Sunday, August 06, 2006

Judge Alsup

As all of you know Judge Alsup was the Judge who heard our civil case. He made the mistake of listening to the banks Attorney and questioning ours. From that dual dose of misinformation and his own prejudicial handicap he issued an order that railed us and referred us for criminal prosecution. On this track he thought he found himself some stupid criminals. He arrested our criminal case from the Oakland venue and Judge Jensen thinking he could put the villains away. I filed a Writ of Mandate a common low remedy to the 9th Circuit that Mr. Alsup construed as a motion for recusal. It was not that or intended for that purpose. Regardless it is going to prevail as such and Mr. Alsup on August 15th will be recused. I actually like this guy. Christ made an offer to him in answer to his prayer "so help me God" in his oath of office, that gave us hope for him. We kept giving him opportunities for redemption and honesty. With his recusal we are forced to accept his damage without an opportunity to extend grace. It appears what his wife says ingest "you are beyond redemption" is perfecting into fact. This appears to be a living example of the scripture "seek the Lord why he can be found." Keep him in your prayers that he will come to his senses before it's too late.

30 comments:

imbigo said...

WOW !!!!!!

NUFF SAID!

GOD BLESS YOU MY BELOVED BROTHERN, WE CONTINUE TO PRAY FOR YOU BOTH DAY AND NIGHT!!!

TO GOD BE THE GLORY FOR THE THINGS IS HAS AND IS DOING!!!

SEE YOU AT THE TOP!!!

BIG"O" 1+1+1=1

GOD IS GOOD ALL THE TIME!!!

imbigo said...

BY THE WAY, WHEN THIS BATTLE IS OVER I WILL NOT , I REPEAT WILL NOT COME BACK TO THIS BLOG TO SAY I TOLD YOU SOO!!!!

FOD BLESS YOU ALL!!!

imbigo said...

GOD BLESS YOU ALL!!!! SORRY!

neodemes said...

imbigo said...

BY THE WAY, WHEN THIS BATTLE IS OVER I WILL NOT , I REPEAT WILL NOT COME BACK TO THIS BLOG TO SAY I TOLD YOU SOO!!!!

************************************

Me, neither (probably). ;-)

neodemes said...

So, who ruled on the recussal?

neodemes said...

"It appears what his wife says ingest "you are beyond redemption" is perfecting into fact."

huh? Whose wife said what to who and when did she say it?

mogel said...

I would guess a superior judge would have to issue a recussal against Judge Alsup for his bad behaviour in Court because from what I believe he doesn't have the decency or ethics to recuse himself voluntarily in his
obvious conflicted role.

I would also guess that Judge Alsup's wife said to Judge Alsup in jest he was a "man beyond redemption" & I would guess Judge Alsup probably repeated what his wife said in Court as a passing joke, not realizing that this joke might not be a joke after all, but a self fulfilling prophecy being fulfilled.

When does enough damage become a mistrial & when does enough damages demand that all of these bogus charges against the Dorean Group be dropped & hopefully more sooner than later?

mogel said...

If an "I told you so" is ever needed, I will probably only use it to those that blessed me that I should be incarcerated too. However, I reserve my right to change my mind if my mood changes and an "I told you so" sounds appropriate for the occasion or to special unamed person(s) if the Holy Ghost so moves me. Those charitable people know who they are, that wished for my loss of freedom, but may need a gentle reminder what they said to me over the many months in case they have moments of dimensia & need a reminder. LOL

Having Judge Alsup officially recussed in writing is definitely a step in the right direction towards the eventual goal of victory and resolution if that is really what is going to happen & if that has already been decided but isn't
publicly known yet.

mogel said...

writ of mandate (mandamus) n. a court order to a government agency, including another court, to follow the law by correcting its prior actions or ceasing illegal acts.

mogel said...

Judge Roy Bean said...
Byron - you still don't realize you can't defend charges against yourself by accusing someone else of some other crime.
__________________________________
When Judge Alsup is recused in this case officially on August 15, 2006, I wonder if Judge Roy Obscene will consider this a way
to defend oneself against bogus charges by filing a writ of mandamus that actually gets enforced? If you get rid of a conflicted Judge with unredeemable character, is this not a way of defending oneself against prejudices and injustice?
Maybe Judge Roy doesn't understand a simple common law remedy, even though he purports to be an intelligent Judge with all the answers? You think? LOL

mogel said...

Kurt said: "He arrested our criminal case from the Oakland venue"
______________________________
Hmmmmmm. Why would Judge Alsup do this unless it personally and financially benefitted him? Judge Alsup has alot of explaining to do. He might be a fun person to depose under oath during a Civil lawsuit. Why take a huge career mistake unless the risk of doing something so blatant was equally compensated by say a bribe under the table by some powerful people? Maybe his power went to his head thinking he couldn't be found out? Judge Alsup is not honoring his oath of office by following the rules?
YOu mean to say that Judge Alsup never had the proper legal jurisdiction by stealing venue & made rulings on motions ALREADY without proper jurisdiction? How do you spell "damages?". Judge Alsup is toast in the upcoming Civil lawsuit that will be filed against him by the Dorean Group. When Judge Alsup gets recused, damages are automatic & a Civil case against him will be a cake walk to prove and win.

Without proper legal jurisdiction, doesn't any guilty pleas become meaningless too in Judge Alsup's Court room also? Can't see the Federal Court enforcing a jail sentence based upon a wrongful jurisdiction and when the legal process is already tainted beyond fixing or covering up.

Imbigo, put some more coals on the fire!!! I smell some crow ready to be cooked up soon.

KYHOOYA said...

the fact that they have locked up for over a year and the judges continued exclution from time waiver is delay without cause by my read. that with the onesided effect by him would seem to fall under at least two of the four resones for dismisal.

the fact that the state of Utha dropped there charges did not stop the clock on the time issue in fact from inditment is the start if I'm reading this correct.




A defendant's right to a speedy trial has constitutional and statutory underpinnings in addition to the Speedy Trial Act. Federal statutes of limitations provide a time frame within which charges must be filed. Moreover, Rule 48, Fed. R. Crim. P., grants trial courts discretion to dismiss cases that are not brought to trial promptly. See Rule 48(b), Fed. R. Crim. P. (authorizing trial court to dismiss indictment if there is "unnecessary delay" in presenting the charge to a grand jury, in filing an information, or in bringing a defendant to trial).

Even if a charge is brought within the period provided by the statute of limitations, a defendant may be able to show that preaccusation delay has violated his Fifth Amendment due process rights. To obtain a dismissal of the charges by reason of pre-indictment delay, a defendant has the burden of establishing that the government engaged in intentional delay to gain a tactical advantage, and that he suffered actual prejudice. United States v. Lovasco, 431 U.S. 783 (1977); United States v. Marion, 404 U.S. 307, 324 (1971).

A defendant's rights under the Speedy Trial Clause of the Sixth Amendment are triggered by "either a formal indictment or information or else the actual restraints imposed by arrest and holding to answer a criminal charge." United States v. Marion, 404 U.S. 307, 320 (1971). (As noted above, any delay before this time must be scrutinized under the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment, not the Sixth Amendment's Speedy Trial Clause. United States v. MacDonald, 456 U.S. 1, 7 (1982)). In Barker v. Wingo, 407 U.S. 514 (1972), the Supreme Court set out a four-factor test for determining whether delay between the initiation of criminal proceedings and the beginning of trial violates a defendant's Sixth Amendment right to a speedy trial. The test requires the court to consider the length of the delay, the cause of the delay, the defendant's assertion of his right to a speedy trial, and the presence or absence of prejudice resulting from the delay. Barker, 407 U.S. at 530-533.

son of a prophet said...

editor of artic beacon gets death threts in email for writing about wanta trillions due in trust.

full story at articbeacon.com
---------------------------

Another set of emails, which even appear to include a veiled death threat to the Arctic Beacon editor, has been determined and verified to a high degree to be from the illegitimate camp, fronting for Bush Sr., who has already ripped-off some of the offshore funds and is still in the process of trying to sway things in their dirty direction.



The following email, received with a batch of others from this dubious camp, is reprinted for the editor's safety as well as to let readers understand the real dangers looming behind this story. It should be noted the names of those sending the emails as well as copies have been sent to three separate sources for independent investigation as well as preparation for a lawsuit if the threats continue.



GREG, YOU ARE A VERY BRAVE MAN, I AM SUPRISED YOU ARE STILL WALKING AROUND, AND BEFORE YOU ARE POSSIBLY ELIMINATED, WOULD YOU SEND ME LEO WANTA'S EMAIL ADDRESS OR HAVE HIM CONTACT ME ASAP. I HAVE A GOOD FRIEND IN RICHMOND, VA., WHO WILL COME AND SEE HIM HIS NAME IS (Blank), OR I WILL BE GLAD TO VISIT HIM MYSELF AND HIS GROUP. I WOULD LIKE TO KNOW HOW HE GOT TO BE THE TRUSTOR FOR (Blank) TRUST ACCOUNTS? AGAIN, ASK HIM TO CALL ME OR ASK HIM IF HE WILL EMAIL ME. YOU CAN GIVE HIM MY CONTACT EMAIL AND PHONE NUMBERS BELOW

WillToFight said...

RECORD 75 MILLION AMERICANS NOW
PRETENDING THEY OWN THEIR OWN HOMES
Low Interest Rates Help Many Fulfill The American (Banker's) Dream

Minneapolis, Minn. (SatireWire.com) — Showing no ill effects from a weak economy, housing numbers released by the National Association of Realtors today showed that a record 75 million Americans are now participating in the mass self-delusion that they, and not their banks, actually own their homes.
__________________________
This is all I have to say!

WillToFight said...

THE FED:
Fraud of the Century?...
OR Greatest Show on Earth!

All eyes are again fixed upon the Fed, who must decide whether or not to raise interest rates... or pause.

Swiss America CEO, Craig R. Smith says; "The Fed is clearly backed up against the wall. If they raise rates to shore up the dollar -- the stock market and housing will take a hit. If they lower or keep rates at current levels -- inflation will continue to show up."

While millions of Americans trust the Federal Reserve to protect the nation's financial well being, millions more mis-trust the Fed, seeing it as a private banking cartel that manipulates the economy for the benefit of a hidden few.
____________________

NeoPayedOfftoToutTheFedPosition would agree!

p. d ouspensky said...

- nothing will come to pass -

son of a prophet said...

pres admits conspiracy on the 'New Order of the Ages' or the new world order....WOW!!


Volume One: The New Atlantis

Have you ever wondered why President Bush ordered American forces to invade Iraq and Afghanistan? In his Second Inaugural Address on January 20, 2005, President Bush said that he invaded these two countries because he was attempting to complete an Ancient Plan based on an “Ancient Hope”, a Plan called the “New Order of the Ages”. How old is this Plan? How far back in history does this Plan go? You will be shocked to discover the answer.


Secret Mysteries of America’s Beginnings unfolds the fascinating history behind the founding of America, and exposes the esoteric underbelly of its design. Why is Washington D.C. build on the 77th Meridian? Are the Revolutionary War cities really built in perfect alignment with Stonehenge? If America was founded as a Christian nation, why are many of its symbols based on Pagan traditions? There is no doubt that much of America’s national heritage was Christian, but just as a coin has two sides, our national heritage has a second side – one based squarely on occult secret societies and their values.

To find the answer to these questions, we follow the journey of secret societies from England to the New World and learn of their ancient hope: to rebuild the lost empire of Atlantis.

In the 16th century, Sir Francis Bacon was at the helm of the secret societies in England. When Bacon penned his classic work, ‘The New Atlantis’ he believed that America and Atlantis were one and the same. He outlined his vision for the perfect society, and some suggest the program he set forth has been the driving force behind the course of modern history. While he did not originate the concept, it was Bacon who articulated an ancient plan to be carried out by all the secret orders.

As Chief of the Rosicrucians and the first Grand Master of modern Freemasonry, Bacon sent his followers to the new world. A 1910 Newfoundland stamp with his image upon it reads, ‘Lord Bacon: the Guiding Spirit in [the] Colonization Scheme.’ Because of his influence, Francis Bacon is considered by some to be ‘the real and true founder of America.’ For centuries, controversy has surrounded this figure who is said to be the illegitimate son of Queen Elizabeth I, and secret author of the Shakespeare plays; the man whom Thomas Jefferson considered one of the three most influential men in history.

Is it possible that Bacon’s vision guides America today?

Where The DaVinci Code meets National Treasure: Learn the incredible secrets of the esoteric traditions, hidden within the manifold layers of signs and symbols in our nation’s infrastructure. Find out why some believe that from ancient times America has been chosen to fulfill a secret destiny.

Gforce said...

Mogul--What is the worst case scenerio if I choose NOT to pay on a credit card anymore. I really do not care about credit rating, it is all a bunch of BS. Can they garnish wages or put a lien on a property? A nasty letter or phone call does not bother me. I believe it is time to tell these guys to shove it.

ricco7777 said...

Gforce,
I stopped paying all my unsecure debts. They got me on a default judgement which let to a devistating garnishment from my employer. I then tried to sell one of the houses I have in the Dorean program. As soon as Dr Fred sent me the release from the trust paperwork the judgement attached to the property. I have about 10K I was hoping to get out of the property. The only good news is the debt collector will be my equity and hopefully that will stop the garnishment until the next debt collector gets a default judgement against me. I've been expecting another judgement against me any day now. After Kurt and Scott get the victory I'll be able to pay these 3rd party bastard debt collectors off.

neodemes said...

LOL

Asking how to reneg on credit card debt on a bogus ME blog. That is too funny.

You max out your credit cards to get the things you juuuust couldn't live without and then come whining for a way out?

The borrower is slave to the lender.

Live with it.

(You might want to cut up those cards before you hurt yourselves more.)

Hey mogel, you go, bro. Accuse the Judge of bribery and theft. Smart move. I guess you don't enjoy the fact that you, A Dorean broker, just like LeCompte, Magoon and Tobias who have been indicted, still enjoy your freedom.

Keep talkin' smart guy.

LOL

Gforce said...

Nope, not living with it. Since I do not owe them, why pay them. Oh yeah, I forgot, they might be meen to me. Am I fighting flesh and blood or principalities and powers?

neodemes said...

Why don't you owe them? Did someone else use your credit cards?

tcob247 said...

Rico said.....
After Kurt and Scott get the victory I'll be able to pay these 3rd party bastard debt collectors off.

LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL

In two weeks right?

mogel said...

Gforce: Most credit card companies will not sue and seek for a judgment, so most of the time you are fine. Most will just write the debt off. The greater the amount that you leave owing, the greater chance you have of being sued. If you make yourself unavailable to be served, you increase your chances of not being sued. If you leave the company owing of $4,000 or more you stand a greater risk of getting sued, if you only leave a balance owing of $1,000, then chances are you will never get sued & taken to court.

Actually once your credit card is delinquent for about 4-6 months, you can often settle with these companies for 50-60 cents on the dollar. If you don't care about your credit rating, this is one way to get them out of your hair & settle for a discount by purposely not paying for a while.

If the credit card company sues you and knows where you work & gets a judgment, eventually, they can & probably will garnish your wage or levy your bank account. If you have a judgment against you, it's best not to have a bank account because it's a target to be taken. Or the creditor will assign the debt to a collection agency who sometimes sues you & gets a judgment & levy's your bank account & wage.

Self employed people are safe, wage earners are not.

It's best to fight them by sending out legal papers challenging the debt. Once it goes delinquent enough they will write off the debt & assign it to a collection agency. Once the creditor does that, you have a legal stand not to pay since you have no written contract with the collection agency, & by the law of contracts, the collection agency really doesn't have a right to ask you for money or collect. You can also send a decease & desist letter to the collection agency & by law they can't contact you anymore. Sometimes the collection agencies will violate the law & contact you anyway & even sue you. Unfortunately the courts often side with the collection agencies, but if you have enough knowledge, you can beat them often. It's a numbers game; the collection agencies know if they harass enough they will always collect a certain percentage of the debts that are assigned to them. Just let them know you aren't an easy target & chances are they will go away.


By fighting them with legal correspondence you dramatically increase your chances of not being sued since they prefer going after the easy targets.

Starfish Prime said...

Did anyone see the movie about the Fed and the income tax fraud, corporatism, globalization (NAFTA/FTAA) in the USA etc?? Russo's movie America: From Freedom To Fascism?? WAKE UP!!

http://www.freedomtofascism.com
http://www.penaltyprotester.com
http://www.tax-freedom.com
http://www.givemeliberty.org
http://www.citizensjustice.com/howtowin.php
http://www.orwellrollsinhisgrave.com

whatdoyoumean said...

Mogel,

I would like to contact you. Is there a way to do so away from the blog?

WillToFight said...

StarFish

Many of us have been talking about this for some time.

Aaron Russo Freedom to Fascism is what I've been talking about from the beginning of this blog.

Ol well!

We all pick and choose.

Truth might have nothing to do with it!

WillToFight said...

Mogel

When are you going to stop answering with these idiots?

You make yourself look????????

Gforce said...

Thanks Mogel--

mogel said...

There's something to be said about the family trust JUST for asset protection. Judgments against you personally for credit card judgments don't attach to your house when the house is in the trust because legal title is in the trustees name. Once you put your house back to your personal name again, you become a target for liens attaching to your house like prior credit card judgments.

Estate planning, probate avoidance, asset protection, & privacy, are great reasons not to want to quit claim out of the trust, not to mention you need the trust in tact to get the imminent dorean settlement monies.