Would you trust a snake that bit you (5/12/06)

The antitoxins to the poisonous snakebite is of the same nature. In fact it is a poison to the poison. In math 2 negatives make a positive. The mortgage poison has certain relationships. First there is an asset introduced called a note. Then an agency relationship is created by its transfer. (Not title only possession) Generally some mortgage broker but can include a bank employee. He then creates a trust by deposit with a 3rd party. Now the poison seeps into the bite they just took out of you. The broker agent in his dual capacity conspires with one side to enrich himself and conflicts with your interest. Non-disclosure hides the deposit and successful funding of your financial asset. He now seeks a pledge of property (real-estate) to further enhance his self-enrichment and the assets of his co-conspirator. After pledge also known as a chose-in-action a servicing fee is the next booty. Legal title is then moved to the creditor and equitable title remains vested with the debtor in possession. Of course this is all presumed and not factual. Do you really think it was an accident that Dorean used the same toxins to cure the bite. We used a trust / fiduciary relationship, title change, chose-in-action, pledge and agency. Even Carm Kidd could recognize the fruit from this tree of knowledge of good and evil. The serpentine path had many turns but only one goal.