Thursday, June 08, 2006
Seriously
When I talk of quitting it is always from a teaching angle. It is not a possibility in reality. I got this assignment for this reason. Not because I’m great but the opposite. Any man who stands against evil is as great as another. Every man should be great but most sell themselves cheap. Those of you who encourage me to stay in the fight know I will. My life is not my own and my desires for it are well noted with one who is powerful, compassionate, and aware. My promise is ultimately beyond the threats of the feds and their keystone cops. I only address the naysayers for teaching content. I don’t take them serious. How could I? They tell me about God’s ways and condemn themselves in the same breath. Tell me I’m motivated by money and they have dedicated over a year to pissing and moaning about $3,000. They tell me I am outside Christ yet they only curse me without offering hope. That is just like Christ! Who wants to serve the Christ of their own making. I’ve studied the word 30 years. If their knowledge of scripture were wax they couldn’t hold a candle to what I’ve learned. I’ve learned to respect my pears, keep my mouth shut around those wiser, and to call out and expose the foolish pride of the adolescent. Truth is subjective by our experience but objective when it is the Word of God. I can tell the difference and separate both realities. My detractor cannot. I can also separate people who understand the significance of history in the making and those who have the history of insignificance. I know who I work for and the job I must do for their interest. No pressure or opinion will change that. I appreciate you all. Spread the word, get people talking. Our boast is on its way. People who come late to history will not fully appreciate it.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
25 comments:
Hey, maybe they'll get a jury of their pears.
Now, there is fruit for you.
LOL.
" When I talk of quitting it is always from a teaching angle. It is not a possibility in reality."
Yeah, no kidding.
Even if you don't want to listen, you're a captive audience.
"....you will know them by their vegetables!??...."
i have had enuoght fruit for a while thank you.
orages, apples, peers, bannansas, totmatos, papyas, ugghhhh....
how bout some borccoli?
--------------------------
so is zakowi REALLY ded this time??
seems they killed this guy at least 3 times and then he came back to life.
lets see if he stay ded this time?
of course, as someone pointed out, he really just a provocatur, just causing strife for iraq to fight against each other. prob a CIA asset (like bin-laden)
or maybe he come back to life agian?
maybe he have 9 lifes like a kat!?
Hey SOP
You know Zarkawi is on some beach laughing at this whole thing. They killed someone.
How could they have had fingerprints and DNA?
Was he ever in custody, or do you need to provide DNA/fingerprints if your working for the CIA or Al-Ciada?
u GO god.....
Pentagon sets its sights on social networking websites
New Scientist | June 9 2006
"I AM continually shocked and appalled at the details people voluntarily post online about themselves." So says Jon Callas, chief security officer at PGP, a Silicon Valley-based maker of encryption software. He is far from alone in noticing that fast-growing social networking websites such as MySpace and Friendster are a snoop's dream.
New Scientist has discovered that Pentagon's National Security Agency, which specialises in eavesdropping and code-breaking, is funding research into the mass harvesting of the information that people post about themselves on social networks. And it could harness advances in internet technology - specifically the forthcoming "semantic web" championed by the web standards organisation W3C - to combine data from social networking websites with details such as banking, retail and property records, allowing the NSA to build extensive, all-embracing personal profiles of individuals.
How could they have had fingerprints and DNA?
Was he ever in custody, or do you need to provide DNA/fingerprints if your working for the CIA or Al-Ciada?
Of corse!
Didnt they tell you that they got his fingerprints off a couple of things....
1) part of a half eaten fig he threw away
2) and part of some unexploded ordance left in a car
3) and as you have said, you need to get printed to work for CIA and buy explosive devices
some scary stuff....
http://www.arcticbeacon.com/
9-June-2006.html
You Know SOP
I'm not afraid of all this stuff. I'm only angry with the citizens of this nation, the ones that accept everything they are told hook line and sinker!
It is disheartning that educated people could be so gulable, and sheepish not to even question things that are so important to their lives .
It is a shame, and a shamm!
People look at a video that does notshow a plane crash of flight 93.
The government says, look there it is. Everyone says O.K.!
The goverment/media says, we kill Zaqawi and have fingerprints and DNA! Everyone says, Oh thank you for protecting us!
Can't they allow themselves only to ask, where the hell did his DNA come from, he's been on teh run for years. How could the CIA/FBI anyone have DNA evidence.
They say it was on file. WHAT! on file!
What idiots! Well your government believes your an idiot!
The banks have shown how much of an idiot you'll are for years. We finally try to do something about it and what do we get?
The naysayers say can we get F*&k a little bit harder!
My faith for the people of this once great nation is drendling every day!
dwindling
Al-Zarqawi: Dead US Government Agent
Jack Blood fills in for Alex Jones and is joined by Paul Joseph Watson and later Kurt Nimmo to discuss the death of Musab Al-Zarqawi and the bullet proof evidence that he was a Pentagon created boogeyman caricature use to take the fall for staged bombings in Iraq.
Related: Pentagon Jettisons US Agent Provocateur Al-Zarqawi
Problems listening to the audio? Play the audio directly in Real Player or download the video using the following link -
http://prisonplanet.tv/audio/080606watson.mp3
ok. zaakoweee is daid.
so, now who will be the next agent "provocatoon"?????
hey, oswami, you listing??
dun thinks you can hide.
we got you prints too fo when yo used to work fo us.
we gonna getcha!!!
(and you little dawg too!)
dont make any cell phone calls like those ppl on board the airplane did, unless you got youself a good satphone.
heheheheheeeeeeeee.........
FBI says, “No hard evidence connecting Bin Laden to 9/11”
June 6, 2006 – This past weekend, a thought provoking e-mail circulated through Internet news groups, bringing attention to the FBI’s Most Wanted Terrorist web page for Usama Bin Laden.[1] (See bottom of this web page for Most Wanted page) In the e-mail, the question is asked, “Why doesn’t Usama Bin Laden’s Most Wanted poster make any direct connection with the events of September 11, 2001?” The FBI says on its Bin Laden web page that Usama Bin Laden is wanted in connection with the August 7, 1998 bombings of the United States Embassies in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, and Nairobi, Kenya. According to the FBI, these attacks killed over 200 people. The FBI concludes its reason for “wanting” Bin Laden by saying, “In addition, Bin Laden is a suspect in other terrorists attacks throughout the world.”
http://www.teamliberty.net/id267.html
Mortgage demand dips as 30-year rate hits 4-year high of 6.66%
Are Bush and Condi having an affair? First Lady's telling behavior
High court trims whistleblower rights.
Horror in Haditha: Military probes massacre amid cries of cover-up
Witness claims Saddam 'victims' alive, case built on bribes
New STUNNING info from 9/11 Whistleblower: Richard Andrew Grove (Transcript / mp3)
UK Disarmed: Five years in prison if you are caught carrying a knife
Gagged librarians break silence on Patriot Act
Pentagon pressing for new rapid-strike weapon: report
WISCONSIN BANS FORCED HUMAN RFID CHIPPING
Hostile Takeover - The Corporate Control Of Society And Human Life
Soldiers to get life in jail for refusing to act as occupiers
North American Union to Replace USA?
_____________
Hey I didn't write this stuff! Does anyone question any of this?
http://jackblood.netfirms.com/home/
headline.html
Good Points Mogel
But ya know. These folk will never ever get it until they are stricken with an obstacle of injustice that puts they're very being in jeapardy!
Leave them to they're blindness
CONgress Steals Internet for BigCorps
Net neutrality - the concept of all sites on the web being equal? Forget about it. The big corptelecoms don't want you to be too free, Citizen. (You might question the "official story of 9/11, ask where all the gold in the basement went, why #7 fell over, and even spread rumors of election rigging! - can't have that, now, can we?) CONgress (bought and paid for, as we know) today sold out the internet to the corporate hijackers.
By the way, if you operate a web site, you might follow the trend by such outfits as the Council on Foreign Relations and CNN - and set up www2 and www3 prefixes. Not that it will mean anything, but hey, with the corps unleashed, who knows what will happen next? But when we learned of such prefixing, we added www2's of our own so you can get www2.urbansurvival.com, for now... CNN can be found at www8.cnn.com FWIW...
as far as the ALL CAPS thing by the judge, i guess what it means is that the SCAM was OK use until the avg person got it figured out and started to use it, then all of a sudden it was no good anymore and not valid.
"It is time that defendants turned their considerable intelligence toward viable defense strategies."
Judge Alsup
No it is time for the defense to go above Judge Alsup's head.
Pauligirl, just because the judge thinks a certain way does not mean the defense is incorrect or wrong.
Have you ever heard of sticking to your guns.
Why don't you ask when the Banks will accept the Plaintiff position against the defense instead of fraudulently saying they've been harmed like a rape victim, or robbery victim.
They forced the fraudulent charges onto the Attorney's General with barely, if any Prima Facia evidence.
Get on the right side!
Another good point Mogel
But, the naysayers will not respond to that fact!
ALL CAPS NAME
“A word, phrase, logo, or other graphic symbol used by a manufacturer or seller to distinguish its product or products from those of others. The main purpose of a trademark is to guarantee a product's genuineness. In effect, the trademark is the commercial substitute for one’s signature. In its broadest sense, the term trademark includes servicemark--often shortened to mark…” Blacks 7th
Your true name cannot be classified as a “word, phrase, logo, or other graphic symbol” because it is constructed in accordance with the rules of English Grammar. Your true name corrupted into an all-capital-letter format, however, eminently qualifies as a “word, phrase, logo, or other graphic symbol” and also a “commercial substitute for one’s signature,” because such an assemblage/concoction of letters cannot be defined/classified in any other way. The ALL-CAPS realm is a corporate realm and none other.
Common-law trade-mark
Common-law trade-mark is defined as: “One appropriated under common-law rules, regardless of statutes.” Black’s 4th.
This is why you need not consult statutory law and secure approval from any governmental agency in appropriating (claiming) and enforcing a common-law copyright on your trademark, i.e. your ALL-CAPS TRADE NAME.
Your services (labor) are delivered, billed, and paid for via this trademark/servicemark, which encompasses everything about you in the world of commerce because it is via that entity that commercial interface is achieved. Your TRADE NAME/ trademark is your ticket for doing business with the modern, industrial community, and uniquely identifies all products and services brought into existence by your hand.
"t's not so unusual that the Judge shot down the All Caps argument that the human flesh is not the strawman, but he somehow infers they are one in the same."
The strawman argument is simply that, an argument, empty and useless.
They didn't arrest and jail 'the strawman' (or the tinman, for that matter) and it matters not how they record the names. Move on to the next game.
"How ironic that Judge Alsup thinks that the Principles could be mentally incompetent so he orders a competency process & orders an expert, but now he respects their intelligence by indicating such in the record."
After their smartass blathering about houses burning down and other drivel, the judge eliminated any competency questions upfront, so they couldn't whine down the road that they were too numb to understand anything.
I doubt he respects anything about these gamers. Why should he?
What is 7th fire, the sovereign whack jobs' handbook?
http://www.the7thfire.com/Politics%20and%20History/ControlYourTradeName.htm
On another occasion, I was called to testify against my own mother. I rejected the name they were calling as being my own. The "judge" snarled louder and louder that "I" (pointing his finger at me) had better approach his bench, or his bailiff would take me down. I agreed under the obvious verbal threat of bodily harm he had just made. He then demanded that I show him my drivers license (which at the time, I had) to which I tossed to him to examine (bailiff now right behind me just looking for a reason, literally breathing down my neck) the "judge" read the name on the license aloud, and said "you're so and so", while glancing at the license, I said "no I'm not", this went on three times, after the third "no I'm not", he (the "judge") threw the license back at me (literally) and told "me" to sit down, which I was going to do anyway. Guess what...I didn't testify.....in the face of a "Citation to Discover Assets" with my stawman's name on it! My mother won her case, and we never heard another word about it. Whenevr you see these 'judges" in action, just close your eyes for a second, and picture the little insignificant man behind the curtain, posing as the Wizard of Oz, from that great movie, and suddenly things seem to come into perspective.
When you turned 21 (assuming you have) and went to the store for a six-pack of beer (assuming you did) and got 'carded', who bought the beer? You, or your strawman?
Post a Comment