Sunday, October 23, 2005

Yellow Jersey 10/05/05

The Tour de France of prosecuting the big bad Dorean Group is progressing fast. I am so far ahead of schedule I’m wearing the yellow jersey. Utah came by and served me the fed indictment and made it clear they were going to drop the case. Whether I drop it will be the question. If they think they can bust out months from my life as lawless crooks and let me go they are mistaken. I was kicking their ass any way. The feds only gave them a save of face. I’ll bet the feds rushed so fast because Utah had fucked it up so bad. All said, it is still a victory and now I get to the final course way ahead, wearing the yellow jersey confident that all my years of training have eclipsed my competition. Mr. Keller is already winded and can’t comprehend how well I know the course and my abilities to finish this race. I have trained for this destiny longer than he has practiced law. Pay attention bankers, your hired gun is about to make a big dent in your empire. Let’s get ready to rumble!

52 comments:

Rob said...

Cool blog you got here. Come visit mine sometime. Hey, if you need it, this company is by far the best web hosting service provider out there.

Ace said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Ace said...

Great post kurt, good luck in your fight. In my opinion "criminals" are the best thing that ever happened to America. Some of the worst "criminals" in America were Washington, Jefferson, Franklin, etc. A lot of those "criminals" were put in jail for their "crimes." In my lifetime I have seen many medical "criminals" who figured out how to cure cancer be persecuted and jailed for their "crimes." Let us not also forget about all those "criminals" who discovered that the income tax is a fraud and were jailed for not paying up. As the old saying goes, "It ain't over til the fat lady sings" and I have a feeling that the fat lady is just getting warmed up.

tcob247 said...

Kurt.......

Thank you for addressing me personally but......

You don't know how to read.

I said I DID get my quitclaim back.
So....I don't know where you are coming from.

ALSO.........about me not knowing you were a past criminal.

I found out about that in Las Vegas.
That was WAY before you started spouting off about it on radio shows and on this blog.

By the way.....
I do still want my $4,500 back.
The claims by you and CCR were misleading and wrong.

Go ahead and call me names.
I'm not in jail

Starfish Prime said...

Good post ace.

Starfish Prime said...

Tcob..you have no one to blame for you $4500 but yourself.. you took the risk. I don't care if Kurt said he'd get you a golden goose.

END.

Starfish Prime said...

Go ask the IRS for a refund while you're at it tcob.

Starfish Prime said...

Tcob wants a refund because he is UNGRATEFUL and jumps ship when the tough get going.

How patriotic.

YOU TOOL.

dgwondering said...

Kurt ought to already know the Feds have withdrawn the habeus to move them to CA because of the hearing set for November 1 in Utah.

Doesn't sound like Utah is dropping anything.

tcob247 said...

starskank....

Keep out of my business.

What does Patriotism have to do with a refund?
LOL...do you always just open your mouth and let fly with whatever feels good.
You really are 21 arent you

Question for you....

Are you willing to go to jail for this process?

Waiting for answer

Starfish Prime said...

No.. and I am not a client, tcob. YOU are.

Why would you be going to jail?
Would you have lost your house anyway?
Did you get yourself into your position?

It's the mindset of a patiot, tcob, that I was referring to. A tough stance when the situation gets heated. You have proven you are not capable of defending yourself or YOUR ACTIONS!

Starfish Prime said...

I would be asking Kurt for GUIDANCE..not a refund!

tcob247 said...

Dude

you just contradicted yourself.

You said..."It's the mindset of a patiot, tcob, that I was referring to. A tough stance when the situation gets heated."

My question to you was " are you willing to go to jail for this process?"

You said "no"

If you don't believe in this process and you are not a client, then why are you in here spouting off so much?

Do you have nothing better to do wit your time?

Have you ever in your life asked for a refund for something that you paid for but did not get what you were promised?

Starfish Prime said...

Remember, "The power to tax involves the power to destroy" and that's what those in the U.S. Congress have been doing, destroying America with your tax dollars, and its your patriotic "duty" not to let them get away with it any longer.

Starfish Prime said...

TCOB (aka DUMBASS),

I answered truthfully.."NO" BECAUSE.. I am NOT a client..so why should I go to jail???

YOU have a DUTY as a client to finish what you started (if you ever believed in it in the first place) ...

You know nothing about the Federal Reserve System..Mortgage Fraud..etc.. all you know is pay $4500 then get your house free..

YOU MISSED THE POINT.

Starfish Prime said...

Fourth full day of jury deliberation begins.

Jury to resume deliberations at 9:00 A.M. Las Vegas time. Verdict expected before noon today.

Stay tuned for verdict at triallogs.blogspot.com

============
irwinschiff.blogspot.com
www.paynoincometax.com

tcob247 said...

LOL...you are hilarious

Dream on Starghost

Way to side step my questions and be totally irrelevant

I'm done talking with you.

It's like talking to an inmature 21 year old (whoops, you are)

Starfish Prime said...

But like I said from the very beginning (I was on the fence mind you)...Kurt should have done this on a smaller scale..I figure Kurt must have known that the Government would bring charges against him eventually. The only clients that should have hopped on to begin with were those who were wanting to try anything to save their house and cared about nothing else.

I was fine with my $1600+ mortgage payment and in no danger of foreclosure. I just bought my house this year. Didn't want any major troubles right off the bat. There is a time and place for everything tcob.

I have learned that I need to do a TON of more research and education in order to defend myself as a client of Kurt's or anyone who is attempting to call out those who engage in mortgage/contract fraud.

At this point in time I couldn't even become a client if I wanted to.

PERSPECTIVE.

Starfish Prime said...

Tcob,

Sure I am 21..but I have proven I far wiser than you.

STEP AHEAD OF YA...always and till the end.

Starfish Prime said...

TCOB,

To answer your question once and for ALL:

Yes I would go to jail for my actions if I had a plan to get OUT!

Do you have a plan?

(or just looking for a quick fix)

VOTE LIBERTARIAN.

Starfish Prime said...

Bush Picks Bernanke As New Fed Chairman

By NEDRA PICKLER, Associated Press Writer 35 minutes ago

President Bush on Monday selected Ben Bernanke, chairman of the president's Council of Economic Advisers, to replace Alan Greenspan as Fed chairman, according to an administration official.

The official spoke on condition of anonymity because the nomination had not yet been announced. Bush was to announce his choice at 1 p.m. EDT, said White House spokesman Scott McClellan.

Greenspan, who took over in August, 1987, wraps up his term as chairman Jan. 31. Asked about Greenspan's successor, Bush said, "We'll be making an announcement soon."

McClellan, while not identifying Bush's choice, said the individual he had selected was "someone who is highly qualified and someone who is well respected."

Bernanke, 51, is a former member of the Fed board. He also was a professor at Princeton University and chairman of the economics department.

Bernanke and Greenspan differ on whether the Fed should set targets for inflation — Bernanke thinks it should, Greenspan does not — but otherwise they share a similar philosophy. In fact, while he was at the Fed, market observers would often look at Bernanke's speeches for insight into Greenspan's thinking.

There had been widespread speculation that Bush might act as early as this month to give the Senate time to confirm the nomination before Greenspan's term expired.

However, announcing Greenspan's successor also provided a diversion for a White House reeling under congressional criticism of the Harriet Miers' Supreme Court nomination and a federal investigation into whether top officials leaked the name of a CIA operative for political purposes.

Wall Street reacted favorably to word that Bernanke was Bush's pick. The Dow Jones industrial average jumped 60 points minutes after Bernanke's name leaked out and was up 110 points at midday.

Bernanke has a reputation as a straight-talking economist and a Republican who avoids telegraphing any ideology.

In June 2005, Bernanke was sworn in as chairman of the President's Council of Economic Advisers. He had served as a member of the board of governors of the Fed since August 2002,

A summa cum laude graduate of Harvard University in 1975, he received his doctorate from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in 1979. During his years in Boston, he focused on the economic underpinnings of the Great Depression and the losing track record of the city's beloved baseball team, the Red Sox.

"Economics is a very difficult subject," Bernanke once said. "I've compared it to trying to learn how to repair a car when the engine is running."

Greenspan was 61 when he first took over the demanding job as Fed chairman.

His first government service was as chairman of the president's Council of Economic Advisers during the Ford administration. He had originally been tapped for that post by Richard Nixon, who resigned before Greenspan took office.

He joined the government after a long stint running Townsend-Greenspan, a New York consulting firm which had as its clients some of the country's top corporations.

It was during this period that he gained a reputation as an economist who loved to delve into the minutia of economic data, from monthly box car loadings to steel production data to try to determine the future direction of the economy.

He pursued his Fed job in the same way, often calling economists at other agencies to discuss the fine points of the government statistics. He would rise early every morning for a two-hour soak in his bathtub, time he used to devour the latest government statistics and Fed staff memos on the economy.

Greenspan succeeded another Fed legend, Paul Volcker, who during his eight years at the Fed had pushed interest rates up to their highest level since the Civil War in a successful effort to break a decade-long bout of inflation but also pushed the country into the deep 181-82 recession.

Greenspan never had to resort to pushing interest rates so high, mainly because during his tenure inflation never soared to the double-digit rates that Volcker confronted.

The economy did suffer two recessions during Greenspan's long tenure at the Fed, a 1990-91 downturn that occurred in part because of a huge spike in oil prices following Iraq's invasion of Kuwait, and a 2001 downturn that was worsened by the deadly terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon.

It was under Greenspan that the central bank began in 1996 for the first time to announce on the day of its meeting whether it had made any changes to the short-term interest rates the Fed controls.

While technically Greenspan only had one vote on the 12-member Federal Open Market Committee, the Fed chairman was exceptionally adept at building consensus among the Fed board members and regional bank presidents who make up the panel that meets eight times a year to set interest rates.

He also demonstrated a keen mastery of Washington's political power games. His long tenure at the Fed was due in no small part to his ability to get along with whoever occupied the White House.

A lifelong conservative Republican, Greenspan was first selected as Fed chairman by Ronald Reagan in 1987. He was re-nominated by the senior George Bush, also a Republican, and won two more selections for four-year terms by Bill Clinton.

Starfish Prime said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
tcob247 said...

got any more info to cut and paste for us

we eagerly await your deft skills

How bout some more on the ghosts you saw

Have they been speaking to you??

Starfish Prime said...

Tcob,

You are obviously scrambling for some sort of a rebuttal.

You always crawl back into your shell of security... to feel better about yourself and your situation.

tcob247 said...

who yah gonna call?

ghostbusters

Starfish Prime said...

Seul Choix Point Lighthouse
on Lake Michigan

14 miles east of Manistique, Michigan

Go see about the ghosts yourself.

Ghosts are real. I'm not afraid to say it.

Tcob, my question for you is, "why do you blame everyone else for your problems? Why do you make fun of what would seem to sound ludacris to begin with but don't take any time or due dilligence to find out the truths for yourself.

With Kurt on your side..I hope you finish this race..but you deserve to finish LAST.

Starfish Prime said...

The bottom line is, tcob: your problems are REAL. Go help YOU help YOURSELF!

Open your heart, open your mind.

yeahrightwhateverz said...

StankFish said...
"Why would you be going to jail?
Would you have lost your house anyway? Did you get yourself into your position?"

StankFish, firsly you have NO authority speaking on this subject. You are not a client, broker, or agent and therefore should shut the fuck up about ANYTHING related to the Dorean process or clients. Your
ASSumptions are making you look stoopid.

Let me however educate you and everyone else out there who believes that the clients were responsible for their own fate.

There were a couple of clients who came into this process who were already in foreclosure. Kurt and Scott made no promises to them, but offered to attempt to help. There might have been another handful who screwed things up due to being left alone to fight the legal battles for themselves, but all in all, the
remaining 400 plus clients were TOLD to stop making their payments by Kurt. That statement was later on retracted for obvious reasons. For some who WERE notified, they were able to catch up on their back payments. For some, the banks forced them out of the Trust. For others, they never received notification
and either lost their homes, or filed bankruptcy to keep their homes. PERIOD!

Point blank StankFish, it would behoove you to stay off this blog because you are of NO value posting the shit you post. I asked please before, now I am not going to be nice. YOU OFFER NO VALUE ADD. QUIT POSTING YOUR BULLSHIT HERE. GO TO YOUR OWN BLOG AND POST WHATEVER BULLSHIT YOU WANT.

Having said that, and since I touched on the subject, this is where it is going to get real interesting for the Li-Bolians. They are in the same situation with 1 attorney to support all their clients. So, when they tell their clients to stop making their payments, there is going to be the same influx of people
needing legal help that the Li-Bolians will NOT be able to keep up with demand. You know Kurt, kind of like how it happened with you? The bleeding hearts of your clients? Ring a bell yet Kurt?

Starfish Prime said...

Let me guess.. it's Kurt's fault you're lost.

WRONG.

Starfish Prime said...

yeahrightwhateverz,

I DON'T CARE. I AM CLOSER TO THE TRUTH THAN YOU WILL EVER BE. What do you want to add? I don't care what Kurt said. He didn't make you sign up.

Starfish Prime said...

I am saying bullshit??

PROVES THAT YOU CANNOT CLAIM SQUAT. THAT I AM RIGHT AND YOU ARE WRONG. PROVE OTHERWISE.

Yeah, whatever. zzzzzzzzz.....

Starfish Prime said...

U.S. prison population continued to grow in 2004

Reuters
October 23, 2005

The U.S. prison population, already the largest in the world, grew by 1.9 percent in 2004, leaving federal jails at 40 percent over capacity, according to Justice Department figures released on Sunday.

Inmates in federal, state, local and other prisons totaled nearly 2.3 million at the end of last year, the government said.

According to the International Center for Prison Studies at King's College in London, there are more people behind bars in the United States than in any other country.

China had the second-largest prison population with 1.5 million prisoners, according to statistics updated in April and cited by King's College. The total U.S. population is about 296 million, while China's is 1.3 billion.

****China has fewer prisoners with 1.3 billion population than does the U.S. with 296 million population.**** THINK ABOUT THAT FOR A SECOND.

Starfish Prime said...

As my friend put it..that's IF Communist China's numbers are TRUE... what does that tell you all?

SEE THE BIGGER PICTURE.

yeahrightwhateverz said...

What truth, that you're a fuckin wack job? A dipshit who doesn't know shit about anything other than cut and paste to non-relevant information? Stay on track or stay the fuck off this site dipshit!!! Of course you can't answer, you have no answers cut and paste queen.

To my point dumb ass, Kurt didn't force anyone to sign up. Some brokers made unwarranted promise you fool. The paperwork I've seen said sit back and enjoy the ride, we'll take care of everything.

Where's the free and clear title?

Where's the money promised to the first 500 to help them out of the situation Kurt got them in StankFish know it all? According to Kurt's post:

"Q: Will the settlements I’m making pay off the mortgage?"

"A: No, the bond and your promissory note did that. I will not be persuaded by the illusion. I know what legally happened and will enforce my contracts."

So StankFish, is THIS the reason why Kurt hasn't released any of the funds that are in escrow? Huh fuckin genius?

"We Are Close to the Finish, I have been in negotiations with the executives of the Feds, California and Utah."

Didn't you catch this StankFish?

This sounds to me like Kurt's selling his soul to the devil. I thought that he was fighting the honorable fight of wanting to change the mortgage industry for the better? Kurt certainly won't by selling out to his enemy. By allowing them to give Kurt hush money to keep their charade going? This certainly wasn't what Kurt had been preaching to your clients all along. Which leads me to the next obvious conclusion, if this is true, from the start, it was all about the money wasn't it? Money that THEY would keep and fuck the clients out of.

Now Kurt's claiming he has a lethal legal weapon? Which is it Kurt. Here's something to think about, do WHATEVER will benefit the client. Do WHATEVER will give the client the damages YOU promised!

Promise after promise comes and goes with nothing but dissapointment. Kind of like all the OTHER ME processes out there who kept on promising money and not ONE delivered. So, let's hear your brillaint provable facts on this StankFish.

Come on stoopid ass, got an answer for these questions? If not shut the FUCK UP and get the FUCK out of here school girl!

tcob247 said...

skankface ghost buster

Why the hell do we care about the prison population

Another great cut and paste job

Nobody wants you in here

This is MORTGAGE ELIMINATION

GET IT????

quit blabbering like a 21 year old ghost loving libertarian fool

Nobody would read your posts on your own blog so you have to come in here and bore us.

Starfish Prime said...

hahahaha. Let me recoup...

Starfish Prime said...

""Q: Will the settlements I’m making pay off the mortgage?"

"A: No, the bond and your promissory note did that. I will not be persuaded by the illusion. I know what legally happened and will enforce my contracts.""

This is true. Wait and see what comes of this legal mess that Kurt (Scott too) is dealing with. Bottom line: what Kurt says is true about contract law. The Feds aren't gonna just say "oh, you're right, you got me..here's your stuff back".. they will fight this to the death..as will Kurt.

Kurt cannot control what comes out of Brokers' mouths. They work off of commissions, mind you.

======

"We Are Close to the Finish, I have been in negotiations with the executives of the Feds, California and Utah."

Didn't you catch this StankFish?

This sounds to me like Kurt's selling his soul to the devil. I thought that he was fighting the honorable fight of wanting to change the mortgage industry for the better? Kurt certainly won't by selling out to his enemy. By allowing them to give Kurt hush money to keep their charade going? This certainly wasn't what Kurt had been preaching to your clients all along. Which leads me to the next obvious conclusion, if this is true, from the start, it was all about the money wasn't it? Money that THEY would keep and fuck the clients out of."

The Fed screws ALL OF US out of MONEY TOO! But that is beside the point here. You took one quote and jumped to conclusions. What that means (if you have read his recent posts) is that he was in negotiation but does not want them to drop the charges in Utah. He doesn't want to let them off easy (according to Kurt). He said that many of these doubters (such as you) deserve to have Kurt find the easy way out of his situation..but rather he will take the Beast head on and expose them for the fraud that occurs after EVERY TIME A MORTGAGE CONTRACT IS SIGNED.

Kurt will not always have his plan go his way from start to finish. But he will not go down without a fight. If you knew the whole truth you would be this angry at the Fed..not Kurt.

Starfish Prime said...

Question for you yeahwhateverz,

1. Are the underlying arguments that led to the creation of the Dorean Group false? Is Kurts claim about Mortgage Contracts false?


Answering "NO" will show how smart you really can be.

Starfish Prime said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Starfish Prime said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Starfish Prime said...

Anonymous said...

Reasonable Guy,

The Federal Budget may relate to income taxes, but it is not even an answer simple Tax questions from the public nor does it justify illegally enforcing a tax!

Losing 43% of their revenue is a good thing, for it will force them downsize useless government expenditures, to stop borrowing and printing so much money, and stop raising the public debt past 8 trillion!


To anonymous posting 10/24/2005 3:48 PM

Starfish Prime is right! That article on the IRS website does not answer the question at all. It is again using intimidation to get people to believe a law actually exists! If you can't see that, you need help on comprehension or something because a child can figure it out!

10/24/2005 4:16 PM

Starfish Prime said...

Did you read that??

"A CHILD CAN FIGURE IT OUT."

WHY CAN'T YOU (you know who you are)?

Starfish Prime said...

Anonymous said...

Reasonable Guy,

The Federal Budget may relate to income taxes, but it is not even an answer simple Tax questions from the public nor does it justify illegally enforcing a tax!

Losing 43% of their revenue is a good thing, for it will force them downsize useless government expenditures, to stop borrowing and printing so much money, and stop raising the public debt past 8 trillion!


To anonymous posting 10/24/2005 3:48 PM

Starfish Prime is right! That article on the IRS website does not answer the question at all. It is again using intimidation to get people to believe a law actually exists! If you can't see that, you need help on comprehension or something because a child can figure it out!

10/24/2005 4:16 PM

A CHILD CAN ..

livinginxs said...

Kurt, thanks for the updates and godspeed to you and Scott.

mogel said...

mogel said...
neodemes said...
Mogel babbled:
>>so they conned the borrower to allow the so called lender to have a lien on THEIR property.

Sir Bruce: Let me explain my statement in a "verbose" way since apparently my simplistic statements usually go way over your head for some reason.

On page 2 Section IV of my Deed of Trust & similiar legalese is found in all deed of trusts, we read:

BORROWER'S RIGHT TO GRANT A SECURITY INTEREST IN THE PROPERTY AND BORROWER'S OBLIGATION TO DEFEND OWNERSHIP OF THE PROPERTY

I promise (i) I lawfully own the Property, (ii) I have the right to grant and convey the property to Trustee, and (iii) there are NO outstanding claims, charges, liens, or encumbrances against the property,......."

In order words, I give a general warranty of title to the Lender. This means I will be fully responsible for any losses which Lender suffers because someone (other than myself) may have some of the rights in the property which I PROMISE that I have at the time of signing the deed of trust. I promise that I will defend MY OWNERSHIP of the property against any claims of such rights.

The above Section IV clearly says that (1) I own the property at my address, BEFORE THE time I signed the deed of trust, (2) that I own the property "free and clear" of any encumbrances whatsoever, (3) I will defend that I own the property free & clear & have the RIGHT TO CONVEY the property or give a lienholder interest to the Trustee.

Now, how can all of these representations by me be properly AND TRULY given 3 days before the alleged loan is officially closed & funded or any monies were wired or transferred, and before the Trustee had an actual interest in the property? The question comes to mind, how can all of these things or conditions BE that the agreement acknowledges and I WARRANT if the lender granted a loan at the time of signing the deed of trust? The answer is that it's impossible. The only possible scenario is that my note the lender had me sign, WHICH I STILL OWN BY THE WAY, because they didn't pay me for it, have FIRST BREACHED OUR AGREEMENT TO LOAN ME MONIES. It appears to be a fact that I am the lender in this transaction & provided the funds for my own loan BECAUSE THE LENDER'S PAPERWORK ALREADY ACKNOWLEDGES THESE FACTS. Is that a real loan, or was a clever exchange made & the lender conned me into thinking they were given me a loan? If there was IN REALITY an exchange made, why is the lender CONNING ME INTO SIGNING A DEED OF TRUST TOO? And why am I signing a deed of trust if I already own the property at closing?

Now if you can't intelligently answer my questions, without making snied comments, then, maybe you are the one that should shut up or maybe you are the one that should shoot themself first IN THE FOOT as a community service. I patiently await an intelligent response from you to explain all of my unanswered questions which my bank can't or won't answer.

Mogel

1:45 PM

yeahrightwhateverz said...

StankFish said...
"Kurt will not always have his plan go his way from start to finish. But he will not go down without a fight. If you knew the whole truth you would be this angry at the Fed..not Kurt."

Nobody's arguing whether or not Kurt's in this for the fight genius, he's in fuckin jail. I know the truth and am equally pissed at both parties, the Banksters, Feds, and Govt. for lying, and Kurt for lying. However, you know where you stand with the Banksters, Feds, and Govt., they didn't promise you shit and they did it by taking everything you own. If Kurt were really an honorable man, he would immediatly pay his clients who lost the most from his process with the money that is "in" escrow.

StankFish said...
"Question for you yeahwhateverz,"

"1. Are the underlying arguments that led to the creation of the Dorean Group false? Is Kurts claim about Mortgage Contracts false? Answering "NO" will show how smart you really can be."

I must say StankFish, you really got me on that one. I asked you questions and all that you do is ask questions in return.

I doesn't matter one iota whether or not Kurt is right or wrong or whether the Banksters, Feds, or Govt are right or wrong, which everyone knows they are wrong. They have the guns, they make the rules PERIOD. Kurt either has to play by the rules or spend many years in prison. Do you think that the Banksters, Feds, and Govt. are gonna let a small fish like Kurt bring down a trillion dollar a year business? Hell fuckin no dipshit! Before YOU answer with another useless post, think about it long and hard StankFish, the answer will come to you.

Here, I'll offer you a question to your question of my questions, if Kurt wins it would make sense that everybody gets paid, everybody's happy yada yada yada. But, if Kurt loses, and ends up going to jail for the next 100 years, what's going to happen with the clients? Will they still get any damages while Kurts rotting away in jail? This will prove Kurt to be an honorable or NOT so honorable man. Why the hell would Kurt pay anybody ANYTHING while he fought and lost?

StankFish, your question can be answered very easily, If clients get paid, then I'll believe anything you want me to, ufo's, ghosts, or that you are really smart. But until then, it is ALL IRRELIVANT, PERIOD!

yeahrightwhateverz said...

Dr. Fred, nice try, but this is yet another excuse after excuse and one LIE after another LIE. Oh, here we go, the holdup is because of incompetent people and it's the web masters fault now huh? First the client, now the web master. Gee, that sounds familiar, Deadwood used the same excuse for over 15 months.

Kind of like all the OTHER ME processes out there who kept on promising money and not ONE delivered. Yet, it is the client who is at fault because Kurt never kept to any of his promises. It is the client who needs to educate themselves, yet there is NOTHING POSTED HERE THAT'S EDUCATIONAL.

It is the client who is told to stay tuned to this blog for important updates. WTF, I come here to be subjected to SankFish's off topic BULLSHIT?

Kurt said that there are certain conditions from a legal perspective that must be in place. The monies are already set aside. Are there ANY guarantees that no matter what happens with Kurt that the client will actually get any of these refunds, and not only the refunds, but MORE IMPORTANTLY the money that is so called in escrow, setup for those who lost their homes or suffered financially? You know, the money that the Li-Bolians say that will be distributed any day now?

Speaking of which, they've seemed to back off on the any day now claims. Seems to me that they were pitching this big time before their price increase. Oh, but they claim that this is what they're being told, great cop out. Oh, and another thing, don't think of mentioning any other ME processes on their conference call. They're the only one's allowed to mention another process, the 2500 free and clear titles who are no longer making their payments. Why don't they mention the 500 who either lost their homes, who are in foreclosure, or who've filed bankruptcy to keep their homes because of the process? God forbid their new clients find out the truth.

Elmer Fudd said...

I'd Like to know where the hell did Fred get that Dr. Title from..Wth did he do besides go to jail to get a Ph.D? LOL Freaking Joke the whole Lot of them.

Starfish Prime said...

I knew Kurt had been in trouble before. He told it to all who listened to the conference calls. He said that what he got busted for the banks have done the same and he will use his talents now for good and not evil. He has turned his life around to take on the banks "bad behavior" (according to Kurt). Please understand that all who would listen to Kurt KNEW that he had been in trouble and it was not secret at all.

Starfish Prime said...

All clients must hope that Kurt wins. If not, ANYTHING could happen. That doesn't change what is right or wrong though. I just don't see him getting a fair trial.

yeahrightwhateverz said...

Hey dipshit StankFish, your attempts to put a positive spin on this have failed. Yeah, maybe some brokers spilled the beans, or Kurt himself, but did they ALSO spill the beans on how SOME investors got paid back and SOME didn't? Or, how most of the money they supposedly took doing "what banks so called do legally" for their OWN financial gain? Hmmm, I wonder how many got shafted? Does anyone see a trend here?

How interesting is it that YOU, StankFish, are not a client, broker, or agent, yet you know so much about what's going on. Any semblance of credibility you had you can kiss goodbye. I dub thee, BlowFish!

yeahrightwhateverz said...

Besides BlowFish, as far as your ANYTHING can happen speculation, there IS money in an escrow account based on the first 500 clients who have filed an Administrative Rememdy. Again, your speculation is making you look STOOPID.