Monday, November 28, 2005

Astonishment

Have you ever wondered how the wise are astonished by the fool as the fool is by the wise? The same set of facts is handled in diverse ways. My environment causes me astonishment all day. You hear every justification to describe the reasonableness of depravity. They couldn’t discover the solution to their problem because they are precluded by their foolishness to see it. To me, it is a microcosm of the entire society and unfortunately what I discovered among my clientele. I do not want you to be blind as the many fools that surround me. Read Tom Schauf’s books, read fed publications, read anything that will help you see the gleaming hope of victory. I can tell you that a fool’s hope is folly because they are destroying their chances by the very execution of their plans. With education you won’t be swayed by the baby talkers on this blog or anywhere else and my actions won’t be a source of astonishment. Let’s pull together as we near the end. As the Musketeers said, “All for one and one for all.”

40 comments:

dgwondering said...

Another great idea. Schauf's lunacy is part of what got you put away.

tcob247 said...

Are you sure you don't mean the Mouseketeers?

Tom Schauf
Irwin Schiff
Larkin Rose
Kurt Johnson

You look at your clients as lunatics but you are the one in Jail

Hmmmmmm

livinginxs said...

I have found that there is no speed limit in the pursuit of excellence. And that behind every great idea is someone saying, "It will not work." Most of the time great things are not done by impulse, but by a series of small things brought together.

I am an optimist by nature, I would like to believe that Kurt can pull this off, but I believe that the good of this event was the education of 4,000 people who have had their eyes opened. Mabe now we need to start a movement to make changes from the inside with the power we have at this moment in time - the right to vote.

If all 4,000 can educate one other person which inturn can educate one - before to long we will be a free and educated society.

Write letters to your Congressman, President and other elected officials. Perhaps we should start a letter, email, fax campaign to help get Scott & Kurt out or at least in front of a court.

habakkuk said...

Hey Tcob,
Why dont u shut the hell up.....We obviously know why u have a beef with Kurt.....but the mere fact that you are calling others like Tom Schauf, Irwin Schiff, etc "mouseketeers" tells me that you dont know what the hell your talking about. I know a few things about Tom Schauf and as far as i can see he is only interested in educating people about the truth. This tells me that u are a total idiot and you have nothing better to do.

tcob247 said...

I have lots to do.
And I can do it cause I'm not in jail.
I'm not out scamming people for $3,000 and then having them lose their house.
So.....who is the idiot?

livinginxs
There are not 4,000 people who are supporters. Maybe at the most 100.
the other 3,900 got educated all right. Scammed out of $3,000 + put their house in jeopardy.

Yes Kurt, we are the lunatics

Tony Tuba said...

PEOPLE VS.THE BANKS



Rubber Stamp Inc has struck again.

I personally thank all of you who came to court in support of my hearing on Monday,
November 21, 2005. Those of you who were not able to come, you missed ten minutes of
solid entertainment.

The Supreme Court judge, one who calls himself “Mr. Justice James W. Williams" (I
call him James) refused to answer any of my questions. These questions are copied
here at the end of this blurb.

There are only two reasons why the judge refused to answer my questions:

He doesn’t have any answers;
He has the answers but he knows he will be in deep doo doo if he tells the truth on
the record.

So the judge rubber stamps whatever the law[less] society tells him to do. The judge
couldn’t stand the heat so he called an end to the proceeding which further exposed
the fact that the whole thing was nothing but a charade, a compact between himself
and the law[less] society to affirm the order made by the judge on September 13,
2005 when he granted the order sought by the law[less] society against me which is
designed to prevent me from representing people in court. The order also made me a
“vexatious litigant” – my newest title.

The judge and the law[less] society made a grievous error – the order was made
against my strawman, JOHN RUIZ DEMPSEY, spelled in ALL CAPS, not against my real
Christian name. So I guess we will be back in court again soon so I can challenge
the order.

Listed below are the questions I wanted to ask the judge. We got bogged down on the
issue of jurisdiction, I asked him to show me how or where did he get the
jurisdiction to make a decision against me. Simple question requiring a simple
answer. We go on the record that he has no answer.

I call the items listed below as: John’s tested ways to shut down a court
proceeding: (use them at your own peril)

Questions for Williams J.


You can call me John, I prefer to be called John because I'm used to it. My friends
call me John. I'm here to represent a fictional entity called JOHN RUIZ DEMPSEY,
spelled in all capital letters. Am I allowed to speak on behalf of JOHN RUIZ DEMPSEY
ALL CAPS NAME?
Before we proceed, I have a few questions to ask you; is it ok to ask you a few
questions?
As a Child of God and a Minister with indisputable title, I am standing in the
Kingdom of God, where do you stand?
Are we in a common law court or an admiralty court?
Are you a Mason?
Is there anyone here who is a member of any Masonic organization?
Did you receive a copy of my letter to you dated October 31, 2005?
Then you know that I am here on a special appearance and under the invitation of the
fictional Petitioner, THE LAW SOCIETY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA who agreed to pay me my
fees, which is $5,000 per hour for making a special appearance here correct?
Under the terms of my acceptance of the Law Society’s offer, I counter-offered that
I will be here if they pay me $5,000 per hour for a minimum of 8 hours.
Anyways, I have a copy of the contract which I am entering on the record, you may
read it if you want. A Demand for Payment has been served to Mr. Peter Voith; a copy
of said Demand for Payment which I also want to enter on the record.
Did you bring a copy of your Oath of Office and your Bond today James?
If not, why not James? I asked you in my letter to you of October 31st that you
duces tecum must bring a copy of your Oath of Office and a copy of your Bond, why
did you not bring it?
Do you have certified copies of these documents here in the courthouse or else where?
(If no Oath or Bond) Let the record show that James W. Williams, d/b/a JUSTICE
(JAMES W.) WILLIAMS/PUBLIC SERVANT, does not have his Oath of Office and his Bond in
his possession today.
Without your Oath, how can I be sure that you will act in an impartial manner here
today as you did not do so last time I was here?
How can I be sure that you have no bias, or that you have no conflict of interest,
or no interest in the outcome of this case?
Since you don’t have your Oath today, would you be willing to swear an Oath today?
How about you Mr. Voith, (law society), would you be willing to swear an Oath today?
I want to enter this on record that these men are not here to tell the truth – they
are here to tell lies.
You made a decision on September 13, 2005, despite the fact you have seen a copy of
my Constructive Notice of Child of God status, now where in God’s name did you
obtain the authority to make such an order?
Are you above God?
Are you equal to God?
Do you stand between me and God?
Do you have any document with any verifiable signature of God that you have the
power over me?
When did I, John-Ruiz: Dempsey, a Child of God and a Minister of God with an
indisputable title consent to your jurisdiction? Especially over me, the man, a
Sovereign, free born, sentient, living and breathing soul.
How did you obtain jurisdiction over me? I want to know, especially when I'm not
even a citizen of your country – my citizenship is in Heaven you can look it up in
the King James Bible – Philippians 3:20.
Or maybe you think I'm a slave, do you say I'm a slave, or am I a freeman?
Could you show me anything, any statute, any law that could prove that you have
jurisdiction over me?
I want to make it clear at this point, my name is John-Ruiz: Dempsey, not JOHN RUIZ
DEMPSEY all capital letters as it appears on the style of cause. John-Ruiz: Dempsey
and JOHN RUIZ DEMPSEY ALL CAPS are not the same; JOHN RUIZ DEMPSEY ALL CAPS is a
fictional name created by the state, it is not me, yet you and the law[less] society
used that name to drag me into this muddle.
Do you understand the difference between the ALL CAPS name and the real Christian name?
The bottom-line here is: which one is more important to you, is it the People, or
the law[less] society. Your action speaks volumes, you don’t care about justice, you
don’t care about mercy, you don’t care what’s going to happen to all the real People
I represent, these are not fictional characters created by your statutes; these men
and women are created by God and by interfering with my work, you are interfering
with God. This is what God’s Word says about you in Luke 11:52 " Woe Unto you
Lawyers! For Ye have Taken Away the Key of Knowledge: Ye entered not in Yourselves,
and Then That Were Entering in Ye Hindered"
In Matthew 23:23 it says this about you: “Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees,
hypocrites! for ye pay tithe of mint and anise and cummin, and have omitted the
weightier matters of the law, judgment, mercy, and faith: these ought ye to have
done, and not to leave the other undone.”

How long do you think you guys are going to go on with your injustice and abuse of
power until the people start a revolution?
I'm not dealing with your Court until the jurisdiction has been proven.
Since the judge refused to answer my questions, these questions will be sent to him
personally, after which, these questions will become part of an affidavit and
entered on the file as public record.
Now seriously, I would like you to read Cicero’s definition of natural law from his
book, On the Republic, published in 51 BC.
"True law is right reason in agreement with nature, universal, consistent,
everlasting, whose nature is to advocate duty by prescription and to deter
wrongdoing by prohibition. Good men obey its prescriptions and prohibitions, but
evil men disobey them. It is forbidden by God to alter this law, nor is it
permissible to repeal any part of it, and it is impossible to abolish the whole of
it. Neither the Senate nor the People can absolve us from obeying this law and we
do not need to look outside ourselves for an expounder or interpreter of this law.
There will not be one law at Rome and another law at Athens. There is now and will
be forever one law, valid for all peoples and all times. And there will be one
master and ruler for all of us in common, God, who is the author of this law, its
promulgator, and enforcing judge. Whoever does not obey this law is trying to
escape himself and to deny his nature as a human being. By this very fact, he will
suffer the greatest penalties, even if he should somehow escape conventional
punishments."

Cheers,
John-Ruiz: Dempsey BSCr. LL.B
http://www.freewebs.com/classaction/
http://www.theclassactionsuit.com

habakkuk said...

Tcob....Bla,bla,bla.....same old talking points....its getting really stail

son of a prophet said...

"As a Child of God and a Minister with indisputable title, I am standing in the [[[ Kingdom of God ]]],(????) where do you stand?
Are we in a common law court or an admiralty court?
Are you a Mason?
Is there anyone here who is a member of any Masonic organization?
Did you receive a copy of my letter to you dated October 31, 2005?......"

As I would wish Mr. Dempsey well in his fight for truth, I would offer the following as a correction on one point, his statement that he (we) "stand in the Kingdom of God."

I would state that he (we) are all standing in the kingdom of satan. If he (we) were standing in the Kingdom of God, he would not be in that courtroom at all, as in Gods Kingdom, there will be no courtrooms, nor will any be necessary.

He is in fact standng before the 'accuser'. We all know who the accuser is. No explanation is necessary.

Again, refferring back to Yeshua's dialogue with satan, when Yeshua did not queton satans authority to offer Yeshua "all these Kingdoms" as Yeshua knew whom they belong to, and by whos authority was given to satan to offer them; God Himself.

Peace.

imbigo said...

tcob find a new argument, I think your numbers are way off. I'm sure there are a lot more then 100 pp in favor of this process!

I know your not going to like this statement, and your probly going to curse me, but...

Your becoming very annoying, you should disappear into cybor space along with your freind starfish..

no offence to you starfish!


BIG"O" 1+1+1=1

SEE YOU AT THE TOP!!!!!

P.S. Happy Holidays...NOT!!!

Merry CHRISTmas "BELIEVE IT SAY IT"

railman65 said...

I'm in agreement with Imbigo, and that tcob should just quietly leave, as there are many who believe Kurt will come out victorious. Lets all pray that Kurt and Scott keep fighting the evil empire for us.

tcob247 said...

hmmmmm....
same old boring talking points huh

Lose $3,000, your house.

Yah real boring.

So, does Kurt have any new talking points?
Do any supporters have any new talking points?

OK Imbigio....
how many people out of the 4000 do you think are in favor of the process?

Another question
Out of the 4,000 people
How many successful mortgage eliminations occured?

By success (defined by Dorean) I mean...........

1.Mortgage payed off
2.Successful re-fi
3.2nd mortgage payed off
4.No payments
5.Money in pocket

How many do you think?

Tony Tuba said...

Astonishment? Laura Branigan?

KYHOOYA said...

To: Tcob247
You come here as a thorn, With only one intention to distract any positive advance. I say at best your a plant for if not one of the FBI, JD, or the like. I also say you have posted your possion many times over it's well noted, so like everyone eles has said (EVEN YOU SAID YOU WERE GOING) it's time for you to go. Remember just a short time back you said you would be going and with that post would to be your last post. We know by that example you can't keep your word. Can you take a hint or are you that dence, I mean realy! You just don't have anything else to do right? So I bet when you signed for the process it was a last ditch effort because your over your head in debt and your mad because it didn't save you right? Now you come on here and play out your day posting one neg. BS statments one after anotherinstead of getting off your ass and looking for some info to help yourself nope your just going sit there and wait for someone or thing to come along and save you but your not going to put any work out for it nope your MAD and BLaBlaBlaBla... so go away nobody, well I speak for myself anyway, wants to here you any more and when you go take anyother names you post under with you. My take is that you are the losser that I stated above and have for some time but there is the strong indication that you may be what IBIGO said a few weeks back, and the more I read your post I must tend to agree with him that your a COP, PLANT, FBI, JD, There is just know way your who you say it don't add up, besides even if you were who you say there would be some sign somewhere out of all your post of you looking for Kurt to win as in why you came to be in the process in the first place, but there is none. Something eles seems to be odd with your posts as of late you have a been hitting the "YOUR IN JAIL" as if to say because Kurt is in jail somehow that makes him wrong and the system right. Get a clue if you have one onunce of brains left you should be worried about the fact that Kurt and Scott HAVE been jail now for over 6 mo. and have not had one legel due process. This could be YOU there in jail ( and don't say no not me ) because shit happens every day. this system is well aware of the fact that pepole at large go along with what (just like the lemmings they are) and you keep highlighting this fact "In jail" like it must be true they must be guilty like they want you to think. You keep pointing to the system by not giving Kurt & Scott there legal rights and there rights go forword. You see the fact is there stalling to let the SYSTEM work the people into thinking there wrong by just doing nothing at all, Just stall and leaving them in jail. But, why am I telling you this, You aready know it, don't you? cause the fact is that what your doing here. GO AWAY "COP" how many times do we have to hear you post the same old thing time after time after time.

l8r

KYHOOYA said...

said...

Write letters to your Congressman, President and other elected officials. Perhaps we should start a letter, email, fax campaign to help get Scott & Kurt out or at least in front of a court.

7:53 AM

I 2ND THAT They are counting on the fact that were a bunch of lasy $%^&*( and want to have everything handed to us ) Come on people there not going to change with out putting up a fight. Would you? I somehow wonder if it is but a waste of time to try and get the masses to rally as it stand right now we live on a sea of the mindless that hope for a better tomorrow, as long as it won't take any effort from them.

PEOPLE WAKE UP! IF YOU DON'T LIKE WHAT IS GOING ON AROUND YOU "US" THAN TAKE YOUR FINGER OUT OF YOUR ---!@#$ EARS GO OUT AND DO WHAT NEEDS TO BE DONE AND MAKE A DIFFERAANCE SMALL OR LARGE.

Or you could do what your doing now, NOTHING. That seems the way to go, Now dosn't it? ....

l8r

tcob247 said...

LOL Kahoeey....
You are wrong wrong wrong
But.... I don't need to convince you do I, because in your mind you know everything

I took you up on your challenge once to give you info about me that you requested.

You turned it down after I met your challenge.
So you accuse me of not keeping my word.
You are laughable

I believe Kurt was conning people out of money. He is delusional thinking he is going to turn around a trillion dollar industry.
He knows it.
He and his Dad were both in Jail for a previous scheme and now his Dad is STILL trying to promote the same exact thing his kid is in jail for now.
What a Daddy.
Hey ....... buddy....If you want these two to be your leader....then have at it.
I won't be quiet while they try to scam away

damc49 said...

tcob247, this is for you..

Kurt is a beautiful man of God, as is his dad, with nothing on or in their minds about ripping anybody off. You want to meet someone that's wasting alot of good air, look in a mirror.
Kurt's guilty of one thing only; he caught them with their paints down, and their guilty as hell looking for a way out.
Stop wasting Ink as well as Air, give us a break..

acenothing99 said...

Tuck,

This rant of yours is the funnies thing I have ever read.

You may want to stop watching old reruns of Perry Mason. The court system is laughing their ass off at your silly bull shit. This one is my favorite... >> John-Ruiz: Dempsey and JOHN RUIZ DEMPSEY ALL CAPS are not the same; << What the fuck are you talking about. They keeping you in jail no matter what you call yourself.

I found it so entertaining I sent the cut and paste version to the joke of the day site. The problem is even though they found it very funny they thought it required too much background.

Keep the laughs coming.

Dr.F(r)ed_Up said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Dr.F(r)ed_Up said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Dr.F(r)ed_Up said...

damc49 said...

Kurt is a beautiful man of God, as is his dad, with nothing on or in their minds about ripping anybody off.

damc49,

why don't you ask dear ole' dad since he's working with the liars of Li-Bo what happened to the judgments that Li-Bo and Fred himself were stating were "just around the corner" and / or "any day now"?

If you get a truthful answer, I doubt it will be either of the two quotes above, unless you consider months from now at the earliest, if at all, inclusive of those answers....

Peanut Gallery said...

knownothing99,

Do some research into the strawman issue. UCC1. Maybe you will learn a thing or two. Or better yet, why don't you enlighten us all with your vast knowledge.


BTW, utah,and taco.
Tell me why my mortgage company endorsed my deed of trust on several occasions?

Seen it in Utah said...

For those interested: Someone (I do not recall who) asked about why nothing was happening on the Utah criminal cases. The preliminary hearing is currently scheduled for December 20th. As to people who are claiming that that the state is dragging its feet--the delays are at the request of the defense (i.e., Kurt and/or Scott) and their attorneys. If Kurt and Scott had demanded speedy trials, the process would be rocketing at this point. The delays are specifically agreed to and requested by the defense. They have a constitutional right to a speedy trial. That right can only be waived by the defendants. They have waived the speedy trials.

If the schedule is kept, then Kurt and/or Scott will be bound over for trial after the preliminary hearing, assuming the judge finds sufficient evidence at the hearing for a bind-over.

Peanut: Without seeing your note, I really cannot answer the questions. Sometimes the endorsement language is already preprinted on the Note to make it ready for sale. Unless the endorsement language is actually accompanied by an authorized signature, then the endorsement is ineffective. If you want to scan the note and e-mail it to me, let me know and I can look at it in better detail and perhaps be more helpful.

WillToFight said...

ACENOTHING99

That's your problem you have no Idea what's going on. But you still open your idiot mouth just like TACO BELL

tcob247 said...

I'll tell you why they did.
Because they can get away with it.
The current system allows them to do it.
I don't agree with it but that is how it is
It's no big secret is it

The current situation is simple
Apply for mortgage
Get Accepted
Receive check
Purchase house
Make payments
Keep house

I choose now to play by these rules.
I allowed Kurt and CCR to persuade me to stray from this course and I nearly got burned.
They knew exactly what they were doing and made a lot of money off of it (but are now paying the price)
Dr. Fred continues to promote the scam

Peanut Gallery said...

taco said

I choose now to play by these rules.
I allowed Kurt and CCR to persuade me to stray from this course and I nearly got burned

No. You got greedy!!!

tcob247 said...

yup

Elmer Fudd said...

Peanut Gallery said...
taco said

I choose now to play by these rules.
I allowed Kurt and CCR to persuade me to stray from this course and I nearly got burned

No. You got greedy!!!

So Basically what you are saying is ALL of CCR and or Dorean's Clients are Greedy? So Kurt capitalized on people's greed? How about Dr.Fred with Li-Bo is he greedy too? Come on Peanut Head explain too all of the clients and one naysayer= myself what you mean exactly.

tcob247 said...

why did you do this process peanut?

mogel said...

Webster defines the term, "Greedy": "desiring MORE than one needs or DESERVES.

Certainly if the lender has committed fraud, and a person sincerely believes that he has been cheated, used, or deceived in the lending process, then, by definition, a Dorean client is not greedy and DESERVES the wrong to be made right. Even the law allows for punitive and compensatory and other special damages when fraud is proven.

A greedy person is one who takes what he is not entitled to. Lenders are the one's that are greedy because they unjustly enrich themselves.

I would think a large percentage of clients NEED to be out of debt, otherwise, they wouldn't be having difficulty making their payments, or wouldn't be foreclosed upon in many cases.

I don't see how wanting a better & more full life as being greedy, but maybe some of you out there don't think too highly of yourself and mistakenly call that feeling to better your life as "greed".

mogel said...

Tcob247: Are you still technically a client or have you received a quit claim of your property back in your personal name AND have you waived any rights to any possible damage claim awards in the future due to the process?

Justice7777777 said...

Nice Try Mogel. Where fraud is involved all bets are off concerning waiving rights to pursue damages. You should start trying to hide your assets like others in your position. Talk to Farrel and Guy, they think they have a system that works--but the money is easily followed (and ATTAINABLE).

When Kurt is convicted watch how the fight begins for the money--including yours!

Better start playing Kurts lotto picks!

mogel said...

Justice777: I was referring to the fraud of the lenders, not your perceived fraud.

complainers suck said...

Justice7777777 said...
Talk to Farrel and Guy, they think they have a system that works--but the money is easily followed (and ATTAINABLE).

If the money is easily followed, then that would suggest that there's no reason to hide the money, wouldn't you think? If people were trying to hide dirty money, it would not be "easily followed" "and ATTAINABLE".

Tony Tuba said...

acenothing99 ? Jethro Tull ?

Tony Tuba said...

Complainers Suck,
Buy Low? Sell High?

Tony Tuba said...

Tucker's Tid Bit For The Day.

If a young lady turns you down for sex, there's always her mama!

complainers suck said...

tucker said...
Complainers Suck,
Buy Low? Sell High?

Sure, if you're trading stocks. However, not all markets work that way?

Tony Tuba said...

Complainers suck,
What if I wanted to buy stock in a porn Video company. In your opinion, is that a company that is up and coming? Is it on the up and up? Is it on the rise? I'm asking because I don't want to get stiffed and take an ass pounding.

This video company has decided to make a movie of Chewbacca butt slamming Neodemes. Although the thought of Neodemes receiving the treatment he deserves is appealing, it concerns me as an investor that such a film is a risk because nobody would buy it. I would appreciate your expert advice C.S..
Thanks

Clueless Fudd said...

tucker said...
This video company has decided to make a movie of Chewbacca butt slamming Neodemes. Although the thought of Neodemes receiving the treatment he deserves is appealing, it concerns me as an investor that such a film is a risk because nobody would buy it. I would appreciate your expert advice C.S..
Thanks

Couldn't pass this one up....

I think you have an AVN greatest of all time seller with this video.... The climax (no pun intended) of the movie would be neMo doing double penetration with Chewbacca and an Ewok!

Clueless Fudd said...

Clueless Fudd said...
I think you have an AVN greatest of all time seller with this video.... The climax (no pun intended) of the movie would be neMo doing double penetration with Chewbacca and an Ewok!

NeMo, would of course be the receiver of double penetration by Chewbacca and the Ewok.