Wednesday, May 11, 2011

Weapon of Righteousness 1-27-2011

The word in Romans 6 tells us to use our body as a weapon of righteousness. It contrast how we use to use it as a weapon of evil. We all know how to sin. I was not exempt from the curse, I had no problem turning my body over to sin as a slave. But in Christ I have been freed from that power and can now offer my body as a slave to righteousness. In sin I profited nothing and at the end of every fancy, every accomplishment was death. Yet that did not deter me from the repeated exercise of futility. No all the more I was eager to put the cloak of death on more firmly.

Now Christ gives me the offer to turn my body through obedience over to righteousness to be His weapon where the end is abundance now and eternal life ultimately. At the end of every fancy and every assignment is life. Shall I shrink back from its demands? I never resisted the demands of death. No all the more my slavery toward obedience should be as loyal as a heart can be. Dorean was formed as a weapon of righteousness by the Lords command. Shall I not give my body over to its full demands? Life and victory await even if I pass through suffering. It is still better for me to suffer toward life than to enjoy pleasures on the way to destruction. I am fond of my body being made a weapon of righteousness. Lord, wield me often! Amen!

7 comments:

dr. ira gilac said...

poor bro. camping...he looked drugged in that last video.

the zoinists must have gotten to him, because they know that he wieled a pwoerful sword in telling ppl to have no spritual auth over them but the HS.

because they know that the HS wuld tell everyone not to kill,nor to join the miltry....poor bro. camping....

judge allslop said...

Watadope couldn't interfere with due process in Utah foreclosures so he's moved on to immigration. Is this another version "don't ask don't tell". Don't ask for your home loan validation because we won't tell you any way.


Associated Press= SALT LAKE CITY (AP) — A judge has blocked a new immigration law in the state of Utah that lets police check the citizenship status of anyone they arrest.
Judge Clark Waddoups ruled Tuesday in Salt Lake City hours after the law went into effect. Two civil rights groups had sued to stop the law, contending it was modeled after an Arizona law currently before the federal courts and its implementation could lead to racial profiling. Utah Attorney General Mark Shurtleff says the law is constitutional. The law requires police to verify a person's U.S. immigration status if they are arrested for a serious crime. Immigration checks are optional for lesser crimes.

judge allslop said...

Crime syndicate judge seeking to rewrite existing laws for home foreclosure and immigration, Watadope and Alsuck join forces with BoA to suppress due process of law.


Associated Press= SALT LAKE CITY (AP) — A judge has blocked a new immigration law in the state of Utah that lets police check the citizenship status of anyone they arrest.

Judge Clark Waddoups ruled Tuesday in Salt Lake City hours after the law went into effect. Two civil rights groups had sued to stop the law, contending it was modeled after an Arizona law currently before the federal courts and its implementation could lead to racial profiling. Utah Attorney General Mark Shurtleff says the law is constitutional. The law requires police to verify a person's U.S. immigration status if they are arrested for a serious crime. Immigration checks are optional for lesser crimes.

dr. ira gilac said...

Benjamin Fulford & Mers Lawsuits May 12/11 Print E-mail
Thursday, 12 May 2011 14:19

Benjamin Fulford & Mers Lawsuits May 12/11

MERS Hit with $400,000,000 Lawsuit | Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems Sued Over Michigan Foreclosures

Posted: 11 May 2011 10:13 AM PDT
"$100 million in actual damages on multiple counts including fraud and wrongful foreclosure, as well as more than $300 million in punitive damages" ~ Electronic Mortgage Registry Is Sued Over Michigan Foreclosures Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems Inc. "illegally prosecuted" non-judicial foreclosures in Michigan and owes more than $100 million to people who lost their … Read more

Fraudclosures | HSBC Continues Freeze On Home Seizures

Posted: 11 May 2011 09:51 AM PDT
HSBC Continues Freeze On Home Seizures HSBC North America Holdings, the ninth-largest U.S. bank by assets, told investors Wednesday that the bank's moratorium on home seizures continues in some jurisdictions and it will be "a number of months" before the bank fully resumes foreclosing on defaulted borrowers. The lender did not specify in filings … Read more

dr. ira gilac said...

WEAPONS OF WRONGTIOUSNESS



this cuntry is toast.



http://www.nwitimes.com
/news/local/govt-and-
politics/article_ec169
697-a19e-525f-a532-81
b3df229697.html

OMO said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
OMO said...

"We believe ... a right to resist an unlawful police entry into a home is against public policy and is incompatible with modern Fourth Amendment jurisprudence," David said. "We also find that allowing resistance unnecessarily escalates the level of violence and therefore the risk of injuries to all parties involved without preventing the arrest."
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


YOU CAN THANK THE BILL OF RIGHTS FOR THAT DECISION. THE BILL OF RIGHTS IS NOT WHAT PEOPLE THINK IT IS. THEY THINK IT IS A STATEMENT OF USES OF FORCE WHICH AMERICAN CITIZENS DO NOT PERMIT TO MEN IN AMERICAN GOVERNMENT.

"THE NAME 'BILL OF RIGHTS' IS ENGLISH. IT IS ACCURATE IN ENGLAND. THE ENGLISH BILL OF RIGHTS IS A STATEMENT OF CERTAIN FREEDOMS WHICH BRITISH GOVERNMENT PERMITS TO ITS SUBJECTS." (Rose Wilder Lane)

A GOVERNMENT THAT CAN GRANT CERTAIN FREEDOMS, CAN TAKE AWAY CERTAIN FREEDOMS. THE AMERICAN BILL OF RIGHTS IS APPLICABLE IN ENGLAND. IT IS NOT COMPATIBLE WITH THE AMERICAN CONSTITUTION BECAUSE THE CONSTITUTION DOES NOT GIVE THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT ANY POWER OVER INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS AND LIBERTIES. NEVERTHELESS, IT IS DOING JUST THAT: GRANTING THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT POWER OVER INDIVIUDAL RIGHTS AND LIBERTIES.

THE COURT IS CONSISTENT WITH THE [ENGLISH] BILL OF RIGHTS. IT RECOGNIZES THE FOURTH AMENDMENT, BUT IT ALSO RECOGNIZES THAT SINCE THE BILL OF RIGHTS IS A GOVERNMENT GRANTED PRIVILEGE, IT ALSO RECOGNIZES THAT IT CAN TAKE AWAY THOSE FOURTH AMENDMENT PRIVILEGES.

OF COURSE IT DOESN'T HAVE TO BE THAT WAY IF YOU KNOW THE TRUTH ABOUT THE BILL OF RIGHTS.

YOU WON'T FIND THAT TRUTH IN THE HISTORY BOOKS.