Thursday, June 15, 2006

The Clerk’s Tale

Chaucer in one of his Canterbury Tale’s made a thought provoking scenario in the Clerk’s Tale, a young women of poverty married a cruel Lord. One who tried and tested her very unnecessarily. Regardless she was always faithful. How much more for those who serve the kind Lord of Christ. Who are we as vessels to say to the potter “why have you made me without handles?” Can that which is formed question he who does the forming? I don’t like my test, trial and current circumstance but I know my Lord kind. Do you really think the $3,000 you think you lost is turning heaven upside down? Maybe its worse, and you’ve lost home and reputation. When can you say with knowledge you have a cruel Lord? When can you say He is not in control? Perhaps we forget from what low estate we come from. Maybe our hearts have lost our first love. Is He not wise to chastise us as loved children that rebellion not enter our hearts again? Do your words give away your true state? I’m asking myself can I tame my soul to respect and trust my Lord solely on His reputation when the trial is painful? Read this tale and see what you would do. I had to repent and recalibrate: “Not my will Lord but Thine.” It is the only way we are better than the evil ones that attack us.

15 comments:

whyudothat said...

Flying Gringo said...
I just read on Pacer that guilty pleas were entered on 6/13/06. Anyone know what that's about??


gringo, this is just speculation, but it is probably a conditional guilty plea, meaning the govt has to accept other things if it is to accept the guilty pleas, just a guess.

mogel said...

"I’m asking myself can I tame my soul to respect and trust my Lord solely on His reputation when the trial is painful?"

YES, YOU SURELY CAN AND WILL.

neodemes said...

Teach me, O LORD, the way of thy statutes;
and I shall keep it unto the end.

Give me understanding, and I shall keep thy law;
yea, I shall observe it with my whole heart.

Make me to go in the path of thy commandments;
for therein do I delight.

Incline my heart unto thy testimonies,
and not to covetousness.

Psalm 119:33-36 KJV

imbigo said...

whyudothat said...
Flying Gringo said...
I just read on Pacer that guilty pleas were entered on 6/13/06. Anyone know what that's about??


gringo, this is just speculation, but it is probably a conditional guilty plea, meaning the govt has to accept other things if it is to accept the guilty pleas, just a guess.

7:47 PM

I say again its the KURT JOHNSON and SCOTT HIENEMAN (STRAWMAN) NOT Kurt Johnson and Scott Hieneman (HUMAN) THAT FILED THE GUILTY PLEE!

KYHOOYA said...

imbigo said...
whyudothat said...
Flying Gringo said...
I just read on Pacer that guilty pleas were entered on 6/13/06. Anyone know what that's about??

I say again its the KURT JOHNSON and SCOTT HIENEMAN (STRAWMAN) NOT Kurt Johnson and Scott Hieneman (HUMAN) THAT FILED THE GUILTY PLEE


Here's my two cents worth on it. My thought is that if the state accepts the Guilty Plee and it was presented with regard to the "Strawman" being the persentors then they have given life to the stawman as a valid property. This along with at the same time they have induced a difference between Scott H & Kurt J living and in so doing have to set standards for the court proceding to witch the jury or judge has to be instructed to follow (I say the jury more for the fact that JD Al-soupy has shown us that his dose what he want's & forget the rule's) as of the momment this court is beginning to look overly predictive about the course of action and is in fact looking to delay by unnessesary motion's no doubt guided by the dear Judge out of veiw of course.

I'll bet that any motion that the FED's bring up is quick to responce as if knowing what was coming.
I'm sure that he's no psychic or... maybe he has that old gypsy blood huh? Ya Right!

so in a nut shell this in my OP is KURT & SCOTT'S way to seperate the two even further for the court to show on record it see them as such.

Just my take on it could be wrong.
would'nt be the first time and sure wont be the last if I am.

ticktoc123 said...

More dribble - no substance.

dgwondering said...

Once again, the "strawman" BS has been ruled as such. The judge ruled that none of the filings they made had any bearing on the case.

mogel said...

Teach me, O LORD, the way of thy statutes;
and I shall keep it unto the end.

Give me understanding, and I shall keep thy law;
yea, I shall observe it with my whole heart.

Nemo said: "Make me to go in the path of thy commandments;
for therein do I delight.

Incline my heart unto thy testimonies,
and not to covetousness."

Psalm 119:33-36 KJV
____________________________

EXCELLENT WORDS NEMO. TOO BAD THE LENDERS AREN'T FOLLOWING GOD'S WORDS. LENDERS HAVE COVETED THE FREE LABOR OF THEIR SO CALLED BORROWERS AND HAVE COVETED UNJUST ENRICHMENT AND HAVE NOT FOLLOWED GOD'S LAWS. THE COMMANDMENT OF HAVING JUST WEIGHTS & MEASURES & NO USURY IS ALSO VIOLATED BY THESE EVIL MEN YET YOU & "FRUIT" SUPPORT THEIR BREAKING OF GOD'S COMMANDMENTS BY SUPPORTING THE WRONG SIDE & CRITICIZING GOD'S ANNOINTED. "IF YOU ARE NOT WITH ME, YOU ARE AGAINST ME," THUS SAITH THE LORD.

light1rae said...

Well said again mogel!

;)

Seen it in Utah said...

Pathetic excuses to try to justify breaking the law and scamming others. How is it, that even under your analysis, two wrongs make a right? How about turn the other cheek?

mogel said...

Blind in Utah said: "Pathetic excuses to try to justify breaking the law and scamming others. How is it, that even under your analysis, two wrongs make a right? How about turn the other cheek?"
_________________________________

ANOTHER BLIND JUDGE WHO ASSUMES THAT ALLEGATIONS ARE FACTS, THAT IF YOU ACCUSE SOMEONE OF FRAUD, IT AUTOMATICALLY BECOMES "BREAKING OF THE LAW" EVEN BEFORE THE VERDICT IS IN. THE ONLY ENTITIES THAT HAVE SCAMMED OTHERS ARE THE LENDERS & TITLE COMPANIES, WHOM YOU ARE A PART OF THAT PROUD GROUP. THE DOREAN GROUP WILL KEEP THEIR PROMISES IN THE END & DESPITE THE BAD BEHAVIOUR OF THE BANKS WHO HAVE COMMITTED MORE THAN 2 WRONGS. I OFFER NO EXCUSES, BUT ONLY GIVE YOU THE FACTS. TWO WRONGS DON'T MAKE A RIGHT. THAT IS YOUR INTERPRETATION. I BELIEVE IN TURNING THE OTHER CHEEK, BUT WHEN I RUN OUT OF CHEEKS, TO GIVE, I BELIEVE IN THE LAYING ON OF HANDS TOO. SOMETIMES THAT'S EVEN MORE EFFECTIVE AND SOMETIMES EVEN A BETTER BLESSING FOR SOME PEOPLE WHO TRULY NEED A WAKE UP CALL. YOU'LL GET THE SPIRIT SOON ENOUGH, JUST BE A LITTLE MORE PATIENT. NICE TO SEE THAT YOU FINALLY CRAWLED OUT FROM UNDER THER ROCK YOU CAME FROM. I WAS WONDERING WHERE YOU WENT?

Clueless Fudd said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
John Holmes - 16 in said...

Seen it in Utah said...
How about turn the other cheek?

i bet that you turn the other cheek for a second load on your face after the first dude finishes blowing a load on the first side...

neodemes said...

And therein lies the vile heart of the doreanite.

James Baker said...

Hi Friend! You have a great blog over here!
Please accept my compliments and wishes for your happiness and success!
If you have a moment, please take a look at my site:
loans center
It covers loans center related subjects.
Have a great day!