Tuesday, September 05, 2006

Class in Session: Lesson 1

The UCC is beyond potent by its own confession. The UCC is supplemental law in that it absorbs the principle of equity and common law but is primary in commerce. Though these principles supplement the UCC they may not supplant. The UCC pre-empts any principle of common law or equity that are inconsistent with the UCC. How did we go from the Common Law as Supreme to being supplemental? You must understand in context. It is a parenthetical context. “The Common Law is (the UCC is public in fiction) the private law of reality.” If you play in the public monopoly game of fictional entities and currency the UCC rules and considers some of the principle of reality but in no ways is bound if it interrupts the game. If you are in reality the UCC is only a fictional restatement of the principles of honesty and fair dealing inherent in equity and common law. Your remedy is in reality. Now the court wants us to think it is functioning in reality because it uses common law and equity principle but uses fictional characters and currency. It is completely subject to the UCC and very bad at it on purpose. We’re being persecuted by the villains of the UCC for relying upon it. This is the dead end they have been pursuing from the beginning. We have executed the UCC upon the banks with precision, upon Alsup with precision, the FBI, the DOJ, the BOP and others. Obeying the law (public) cannot be made a crime (public). Now if the principles of equity are enfolded into the UCC and I followed the UCC in my presentment to the banks then equity was preserved and observed and no loss (victim) can be claimed. Our criminal charges rest on an equity violation. The bank must have been subjected to a loss or potential loss. No inequity no crime. Obedience to UCC no crime.

17 comments:

son of a prophet said...

brother love (should have) said...



"....think about it....there must be higher love...without it...yo just wastin' yo time...."


who sung that song??

was that michael bolton?

son of a prophet said...

or was it...


STRAWMAN©

comebackfromfantasyland said...

o you meant august 2016

comebackfromfantasyland said...

or did you mean august 3006?

wantobefree said...

Yo mogel glad i didnt set up an offshore account for a small fee of $250 Here it is sept 5 and dont see any signs of freedom."Hurry be the first to open account before the end of august".LOL

mogel said...

Want To be Free: If you have your trust paperwork already in hand, like many earlier clients already do, there is no fee, other than a small notary fee to get your bank resolution minute form signed & notarized. That form informs the domestic bank of your choosing who is authorized to sign on the new bank account & agreed to & signed by the trustees or their designee.

Again, you have misunderstood what the costs were for. If you don't have the necesasary trust paperwork in hand, then whatever you pay to get that paperwork in hand, will be deducted from the cost to set up the trust you already agreed to in writing to pay. So it's not like you would have been out any money you aren't contractually obligated to pay already in the first place.

You might as well use your trust and set up domestic banking in place for it & use it until the imminent settlement happens. When the government proffers an acceptable financial number for all damages for all clients, it will happen.

After all, you haven't even paid for the cost of setting up the trust that you & all clients agreed to pay for according to to the service agreement you signed & that was originally set up for you by the Dorean process. YOu have a legal trust in place; so why not take advantage of it.

skdc96 said...

Hey there mogel I have a question for you. I read your comment on the bank account. Does this mean that the trustee are the ones authorized for the account? Can you please clarify that for me. Thanks in advance.

dgwondering said...

The liar Byron Gashler said "YOu have a legal trust in place; so why not take advantage of it."

Yeah right. That's why all the players in the scam are getting their asses handed to them if they try to fight the lenders in court.

A trust that's set up to defraud will get you nowhere.

oksurewhynot said...

Anybody know what this is about on Judge Alsop's calendar?

Sept. 19 2006
02:00 PM (r)CR05-0611 USA v. CharlesTobias (custody)--Change of Plea

justice77777777 said...

....Well since he's previously pleaded not guilty, it won't take a rocket scientist to figure this one out......

~~The Swami~~~ said...

Hey SOP TRY THIS!


Karen Overton - "Your Loving Arms"

(Club Mix)

from
Armin Van Buuren- State of Trance 2006

son of a prophet said...

geez, didnt know that katie curioc was that impotant....




Katie Couric: Newest New World Order News Anchor

Couric Makes `CBS Evening News' Debut

In Long-Awaited Debut, Couric Is Praised For Her Performance: "this is really day one," Hartman said. "Imagine in six months what a** we will be kicking."

BUSH, CLINTON, LIMBAUGH, CRONKITE TO LAUNCH KATIE COURIC: Plans for the opening week of CBS EVENING NEWS WITH KATIE COURIC have surpassed network executives' wildest dream -

NOTE: New World Order icons pushing hard for Couric - from both sides of the political fence

mogel said...

SKDC96 said: "Hey there mogel I have a question for you. I read your comment on the bank account. Does this mean that the trustee are the ones authorized for the account? Can you please clarify that for me."
_________________________________

As I understand things, the trustees have control & legal title over the assets of your family trust. Setting up a bank account becomes another asset of the trust. Their job is to protect and preserve the financial interests of the beneficiaries of the trust. If the trustees designate or authorize certain people to sign on the family trust bank account, this is made known to the bank by the bank resolution minutes form the bank will keep on their files. That way the bank knows who is legally authorized to sign checks on the Family Trust bank account.

I don't know if that clears things up for you or not. I'm sure Dr. Fred could answer your questions better than I could.

mogel said...

DG Wondering assumed: "A trust that's set up to defraud will get you nowhere."
_________________________________

And you think that the bank is going to ASSUME this also without any Court judgments or decrees or any facts of any kind & automatically NOT open up an account for you when the bank doesn't even know you are a dorean client? You're not only wrong, but you're pathetic also!!! How is setting up a family trust bank account, defrauding the bank?

Where is the dorean fraud if the UCC rules have been followed? What UCC rules haven't been followed by the Dorean Process? What is illegal about putting a property in a trust? What is illegal or fraudulent about the dorean process taking legal title away from the lender if the lender DIDN'T FOLLOW THE UCC RULES or didn't validate the debt according to FDCPA? Where is the harm to the lender if the dorean bond paid the lender twice over? Where is the harm to the lender if the lender risked none of their own assets? Can their be fraud if the lender is not harmed or doesn't suffers a loss? How can the lender prove a loss?

You can't answer those questions because you are GUESSING as always and are clueless. If you are wrong, doesn't that make you the liar?

dgwondering said...

Gashler lies again: "Where is the harm to the lender if the dorean bond paid the lender twice over?"

The presentment and alleged bond are legally bogus.

You're a liar, Gashler, and you won't stop lying until you admit your sins and come clean.

dgwondering said...

Byron, you soul is at risk. Admit your lies and save yourself.

mogel said...

DG Wondering said: "The presentment and alleged bond are legally bogus."

PROVE IT. YOU'VE PROVIDED NOTHING OF RELEVANCE.

You're a liar, Gashler, and you won't stop lying until you admit your sins and come clean

OH NOW THAT'S RICH MAKING CHILDISH ACCUSATIONS. PRETENDING TO BE MY SPIRITUAL ADVISOR NOW AS IF PRETENDING TO BE MY BISHOP WASN'T ENOUGH SACRILEGE? SO YOU OFFEND MY CHARACTER & THEN CALL ME TO REPENTENCE? THAT'S REAL GODLY OF YOU. LOL

WHY IS IT I FEEL YOU DON'T GIVE A RAT'S A** ABOUT ME? LOL

THE REALITY IS YOUR SOUL IS AT RISK. FIRST CAST THE BEAM OUT OF YOUR OWN EYE SO YOU CAN SEE CLEARLY BEFORE YOU ATTEMPT TO CAST THE SPECK OUT OF MY OWN EYES.