I heard a quote from Wesley “Your Christ is my Devil”. I could relate to his sentiment The Christ of the gospel message is completely misunderstood by the corrupt human heart. When a true Christian has a relationship with God through Christ he is easily criticized for his obedience which is foreign to all they know as righteous. It is why so many clamored to have Christ crucified. He knew that His true professions of the Godhead would be reflected by those who garner their righteousness from the devil.
What is so despicable about the judicial system Scott and I faced and still fight is that it borrows the righteous credibility of God’s righteousness buy follows the tenets of the devil. Christians foolishly allow themselves to be duped by the profession of righteousness and presume in their ignorance that God’s will is being performed. I tell you the fact by the knowledge of Christ, The true Christ, that our judicial system is akin to witchcraft and none who practice its art can know the Lord. If they profess a relationship with Christ their Christ is the devil of the true gospel.
I have had friends and I will use that term loosely who have studied the word of God with me. Yet when the institutions of law merely make the cursory claims of God’s authority they ignore the witness they have of me and condemn me as unjust. This is the work of the devil and true Christian love cannot practice it. So when you make the profession of Christ I am not easily moved and I will judge you by whose report you believe before I call you brother.
As for the judicial system it has made an enemy with Christ in me. I have no fear of the quantity or the size of the giants God throws at my rock. They will be defeated as Goliath because the true Christ of the gospel is more than a conjurer and is not deceived by the devil’s false righteousness.
As to the battles I face I do not grow weary and have always seen the victory inherent in Christ. So if you cannot understand my determination against or contempt for all things labeled lawful fear not it is easily understood: Christ is my devil.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
4,867 comments:
«Oldest ‹Older 3201 – 3400 of 4867 Newer› Newest»1099-OID FILERS - DEPT. OF JUSTICE HAS LOST ITS PATIENCE!!! 500 years in prison for filing 1099_OID FORMS ( original issue discount)
https://www.justice.gov/usao-cdca/pr/hermosa-beach-couple-arrested-federal-charges-related-tax-scam-and-passing-false-checks
Geez, what were they thinking! All for Federal Reserve funny money! It ain't worth a continental nickel!
Sean David Morton isn't he the remote viewing guy? Couldn't he ' remote view' what was going to happen?
No, not the same Sean David Morton.
Sean David Morton, the remote viewer is not 58 yrs old. See for yourself: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HowEV1LwSY8
maybe he should of called up his namesake and ask hm what would happen if he filled the 1099 OIDs with the govt??? lolol!!!!!!!! he could have remote viewed the results and save him over 500 yrs in jail.
Whatever happened to the Winston Shrout case?
Whatever happened to the Winston Shrout case?
On December 8, 2015, Shrout was charged with six misdemeanor counts of willful failure to file tax returns. On March 15, 2016, The Government added additional 13 felony counts, of "issuing fictitious obligations." On March 31, 2017, Shrout's motion to dismiss the new counts was denied.
So did he peel it?
He won't peel it. If he has any sense at all he knows where this case is headed. Once they've got you in their courts, it's all over. Keep it out of court. That's what Alan Watts would recommend. For god's sake keep it out of court. There is no fairness and justice (equity) in their courts. Outside their courts, yes. Inside, no.
By Alan Watts. It answers the question what is common law.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NXvhNkmXruE
7:27 And that is why, in Chinese ideas of justice, a good judge is not somebody who abides by the book. Their idea of justice is for god's sake keep the case out of court, let us have a consultation behind the scenes and lets arrange a compromise, because we know our opponent is a rascal. I know I am rascal and therefore there can be a mutual arrangement between thieves. So we talk about it and we call the judge in An unofficial capacity, and the judge hums and haws, and if he is a good judge, has a sense of what is called Lei. ...Lei is justice, but you can't write it down. … And this word represents, in its Chinese character form, a caldron for cooking sacrifices and a knife. In the high and far off times of Chinese history there was an Emperor who when the people brought their sacrifices of meat and so on to be put in the caldrons, he also scratched with a knife on the side of the caldrons the laws of the state so that all the people could read these and understand what they were. But the sages who advised this Emperor said that was a very bad thing to do. Because the moment people see the law written down they develop a liturgist spirit—that is to say they think out ways of wangling around it. And that's what we do all the time don't we? The moment Congress passes a law—a tax law especially—all the lawyers get together and they think—they fill it with holes. They say, well, it didn't define this and it didn't say that. And some of those Confucions wanted to put the language in order and to make all the words mean just so. But the Taoists laughed at them and said if you define the words, with what words are you going to define the words that define the words? So they said therefore the Emperor should not have written the laws down. Because a sense of justice is not something you can put in words. It's what our lawyers call Equity. And you can talk to any lawyer and in discussing various judges around town, he will say, well, judge so-in-so is pretty much a stickler for the letter of the law. But on the other hand judge so-in-so has a sense of equity. He knows when the letter of the law doesn't apply to the particular case, and he just has an innate sense of fair play. That's a man to be trusted as a judge. So this is what the Chinese mean by a judge who has the sense of Lei, of real justice—it can't written down—it can't be explained, because every case is individual. But what such a man has fundamentally in his heart he trusts the good and bad of human nature. Human beings are complex. We don't know ourselves at all really. Consider your nervous system. Neurologists haven't even begun to figure it out, and yet all your conscious decisions are based on the this thing that you don't understand. You're unbelievably more wise in your nature than you ever will be in your conscious thoughts, because behind your conscious thoughts lies your nervous system.
Split it up a bit to make it more readable.
7:27 And that is why, in Chinese ideas of justice, a good judge is not somebody who abides by the book. Their idea of justice is for god's sake keep the case out of court, let us have a consultation behind the scenes and lets arrange a compromise, because we know our opponent is a rascal. I know I am rascal and therefore there can be a mutual arrangement between thieves. So we talk about it and we call the judge in An unofficial capacity, and the judge hums and haws, and if he is a good judge, has a sense of what is called Lei. ...Lei is justice, but you can't write it down. … And this word represents, in its Chinese character form, a caldron for cooking sacrifices and a knife. In the high and far off times of Chinese history there was an Emperor who when the people brought their sacrifices of meat and so on to be put in the caldrons, he also scratched with a knife on the side of the caldrons the laws of the state so that all the people could read these and understand what they were. But the sages who advised this Emperor said that was a very bad thing to do. Because the moment people see the law written down they develop a liturgist spirit—that is to say they think out ways of wangling around it. And that's what we do all the time don't we? The moment Congress passes a law—a tax law especially—all the lawyers get together and they think—they fill it with holes. They say, well, it didn't define this and it didn't say that. And some of those Confucions wanted to put the language in order and to make all the words mean just so. But the Taoists laughed at them and said if you define the words, with what words are you going to define the words that define the words? So they said therefore the Emperor should not have written the laws down. Because a sense of justice is not something you can put in words. It's what our lawyers call Equity. And you can talk to any lawyer and in discussing various judges around town, he will say, well, judge so-in-so is pretty much a stickler for the letter of the law.
But on the other hand judge so-in-so has a sense of equity. He knows when the letter of the law doesn't apply to the particular case, and he just has an innate sense of fair play. That's a man to be trusted as a judge. So this is what the Chinese mean by a judge who has the sense of Lei, of real justice—it can't written down—it can't be explained, because every case is individual. But what such a man has fundamentally in his heart he trusts the good and bad of human nature.
Human beings are complex. We don't know ourselves at all really. Consider your nervous system. Neurologists haven't even begun to figure it out, and yet all your conscious decisions are based on the this thing that you don't understand. You're unbelievably more wise in your nature than you ever will be in your conscious thoughts, because behind your conscious thoughts lies your nervous system.
Instead of Constitutional courts of law and equity, we have private bankers courts of no law and no equity.
I never understood what equity meant until I listened to the above by Alan Watts. You won't get equity in today's courts because they are not constitutional courts.
A bit off topic, but thought I'd share it anyway. :D
Charles Bukowski on Death and Writing
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MTPxWkBgW6U
". Once they've got you in their courts, it's all over. Keep it out of court. "
but wasnt that what shout was always shrouting about? keep it out of courts? thats what i dont udnerstand about all these guys, and sometimes i wonder if they are being fronted as 'bait' just to get others ensnared in thier schemes.
as one were going to keepit out of court, then one would have to start at the very beinngin, as in, are you JOHN DOE? NO. i am John Doe and all that nonsense. but even those who have tried this have been looked up. so the bottom ling is, no matter what you try, they can and will lock you up. so then its a qusetioin of, "why bother to try anyting at all"?
good question that only the shouts, skiffs, and even capt. krik and scooty can only answer??? all thier efforts havefor the time being...failed.
although i think that they will all prevail......very....very....sooooon! ;-)
but wasnt that what shout was always shrouting about? keep it out of courts?
__________________________
No, Schiff was always in court- he filed case after case against them. He understood the court system of no law and no justice intellectually but not as expounded by Alan Watts, so his approach to said private bank courts was always the same- he went in fighting. You can't go in fighting- a whole new approach is needed. Schiff is gone and soon will be Shrout- life's a bitch then you die.
Shrout's trial starts today.
shout advocated 'administrative' methods staying out of court...yet, thats exactly where he seems to find himself. im not talking about skiff, altho i did mention him in error with the above. skiff was probably also a shill to ensnare other. noone who was as intelligent as he, could possibly beleive that he could/would win in court there3fore overturning the entire federal tax system
Taking down the tax system is taking down money system. That's why they never allowed Schiff to win. Today's black-robed priests are gatekeepers of the federal reserve system. They can't jail everyone so they go after the promoters who put their corporate b.c. name on books, workshops, and videos. You've gotta be as anonymous as possible in this business lest be thrown into the lion's den.
Most states require a thumbprint for a driver license so if you have a driver license they have your thumbprint, so it's probably a good idea to find a way to burn the lines off your thumb or index finger so they can't identify the corpse as the ALL CAP corporate name. lol
perhaps there is some positive movement re: the dg issue....i have been looking at deed recorders land records on websitess and in many instances are now seeing where loans have been illegally assigned without filing with the county deed recoreders office. these were assigned many years ago, but have only now been recorded with long delay post assignment and in many cases also, the fraudulent assignments were done after a court judgment indicating the original bank lender who did not in fact assign the mortgage notes to another bank/MERs. so apparnetly, there seems to be BIG fraud going on there...but, again how long will it take to 'monetize' this fraud...anthoer 10 years??
The Jews put Trump in power...
https://www.dailystormer.com/trump-delivers-bizarre-weekly-address-praising-jews-and-israel/
"Trump opens the video by praising the Jews and talking about Passover. This is the Jewish holiday that celebrates the biblical murder of Egyptian first born sons. He goes on to falsely claim that Jews have been unfairly persecuted throughout history and that they have brought light to the world. Total lies to anybody who knows anything about history. Jews have only brought darkness and death into the world.
The address was nothing but kikery and cuckery. The fact that he leads his address talking about Jews, Passover and Israel is either a cry for help or a slap in the face to his political base. Take your pick.
It is also worth noting that his delivery in this video is very robotic and low energy. He looks like someone who has a gun pointed at him while he reads off the teleprompter. This is far different than many of his previous addresses where he seems to be acting like his normal self.
It’s clear that Trump is no longer the man he once was. The Jewish media establishment went from non stop Trump bashing to accepting him as President over night. All it took was for him to order a barrage of cruise missile strikes against a Syrian military base...."
"....beware of those who say they are, but are not, for they do lie..."
relly???
Didn't know Alex Jones got a divorce. Didn't know he remarried either.
https://alexjonesexposed.info/
BREAKING NEWS! Alex Jones was legally divorced from his Jewish wife Kelly Jones/Violet Nichols on March 23, 2015. Kelly/Violet initially filed for divorce from Alex Jones on December 18, 2013, and since then has been engaged in continuous litigation against him over custody of their three children. As part of the divorce settlement, Alex Jones was court ordered to deed the family house (valued at $900k) to Kelly/Violet as well as sign a promissory note payable to Kelly/Violet in the amount of $2.7 million (Kelly/Violet also owns an additional house valued at $1 million). Alex Jones’ separation from his wife was first revealed by self-admitted F.B.I. informant and D.o.D. intelligence agent Aaron Wilson of GONOB Radio / Alex Jones Critic / Alt-Media Radio / Alt-Right Radio / Video Freedom / 360win. (He serially reinvents himself in order to infiltrate different internet communities for the Federal law enforcement and intelligence agencies that he contracts for.)
Alex Jones's ex-wife gets almost half of everything they own and then he turns around wants to do it again... WHAT AN IDIOT.
On a different note...
Want to buy some Trump memorabilia?
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/46905.htm
Why doesn't Paul Craig Roberts understand US is a Zionist colony? "It will be US, not North Korea, that ends life on earth." Henry Makow
President Trump’s Disappearance
The World Worries That Washington Has Nuclear Weapons.
By Paul Craig Roberts
April 20, 2017 "Information Clearing House" - In my long experience in Washington, vice presidents did not make major foreign policy announcements or threaten other countries with war. Not even Dick Cheney stole this role from the weak president George W. Bush.
But yesterday the world witnessed VP Pence threaten North Korea with war. “The sword stands ready,” said Pence as if he is the commander in chief.
Perhaps he is.
Where is Trump? As far as I can tell from the numerous emails I receive from him, he is at work marketing his presidency. Once Trump won the election, I began receiving endless offers to purchase Trump baseball caps, T-shirts, cuff-links, coffee mugs, and to donate $3 to be entered into a raffle to win some memorabilia. latest offer is a chance to win one of “personally signed five incredible photographs of our historic and massive inauguration.”
Government to simulate nuclear blast over Manhattan (video 3.5 min)
https://www.intellihub.com/operation-gotham-shield-u-s-govt-to-simulate-nuke-blast-over-manhattan-as-actual-war-nears/
"...self-admitted F.B.I. stoolpigeon and D.o.D. intelligence agent Aaron Wilson of..." LOLOLOLOLOOOLLL!!!!
Winston Shrout jury verdict:
http://www.oregonlive.com/portland/index.ssf/2017/04/man_who_failed_to_pay_taxes_fo.html#incart_river_home
And that's why anonymity it A MUST. How do they get jurisdiction over the person in the first place? That's what I'd like to know. The birth certificate is the beginning of all claims against the person. They will never admit or deny it, but I'd still think they need to prove jurisdiction over the person to do anything and how they get it is a mystery.
How do they get jurisdiction over the person in the first place? That's what I'd like to know.
In a criminal case, if the defendant is a human being, the court has personal jurisdiction if the defendant is physically present in the courtroom at the time of arraignment, even if he was brought there illegally.
https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/342/519/case.html
The birth certificate is the beginning of all claims against the person.
Then why is the birth certificate never offered in evidence in a criminal case? And how does a court have jurisdiction over an illegal alien who commits a crime, since that alien's birth was never registered in the U.S. (and possibly was never registered anywhere)? And how did courts function before birth certificates were first required (in most places, not until 1890 or so)?
got stains on yo jacket? then shout it out!!! shout!!!
Oregon Promoter Convicted for Making, Passing and Sending Bogus Financial Instruments to U.S. Treasury and Financial Institution and Failing to File Tax Returns
About 10 years ago Winston Shrout blew into town and put on a somewhat secret, private seminar for far-edge, think-outside-the-box legal theorist movers and shakers in the Tampa Bay area. He taught them about the ultra-slick, arcane 1099-OID process of getting the IRS to pay scammers undeserved tax refunds. I had started calling the process a scam back then, and so the movers and shakers shunned me as they pulled in dupes and fools to whom they sold their 1099-OID service.
It took the IRS and DOJ a few years, but they finally started getting indictments and convictions against 1099-OID and other scammers who used very clever ways of cheating on the taxes. Incidentally, you should not take my expressed disdain for the scammers as an indication that I believe they actually owed any income tax because I don't. However, the scammers used an utterly crooked way to get out of paying the tax AND of getting refunds of far more money than they would have deserved with a traditional tax return.
After tolerating years of the scammers' bogus seminars to teach crooked methods and of preparing and filing fraudulent documents, the government got indictments and convictions of the infamous Timothy Turner (of the Restore America Plan scam) and Glen Unger, AKA Dr. Sam Kennedy. Today those scammers live in federal prisons, right where they belong.
And now Winston Shrout will soon join them because the government just won a conviction against him for his own brand of scams. See the articles below.
To all who hate the income tax: beware of preparing or filing false or fraudulent documents in an effort to avoid or evade income tax.
https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/oregon-promoter-convicted-making-passing-and-sending-bogus-financial-instruments-us-treasury
waht they really saying is the he is guilty of filing fake, fraudulent document. the govt actually files REAL legitimate fraudulent documents all the time. why? becase they have to power to do so (and get away with it)
how does all these guys being put in prison relate to the dg principals??
if they are still locking all these guys up, then how in hell do capt. krik and scooty every expect to get a fair shake in this matter?
they purposely let shout get away with this for years, which caused a lot of people to actually believe that he was on to something. he found the way out. and all it did was to ensnare more people into it.
Understanding the birth registration process
http://stopthepirates.blogspot.com/2010/09/cestui-qui-trust-strawman.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+StopThePirates+%28Stop+The+Pirates%29
"Then why is the birth certificate never offered in evidence in a criminal case?"
______________
I don't know, maybe it's because it falls under the evidence rules as hearsay, not evidence.
"And how does a court have jurisdiction over an illegal alien who commits a crime, since that alien's birth was never registered in the U.S. (and possibly was never registered anywhere)?"
____________
Maybe the court gets jurisdiction over the illegal alien by treaty where the illegal alien came from.
"And how did courts function before birth certificates were first required (in most places, not until 1890 or so)?"
_____________
Only the states have criminal jurisdiction. Feds have limited criminal jurisdiction- mainly in the area of maritime/admirality and counterfeiting- I believe there's one other but I can't seem to remember it now.
see USCFR or CFR 27 SECTION 72.1
or
WHEN ALL CRIME IS COMMERCIAL
just like tv, there is comical commercials!!
on other words, all crime is a bizness
also see:
http://www.ronpaulforums.com
"READ THE UCC CONNECTION FIRST
Important : UCC 1-207 has been moved to UCC 1-308 to hide it from the public. Also you will need to make written motions instead of the verbal procedure in court in this article "The UCC Connection" Additionally, lower level state courts and magistrates will not know what you are talking about. You have to either appeal to a higher court an/or ask for a real judge. In Federal court they will offer you a magistrate. Never accept a magistrate. You always want a real judge.I have enclosed a notification of reservation of rights.Make sure you get it notarized and then file it with the county to make it public record. This is usually the same place that you file a marriage license. After they stamp it filed, then make several copies and send it to real judges on the state and Federal level. Certified mail and return receipt. If signature is refused, then just send it first class mail and they are then responsible for its knowledge. Be sure to keep all of your mail receipts. DO NOT send it to magistrates or judges that only try traffic tickets and dog bites etc.. Send it to real judges that try real felonies. It’ll take about 15 to 30 days, but there will never be a warrant issued for your arrest or to search your property unless Ya actually harm someone. Also so you should not get a traffic ticket. Sometimes the judges fail to put you on the list for diplomatic immunity. If you do get a traffic ticket, then just appeal the decision of the traffic ticket court to the next court up and file a motion to dismiss because of reservation of rights. Then you may never hear from them again, or they will drag it out up to a year trying to wear you down or scare you into a plea bargain. But stick to your guns and do not give in. There is nothing they can do. The fact is that he will never rule on your motion but continue to drag out the case until they can no longer try you. This is usually 12 months. Then you file a motion to dismiss because you did not receive a speedy trial.To test for diplomatic immunity, I suggest removing your car tags. This way if you are not on the list and do get a ticket, this non moving violation ticket should not hurt your insurance in case ya mess up the process.If you run into trouble or do not understand something, call me or give me an email.
How the UCC 1-308 works
.
UCC 1-308 is the remedy for any legal process under commercial law in the U.S.
"But stick to your guns and do not give in, even if they lock your ass up." LOLOLO!!!
§ 1-308. Performance or Acceptance Under Reservation of Rights.(a) A party that with explicit reservation of rights performs or promises performance or assents to performance in a manner demanded or offered by the other party does not thereby prejudice the rights reserved. Such words as "without prejudice," "under protest," or the like are sufficient.
.
Since the Federal Corporation is just that, a corporation. It has no jurisdiction except with those that contract with it. Also see Congressional act of 1871 and USC Title 28, Part VI, chapter 176, sub chapter 176, subsection A, 3002 (15) “United States” means—(A) a Federal corporation;
The states illegally contracted with the federal corporation by passing the Uniform Commercial Code making themselves as well as the unsuspecting people subject to the Federal corporation and also to the states in their new commercial capacities. Therefore all of the laws (color of law) are contractual commercial laws and the remedy is UCC 1-308. The Uniform Commercial Code makes all crimes commercial only by contract as per 27 CFR 72.11. The problem is that you have to get into higher courts before they will recognize the remedy. The remedy however should legally and always be give without delay on demand or claim. This of course is the problem. The misdemeanor courts do not have a clue as to where their jurisdiction comes from and neither do magistrates. You have to get in front of a court with a real judge that tries felonies. The courts try to string ya along under duress of threat hoping that you can be scared into a plea. But they in the end have to honor the remedy.
.
27 CFR 72.11 PART 72_DISPOSITION OF SEIZED PERSONAL PROPERTY--Table of Contents
Subpart B_Definitions Commercial crimes. Any of the following types of crimes (Federal or State): Offenses against the revenue laws; burglary; counterfeiting; forgery; kidnapping; larceny; robbery; illegal sale or possession of deadly weapons; prostitution (including soliciting, procuring, pandering, white slaving, keeping house of ill fame, and like offenses); extortion; swindling and confidence games; and attempting to commit, conspiring to commit, or compounding any of the foregoing crimes. Addiction to narcotic drugs and use of marihuana will be treated as if such were commercial crime.
Last note: The 14th amendment actually creates a lower class of “citizen of the United States” rather than the higher Citizenship of one of the several states of the union. The remedy provided to the 14th amendment, is an act by congress known as 15 United States Statute at Large, July 27, 1868, one day before the 14th Amendment took effect and also known as the "Expatriation Statute." This is your remedy to claim to be a natural Citizen of your state. This makes you a higher Citizen and no longer subject to the Article 4 loophole that also deprives you of your rights. "
"But stick to your guns and do not give in, even if they lock your ass up." LOLOLO!!!
OVIOUSLY, shout must of read this and foolow along..............> right to the gray bar hotel.....
Since the Federal Corporation is just that, a corporation. It has no jurisdiction except with those that contract with it. Also see Congressional act of 1871 and USC Title 28, Part VI, chapter 176, sub chapter 176, subsection A, 3002 (15) “United States” means—(A) a Federal corporation;
******
the probelm is have you already been 'contracted' agaisnt your will by virtue of your birth/cert???
and if you have, can you void it based on lack of full dislcosure??
"To test for diplomatic immunity, I suggest removing your car tags.
i always like ron paul, but even him, sometimes i wonder....
DO YOU REALLY THINK THAT IF YOU TAKE THE PLATES OFF OF YOUR CAR, AND JUST TRY DRIVING AROUND, HOW LONG BEFORE YOU ARE STOPPED, AND THEN JUST TELL THE P.O.....
"...YO, PLEECE OFFSIR, DUN YO NO DAT I HAFT DIPSHIT IMMUNITY, YO CANT TOUCH ME...."
right!! your car will be towed, and shortly you will be cuffed.
ok, wrong! i got it backwards! you will be cuffed and then your car will be dogpounded.
let me no ho it works out!! lolo
has anyNONE ever tried this??
ho come the ppl that promote this stuff dont do it themselfs??
ronpaulforums.com does have some intersting stuff on it tho.
The problem is that you have to get into higher courts before they will recognize the remedy. The remedy however should legally and always be give without delay on demand or claim. This of course is the problem. *********"The misdemeanor courts do not have a clue as to where their jurisdiction comes from and neither do magistrates.******* You have to get in front of a court with a real judge that tries felonies. The courts try to string ya along under duress of threat hoping that you can be scared into a plea. But they in the end have to honor the remedy.
so yo nee $$$$ to peel everything to a high circus court. good lunck with that!!!
.
REMEDY AND RECOURSE
Every system of civilized law must have two characteristics: Remedy and Recourse. Remedy is a way to get out from under that law, and you recover your loss. The Common Law, the Law Merchants, and even the Uniform Commercial Code all have remedy and recourse, but for a long time we could not find them. If you go to a law library and ask to see the Uniform Commercial Code, they will show you a shelf of books completely filled with the Uniform Commercial Code. When you pick up one volume and start to read it, it will seem to have been intentionally written to be confusing. It took us a long time to discover where the Remedy and Recourse are found in their UCC. They are found right in the first volume, at 1-308 (old 1-207) and 1-103.
"The CIA Has Been Deeply Humiliated" - Watch Ron Paul Interview Julian Assange
april 27-17
https://youtu.be/QwkrtpXp-wg
ee USCFR or CFR 27 SECTION 72.1
or
WHEN ALL CRIME IS COMMERCIAL
just like tv, there is comical commercials!!
on other words, all crime is a bizness
__________________
No injured party = no crime. You can't injure a business because it exists only as idea. The dumb-down jury convicted an innocent man who hurt an artificial person-- e U.S.A. INC. The government prosecutor probably made it sound to the jury like U.S.A. INC., was a real person without ever putting U.S.A. INC. on the witness stand or even show or point where in the courtroom U.S.A. INC., was sitting. LOL
Alex Jones loses his battle for joint custody of his 3 kids. Alex Jones is crazy but not THAT crazy. What a sad day..
https://www.buzzfeed.com/charliewarzel/jones-trial-verdict?utm_term=.wudYLvdmr#.nbKmxvkAJ
The story in the article depicts him as an unfit father, and maybe he is.
Okay, so he's no longer in love with Kelly. He wanted something prettier, sexier... someone with a better body... LoL
From the comment section: (looks like SHE left him for another man OMG LOL)
"READ MY LIPS THIS TRAMP LEFT HER FAMILY FOR ANOTHER MAN. HE DUMPED HER AND NOW SHE IS GETTING CUSTODY TI GET MONEY. SHE COULD CARE LESS ABOUT THOSE KIDS. IF HE IS SO BAD WHY WOULD SHE LEAVE AND NOT TAKE HER CHILDREN. I WILL TELL YOU WHY SHE DID NOT WANT THEM. THIS IS ABOUT MONEY."
The prosecutor for U.S.A. Inc, makes the jury think U.S.A Inc. is a real person with real injuries and no one ever questions it, not even the defendant. The victim U.S.A. Inc., makes an appearance only in your imagination. Wow.
Winston Shrout has disabled comments for all his videos. Tsk, tsk.
He seems to understand that we have a shadow government yet he allowed the same said shadow government to put him behind bars for a very long time. Just listen to him talk for the first two or three minutes:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NsDyxkE3xTE
I like what Shrout says in that video (at 2:50) about money of account vs. money of exchange. What we have is money of account- bookkeeping entries- the transfer is not a consideration in both directions. Only money of exchange is consideration in both directions.
WASHINGTON
The Internal Revenue Service is demanding a whopping $7 billion or more in back taxes from the world’s most profitable hedge fund, whose boss’s wealth and cyber savvy helped Donald Trump pole-vault into the White House.
Read more here: http://www.mcclatchydc.com/news/politics-government/article147454324.html#storylink=cpy
demanding a whopping $7 billion or more in back taxes
dun woory. i pay yo a few bux a week. in time yo will get pay all yo money. just like da dg will pay yo in time....
wah a few billon he oh they?
NESARA????
yo, wahver hoppens to nesaro??? oooh, ye, nesaro...its hear!!
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. In the new 2017-2018 budget under Section E (Financial Services starting on page 471) Title 1 (Dept. of Treasury) it reads as follows:
2. Highlighted sections mentioned audits, and auditors overseeing the audit.
3. 114A shall remain in effect until September 30, 1 2017: Provided further, That of the funds awarded under this heading, not less than 10 percent shall be ********(Funding for low income per NESARA) and used for awards that support investments that serve populations living in persistent poverty counties:
4. There are several mentions of the IRS in this most recent budget. *******There are NO mentions of the Federal Reserve..
5. They have a specific clause about not re doing the US $1.00 No mention of other denominations. Guess by law you start low and work up in value. Protect the $1.00, you have protected them all.
6. SEC. 117. None of the funds appropriated in this Act or otherwise available to the Department of the Treasury or the Bureau of Engraving and Printing may be used to redesign the US $1 Federal Reserve note.
1. In the new 2017-2018 budget under Section E (Financial Services starting on page 471) Title 1 (Dept. of Treasury) it reads as follows:
i guess yo can goggle it to see if it nsario or not??
Goooooogle:
treasany: bidget: secton E tittle 1
I would be leary of NESARA.. It could be a replacement for the Federal Reserve system.
1:30 "The only problem with the system is that they don't tell us how it works. It's a system that needs to be in place. They're never going to get rid of the Federal Reserve system, and if they do, they'll just call it something else."
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zZ7SZQq4gWY&t=354s
http://www.nesarasucks.com/
"I would be leary of NESARA.. It could be a replacement for the Federal Reserve system.
i guess that you can call it what you want....but if they gift you free $$$, then who cars what they call it????
feral reverse becoms nesario and gives out free money!!!!
I don't know.. but I hardly doubt thr new system would be a free one.
I'd really like to see a real full copy of the budget and confirm that the word, "Nesarra" was even mentioned in the record. How do you know it was mentioned? Because a 3rd party said so?
Just do a search on this webpage for NESARA. There is no link to the actual budget document:
http://inteldinarchronicles.blogspot.com/2017/05/new-2017-2018-budget-sections.html
Like I thought and said, the words were edited in by the website or a 3rd party the following words in red ink:
"(Funding for low income per NESARA)"
Means nothing and offers no proof of the legitimacy of Nesarra as far as the budget is concerned.
i goggled the budget and the sections mentioned and i could not find it either (nesaro) but that also does not mean that neraso is not there in principle either. perhapst the ptb can never actually come out and call it nesaro. for whatver reason???
interesting video by karne hudes on the global currncy reset:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gCwUpMOkrwA&feature=youtu.be
true or not, it seems to make sense.
just look at all the gold certificates in the above video. some filipino guy was entrusted with them. then the usa decided to take marcos out and fabricated trumped up charges agaisnt him. he was going to use all the gold for humanitarian purposes and the botoom line is that the usa govt. stole it from him. years later.... 9/11 result maybe????
In the good old USA its all about locking up the bonded debt slaves.My position on going to court has always been: never voluntarily go to court. Live men and women are not meant to be in any place designed solely for the business of fictional entities. When we attend court, we are deemed dead, in fact, they cannot deal with us until we admit to being dead….a legal fiction….a trust. Court is for titled persons: judge, prosecutor, defendant, bailiffs, cops, and attorneys. Live men and women are not recognized, so it makes sense to send in a dead person––an attorney––to handle our cases …. except for one thing: they do not know how the system works, due to their indoctrination. If you can find one to do as you say, then you will prevail, but most of them would rather hang onto their BAR cards than behave honourably. The only thing that dead, fictional entities want from us is our life energy, and the only way they can get it is by our agreement. Without us, they cannot function, so, they are desperate to get us into court, to have us pay the debt which they created by charging the trust.
Since common law courts no longer exist, we know that the case never has anything to do with “facts” or live men and women and so, anyone who testifies (talks about the facts of the case) is doomed. ALL courts operate in trust law, based upon ecclesiastical canon law–– ritualism, superstition, satanism, etc.––which manifests as insidious, commercial law and we are in court to take the hit, if they can get us to do so. They use every trick in the book––intimidation, fear, threat, ridicule, rage, and even recesses, in order to change the jurisdiction, when they know they are losing, in order to make us admit that we are the name of the trust. When we do so, we are deemed to be the trustee––the one liable for administering the trust. Ergo, until now, it has been a waste of our time, energy, and emotion to go to a place where it is almost certain that we will be stuck with the liability.
We all know from our indoctrination, programming, and schooling that judges are impartial and have sworn an oath to this effect. This means he must not favour either plaintiff or defendant. But, our experience reveals that he does, indeed, favour the plaintiff, indicating a glaring conflict of interest––that the prosecutor, judge, and clerk all work for the state––the owner of the CQV trust. So, as the case is NOT about “justice”, it must be about the administration of a trust. They all represent the trust owned by the state and, if we are beneficiary, the only two positions left are Trustee and Executor. So, if you detect the judge’s partiality, although I doubt the case will get this far, you might just want to let them know that you know this.
cot'd
cot'd
If you consider court as entertainment and if you can stand the evil emanating from its officers, the fear and angst oozing from the walls, and the treacherous atmosphere, then go, knowing that under trust law we cannot be the trustee or the executor of a trust, whilst being beneficiary, as that would be a conflict. The position of beneficiary may lack clout, but the other positions hold liability. Since state employees want to be the beneficiaries of the trust, the only way they can do so is to transfer, to us, the liability which they hold, as trustees and executors, because they also cannot be both the administrators and beneficiary of the trust. So, trusteeship and executorship, i.e.: suretyship, becomes a hot potato and everyone wants to toss it so s/he can be beneficiary of the credit from the trust.
When we were born, a trust, called a Cestui Que Vie Trust (“CQV”) was set-up, for our benefit. Evidence of this is the birth certificate. But what is the value which must be conveyed to the trust, in order to create it? It was our right to property (via Birth into this world), our body (via the Live Birth Record), and our souls (via Baptism). Since the state/province which registered the trust is the owner, it is also the trustee…. the one that administers the trust. Since they, also, wanted to be beneficiary of this trust, they had to come up with ways to get us, as beneficiary, to authorize their charging the trust, allegedly, for our benefit (via our signature on a document: citation, application, etc.), and then, temporarily transfer trusteeship, to us, during the brief time that they want to be the beneficiary of a particular “constructive” trust.
This means that a trust can be established anywhere, anytime, and the parties of the trust are quickly, albeit temporarily, put into place. But, since a beneficiary cannot charge a trust––only a trustee can do so––it is the state that charges the trust, but they do so for their benefit, not ours (albeit occasionally we do reap some benefit from that charge but nowhere near the value which they reap. Think bank loan….. we reap a minute percentage of what they gain from our authorization). So, the only way, under trust law, for them to be able to charge the trust is to get the authorization from the beneficiary––us, and the only way for them to benefit from their charge is to get us to switch roles––from beneficiary to trustee (the one responsible for the accounting), and for them to switch their role––from trustee to beneficiary because no party can be both, at the same time, i.e.: within the same constructive trust. They must somehow trick us into accepting the role of trustee. Why would we do so when the trust is for our benefit? …. and how do they manage to do this?
CQV Cestui Que Vie Trust -- Appointing the Judge Trustee in New Hampshire
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gQ0Y_jjlCTQ
this is funny!!!
Liens Filed Against the Federal Reserve: The Key to Trump Ending the Fed & Returning the Gold Standard?
http://sitsshow.blogspot.com/2017/05/liens-filed-federal-reserve-key-trump-ending-fed-returning-gold-standard.html#more
cut off all da fat. jus yoze da lean$.
This is a picture of the Nazi gold mine in Merkers-Kieselbach,
(http://cdn.themindunleashed.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/wikileaks.jpg)
Germany, where stolen Nazi gold and other treasures were kept. Thus, it is possible that Wikileaks is sending a strong message to those within the BIS and other top-level financiers. Naturally one must ask, does Wikileaks have something to reveal about these stolen assets? We will see.
Coming back to Trump, it would be beneficial for him to not only begin pressing hard for a true audit of the Federal Reserve, but to also work with the East in recovering these vast amounts of assets to back currencies, thus transforming the global financial system.
As the reader will notice in the UBS and BIS cease and desist document, which also provides the Green Hilton Memorial Agreement document, President Soekarno’s son signed over the rights to the Green Hilton Memorial Agreement to Neil Keenan. To this day, Neil Keenan is working with multiple Asian countries to bring this massive fraud back into the open, though he has obviously faced much opposition from the implicated parties. Additionally, Keenan filed a lawsuit in late 2011 in the Southern District of New York against the United Nations, the World Economic Forum, Silvio Berlusconi, Ban Ki-Moon, the Italian Republic and several others in a separate case that also relates to the theft and abuse of the global collateral accounts.
For those that want proof of this lawsuit, here is a screenshot of the filed case. This comes from pacer.gov, which is used to look up filed cases. Take a look at the plaintiff and defendants.
The lawsuit was withdrawn by Keenan shortly after because the judge overseeing the case was dismissed and replaced with a brother of one of Barack Obama’s economic advisors. Thus, the case was about to be silenced by the banking elite. However, because Keenan withdrew the case and has since gathered much more evidence in the time being, this case will once again be brought forth.
Related Neil Keenan | The Challenge To Uncover Your Corporate Identity: Collateral Accounts, Straw man Trust, Sovereignty, Federal Reserve Notes, Bankruptcy, Gold and more
In other words, if Trump wishes to really audit and end the Federal Reserve, as well as bring back the gold standard, he must look at the long history that has taken place with respect to the global collateral accounts, and also the recent history of the liens filed against the major banking institutions around the world. Imagine the movement he could create if he began openly discussing the fact that liens have been filed against these banks as well as a cease and desist order, because of the fraud involved in illegally using the global collateral accounts.
lololol!!!
Additionally, Keenan filed a lawsuit in late 2011 in the Southern District of New York against the United Nations, the World Economic Forum, Silvio Berlusconi, Ban Ki-Moon, the Italian Republic and several others in a separate case that also relates to the theft and abuse of the global collateral accounts.
yo relly tink dat all dose peepls abuft named are gong to let yo cleckt on deese leans??? maybe yo tooo skinny.
just axe dat good lockin 'han$um' guy if he eva cleck on his lean$ he still too skinny.
they just as soon kill yo frist beefo they let yo clect da fat from da lean$.
whaver hoppens to dat han$um guy, he filled fat leans fo billon$ of doola$. is he still alife???
his real name was hansen i think?
Scott got in the mail yesterday his Petition for Cert. If that petition is granted it will release both Kurt & Scott from prison. He's been denied 4 times, but he's fix those issues now. Come May 27, 2017 it will be exactly 12 years of incarceration for Scott. So this is some good news on his recent filing in the court that will soon be heard. His Petition is one of innocence and alleging no crimes were committed and so the petite jury verdict is moot that sent him and Scott away.
It's been 6 years since Keenan released his claim. Why hasn't he filed something again? Makes no sense to wait so long.
Hansen claimed that he was kidnapped. I had Hansen email me once. I still have his email. Course was it the real Hansen or the pretend Hansen? I don't know. Is he still alive? I would guess he probably is.
One of Alvin Joseph Hansen's last posts in 2007:
http://pennibancposttest.blogspot.com/
He predicted the release of Kurt & Scott 10 years ago. Interesting allegations in this post. You need to read it several times to get what he is saying. Deborah Welsch, Kurt's estranged "common law wife" mentioned to me that she met Alvin J. Hansen once and thought he was kind of peculiar and eccentric. Alvin alleges a 2.7 trillion dollar lien + 12% interest accruing from over 10 years ago against the banker establishment.
Kurt Johnson is the trustee of the Pennibanc Trust, by the way, so obviously Mr. Hansen has alot of trust and respect for Kurt.
https://btc-e.com/
You know you could have made a 250% return had you have bought Litcoin several months ago when it was at $6.00. It's now at $30.00 and rising.
Course Bitcoin is at $1760 per coin much more expensive than an ounce of gold. The media is taking notice again. Could have made a 125% return on your money in the last year on Bitcoin.
yes, litecon is gong to go up just like btc and other crypto's. but litecoin is much cheaper right now, yes.
re: hansen. was it/is it realistic taht they are going to pay anyone $2.7 trillion?
would the ptb not try to kill that person first?//
the first crypto currency concept that really worked was ebullion. the bruly balls fav.
it had the crytpo card decipher adn the govt. had it shut down and stole the money.
they had the guy set up with the wife and her lover so that he felt that he had to kill her it would seem. then they immediately shut down ebullion.
i had 30k in ebullion in there and filed with a lawyer, then when i never heard anything after a couple years, i filed a cliam online. then after a couple years more of not hearing anything, afther i found out online, that a judgment was rendered, i called the lawyers and they told me that the claim was paid and i was disqualified becase i filed 2 claims, one with them and one with the govt/rec'vr. what should that have anythign to do with it!!! those batards!!! waht a sham!
the layers must of kept my money and i have no way to prove it. these were specialty online/hyips lawyer in state of PA. scott hare it was. he was recommended by berry ball
effin ebullion was really a good concept that really worked well. they shold have somethign as good today with the cryptocard and all. waht a shame. but the ptb could never have allowed such a thing to exist for long unchallegned. eventually paper money wuld have become obsolete.
Richard stack
1.0 star out of 5
Posted by Richard Stack
May 5, 2013
Mr Hare took a retention payment from me and remained completely unreachable for weeks at a time. He wanted to drive the case in his own direction and completely missed the scope of the actual claim. After 9 months of time I accomplished nothing at all.
Worse that that I have requested my paperwork be returned to me and he simply ignored these requests as he does my phone calls. I can not even retrieve my personal property back from him.
I have been forced to hire an attorney to deal with this attorney.
This is the worst attorney I have ever encountered!
https://www.avvo.com/attorneys/pa-scott-hare-742266.html
I hired Scott Hare, the attorney as he initiated a claim, and I got paid from the e-bullion fiasco. It wasn't the full amount, but a percentage of what I lost. Bitcoin is not going away or being shut down by the government. If the government wanted to shut it down, they would have done so by now.
Your claim was probably denied because they thought you were attempting to get paid twice. Looks like some malfeasance on the part of the attorney you hired. You might check into that claim of malfeasance. Your attorney should have caught that you filed two claims. 30K is alot of money.
i was not attempting to get paid twice. and even IF they thought that, all they had to do was deny the second claim. its all on record so youd have to be pretty stupid to try to collect twice. what was i supposed to do after not hearing from him in over 2 years!!!
THATS WHY LAWYERS ARE THIEVES!!!!!!!!!!!!
and as far as malfeasance goes, like everything else in the court of baal, how do i prove this, and how do i get an atty in pa to handle it and its probably over that statute of lims by now.
but i do believe in what comes around.....O
You can still file a complaint with the Bar Association. That will give you some leverage to get the lawyer to the bargaining table. Attorneys are bonded, are they not? Can you go after that bond regardless of the SOL? It's not like you are suing him in court where the SOL applies. And you have enough documentation probably to file a good faith complaint.
If I lost 30K, I just wouldn't walk away, and hope for Karma to kick in at some point.
glad to hear that kurt/scott will be getting out.
as i know that youve been involved with them since day one, if you may say, will they be contacting dg clients or will they be going back to a info type deal like dr. fred used to send in weekly emails? if they are out, i would assume that the heavy lifting is done and it only a matter of tying up loose ends regarding settlements.
and speaking of ebullion, what a very weird coincidence that i only just opened an unsolicited email from anthem gold which after reaeding it, would appear to revisit the ebullion issue, ie, a gold backed crypto currency per gram. so strange that its unreal!
here is the email:
Dear XXXX XXXXXXX :
We are proud to announce that you can now support the launch of the world’s first Ethereum-based, gold-backed cryptocurrency.
This is a cryptocurrency backed by gold, in the form of London Bullion Market Association (LBMA) certified bars, physically stored in a secure and fully insured vaulting facility in Texas. Every individual ANTHEM (AGLD), the digital coin we are launching, is backed by 1 gram of gold, making this cryptocurrency one of the most secure in the world. Digital and physical security at its finest.
Created in December 2016, AnthemGold is an innovative new portfolio product from The team behind Anthem Vault, Amagi Metals, and Gold Money. AnthemGold is led by Anthem Blanchard, CEO of Amagi Metals and Anthem Vault (previously with Goldmoney) and David Miller, a security and blockchain expert. In partnership with Amagi Metals, where you can redeem and trade ANTHEMS (AGLD) once the digital gold coins are launched.
Only available to accredited investors and cryptocurrency enthusiasts through BnkToTheFuture, where over 37,000 investors have already invested $160 million into shaping the future of the financial sector and cryptocurrency. Known for its transparency and dividend policy; over 680,000 dividends have been paid out so far.
Here is your chance to shape the future of cryptocurrency :
I want to Invest
If you have any questions, please feel free to contact myself or Cynthia at the email addresses below.
Best Regards,
Anthem Blanchard, CEO, and Cynthia Blanchard, President of AnthemGold, Inc.
anthem@anthemgold.com
cynthia@anthemgold.com
???? wasnt goldmoney shut down just like ebullion and egold??
re ebullion remission, true i can probably go the the Pa bar assoc and file a cliam of malfeasance, but the issue is; would i collect anything? and if i did, how long would it take ot prove it and such? could/would the atty appeal it?
would it happen faster than just waiting for dg settlements and/or the rv of dinar to happen?
prolly not.
ea$y come.......ea$y go......refi a house....put house into dg program....easy come $$$....secure $$$ in ebullion acct and wait for appreciation of gold to withdraw based on gram wght...........ebullion acct. locked by the 'g'.....dg settlements delayed by over a decade.....ea$y go..... acct bal. -0-
ineresting but a looooong read....
http://stopthepirates.blogspot.com/2017/05/uniform-commercial-code.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+StopThePirates+%28Stop+The+Pirates%29
As the saying goes, money is the root of all evil.
'As the saying goes, money is the root of all evil.'
CORRCTION: "The LOVE of money is the root of all evil."
Most people pay a lot of attention to it, which means they LOVE it.
or, the attention that we GIVE to it.
"DOLLAR" MEANS "WEIGHT". Or, at least it used to be. Title 31 now defines a legal tender dollar as worthless words and numbers like dimes and 100 cents.
http://www.youshouldbuygold.com/2011/07/weights-measures-and-balancing-scales/
“Dollar“ is the name for monetary units used in various countries all over the world. The definition of the word dollar is “weight.” The term dollar is from the Greek word taler, referring to the weight of gold or silver. The dollar came to America from Bohemia. The Bohemian coin called the thaler contained 451 grains of pure silver.
From 1792 until 1933 -almost 150 years- $1 was 1/20th of an ounce of gold. Anyone could have had this old $20 Gold Piece for a $20 paper bill. The dollar was fixed to gold in a relationship of 20 to 1.
until the advent of fedral reverse nots
Yes, the PRIVATE federal reserve banking system
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qaE_sjQigcg
Human consciousness cannot be stopped!
“Humanity’s challenge at this decisive point in history is to face a monster that is desperately attempting to expand it’s tyrannical system of human enslavement. Simultaneously, human consciousness is growing with unparalleled expansion and this is a grave threat to the tyrants. Only one of these forces, humanity or tyranny, can succeed and the world we handover to our children and future generations will be defined by our success or failure in this regard. The irony is that the tyrants have no power but that which we have unwittingly relinquished to them… in order to create a better world we simply need to take our power back. That is my ultimate goal; a better world. My wisdom in this matter comes from the knowledge that the attainment of this goal is not up to me, it is up to us.” Ken O'Keefe, Nov. 2015
“I do not believe technological development can in any way prevent spiritual development. I have the utmost respect for science, and for its product, which we call technology; but of course, one should not... Well, we cannot directly deal with that issue. I'd have to go into metaphysics and it would be really boring.” Stephen Jourdain
No money since 1913...
"Part of the fraud the banks instigate is to call their extensions of credit "money." We use their extensions of credit as "money." Money should actually exist." Larry Becraft
No money since 1913. Only extensions of credit. Borrow from Peter to pay Paul.
Rob from pastor to play Paul
Rob from Peter to play Paul
http://vftonline.org/VFTINC/frn/unabomb2.htm
Taking a Hard Look at the Modern Economy
Those who justify borrowing make two mistakes (besides misreading the verses quoted above). First, they fail to consider all the Scriptural reasons to avoid debt. Some of these reasons are set forth in Bill Gothard's Men's Manual, Vol. II, beginning at page 74. Second, they fail to consider how monstrously evil the modern economy is. Borrowing puts one right in the heart of the beast. And in our modern "inflationary economy," not only is borrowing unwise, it actually is the cause of inflation, and therefore violates clear scriptural injunctions.
"'Monstrously evil'? Come on" some will say. "Borrowing causes inflation?!" These charges are as strong as they are unfamiliar to most Americans. Let me start by showing you that our nation's clock just isn't telling the right time.
Take a quarter or a dime out of your pocket. Examine it. Notice that the edge is orange. Inside, the coin is copper. It has been plated with nickel to give it the appearance of silver.
Why would the government paint a copper coin to make it look like silver? Dimes, quarters, and half-dollars were in fact made of silver up until 1965, but in order to fund activities which the Scriptures nowhere command the State to undertake,4 the State began to substitute inexpensive copper for the more expensive silver. Show a quarter or dime to your pastor or financial advisor. Point out the orange center. Ask him what kind of money this is. If you don't eventually hear the phrase "debased currency," your advisor is not equipped to give you sound, Biblical economic advice. The post-1965 coin is a classic example of "debased currency," which every economist can describe. History records this kind of debasement as occurring in every empire in human history - right before its collapse. The practice has always been recognized as immoral. It is a form of theft. It is plainly prohibited by Biblical Law.
Few people are aware of the significance of this subtle change in coinage. These coins are but the tip of the iceberg. Most of our economy is not run on coins, but follows the same techniques of "debasement." The implications are staggering.
Every time I talk to people about the tangled subject of usury, debt, and our nation's currency, I find it uncovers a whole army of other problems, such as covetousness, inability to defer gratification, and brainwashing at the hands of the State's schools (Romans 12:1-2). And a false system of money not only permits the widespread charging of interest, it "violently" oppresses the poor, according to the Scriptures.
Don't borrow- don't go into debt- owe no man. Don't be a slave to the banks. No mortgages.
People on this blog might be interested in this story. On June 2, 2017 Homeowner retakes property in peace without any problems 31 days after the Sheriff office throws them out.
Here's the latest on the story of my friends efforts to get back their home after the Sheriff office in Reno, Nevada illegally evicted the tenants for the benefit of the bank and the bank was getting ready to sell the home. Basically the owners retook the home on June 2, 2017 after being thrown out 31 days ago, however based upon all of the owners paperwork, the common law grand jury's decision in their favor, (I was fortunate to be one of the jurrors in this historic case), and putting the Sheriff's office into default by the Sheriff not answering all of the written charges against them, with damages of $40,000 plus, the Sheriff did not fight the owners in retaking their property, so damages assessed against the Sheriff office were waived, but financial damages were still assessed to the Court and the attorney's involved trying to steal their home, theft by deception.
Apparently the Sheriff's office got a writ of restitution to evict the owners, but stupidly never served the owners in person. One mistake of many by the Sheriff Dept. A rare example of a victory by one of the People.
So the bottom line is, common law grand juries do work and do have power and government will back down if things are handled properly. Patricia Anthony who spear-headed this is a member of the National Liberty Alliance.
____________________________________________________________________________
Friday morning, June 2, 2017 we did personally visit criminal division Deputy Eric Smith regarding trespasses upon us, our rights, and our house, land and personal property with 5/3/17 lockout where Doerflingers were not given either alleged 4/7/17 ORDER… or associated TEMPORARY WRIT OF RESTITUTION upon lockout, nor was there a required Notice of …. Writ attached by court clerk nor received via mail, as mandated by N.R.S. for your agents; upon hearing about willful bias supported with 4 witness affidavits, Writ of Error, denials of trial by jury, etc. Deputy Smith suggested we contact Nevada Attorney General, but would not accept service for Sheriff Chuck Allen of Certificates of Dishonor and Writ of Restitution Notices, although he did give us # to call to make appointment to talk to Sheriff, since Chuck was not there at that time. We did then serve Sheriff via civil division Chief Records clerk Ron Souza. Realtor Karen Greathouse was called 11:24 and 11:27am by Linda Doerflinger to arrange peaceful access to house to access personal property belongings with appointment set for 12:30 pm so Karen and or agents could remove board(s) and unlock house, garage for same. We had arranged for team of helpers and Karen and or agents never showed up and she refused to take subsequent call @ 1:58pm. Upon further counsel, Doerflingers then chose to lawfully re-take possession of their house and land and did so, removing the boards, posting lawfull NO Trespass notices and changing locks. Daily trespass true bill charges have ended as of June 1st, 2017 to numerous parties based on Linda and Kenneth’s peaceful lawful possession as of June 2nd, 2017 A.D.
Once inside house, Kevin Higgins’ 4/7/2017 ORDER and WRIT taped on inside of window could be accessed for our lawful response thereto: Exempt from Levy - These 2 presentments found taped on inside window 6/2/2017 when we took lawful possession of our house and land are timely returned honorably as grievous trespasses to Sheriff – agents Failed to serve at 5/3/17 lockout; Conditionally accepted for value upon proof of claim that “JUSTICE” and “attorney(s)” display: 1) Article VI clause 2 oath of office 2) bond and 3) paperwork sworn to by an injured party or firsthand witness; Certificates of Dishonor have issued against court officers. Govern yourselves accordingly, All rights reserved! by living man Kenneth and living woman Linda 6/5/2017 with additional red hand-inscribed notices.
Registered Mail # RB 406 117 480 US- ORDER … 4/7/2017 ; Registered Mail # RB 406 117 493 US - TEMPORARY WRIT OF RESTITUTION 4/7/2017, both also noticed “Defective on its face” naming “dead corporate fictions not … people”
Registered Mail # RB 406 117 502 US - NOTICE OF RIGHT TO RECLAIM ABANDONED PERSONAL PROPERTY – dated 5/3/2017: red hand-inscribed: Discovered taped 6/2/17 to board over front door Timely honorably refused for cause Again June 5, 2017- see attached, from May 9, 2017. All rights reserved, No Contract!!!... by … Kenneth… linda original will be returned via postage stamped U.S. Mail to Aldridge Pite - San Diego, Cal.
Again noticed: Attached are draft copies of two 5/31/17 verified Certificates of Dishonor rendering “JUSTICE OF THE PEACE” Kevin Higgins 4/7/17 TEMPORARY WRIT OF RESTITUTION used to unlawfully and illegally remove Doerflingers from their land and house with 8 Sheriff deputy’s assistance on 5/3/2017 null and void nunc pro tunc. You are hereby also noticed of “warrants ruling Writ of Restitution for 5094 Sagebrush Drive, Sun Valley, Nevada in favor of Claimants Linda and Kenneth…: Doerflinger, living woman and man, also on behalf of all Nevadans supporting peer jurors as judges of facts and law decisions agreed and witnessed to.”
Blessings to you as you remain true to your oaths to the law of the land and its true beneficiaries of the constitutions, the living people. Reserving all rights and most sincerely, Kenneth, Linda and Patricia J, also for all Nevadans this fifth day of June, 2017 9:45 pm
That's interesting you talk about Ethereum. I've heard that this cryptocurrency could surpass Bitcoin by the end of 2018 in volume and become the industry leader. As you know Bitcoin has made extraordinary returns lately and is more valuable than an ounce of gold, worth about $2600 today per coin. So if someone wanted to put $5,000 into Ethereum today, it's value is quite low right now, it is not at all unlikely they could become a millionare or a multimillionaire down the road in the not so distant future.
Ever wonder if you really came out of this planet or not? I have.
From Alex Collier:
39:20: "Everybody on the earth is from someplace else. None of us were born or hatched here. None of our souls were created here. We all come from another time and place.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oQZgAEA95s8&t=3695s
At 1:01:05 he recommends this book:
The God's of Eden, by William Bramley
https://www.amazon.com/Gods-Eden-William-Bramley/dp/0380718073/ref=cm_cr_arp_d_product_top?ie=UTF8
Sure, a "must read" book. For those who want to know the true story about mankind, about who control us, about how to get free from manipulators. A book that tells the truth sure at at least 90%.
Well. The book is great. Loved it. Well written. Great detail in banking and religion on the Custodials or UFOlogy. Just what i enjoy burying my head in. If this is also your subject of interest then you will get what the author is saying too. Happy reading
In the attachment are the jury instructions.
"Prejudicial instructions like, page 1: "you must follow the law in my instructions whether you agree with the law or not."
Page 1: "You must not read into these instructions or into anything the Court may have said or done"
Page 6:
"You have heard evidence that the FBI raised the offices of the Dorean Group and that defendants were arrested. This information may not be used by you to infer that actions were committed." Judge should have said, the search warrants were illegal and the FBI didn't have a search warrant signed by a Judge if he wanted to be fair and fully disclose. He should have said, Just because the search was illegal doesn't necessarily mean that the defendants were guilty of something. LOL
Page 6: "Nothing that I have said or done, I reiterate, should influence your verdict. That is a matter entirely up to you."
The jury can't use the fact that the Judge perverted the law to influence the Jury as a reason to vote not guilty?
Page 7: "You have heard that certain counts involving bank fraud have been dismissed by the government. This has nothing to do with whether the counts that are on trial have or have not been proven."
"That the bank fraud counts have been dismissed voluntarily does not mean that the banks were not defrauded--nor does it mean that they were. It is simply irrelevant to your decision."
Page 7: Untrue statement: "You have heard testimony from Farrel LeCompte and Jennifer Holtzer witnesses who were alleged to have been involved in the crime charged and who pleaded guilty or no contest to a crime....."
Jennifer Holtzer was never charged with any crime in the indictments.
Then you have all of these conditioning and uncalled for and irrelevant statements that have nothing to do with the indictments that sway the Jury like:
Page 7: "You have heard about prior convictions of Mr. Johnson. You may consider this only for purposes of evaluating his credibility as a witness and not as proof of guilt in this case. You have heard that both defendants have been arrested in connection with another matter in Utah. You may not consider those arrests as proof of any guilt in this case."
Untrue statements under the law espoused by the Judge concerning rescission and loans:
Page 9: "Under now circumstances can the borrower simply eliminate the loan, recover the collateral, and keep the money from the loan."
The Jesiloski decision in Jan. 2015 says otherwise on the topic of "rescission of a loan". All that is required is the letter sent to the bank to cancel the loan, borrower doesn't have to file a suit or even return the property or any money until the lender does their obligations first. The rescission becomes effective by operation of law the day the rescission letter is sent. Lender must first return all monies paid on the loan to the borrower, otherwise, the borrower can keep the property "without further obligation." See: https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/13-684
and the TILA law.
Page 9: "Within regulatory reserve requirements, banks are allowed to receive deposits from customers and then to use those deposits to make loans to borrowers, banks are also allowed to borrow money from the Federal Reserve Bank and then to use those funds to make loans to borrowers; and banks are free to use their own equity to make loans to borrowers."
Page 9: "Of course, a borrower or his agent or his trustee may send a letter to a lender complaining about aspects of a loan. The lender, however, is not legally obligated to respond to such a letter, at least with respect to any circumstances relevant to this case. Rather the lender is free to ignore the letters and to stand on its rights under the loan documents."
Page 10: "Ignoring such a letter or notice cannot have the effect of lawfully appointing anyone as the lender's agent or attorney-in-fact. In turn, any reconveyance signed by any such purported attorney-in-fact or purported agent would be unathorized and invalid."
This was the strongest defense of the Dorean Process which the prosecution called a scam, because in the worst case scenario if the Dorean Group was incorrect in discharging the liens for all clients upon the default of the banks to answer & prove a real loan was given, at least there was an insurance policy given to the banks which was a subrogation bond to make them whole twice over, where they couldn't claim a loss. And that was the issuance of a subrogation bond in the amount of twice the original loan amount at closing given to the banks, as long as they would be honest about the lending process, they could cash these bonds which were real, but no banks would do that & come clean and honest answer point for point the affidavit of Scott which was required to address or sign an affidavit already prepared for them which is how banks say lending works. No bank would sign or address that either, but rather chose to ignore their lending fraud.
Page 10: "You have also heard reference to a subrogation and security bond. Under the law, no borrower has the unilateral right to substitute someone else's promise to pay for his or her own promise to pay. Nor can a borrower unilaterally substitute a bond for his original collateral under the loan." To prove that Judge Alsup is lying through his teeth,
Here's what it says in the Law Dictionary, by Steven H. Gifis on the topic of subrogation:
page 203: "The substitution of another person in the place of the creditor to whose rights he [the other person[ succeeds in relation to the debt; one's payment or assumption of an obligation for which another is primarily liable." McClintock, Equity 123 (2d ed. 1948).
"This doctrine is not dependent upon contract, nor upon privity between the parties; it is the creature of equity, and is founded upon principles of natural justice. Subrogation has been generally classified as being either legal or conventional. Legal subrogation arises by operation of law where one having a liability, or right, or a fiduciary relation in the premises, pays a debt due by another under such circumstances that he is in equity entitled to the security or obligation held by creditor whom he has paid. Conventional subrogation, on the other hand, arises where by express or implied agreement with the debtor, a person advancing money to discharge a prior lien might be substituted to thesecurity of the prior lienee." 18 S.E. 2d 917, 920.
Subrogation typically arises when an insurance company pays its insured under a collision protection feature of an insurance policy; in that event the company is subrogated to the cuase of aciton if its insured. So too under workmen's compensation acts the board is subrogated to the injured worker's right (up to the amount of the board's payments) to sue the responsible party.
My feelings: Only an Anti-Christ like Judge Alsup who offends the intelligence of all Christians everywhere would say that subrogation has no real effect or legal efficacy in the world. In his lies, He he would also deny that Jesus Christ, as a subrogation agent, took upon himself all the sins of the world, and literally paid for all sins and debts, and even had no legal right to do so, thus,. Judge Alsup is denying the greatest gift ever given. That's how unspiritual and stupid and devilish he is.
More lies:
Page 11: "There is nothing in the UCC that would alter the lender-borrower law described in these instructions. There is nothing in the federal-reserve system or other banking laws that affects the rights and duties of lenders and borrowers as I state them to you in these instructions. Nor is there anything in generally accepted accounting principles that would modify the law as I state it to you in thee instructions. "
My response: UCC 3-603(b) Rejection of the subrogation bond is discharge of the debt is one UCC law Judge Alsup failed to mention, however, there are many to refute his lies.
Also GAAP proves that the loan was paid off at closing if you can subpoena FAS 140, the offsheet accounting records of the banks which the banks refuse to provide as they call them "trade secrets" & "proprietary information."
Page 12: "Turning to Count One, it alleges that defendants knowingly conspired between themselves to devise a scheme to defraud lenders to obtain money by means of materially false statements. Count One alleges various attempts to eliminate mortgage pursuant to the alleged conspiracy."
My thoughts: There was never the intent to "defraud lenders" as the subrogation bond was given. There were no "false statements ever proven.
Page 13: "the accused knowingly conspired with one or more of the alleged co-conspirators to commit a scheme to defraud".
My thoughts: The conspiracy of a scheme to defraud was never proven. The intent to commit a crime was also never proven. Without the "intent", there was no case for the prosecution. Everything the Dorean did was based upon the law.
Page 14: "Falsely claiming that the loan secured by the property had been fully paid, when in fact the loan had allegedly not been fully paid, the alleged effect of which was to falsely eliminate the lender's secured collateral for the loan."
My thoughts: Again the loan was paid at closing, when the lender endorsed the note, and turned it into a negotiable instrument, but the lender never told the borrower this, it was paid a second time when the lender sold the note, and the lender never notified the borrower of this, and the alleged loan was paid a third time when the lender accepted the subrogation bond, and never timely dishonored it, and never sent it back. Who's to say that the lender didn't fractionalize the subrogation bond asset they received and use it so they can loan out even more money and profit thereby?
Page 15: First the accused devised a scheme to defraud for obtaining money or property?
My thoughts: What "scheme"? How did they defraud anyone? What property or money did they receive?
Page 15: "Second, the accused acted with the intend to defraud"?
My thoughts: The fraud was never proven by the prosecution.
Page 15: "Nor it is necessary for the government to prove that the alleged victim or victims of a scheme to defraud received any misleading statement or received any alleged mailing. It is necessary, however, for the government to prove the specific mailing alleged in the count."
My thoughts: government doesn't need to prove that the victims received misleading statements? How can you defraud someone by telling them the truth?
Page 15: "nor does it matter whether the scheme or plan was successful or that any money or property was obtained."
What???????
Page 16: " One issue for you to decide intent."
The Dorean Business plan put into the court record showed from the very beginning there was no intent to defraud. It showed the banks were defrauding borrowers.
Page 16-17: "Nor may you consider any issue of compensation for the allegedly defrauded investors. That is an entirely separate matter not relevant here and to which you should not speculate or base your decision in any way."
My thoughts: Let's see the amount the banks allegedly suffered or Dorean clients suffered was relevant in the sentencing, but is not relevant to the petite jury? So if the Dorean group received no money or properties, that this is not relevant to the jury in deciding whether a scheme to defraud happened or not? There is no scheme or artifice to defraud without the elements of "kickbacks" or "bribes", two elements never existing in the Dorean Process challenge to the banks according to the "Bond" case that was ruled upon in the last several years in the Supreme Court.
"You have heard evidence that the FBI raided the offices of the Dorean Group and that defendants were arrested. This information may not be used by you to infer that actions were committed."
____________________
Truth of the matter iss the defendants were NOT arrested at the time the FBI raided the Dorean office. FBI stole the client files without a legitimate warrant, but they did not arrest Kurt or Scott at that time. The second sentence is just plain stupid. So what if actions were committed or not committed.
To seize or hold is still considered an arrest.
____________________________________
See more synonyms on Thesaurus.com
verb (used with object)
1.
to seize (a person) by legal authority or warrant; take into custody:
The police arrested the burglar.
2.
to catch and hold; attract and fix; engage:
The loud noise arrested our attention.
3.
to check the course of; stop; slow down:
to arrest progress.
Nobody was being held there- at least nobody was told they were.
FBI asked for our I.D.'s. When they asked for my I.D. I turned around and asked Marcia Doer if I had to show it to them. She fell silent- didn't say anything. Kurt and Scott were standing right there when I ask Marcia and neither one said anything aobut that. Everyone complied. lol
was marcia pretty?? if so, i would do her.
No, she was the bohemian type- a sojourner on the land. Wrinkles, long gray untrimmed hair, wore long and loose dresses. Didn't have a permanent residence. Don't have clue what she's doing now- probably in her 70's now. She was paid $1,600 A WEEK by Dorean Group to to write and put together all of the documents that needed to be sent to the bank and clients.
"You have heard evidence that the FBI raided the offices of the Dorean Group and that defendants were arrested."
Nobody was arrested; nobody was detained. Intimidated by FBI jackets yes, (lol) but not arrested or detained. No arrest warrants were served on Kurt, Scott or anyone.
Then Macia shoud not have a last name of Doher,or even w/o the H!! lol!!
Her last name was pronounced Door. Marcia Door, but spell Doer.
Then she should have been shown the door.😂😂😂😂😂
If no one was detained, why didn't everyone just say, I'm not being arrested, so I'm just going to lunch right now and, is that OK, and just leave. Call their bluff. You are under no obligation to show I.D. There is no statute that requires this. And if you aren't being detained, why show I.D.? Why not ask, am I free to go? If they said "no", then you were arrested. If they said nothing to that question, and ignored you, just leave and see what they would have done. I suspect they would have detained you and stopped you. Had that have happened, it would be considered an arrest. The FBI garb, their guns, and ordering you against a wall, and their intimidation I think constitutes an arrest. The actions of the FBI and what people thought, supports the definition of an arrest and illegal stoppage of your work.
"Why not ask, am I free to go? If they said "no", then you were arrested. If they said nothing to that question, and ignored you, just leave and see what they would have done. I suspect they would have detained you and stopped you."
________________________
No, I'm not going to ask permission "Am I free to go?". The question itself is passive- it implies I understand what they are doing, who they are, what they are there fore, etc. I know nothing! If they had authority they would have showed it- I need not ask or do anything. They didnt' show any authority therefore they didn't have it!
"Am I free to go"? OMG, are you kidding me? The question itself implies that you know who they are, persons of authority. You wouldn't have asked if you didn't already know. Guilty as charged!
Why not ask, am I free to go? If they said "no", then you were arrested. If they said nothing to that question, and ignored you, just leave and see what they would have done. I suspect they would have detained you and stopped you. Had that have happened, it would be considered an arrest. The FBI garb, their guns, and ordering you against a wall, and their intimidation I think constitutes an arrest. The actions of the FBI and what people thought, supports the definition of an arrest and illegal stoppage of your work.
_________________
They would have said, "yes", you are being detained (arrested), because nobody had the confidence to walk away, confident in the knowledge they could defend and get themselves out of that situation had they been arrested and taken to holding cell.
Illinois is collapsing
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VxUYdIP7mqs
Illinois is insolvent. Start listening at 22:40
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4DfKydv_XBQ&t=1451s
You don't do nothing in this country unless you get permission...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w0Xt3zNngvA
http://beforeitsnews.com/survival/2017/06/canary-in-the-coal-mine-unfunded-liabilities-have-turned-illinois-into-a-banana-republic-on-the-brink-of-bankruptcy-2669686.html
Illinois is the perfect example of what happens when your state is run by fiscally irresponsible dunces for decades. The state is buried debt, and hasn’t passed a budget in over 700 days. 100% of their monthly revenue is being consumed by court ordered payments, and the Illinois Department of Transportation has revealed that they may not be able to pay contractors (who are working on over 700 infrastructure projects) after July 1st if the state doesn’t pass a budget. To top it all off, the state’s credit rating is one step away from junk status, the lowest of any state. Because of these factors, Illinois may become the first state to declare bankruptcy since the Great Depression.
In the attachment are the jury instructions.
"Prejudicial instructions like, page 1: "you must follow the law in my instructions whether you agree with the law or not."
Way too late now to object to jury instructions.
To object to jury instructions, the defendant must object "before the jury retires to deliberate," Fed. Rule Crim. Pro. 30(d), or else the issue cannot be raised on appeal. So if Kurt and Scott didn't object then, they waived the issue forever. If they did object then, they should have raised the issue on their initial appeal; if they didn't, they again waived the issue forever. If they raised the issue on appeal and the Court of Appeals ruled against them, the issue has been decided and can't be reopened.
Winston shouts last shrout out on the upcoming 2 tiered money system.
Here: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=fjr_S9TUcWA
Almost 3 hrs long but worth it in my opinion.
On August 1, will shrout be eating tunafish "in the can" or will it be fresh homemade?? Time will tell....
"He purposely sent a package of 1,000 homemade International Bills of Exchange, each purporting to be a legal tender for a trillion dollars, to a small community bank in Chicago "hoping to slip one by an unsuspecting banker,'' U.S. Tax Division trial lawyer Scott Wexler told jurors."
"....Slip one by.....'. Looollloool!!!!
http://www.oregonlive.com/portland/index.ssf/2017/04/man_who_failed_to_pay_taxes_fo.html
Unsuspecting Baker.....'Oh yea, one trillion dollars, we get those everyday...'.... Thousands of em.....
At 2:26:00 Shrout says that by the end of the year we will no longer be using cash which means everyone is going to have to have a debit card. That means more job layoffs. No more bank tellers. Only ATM. Anyone whose job duties include handling cash or checks will either be laid-off or, if they are lucky, kept and given different duties.
Corporations to buy Illinios
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=31BxmYhhD9Y
Yes, everyone will have a pre loaded debit card with their birth certificate $$$$ loaded on it- global prosperity package/global reset/dg settlements $$$/ whatever you want to call it.....
And all that has a limited shelf life until it implodes for real.... In other words, until it goes MAD MAX movie reality.
Layoffs?? It won't matter. Everyone will have plenty of free $$$$.
Free money? In exchange for what? There is no free lunch. Throw all their empty promises in the junk heap! Don't follow those idiots! People believed Hitler and look what happened to them!
If you want to be led down the primrose path, that's your prerogative. As far as I'm concerned, they take their free money and stick it where the sun don't shine. Give me liberty or give me death!
There is going to be a 'free lunch' at least for a little while. You can refuse it if you like, but it's going to happen whether you agree with it or not.
No.
@49:30 of shouts video he says that he came back from the 7th dimsion....to straighten things out......hmmmmmmmm....???????????????????
Here: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=fjr_S9TUcWA
shouts vidoo: Here: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=fjr_S9TUcWA
Read the book The God's of Eden by William Bramley. The solution is to turn your back on all of it- walk away! Don't be fooled by the apparent light at the end of the tunnel. Turn your back and walk away... Choose freedom!
@49:30 of shouts video he says that he came back from the 7th dimsion....to straighten things out......hmmmmmmmm....???????????????????
____________________
He also claims that he's never been on this planet before. According to the Andromedans, if he is here, he's been on this planet before! Instead of choosing to turn his back on the light, he chose the light, and if you choose the light, you choose to come back here! It's not really a choice per se, because he was not told he had a choice; nevertheless, he came back here because he didn't know he had another choice.
Start listening @ 5:00 to 7:00
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mhXc73vm5EY&t=329s
Read Bramley's book and decide for yourself whether you think they will ever give this planet back to the people. Really think about it, and stop being deceived for once in your life for god's sake.
I'll turn my back when you give me all the money that you've got coming.😉
If they give it to you, you will be indebted to pay it back with either your blood, sweat or tears. No free lunch.
already doing/been doing that now anyway, and what to show for it??? -0-
Owe no man and you'll be happy as a claim.
to be happy and have no worries... that's worth its weight in gold.
Imagine taking 100% of your earnings home. Imagine no property taxes. Imagine no sales taxes. Imagine free energy- no electricity or gas bills. All of these things are possible except in a debt based monetary system.
Attorneys are bonded, are they not?
No, but most carry liability insurance, which applies only if they're sued in court.
Can you go after that bond regardless of the SOL?
No.
Scott got in the mail yesterday his Petition for Cert. If that petition is granted it will release both Kurt & Scott from prison.
The Supreme Court's docket is on-line and searchable. It shows nothing on file from either Kurt or Scott.
Can you go after that bond regardless of the SOL?
No.
SOL = sheet out of lunck.
Scott got in the mail yesterday his Petition for Cert. If that petition is granted it will release both Kurt & Scott from prison. He's been denied 4 times, but he's fix those issues now. Come May 27, 2017 it will be exactly 12 years of incarceration for Scott. So this is some good news on his recent filing in the court that will soon be heard. His Petition is one of innocence and alleging no crimes were committed and so the petite jury verdict is moot that sent him and Scott away.
SOL = SHIT OUT OF LUCK
"....but i tell yo da troot, beefo the cunck craw dice, yo will deeny me tree times....but da turd tymes da chum...."
n watch ot fo da shoks!!!
The Supreme Court's docket is on-line and searchable. It shows nothing on file from either Kurt or Scott.
it already done, so now remoofed from duckits.
it already done, so now remoofed from duckits.
The Supreme Court docket shows every case that has been filed, including its disposition if the case has been decided. So if a cert. petition was either granted, denied or filed but not yet decided, it would be on the docket.
There is no current case on the Supreme Court docket in the names of either Kurt or Scott.
That leaves two possibilities: the person who said Scott had filed a new cert. petition was incorrect; or Scott attempted to file something, but the Supreme Court Clerk's Office refused to file it because it violated some provision of the Supreme Court's rules. See Supreme Court Rule 1.1 ("The Clerk ... has authority to reject any submitted filing that does not comply with these Rules"). For example, the Clerk can refuse to file a Petition that is too late (see Supreme Court Rules 14.1 [cert. petition in a criminal case must be filed within 90 days of the lower court's decision] and 14.2 [Clerk will not file a cert. petition which is late]).
1,600 Federal Reserve Notes for one gold coin:
https://catalog.usmint.gov/american-eagle-2017-one-ounce-gold-uncirculated-coin-17EH.html?cgid=gold-coins#start=1
the person who said Scott had filed a new cert. petition was incorrect, ie 'they lied' ;-(
are you saying that mongrel 700 lied??
"the person who said Scott had filed a new cert. petition was incorrect.
Misguided maybe, but not incorrect.
Even the gold standard is bad...
Excerpt from the book The Gods of Eden by William Bramley pgs 218-219
By the 17th century, the Medici banking house of Italy had come up with the idea of using gold as the commodity upon which to base all paper currency. Gold was touted as the perfect basis for paper notes because of the scarcity and desirability of gold. This was the beginning of the “gold standard” in which all other goods and services are valued in relation to gold (and sometimes silver). The gold standard was certainly a terrific idea for those people who owned plenty of gold and silver, but it created an artificial reliance on a commodity that is not nearly as useful as many other products. To base an entire monetary system on a single commodity is better than basing it upon no commodities at all, but even under a gold standard paper notes will far exceed the metals used to back the notes. The best solution is to root a money supply in a nation's entire valuable output so that the money acts as an accurate reflection of that output.
Once the gold standard was created, paper notes were thought to be “as good as gold” because people could redeem the notes for actual gold. This created a false sense of security. As more and more gold notes entered the market, they gradually became worth less and less, resulting in a steady inflation. The gold owners/bankers had to keep issuing a constant stream of notes because that is how they earned their profits. As long as the bankers planned carefully and the people retained faith in the notes, the note writers could stay ahead of the inevitable inflation they created and make an enormous profit from it. If, on the other, they issued an overabundance and too many of their notes came back for redemption, they could, as a last resort, devalue the notes to save their gold. In this fashion, inflatable paper money, even under a gold standard, became a source of wealth and power to those entitled to create the money. It also generated indebtedness on an enormous scale because most of the “created-out-of-nothing” gold notes were released into the community as loans repayable to the bankers. If people did not borrow from the bankers, little new currency would enter the market and the economy would slow down.
This method of creating money clearly destroyed the true purpose of money: to represent the existence of actual tradeable commodities. Inflatable paper money allows a handful of people to absorb and manipulate a great deal of true wealth, which are the valuable goods and services people produce, simply through the act of printing paper with inflation. It causes money to become its own commodity which can be manipulated on its own terms, usually to the detriment of the production-and-barter system. Money was meant to assist that system, not to dominate and control it.
Illinois bankruptcy caused by BIG PHARMA
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8I8z9va3Y50
"the person who said Scott had filed a new cert. petition was incorrect.
Misguided maybe, but not incorrect.
All I know is that no cert petition is on file. I don't know if the person who said Scott filed one was lying, mistaken or confused. For all I know, Scott may have actually tried to file one but (under the Supreme Court Rules I cited above) the filing was rejected by the Clerk as untimely.
"..... if the person was lying, mistaken or confused....
"....if the person found at the bottom of the building jumped, fell or was pushed....?
/s/ Dr. R Quincy,
Chief Medical Examiner
Coroners Office
County of Los Angeles
California
and btw, check out all the $$$ people got back from the IRS tax.
here: http://losthorizons.com/Newsletter.htm#Victories
I deleted the post because just the thought of IRS makes me ill.
If you owe taxes from previous years you won't get a refund. Any refund will be applied to previous years. You won't be able to fix any other problematical returns as peacefully.
CtC is mainly for traditional return filers and there's always a chance the next years zero return will be rejected/returned as frivolous. Then you'll have to spend more time at losthorizons learning how to refute IRS's frivolous letters. If you get a frivolous letter from IRS it means they've now coded you as a tax protester. Happy filing!
Is paper money constitutional? Answer: No.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=40MBdt1BQgE
Fake quotes:
http://tomwoods.com/the-greenbackers-fake-quote-industry/
"Then there’s this Jefferson quotation that a lot of Greenbackers use: “If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their currency, first by inflation, then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around them will deprive the people of all property until their children wake up homeless on the continent their Fathers conquered.”
This one is a total fake. The terms “inflation” and “deflation” are anachronistic here, for one thing, not being in use in Jefferson’s time.
Now there are plenty of anti-national bank quotations one can find from American statesmen, so why use a fake one? I suspect the answer is that this fake quotation goes after the “private banks,” which Greenbackers oppose. So now Jefferson is made to look like someone who wants the government, not the “private banks,” issuing the paper money. But Jefferson was a hard-money man to the end, calling for the retirement of all paper money and its replacement with specie, and writing the introduction to the English translation of Destutt de Tracy’s hard-money treatise."
https://mises.org/library/did-framers-favor-hard-money
"The historian of early American banking, Bray Hammond, leaves no doubt as to the conclusion that any honest historian or constitutional scholar should draw:
Was it intended that though the states might not issue paper money, establish other legal tender, and impair contracts, the federal government might do so? The question is not to be answered by the Supreme Court's subsequent decision that the federal government does have the power nor by the fact that the federal government has exercised the power. The question is historical and is not answered by jurisprudence or by subsequent practice. Was the power intended? The answer … seems clear enough: it is no."
"Two centuries later, our money supply is composed entirely of government-issued fiat currency and bank deposits redeemable in the same currency. The money supply and the banking system are largely controlled by means of federal laws and the existence of a powerful central bank. None of which are authorized by the Constitution. It is yet more evidence that our government is no more constitutional than it is democratic or liberal."
Buy gold!
Post a Comment