Dorean criminal trial the US District Attorney's should have also been required by the Judge to force all the lenders named in the indictments to provide the original notes & original mortgages too of the banks that were supposedly damaged in order to prove that there was mail fraud or some sort of conspiracy going on by the Dorean Group against all those lenders that were named in the indictments originally. The case in the beginning was based upon bank fraud committed by the Dorean Group against the banks & that's why the grand jury indicted the Dorean Group in the first place & is why both Principals were transferred to California to face federal charges from the Utah jail. It's too bad that the Utah charges never went to trial. I think those charges would have been easy to beat.

Seems to me that clients can't be the victims of mail fraud if the lenders are defrauding the clients first because these lenders don't have the original promissory notes along with the original mortgage documents in their possession and they are all pretending to be creditors of interest in these loan transactions & these lenders mail out billing statements every month. That is mail fraud committed by the lenders against the Dorean clients.

Seems to me for the lenders to make their scam work effectively, they always have to split the note from the mortgage in the very beginning.

So if the Dorean Group is only challenging the lenders interest, and giving them a chance to prove their interest, & even bonding their claim for TWICE WHAT THE LENDERS SAY IS OWED, how is that even a scam or remotely close to what a real scam is? If the Dorean Group were charged with mail fraud because they cancelled the bogus interest of the banks, well that's the same thing that happened in this Kansas Supreme Court case. The interest of MERS was just cancelled by the Court without giving MERS any notice. LOL

Kurt & Scott got 2 decades in a jail sentence for doing the EXACT SAME THING.

At least the Dorean Group was considerate enough to provide notice to the lenders of what the Dorean Group was going to do if the lenders didn't prove a legitimate interest which the consequence was the Dorean Group trustee would cancel the lenders interest of record & record that action.

Scam artists don't signal their punches & spell out consequences and tell you exactly what they are going to do, when they are going to do it, & then put it in writing as a warning & consequence. Only honest people do that or lawyers who are trying to follow the real intent of the law.

If there is no scam by the Dorean group, because the lenders are the one's committing the fraud in the first place, how can there be a conspiracy or even mail fraud on the part of the Dorean Group?

Since when is righting a wrong considered "mail fraud" or conspiracy to commit mail fraud or wire fraud?

God believes in justice and fairness and righting a wrong, so why did Judge Alsup's court twist all of these things into something that wasn't fair and how can the US District attorney's get away with all of this & not be charged with abuse of due process against two innocent men?

Even Judge Alsup could overturn the verdict of the petite jury due to all of the flaws in the trial, but he doesn't have the integrity to do that.

Seems to me the Supreme Court of Kansas disagrees with Judge Alsup that material facts & original records or instruments must be in possession of the injured party & presented into evidence to prove they have a creditor interest in the transaction. If they have no financial interest, they certainly can't be named in the indictments.

Yetter said...

There are a number of important points to be made here:

1. Similar decisions have occurred in other states.

2. This is extremely important, but not necessarily a landmark.

3. The attempt at appeal will be backed by unlimited funds because of the serious ramifications in this state.

4. State by state, this exact decision is taking place and surviving the gruelling appeals processes.

5. This type of decision erodes the very fabric of the Securitized Investment Vehicle backed by a grouping of mortgages.

6. Eventually the screams of the public will be heard by state judges that depend upon the electorate.

7. From a modest kindling fire this move will grow into a conflagration of anti Wall Street, anti financial people. Attorneys will begin to seek these easy slam-dunk cases as a large revenue generators.

8. Between the error of singular mortgages being used in multi SIVs, the disaster of paperwork behind the mountain of mortgages made from 2006 to 2008, state laws on simple things like notary seals on documentation, and the requirement of having a legal standing for which to take the action (which servicers DO NOT), SIVs will be valued as below junk assets. These pure "legacy assets," as they are now called, are a noose around the neck of any institution holding them including the Federal Reserve.

Yetter said...

Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems Loses Legal Shield|
By Barry Ritholtz – September 23rd, 2009, 6:47AM
MERS is the firm that (technically) holds 60 million US (securitized) mortgages on behalf of the actual buyers. They were created by a consortium of lenders in part to save money (on paperwork and recording fees) every time a loan changes owners. In the era of securitization, these savings amounted to billions of dollars. But MERS also acts as a shield, making it all but impossible for many borrowers to deal directly with whoever happens to be holding their mortgage at the moment. As the NYT noted, it has “made life maddeningly difficult for some troubled homeowners.” Now, the Kansas Court of Appeals has called foul. In Landmark National Bank v. Kesler, 2009 Kan. LEXIS 834, the Kansas Court held that a nominee company called MERS has no right or standing to bring an action for foreclosure. (Other than GlobalResearch.ca, I have yet to see any MSM coverage of the issue). The Court stated that MERS’ relationship is not that of a true party possessing all the rights given a buyer. Hence, the court ruled: “By statute, assignment of the mortgage carries with it the assignment of the debt. . . . Indeed, in the event that a mortgage loan somehow separates interests of the note and the deed of trust, with the deed of trust lying with some independent entity, the mortgage may become unenforceable. The practical effect of splitting the deed of trust from the promissory note is to make it impossible for the holder of the note to foreclose, unless the holder of the deed of trust is the agent of the holder of the note. Without the agency relationship, the person holding only the note lacks the power to foreclose in the event of default. The person holding only the deed of trust will never experience default because only the holder of the note is entitled to payment of the underlying obligation. The mortgage loan becomes ineffectual when the note holder did not also hold the deed of trust.” (emphasis added).

taycamstu said...

http://www.webofdebt.com/articles/mers.php

sopsback said...

6. Eventually the screams of the public will be heard by state judges that depend upon the electorate.



dont count on it...as long as the cuntry remains a Corp. then there will be problems



ever wnder why the pres. is elected by the "electric collage?"


becoss just like any good corp, its pres. is eleckted by the "bored of drecktors"
and not dreckly...same with the pres of da usa


as long as the govt. functions as a corp., or in emeralty court, then as ppls dont no dis, they there will aways be dose ho get scrooged.

coss rembber, when deeling with a corp. you elect to contrack or to not contrack


an becoss mose ppls dun no what they are doon when they contrack, they gong to get scrooged in the deel

same deel here.

sopsback said...

an once yo contrack with dem, yo gonna get BOHICA



(bend ova, here it cum again)

Yetter said...

What goes around, comes around.

judge allslop said...

What goes around, comes around.

You mean sticking their legal system up their ass for a change.

sopsback said...

You mean sticking their legal system up their ass for a change





dun tell jug beans dat...he like when it cum around his end again....


LOLOLOLO!

sopsback said...

too bad they found some guy ho works fo da us senseless buroo hung on a tree wit da words "fed" carve in chest...they shud of hung jug beans and a lot of other govt. workerss inted of dis guy...waht a waste....

even tho i thinkgs dat the fed govt. is a bunch of crminals and desrve to all be hung by they bowls, not sum anomus centsless guy...he not da problem with the govt. he just tring to get a paychek...to fed his famless...wha he dunt no is dat the ppls gonna start to turn on da fed govt as havin bin reprehensible fo dis hole mess.....

sopsback said...

it was jus centsless to do this...jus sensus....

sopsback said...

everynone can say wha yo want....are the jugments cumming soon??

the city of sindey allstrainya was turn blud red yesterday fo a few hours...

wha dose it meens??

it all ova soon is wha it meens....i no, they call it a dust storm...nooone i eer say was blud red...


http://www.whatdoesitmean.com/index1280.htm


September 24, 2009

Australia Hit By “Blood of God” As Dragon Tail Of Death Returns

sopsback said...

"...and the sky shall turn to blud...."

sopsback said...

For the greatest understanding of this unprecedented event for our modern times one must look backwards in our history to when these same things occurred, and, perhaps, with no better guide than the much maligned by the “science cartel” Russian-born American researcher, Immanuel Velikovsky, who detailed the last time our Planet was hit with this “Dragons Tail” when its red dust fell upon ancient Egypt causing its rivers to turn blood red.

sopsback said...

when its red dust fell upon ancient Egypt causing its rivers to turn blood red.




then it was a 'jugment' from god....wah yo thik it is now????



i no...it just 'dust'....rright!



bunkle yo
seebelt...sumtings cumming!

sopsback said...

da tv noos can say all they want..."it just dust"....rith!



yo tell me if yo life in nyc and all sudden yo see da hole sky and evertihins around yo turn blud red...wha yo gonna do??/


ill tell yo wah yo gonna do....yo gonna be chittin' yo pants runnin to the sto to by sum immodium a/c...

sopsback said...

an burly baal, hurry up an make yo HYIPs bpay out...beefo god destroy da hole plant here and wha goood is yo hyips if all da jugments cums and destroy the plant fo good...cant spend it then...

sopsback said...

and wha about this???


a piece of gold just found with the scripton on it:


This gold strip carries the Latin inscription: "Rise up O Lord, and may thy enemies be dispersed and those who hate thee be driven from thy face." It has two sources, the Book of Numbers or Psalm 67, taken from the Vulgate, the Bible used by the Saxons.


http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/england/staffordshire/8272058.stm

sopsback said...

"...rise up and spit thy enemas.."


o wah it



'rise up and spite thy enemies"

or 'smite thy enemies'

sopsback said...

"...andthose who hate thee be driven..."



dat be jug beans...

sopsback said...

too bad!!

i like dat sawng "calipornia creamin'"

and da fadda of machendry flipps...


so wah da the big deel....he like f***king his dawter, so wha????


dat why they call it calipornia creamin'...he be creamin his dawter good!


it like...


"c'mon, time fo to go to bed... daddy gonna tuck yo in now..."


so then he tuck her in, and then clime into bed with her and "tuck it into her slot"....


him too must of red the ole tentament....coss dat was common practice in dose days...nothin rawng with it for dose ho still foolow da OT...WHERE YO CAN PICK AND CHOSE WHA YO WANT TO JUSTIFY LIKE F***KING YO DAWTER. LOOK IT UP. IT ALL THERE. DID HE MAKE HER SWILLOW IT TO, OR DID HE LET HER SPIT OUT THY ENEMA?



NOT!

sopsback said...

rember:


bmr-babylonina misery relgion

also base on da babylonian talmood


an a lot of da OT is also base on da babyloonina talmutt


now yo in a good 'mood'

sopsback said...

by da ways...case anynone is wunnering about the above, the story is about mackenzie phillips, former star of the series "one day at a time" with valerie bertinelli.

she just release a book that said that she used to have sex with her father until she was 20 yo.

her junkie father intro her to drugs and one nite when she was hi as a kike, he rapped her, or so she say, maybe she want it too, ho nose?

in any case, afta that she enjoy poppyscock an haf it regulary.


fo dose ho dun no, her fadda john phillops wasw the led singer fo da groop 'da moomas an da poopas

no sh*t

an they had a famus song

"california dreamin'" which i like btw


...all da leefs are brown

and da sky is gray...


california dreemin' on such a witnry day....

sopsback said...

they also haf big mamma cast elliot...all 1/2 a ton of her.....


an po mary travers...she just die to a few weeks ago

she was with the other folk groop, peter, paul and mary


i rember they haf a sad song ....

puff da magic dragon...lived by the sea, and froliced in the open mist in a land called honnahlee....

sopsback said...

Puff, the magic dragon lived by the sea
And frolicked in the autumn mist in a land called Honah Lee,
Little Jackie Paper loved that rascal Puff,
And brought him strings and sealing wax and other fancy stuff. Oh

Puff, the magic dragon lived by the sea
And frolicked in the autumn mist in a land called Honah Lee,
Puff, the magic dragon lived by the sea
And frolicked in the autumn mist in a land called Honah Lee.

Together they would travel on a boat with billowed sail
Jackie kept a lookout perched on Puff's gigantic tail,
Noble kings and princes would bow whene'er they came,
Pirate ships would lower their flags when Puff roared out his name. Oh!

Puff, the magic dragon lived by the sea
And frolicked in the autumn mist in a land called Honah Lee,
Puff, the magic dragon lived by the sea
And frolicked in the autumn mist in a land called Honah Lee.

A dragon lives forever but not so little boys
Painted wings and giants' rings make way for other toys.
One grey night it happened, Jackie Paper came no more
And Puff that mighty dragon, he ceased his fearless roar.

His head was bent in sorrow, green scales fell like rain,
Puff no longer went to play along the cherry lane.
Without his lifelong friend, Puff could not be brave,
So Puff that mighty dragon sadly slipped into his cave. Oh!

Puff, the magic dragon lived by the sea
And frolicked in the autumn mist in a land called Honah Lee,
Puff, the magic dragon lived by the sea
And frolicked in the autumn mist in a land called Honah Lee.

sopsback said...

i no lots of little kids who used to cry when they heard that song......i was one of 'em......

mogel007 said...

.and the sky shall turn to blud...."
_________________________________

I THINK THAT SCRIPTURE WHICH I BELIEVE YOU ARE TAKING OUT OF CONTEXT, HAD A REFERENCE TO THE MOON, NOT THE SKY, THAT THE MOON WOULD TURN TO BLOOD, OR THE MOON WOULD TURN TO A RED COLOR.

mogel007 said...

I think Puff the mighty dragon wasn't so mighty after all, if he depended on his little boy friend to be brave. LOL

Nothing to cry about, even dragons need to grow up & stand on their own.