Tuesday, November 01, 2005

Of Right or Might

Here is the test again where men have comfort, convenience, or expedience to measure against truth. All complain about the shackles of debt and the unfair advantage of the banker, but none will turn their head from the glamour of this empty promise. The tyrant is always in a death struggle since he has not God or nature on his side. His offense is ever present and his only hope of non-discovery is to charm you into a slumber. Stolen resources purchase might, but can never obtain the power of right. History is replete with examples of men who know the power of virtue, the cost of freedom, and the inherent weakness of all tyrants: lust. One voice can avenge the tyrant whose deathly fear unwinds him. Success or failure depends always on divine providence and the coherency of the victim. Today Dorean called the tyrant out, sent a death warrant to his agents, and bugled out the revelry to all who slumber. We exposed his weakness, bore the brunt of his wrath and your opportunity to revolt to freedom is now. Do you suppose Homer Simpson will save you during a commercial? What is your hope, some act of congress? T.I.L.A. and R.E.S.P.A. were victories for the banker’s token gifts from their justices. Their crimes now limited to small fines instead of jury awards; bought another decade of slumber their greatest reward. Will you crucify us and ask for the murderer to be freed? It’s been done before. If we unite we can pry the bag of gold from their hand and return it to our posterity. Get a grip or let it slip!


son of a prophet said...



November 01, 2005 ... last friday night i got a call i did not expect ... it came from my long time good friend Alex Merklinger ... host of the world wide show "mysteries of the mind" ... he said that friday would be his last nightly radio show for some time and would i come on for one last visit ... of course i said yes and we talked about the upcoming plan that i am working on to create a new Federal District and flush Washington DC down the political toilet ... to eliminate the CIA (the police force of the IMF world bank) and create the constitutional monetary system and eliminate the Federal Reserve phony banking system with its debt fake money reserve notes and eliminate individual income taxes and revert back to a constitutional USA ... where what a man or woman earned they got to keep ... life liberty and the pursuit of happiness ... the way the founding fathers intended it and to eliminate the crook-fest of professional politicians ... and finally to replace the banker appointed supreme court with a truly constitutional supreme court ... then we said good evening and i promised the audience that i would continue to do my work and carry on with my weekly radio show and science work ... it makes me feel like the lone ranger out here but i trust alex will be back one day stronger and better than ever ... let me say for all of you that we need more people like alex merklinger in this world ... jim mccanney


Peanut Gallery said...

What the hell does that mean?

Peanut Gallery said...

Not your post son of a prophet, Kurts

son of a prophet said...


we know that sometimes guys with b---s get them cut off.

JFK tried to do same thing as you.

Peace of Yeshua be with you.

tcob247 said...

"Today Dorean called the tyrant out, sent a death warrant to his agents, and bugled out the revelry to all who slumber."

Sir, could you kindly tell us how you accoplished this?


"We exposed his weakness, bore the brunt of his wrath and your opportunity to revolt to freedom is now."

Would you mind telling us what you are talking about?
You are speaking in code obviously


Starfish Prime said...

Democrats Force Senate Into Iraq Meeting

By LIZ SIDOTI, Associated Press Writer 9 minutes ago

Democrats forced the Republican-controlled Senate into an unusual closed session Tuesday, questioning intelligence that President Bush used in the run-up to the war in Iraq and accusing Republicans of ignoring the issue.

"They have repeatedly chosen to protect the Republican administration rather than get to the bottom of what happened and why," Democratic leader Harry Reid said.

Taken by surprise, Republicans derided the move as a political stunt.

"The United States Senate has been hijacked by the Democratic leadership," said Majority Leader Bill Frist. "They have no convictions, they have no principles, they have no ideas," the Republican leader said.

In a speech on the Senate floor, Reid demanded the Senate go into closed session. The public was ordered out of the chamber, the lights were dimmed, and the doors were closed. No vote is required in such circumstances.

Reid's move shone a spotlight on the continuing controversy over intelligence that President Bush cited in the run-up to the war in Iraq. Despite prewar claims, no weapons of mass destruction have been found in Iraq, and some Democrats have accused the administration of manipulating the information that was in their possession.

Vice President Dick Cheney's chief of staff, I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby, was indicted last Friday in an investigation that touched on the war, the leak of the identity of a CIA official married to a critic of the administration's Iraq policy.

"The Libby indictment provides a window into what this is really all about, how this administration manufactured and manipulated intelligence in order to sell the war in Iraq and attempted to destroy those who dared to challenge its actions," Reid said before invoking Senate rules that led to the closed session.

Libby resigned from his White House post after being indicted on charges of obstruction of justice, making false statements and perjury.

Democrats contend that the unmasking of Valerie Plame was retribution for her husband, Joseph Wilson, publicly challenging the Bush administration's contention that Iraq was seeking to purchase uranium from Africa. That claim was part of the White House's justification for going to war.

Sen. Trent Lott (news, bio, voting record), R-Miss., said Reid was making "some sort of stink about Scooter Libby and the CIA leak."

A former majority leader, Lott said a closed session was appropriate for such overarching matters as impeachment and chemical weapons — the two topics that last sent the senators into such sessions.

In addition, Lott said, Reid's move violated the Senate's tradition of courtesy and consent. But there was nothing in Senate rules enabling Republicans to thwart Reid's effort.

As Reid spoke, Frist met in the back of the chamber with a half-dozen senior GOP senators, including Intelligence Committee Chairman Pat Roberts of Kansas, who bore the brunt of Reid's criticism. Reid said Roberts reneged on a promise to fully investigate whether the administration exaggerated and manipulated intelligence leading up to the war.

Inside the Senate, Democrats sought assurances that Roberts would hold hearings into prewar intelligence. The Senate had been considering a budget bill when it went into closed session.

Starfish Prime said...


Clueless Fudd said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
son of a prophet said...

apologies for the incorrect spelling of jim mccanneys site.

it is "jmccanneyscience.com"

I left out one of the two "n" s in his site address.


tcob247 said...

Bill Frist and Trent Lott are right

mogel said...

Below is some correspondence I received today from the Plaintiff's law firm concerning a class action lawsuit that has been ongoing for over 3 years now & which I was an injured party of about 25,000 people. This class action lawsuit involves about 250 Million dollars in fraud (small in comparison to what some people claim Dorean took in), concerning a company that represented many things that were simply untrue, one claim being that they had a valid e-currency that was backed by real gold. Here is part of the letter to me today from the Class Action's lawsuit Plaintiff's attorney:

"In any event, your claim has not been directly impacted by any ruling in this case, including the one you cite. As you will recall, you filed your claim late and the Court denied our Motion to have you joined as an additional Plaintiff. Accordingly, you are free to commence a new lawsuit against the One Groupe Defendants, if you so choose. As we originally advised you when your entry to this case was denied, we urge you again to proceed with haste to bring a new case against those Defendants, if you are so inclined. (Please see my prior email to you of December, 2004 and attached Memo - WHICH YOU ACKNOWLEDGED BY A RESPONSE).

Even though we do not represent you or your claim in this case, we thought a response to your email was in order, GIVEN THE INCORRECT CLAIMS YOU HAVE MADE THEREIN. We wish you all the best in pursuing your losses against One Groupe and OSGold, should you decide to do so.

A. John P. Mancini
Mayer, Brown, Rowe & Maw, LLP
1675 Broadway
New York, NY

What caught my eye about this letter are several things. The attorney points out a fact that he no longer represents me which is true. Even though that agency relationship was terminated, he STILL felt a need to respond since he said "that was in order" due to the "incorrect claims I had made" in a previous email. How many incorrect claims are made in the Dorean Presentment? According to the banks it's ALL a crock & everything is untrue. In other words, even an untrue presentment needs to be responded to.

How many times has Kurt said that when an agency relationship is created, it IS MANDATORY THAT THE PARTIES IN THE RELATIONSHIP RESPOND WHEN CONTRACT ISSUES ARE IN DISPUTE? How many times have you heard proponents of the banks say, that when the Dorean presentment is sent out, the lender has NO OBLIGATION to even respond?

Mr. Mancini, is no longer my agent, but still felt a NEED TO RESPOND. How much MORE important is it to respond to legal issues when a clear agency relationship exists like an alleged borrower and a lender?

Then the attorney cited an email that I had received & responded to, basically saying my response was an ACKNOWLEGEMENT of the attorney's advise for me to proceed quickly to file my claim. In other words, the lawyer wanted me to understand that "time is of the essence", since he didn't want me to say I wasn't warned. The Dorean presentment gives the lender 10 days to respond to the complaint saying that "time is of the essence" or that all charges against the lender will be concluded as true due to a nonresponse & certain conditions will follow if ignored like Legal Title taken away & a power of attorney relationship created.

Mr. Mancini's letter to me suggests that attorneys do understand this doctrine of "agency by estoppel", or "agency by silence," or "agency by default" or an understanding of a contract created simply by nothing being rebutted through silence or neglect. Mr. Mancini didn't want my unfounded accusations against their law firm to be concluded as being true by their silence, so he quickly denied them & supported foundation and evidence why my allegations weren't true.

Why then, do the banks remain silent? Could it be that they can't argue their case because all of the accusations in the affidavit of truth are true? It doesn't matter if the banks respond anyway, since their silence is an admittance of their fraud anyway as per the conditions of the presentment. Either way the lenders are turkeys & they are cooked. So yes, Kurt does have the winning hand.


mogel said...

How important are procedural violations in a Court case? How many precedural violations have been violated against Kurt & Scott already? It only takes one mistake to make a difference sometimes in the momentum of the war. Just read the previous blog posts on the many mistakes made by the bad guys against the Dorean Group. They are numerous. Here is a battle won, BEATING A SUMMARY JUDGMENT, but not the war, by the bad guys in a Court case due to a simple procedural violation of the good guys. You see the sword cuts both ways for those that don't believe in Dorean's chances of victory.

I guess what is disheartening is that certain simple so called facts were determined 3 years later after the case was initially filed by the Good Guy Plaintiffs that there was some "proof of service" issue problems. How do you make such simple mistakes when so much money is at stake? Even high powered law firms sometimes make these procedural type of mistakes.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- x
-against- 02 Civ. 8993 (LAK)
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- x
LEWIS A. KAPLAN, District Judge.
On July 26, the Court denied plaintiffs' motion for the entry of
default judgments
against six defendants on the ground that no evidence of record
indicated that a copy of the summons
had been served on them. The Court ordered plaintiffs to show cause
why the action should not be
dismissed for failure to serve a summons. In their response, which
was untimely, plaintiffs consent
to dismissal of the complaint as against two of the defendants,
Frank Zuchristian and Pecunix, Inc.
They argue that service on the other four defendants -- One Groupe
International, Inc., OSGold.com,
OSOpps.com, and David C. Reed (collectively "Core defendants") --
was effective or, in the
alternative, that they should be afforded an opportunity to cure the
defects in service.
Rule 4
Service of process in the federal system requires service of a
summons, in the manner

Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(c)(1); accord Omni Capital Int'l v. Rudolf Wolff &
Co., 484 U.S. 97, 103
(1987) ("Before a federal court may exercise personal jurisdiction
over a defendant, the
procedural requirement of service of summons must be satisfied.").
in attempting to effect service.14
Here, plaintiffs have not proven that defendants had actual notice
or concealed a
defect in service. Moreover, their failure to effect serve appears
to have been the result of
inadvertence or mistake on the part of counsel. "[I]f the Rules are
The requirement under Rule 4 that "a summons shall be served
together with a copy of the
complaint" is unambiguous. Based upon their own inadvertence or
mistake, plaintiffs failed to do

For the foregoing reasons, the action is dismissed as against
defendants One Groupe
International, Inc., OSGold.com, OSOpps.com, and David C. Reed, for
failure to make service, and
as against defendants Frank Zuchristian and Pecunix, Inc. by consent.
Dated: August 15, 2005

Ace said...

Starfish, Maybe Kurt is not answering a lot of the clients questions because if he did it would give the enemy some info to use against him in the upcoming court case. Keep your fingers crossed and lets see where the court case goes.

Ace said...

son of a prophet, I listen to Alex Merklingers archived shows. I wonder whats going on with him being off the air for "some time". I think his wife is in the hospital. Too bad, he has a great show.

Ace said...

son of a prophet, Your right about Kennedy. Printing those United Stated Notes was a death warrant for him. JFK had no protection from above. He was screwing so many women that his guardian angel put in for a job transfer. Lets hope McCanney is not doing the same. On the other hand Andrew Jackson also tossed the bankers out but when their assassin pulled the triggers on his guns they both misfired and Jackson lived to a ripe old age. What a difference a lifestyle can make!

hvm said...

Hi: ##Name## I was just going about trying to find the latest information on Promissory note, when I came to your site, and even though, Of Right or Might, is not quite what I was searching for, it did get my attention. I now see why when I was looking for Promissory note, related information It led me here. Good to be able find out about this. Thanks for the info.

mogel said...

At the time of Christ, the Jews were anticipating a Saviour to free them from physical & political bondage. They could not understand the spiritual freedom that Christ offered, so they REJECTED his message of truth. The people even had the choice to free Jesus from a death by crucifixion that was pronounced by governmental decree. Pontias Pilate in honoring a Jewish tradition had the right to free & pardon a captor from prison on a given day of the year. Unfortunately, the majority of the people turned against Christ & picked Barabbus,a well known murderer, as being the most popular person they preferred to be freed.

Popular ideas are not the same as truth. If it is popular for the government to condone theft & even saction and protect it, it still doesn't make it right. Who will you pick? Barabbus or Kurt? The choice is there for all the clients? He is fighting the wrongful "mortgage", the term meaning, "death grip", in Latin. Who will you crucify or who will you support when the going gets tough? Are you going to let go & give up? Remember, even Jesus at one time was so popular that even the governmental & ecclesiastical authorities were even afraid to have him arrested or mocked during the daylight hours. They had to arrest him at night due to his immense popularity. Course Jesus's popularity also wained toward the end of his life to the point where most people consciously let go.

Like Christ, Kurt's popularity isn't what is use to be due to all of the bad publicity & misunderstandings of the power of Kurt's message & mission, if you will. Do you think Jesus was misunderstood? The people turned against him simply because they expected the wrong things & did misunderstand his mission & Jesus's time table of things & his message, yet he had what the people needed for a better life. Don't make the same historical mistake.

Victory is not far away, is the most important thing to remember, so don't let go. Every wrongful criticism made is a form of letting go of that grip you have on the gold prize.


son of a prophet said...

A couple of notes....

I also have been listening to Merklinger for a while. Didnt know that his wife was in the hospital. Hope she gets well if she is there.

I have been listneing to McCanney for a few years now. I dont believe that he would be involved in the same things that JFK was. Just my opinion. He seems like a real 'straight shooter' but we must remember taht the Holy Spirit is to be our only real guide as those who are actively trying to better this world are de facto trying to bring in the 'Millenial Kindom' which we know that the bible says will be a false one.

Now I am not saying that they should not try to bring it in, just that it will be a false peace. Again, this is satans Kindom and always will be until Yeshua returns. Also, as evil starts to see his own losing the battle to good, evil will begin to go with a winner, as everyone else does and will seek to infiltrate good from the inside.

We must remeber that govts. are the ministers of God. Again, I am not saying that govts. are good. In fact, I beleve that they are evil and run by satan. Nonetheless, they are still Gods ministers to carry out judgement, like the Iraq war, which is an ablsolute fraud, but which many thousnds of years ago God decalered judgement on the Babylonians and here it is and good ole' USA is carrying it out. Gods minister of judgment. Of course, the judge itself is evetually judged, as in Habbakkuk, when the prophet asked God why God sent the Chaldeans after them whose horses were swifter than leopards, to which God replied (paraphrased)..."dont worry, I am going to take care of them (later), BUT first, (because you have turned away form me) I am going to use them to take care of
YOU! H'asta L'vista, Baby!

More info from a trusted source regarding what Mogel said....

"I quite unexpectedly received a chat this morning from a gentleman from outside of the USA who belongs to an organization of apparently great power and one of their endeavors is righting wrongs done by governments. They have jurisdiction in many different countries he says. I'm still not sure why he chose me to converse with. I guess it was because he knew I was the liason between you and Randy and to suggest for me to try and help out for just a little while so his wife an kids have groceries until this is all cleared up. It goes to show you we are being watched by many we are not even aware of and the name of the game is to keep your nose clean. If the holy spirit is within you, you do that anyway because of your love for the Saviour, not because you feel you have to. It's part of the sanctification process. Anyway, this guy tells me that Randy has been dealt a great wrong, they have been investigating this case and that charges against him were simply not true and they are going to clean up this mess, and soon, perhaps by the end of this month. He says you may see reimbursements as soon as mid Dec instead of a year from now, and they probably won't be coming from any receiver. He wouldn't tell me exactly who they were and told me I could not share much of our communication with you but to let you know there is light at the end of the tunnel, this thing is taking a turn for the positive, and that they ARE taking care of this injustice behind the scenes. I WAS able to communicate with Randy today afterwards to verify if what I had heard was true or it was just a hoax call of some kind. I get quite a few nasty emails over this item, calling me a low life and how I work for the devil and all. It was refreshing to get an uplifting communication for once. Randy told me it was true but he could not talk about it AT ALL. I haven't seen him in such good spirits in a long time, especially considering the government has finally got him where they wanted him and confiscated or frozen every asset he owns. He said he had a prophetic dream or vision about this some time ago, that this is how it would all get resolved. You have to understand his history. His father is a pastor. He has done all these things with discernment and prayer. I have prayed with him over the phone. If he has a fault it is trusting other people who are not honest, especially upper echelon banking people. I know for a fact the things Crown Inc was funded into were legitimate businesses. I have a whole notebook full of the companies and what they did to make the money for us. Greed and theft of large sums of money is what this was all about. I don't think they are going to get away with it. They picked on the wrong person. Yahweh protects his people that do His will. Randy had several humanitarian projects underway these funds were needed for. He wasn't playing David Reed (I've got an update on him too in this letter) and building mansions in Cancun with the money

Peace of Yeshua be with you.

tcob247 said...

yes mogel

Kurt is just like Jesus

midwesttoo said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
midwesttoo said...

it seems the pattern of injustice continues...
"77-Year Old Schiff Being Tortured
With Chain Shackles, Mistreatment"
October 31,2005

son of a prophet said...

Is this what its coming to??


Law Might Have Effect of Creating A "Torture Czar" Cabinet Level Position

> The Senate amendment to the new Defense Appropriations Act would
> explicitly prohibit the U.S. government from subjecting those in its
> custody to cruel, inhumane, or degrading treatment or punishment.
> It's pretty straightforward stuff. Yet despite a rousing 90-9 vote
> for its passage, there are still dark forces at work trying to subvert
> the intent of this measure, the language of which must survive the
> conference committee in the House of Representatives.
> If the morality perverters have their way, there will be a carve-out
> to exempt the CIA from this prohibition. They are seeking this with
> the express knowledge that sadists (acting under the color of CIA
> authority) have been responsible for the horrific abuses which made
> necessary further action and clarification of existing law. This
> exemption would in fact turn the measure on its head to AUTHORIZE
> torture by a particular agency, diametrically contrary to the
> amendment's intent. They might as well appoint a "Torture Czar" and make it a cabinet level position.
> Actually, for all practical purposes we already have a torture czar . . .
> it's the Vice President of the United States, Dick Cheney. Yes, it is
> Cheney himself who is PERSONALLY pressuring the conference committee
> to rescind the McCain amendment in this way (just as he was pressuring
> CIA analysts in the cooking of the justification for war with Iraq).
> It has been Cheney himself who has taken a lead role from the
> beginning, talking in 2002 about the need to revive the "dark arts."
> Since they could no longer keep the abuses at Guantanamo and Abu
> Ghraib and elsewhere classified, they have prosecuted a couple of
> selected patsies for these crimes, while their agency handlers right
> up through the chain of command have continued in their unconscionable ways.
> This is not to let the president himself off the hook. In the first
> place there is Bush's own overreaching lust for absolute dictatorial power.
> Indeed, his longtime attorney and ally, Alberto Gonzales, put his name
> on the infamous Jan 25, 2002 memo, referring to the Geneva convention
> as "quaint." But what many people do not realize is that the heart of
> that reprehensible legal pretzel job was drafted by David Addington,
> the staff attorney closely associated with Dick Cheney. And would
> anybody like to guess Mr. Addington's current title in the White
> House? That's right. He just replaced the indicted "Scooter" Libby as Cheney's Chief of Staff.
> There isn't a "talking head" out there not drinking their own "talking
> points Kool-Aid" who believes the Fitzgerald investigation is remotely
> close to being finished. If anything, the allegations in the Libby
> indictment, which identify Cheney as the one who specifically advised
> Libby that Valerie (Plame) Wilson worked under the covert wing of the
> CIA, suggest that the Vice President is at least one of the big game
> that the Special Counsel is still pursuing. The tight-lipped Fifth
> Amendment-type reactions given by Cheney in the aftermath of the
> indictment to explain his own role in the leak scandal do nothing to dispel the intrigue.
> Instead the administration is circling the torture-advocate wagons
> even tighter with the promotion of Addington, while the shadow of
> Traitorgate continues to darken over their heads.
> Especially now, with the chickens of treason coming home to roost in
> the nest of the chicken hawks themselves, this is the last time in
> history for the authors of torture as official American policy to be
> allowed to push for largesse for even wider atrocities. We must all
> immediately contact our senators and members of the House of
> Representative who might have influence on the conference committee to
> demand that the overwhelmingly approved language of the McCain
> amendment remain intact in the final Defense Appropriations Bill.
> ACTION FORM: http://www.nocrony.com/no_torture.htm (McCain Amendment)
> We must also recognize that this is profoundly related to the
> selection of a replacement for Harriet Miers as Supreme Court nominee.
> Remember -- one of the talking points of the neocons (before they
> turned on her for not being sufficiently and demonstrably loyal to
> their causes) was that she would support the president's policies in the deceptively dubbed "war on
> terror." But the universal common denominator of all Bush appointees is
> their submissive endorsement of the unlimited expansion of the
> president's power to do whatever he likes in defiance of Congress and
> even the people themselves.
> In his own confirmation hearing Roberts refused to say (among other
> things) whether the Congress would have the power to stop a war if the
> president ignored their authority. That case might come before him,
> he argued, as if he knew something we didn't. And it most certainly
> will if Bush is not stopped from making any more such appointments.
> Roberts and his ilk will not legislate from the bench (as if that were
> the boogie man to be feared). No, instead they will UN-legislate from
> the bench, perhaps even to remove the McCain language from American
> law by court order on the grounds that it would interfere with the
> power of the president to play God. Remember also that in his first
> day on the bench of the high court Roberts left the sheep's clothing
> in his chambers to ask aggressively why they should not overturn the
> TWICE-expressed will of the people in the Oregon "Right to Die" case.
> For all of these reasons we must demand that the next nominee to the
> Supreme Court be a true moderate and a true nonpartisan. One of the
> truly beautiful things about Special Counsel Patrick Fitzgerald is
> that the American people can look at his work and agree that it will
> be based entirely on the facts and the law. Even opposing attorneys
> of those he has indicted must concede that he is unwavering in his
> fairness and his integrity, favoring neither side by any inherent
> bias. We can demand no less from the next justice to be appointed to the Supreme Court.
> ACTION FORM: http://www.nocrony.com/no_conservative.htm (Supreme
> Court)
> If we all speak out, we can remove the Vice President from his
> position as the torture czar. It's not as if he doesn't have enough
> other black hats to wear; he's already serving in the capacity of treason czar as it is.
> Sheriff Fitzgerald is working on that last one. The rest is up to we
> the people.
> Please take action NOW, so we can win all victories that are supposed
> to be ours, and forward this message to everyone else you know.
> If you would like to get alerts like these, you can do so at
> http://www.usalone.com/in.htm
> Or if you want to cease receiving our messages, just use the function
> at http://www.usalone.com/out.htm

The measure of a society/civilisation is determined by how its treats the worst of its inhabitants.

If this is true, then we are all doomed (in this life, anyway) as our future hope, Yeshua comes soon.


son of a prophet said...

More good stuff from McCanney....

"buy your gas at CITCO ... all the money goes to venezuela to help their poor through government programs of Hugo Chavez ... they have a nationalized oil industry ... Mexico nationalized their oil industries back in the 70's when i was living there creating PEMEX and throwing out the US oil corporations ... and now they are the 5th largest exporter in the world ... so part of my plan of replacing washington DC is to nationalize the oil industry in the USA ... oil is a natural resource and this program where the gov divies up the resources to its friends and their corporate buddies has to be a thing of the past ... the oil profits and savings must go to the public ... not the rich oil pigs who had the largest profits EVER in the past 3 months ... pure profiteering off of "natural disasters" ... illegal under current federal law ... yes ... "natural disasters" created by the same band of thugs under the watchful eyes of congress and the oil pres ... yes they are ALLLL in on it ... that is why the ALLLL have to GO ... remember ... buy your gas at CITCO stations and boycott american oil companies ... i recently found out from an insider that gasoline as it leaves the refineries in the gas truck is 37 cents a gallon ... the gas stations make a few cents per gallon ... so why are we paying $2.50 per gallon ... gasoline today in Venezuela is 16 cents per gallon at the pumps (RETAIL) ... cheaper than water ... you do the math ... venezuela offered their vast supply to the USA after Katrina and guess what ... the US response was an assassination attempt on Hugo Chavez ... jim mccanney

P.S. i have located the land for the new Federal District and am in progress at securing it for the upcoming election ... am now looking at a date of May 15, 2006 to hold full scale national all paper ballot elections to replace washington DC ... more information to come soon ... this is real and it is going to happen ... so get ready and tell your friends ... what will happen to Washington DC ??? ... we will change its name to remove association from George Washington our great founding father and let it set there as an ever present reminder to greed and unbridled capitalism ... remember that we are invoking the giant red reset button to return to a constitutional USA ... more information to come soon ... put MAY 15, 2006 on your calendars and get ready to vote ... jim mccanney

November 02, 2005 update ... today as i saw the headlines and also continue to get feedback from all corners of the USA in support of my work to create a new federal district and eliminate washington DC and all the cockroaches that infest it ... it brought back memories of people in latin america when i lived there telling me first hand accounts of the good ole days in Havana before castro ... when the CIA and Mafia could mingle freely and plan their corruption uninhibited by US law ... yes drug smuggling, money laundering, prostitution, manipulating international governments and politics, educating terrorists and thugs to infiltrate and take over every country of the world and ... oh yes ...those warm Havana nights where the CIA and Mob boys would go down town dressed in their white suites and hats after a hard day of fishing marlin in their government purchased yachts ... yes in lovely old Havana under US control ... to have some good ole fashioned american fun ... like hauling young girls out of the country side to have them tied down to a table so donkeys could have sex with them in front of an audience of rum drunken cuban cigar smoking CIA and Mob boys ... yes these were the good ole days ... when i see the picture of Che Guevara and Fidel sitting in the back of one of the CIA boys mega yachts smoking cigars the day after the revolution it has always made me smile... remember that the entire country of cuba supported them for months in the mountains as they raised their little army and trained them ... it also makes me glad that the CIA got their butts thrown out of a country ... for good ... the USA spin press has always painted castro as a bad guy ... unamerican ... but he gave dignity and self respect to one of the poorest nations in the western hemisphere ... words you don't hear much in the good ole USA anymore ... he gave them medical and dental treatment so now cuba has one of the best medical programs in the western hemisphere ... where they are self sufficient ... and yes they are still poor by western standards ... and now today's headline read ... US gives aid to cuba after Hurricane Wilma (that manipulated storm that sat for 3 days off the west end of cuba ... HMMM !!!??? .... then sped over florida and up the eastern atlantic coast at 52 miles per hour !!!) ... the story continued that this would hopefully begin a "US surge to bring democracy to cuba" ... ... ya you betcha ... good ole IMF and the CIA and US spin press already at work trying to make it sound soooo "american" and good ... and after that terrible castro is gone ... sounds like the CIA boys just won't give it a rest ... after all it was a pretty big embarrassment to have their lousy asses thrown out of a second rate caribbean nation by a small band of "rebels" (now they would call them terrorists or dissidents) dressed in second hand uniforms ... then also in the headlines today was the story of the assassination of a political leader in the mid-east raising tensions between Lebanon and Syria ... this of course had the stamp of CIA all over it ... with condy rice and the USA riding in the their white horse "to uphold justice" ... leading the UN security counsel to bring pressure on Lebanon (who by the way is not complying with US interests in the Iraq conflict ... ) ... standard fare for the CIA ... to create the conflicts around the globe that "promote the interests of the USA" ... whether it is a bombing in bali, cocaine trafficking from columbia, heroine trafficking from afghanistan or an assassination in the mideast ... don't you feel safer tonight knowing the CIA is still hard at work around the globe" ... jim mccanney

tcob247 said...

it's getting wacky in here

now we got the CIA tying down Cuban girls so donkeys can have sex with them and Castro the savior coming in and rescueing them from the ugly Americans

We manipulated that hurricane to stay over Cuba huh


Seen it in Utah said...

I just checked the court website--your heroes are now scheduled for a preliminary hearing on December 20 for the Utah charges. No mention of them being shipped out or charges being dropped.

Can you believe it? Another promise of Kurt's not coming true?

mogel said...

TCOB247: You completely missed the point. If you liken your life to parallel's of someone else's life, this doesn't make you JUST LIKE THE OTHER PERSON, nor did I say that. Nor does Kurt likening his own struggles to a greater life, make him a martyr or a Saint, Kurt's own interpretation of himself by the way. Maybe you missed that point, an important point by the way. Go back & read the previous posts by Kurt that makes this point PERFECTLY CLEAR to most people. Why must you twist words to pervert meanings of what is intended to be communicated? I don't do that to you. Would you prefer to communicate, and be understood, or would you prefer to just create negativity and alienation? Do you practice the "golden rule"? If you send out negativity towards a good cause, should you expect negativity to come back in your own life's struggles? Do you have need of any support in your own spiritual & financial endeavors? Or are you an island unto yourself where you don't need direction or God in your life?

Kurt is fighting the good fight. It's a spiritual fight as well as a financial battle. Is that really something that should be mocked? Can you really discern someone else's heartful intentions? Would you prefer Kurt give up, like apparently you have already done so your criticism is justified? However, you still hang around on this blog for some reason unknown to most people? Would you prefer to be right or would you prefer to be financially blessed? Kind of a stupid question, huh? Or is it really? Your behaviour & your choice of words and the side you choose, and your faith, define who you really are.


imbigo said...

Amen to that!!!

Very Nice Mogel!

BIG"O" 1+1+1=1


mogel said...

Seen It In Utah: Isn't it a fact that Kurt & Scott were shipped out to CA and faced the Federal Court on November 1, 2005, so if it wasn't mentioned on the Utah docket of their transfer to CA, is that ommission relevant enough to come to a CERTAIN conclusion?
December 20, 2005 isn't here yet, is it, so how can you ascertain that a promise has been broken if the word, "promise" is the correct word here? Kurt believes that The State of Utah has yielded their position to the Federal Court. How is a belief tantamount to to a promise? Since when do beliefs based upon certain actual occurances or events, become promises of a person that one should be judged by you? Do courts ever have continuances? Do Courts ever cancel hearings on a docket? Are you counting your chickens before they hatch & having a celebration party already?