METHOD AND MEANS OF THE SCHEME TO DEFRAUD
16. BANKSTERS made claims of a security interest in property that was held in family estate trust to which the 3rd-party Plaintiffs were trustees. 3rd-party Plaintiffs as trustees had a legal and moral obligation to verify these claims. A bonded presentment was sent seeking the appropriate information for this purpose. No BANKSTER ever supplied verification. Trustees sought the original promissory note unaltered and in possession of the BANKSTERS. No promissory note existed in this condition. BANKSTERS never used their capital as consideration to purchase an interest in the financial asset (promissory note) of the trust. They only had an agency role to solicit bids, and offers from the commercial secondary markets for a sale called securitization. BANKSTERS also took on a fiduciary obligation by the deposit of financial asset into their depository in a personal account of the drawer. Never was this account exposed or disclosed. The funds were liquidated without the knowledgeable consent of the beneficiary, nor were they distributed to the beneficial interest. BANKSTERS breached their fiduciary obligation to enrich themselves by misstatements, fraud, and theft and breached their agency by conflicting into a servicing role with their coconspirators. They are in league with the government through its business enterprises known as FANNIE MAE, FREDDIE MAC, and GINNIE MAE. These companies use these stolen financial assets to justify the values of their stocks and bonds. All BANKSTERS apparently get some cut, kickback or financial incentive to maintain this securities fraud as the status quo. No rights, title or interest pass from the drawer to the end user or any of the mediators via these methods.
17. BANKSTERS advertise via all forms of media that they have monies to loan, knowing this to be false. They give the appearance that they are the creditor when all along its the alleged borrower / victim that is the creditor and not the debtor. Credit is the only commodity in the transaction and the maker of the promissory note is the creator and extender of credit.
18. The BANKSTERS use sophisticated double-speak contracts that deceptively hide the true nature of the consideration of the parties.
19. Incentives are offered to brokers and agents to perpetuate this fraud and to create conflicts.
20. Once the promissory notes are in their possession, securitized, or sold without a true transfer of rights, title, and interest a bogus security interest is placed upon the asset property of the maker.
21. Security interest are recorded upon the public record in the County of possession.
22. BANKSTERS have created a false record that title companies and recorders believe to be true.
23. BANKSTERS have purchased interest in most title companies and influenced most county governments by their creditor / debtor relationships.
24. When confronted by 3rd-party plaintiffs BANKSTERS used their financial influence to purchase favors from the judiciary specifically Mr. William Alsup who showed his loyalties by an over zealous reaction to 3rd-party plaintiff’s civil complaint; steep sanctions and referral for criminal prosecution. Incentives include, but are not limited to, retirement benefits, mortgages, bribes, and other indirect methods. It is clear the Northern District court is the best money can buy. Wayne Brazil issued warrants, tampered with evidence, entered pleas and purposefully tried to make the beneficiaries surety for the 3rd-party plaintiffs, which are Cestui Que Trusts. D. Lowell Jensen continued this known error in order to attach liabilities via unapplicable bank fraud statutes. Bernard Zimmerman after separating the parties in open court changed the record by stealth to remain in league with his peers and the BANKSTER’S agenda. Mr. Alsup took control over the criminal prosecution knowing his automatic disqualification by prior conflicts.
25. Prosecutors were given financial incentives, via retirement, career, loans, and cash. All were already in a fiduciary relationship with the Cestui Que Trust / 3rd-party plaintiffs. The incentives were substantial enough to cause them all to breach this duty, enrich themselves, and attempt to hide it all by destroying the victim, the only party who could make a claim for damages, the beneficiary of the trusts. They also knowingly tried to make the beneficiaries a surety for the trust, which they purposefully placed in dishonor as a delinquent creditor in the bankruptcy of the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.
26. BANKSTERS have conspired with VIOLATORS, FIDUCIARIES, AGENTS, FRAUDSTERS, and BROKERS to trespass upon the contracts and property of 3rd-party plaintiffs with the end goal being the conversions to their own use, enjoyment, and self-enrichment.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
3 comments:
Finally, finally, finally! Substance about mortgages and the scheme. However, this is old news. Why? Because we wouldn't have given the money and docs to you Kurt if we didn't already have some knowledge of this scheme.
So, now post on how and when you are going to finalize what you started, in my case, come July two years ago. You even had Dr. Fred get us on a conference call last November to tell us within the next 30 to 60 days. So now is the time to stick with substance, action and completion.
saw this on a website...
Quitclaim Deed
When sending in a quit claim deed, whether on property or credit card, who are all the people that I notice?
On a property, you send it to the one you borrowed the money from.
If another one is involved you send them a copy of it.
If there’s an attorney involved, send him a copy and send him a copy of the crimnal complaint. You will stop this. They don’t want to lose their bar card. I’d also send a copy to the sheriff. (10/1/03)
You said the bank cannot return my promissory note. How do I get it back after I quit claim the property?
They can’t get your house.
They can’t have both the promissory note and your house. They also won’t turn you in to the credit reporting agencies as a “bad pay.” Don’t DEED it back to them. A deed and a quit claim are different animals. With a deed, you lose everything. A quit claim just says “if I owe you anything, I’m giving it back to you.” (10/1/03)
When you quit claim your house back to the mortgage company and demand your note back, do you also demand all the payments you paid in to close the account?
Do it. I’m not going to say they will give it back, but they’re supposed to. When there’s fraud involved, they’re supposed to give everything back. That Ashley letter is going to sink their boat. (10/1/03)
Can you quit claim on your mortgage if you are not behind or in foreclosure?
Sure. (10/1/03)
We have visitors who would like to learn about quit claim deeds to protect their properties. Can you explain in detail.
As I see it, this is the way the foreclosure has to be done. Because you signed a contract, all the law of that deed of trust is in the contract. You can’t go outside of that and try to enforce any laws. No law can be brought in to your contracts. People are continually trying to go outside of that and do certain things. The first thing you have to do is deed back the property to the mortgage company – or to the one who gave you the money. If you don’t do it, you can’t charge them with fraud. Once you deed it back, you send a Bill of Demand where you demand back what you put into the contract, what you gave them. They cannot have both at the same time.
Don’t veer off the person you got the money from. What do they do with these mortgages? They sell them to someone else. What is that for? To get you confused as to who to go after. Say to them, you aren’t part of the property, you’re fired. Then demand back what you put into the contract. If they want the house, they have to give you the promissory note. They can’t have both. What they’re doing is taking the houses, taking the promissory note; they put insurance on the houses and they take the insurance also.
If you deed it back, you can go after them for fraud. Send them a bill of demand and tell them, "There’s fraud that has been done in this contract." Describe the contract. Fire the trustee for his incompetence for not telling you about the fraud involved in it. His name will be in your contract. Also file a criminal complaint against him for being an attorney and letting you get taken by the bank. Then send the company a copy of the Ashley letter. The fraud in this contract is you charged me interest on MY credit.
You cannot address that third party other than, “You’re Fired.” Stay with the first person you signed with. They are the ones liable to you. They are the ones who committed the fraud. Stay with them until they say, “OK you can keep the house.” If they let you keep the house, then tell them they can keep the promissory note. (10/16/03)
IRS CHECKMATED!???
IRS DISMISSES CASE WITH PREJUDICE BACAUSE IRS HAS BEEN USING BOGUS 1040 TAX FORMS FOR LAST 24 YEARS!!!
THIS IS B-I-G!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
http://www.givemeliberty.org
/RTP2/UPDATES/
Update2006-06-09.htm
Post a Comment