Tuesday, October 04, 2011


Tell me in history where a government has lived up to the potential of goodness from its citizens, it is a sad report that all out institutions fail us. Still it is not vanity to hope that the virtuous heart would rise up to steer out nation.

This is an individual battle as much as the collective I know personally the rage within me from suffering injustice tempts me with promises of vindication. But can a jackass lead a bull? Both are stubborn and arrogant and neither can rise to the potential of this human master. When I think on the ills that now plague our nation I find nothing within myself that can cure. The failure of our institutions is a reflection of our own hearts.

I view myself as a better man morally than my accusers but that is not the measurement that can bring justice. The only reason I know better that them is not because I was endowed with better qualities but in honesty only because the Lord taught me. So as it is with man so it is with our institutions. If we will humble ourselves and trust in the Lord’s guidance then we will arrive at out best potential, a potential which includes justice, wisdom, truth, Love, and hope. A potential reality only found in Christ who is endowed with superiority over our personal weakness.

No vote, no change of parties, no constitution, or reasoned law will deliver us from evil. So when I cry tears under my suffering I also cry for mercy and a true deliverance. For only Jesus Save!


judge allslop said...

As long as jewish Bankers pick your candiates the only change you can believe in,is theirs.

JPMorgan Chase recently donated an unprecedented $4.6 million to the New York City Police Foundation. The gift was the largest in the history of the foundation and will enable the New York City Police Department to strengthen security in the Big Apple.

What's with the sudden love for the bro's in blue jamie, things getting little tense outside your offices.

Anonymous said...



Anonymous said...


Anonymous, until recently known mostly for wreaking havoc on the Internet through blunt-force takedowns of websites and opportunistic hacking attacks, has lent its help to low-tech street protests of late. Prior to its participation in Occupy Wall Street, the initiation of which is credited to the Canadian activist group Adbusters, Anonymous also had a large role in a string of live protests against actions taken by the Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART) authority's police force.

The threat to "erase" the NYSE from the Internet was not explained, though in comments on the YouTube video, some speculated that Anonymous was planning a Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) attack on the public-facing NYSE.com website, similar to DDoS attacks the group has used to take down websites in the past.

Others felt that would only be a minor setback for the NYSE and guessed that Anonymous was planning a larger attack, perhaps even an attempt to actually disable trading on the exchange.

Here's the transcript of the latest Occupy Wall Street video from Anonymous:

Greetings, institutions of the media.

We are Anonymous.

The events transpiring within Wall Street have caught our eye.

It seems that the government and federal agencies enjoy enforcing the law a little bit too much. They instate unjust laws as mindless automatons, blindly following orders with soulless precision.

We witness the government enforcing the laws that punish the 99 percent while allowing the 1 percent to escape justice, unharmed, for their crimes against the people.

We have observed this same government failing to enforce even the minimal legal restraints of Wall Street's abuses. This government who has willingly ignored the greed at Wall Street has even bailed out the perpetrators that have caused our crisis.

We will not stand by and watch the system take over our way of life.

We the people shall stand against the government's inaction.

We the people will not be witnesses to your corruption and ill-gotten profits.

We will not labor for your leisure.

We will not assist you in any way.

This is why we choose to declare our war against the New York Stock Exchange. We can no longer stay silent as the population is being exploited and forced to make sacrifices in the name of profit.

We will show the world that we are true to our word. On Oct. 10, NYSE shall be erased from the Internet. On Oct. 10, expect a day that will never, ever be forgotten.

Vox Populi, Vox Anon.

The Voice of The People is The Voice of Anonymous.

We are Legion. We are the 99 percent.

We do not forgive. We do not forget.

Wall Street: Expect us.



Oct. 3, 2011

Anonymous said...

On Oct. 10, NYSE shall be erased from the Internet. On Oct. 10, expect a day that will never, ever be forgotten.

We do not forgive. We do not forget.

"....holy shite, batman!!!"

"no sweat, Robin!"

Anonymous said...

"...hello, is this the trading desk?...yes, i'd like to place an order to by 1000s of Apple Cumputer plz 'at the market'....

borker: "sorry, we cant take order right now, the stock market has "disappear".....



Anonymous said...

yo forgut to tell yo dat moonday is a holeyday.

da sock makeit is close anways

judge allslop said...


Thanks for ten wonderful years. A bumper crop of opium to keep BAC, Wells Fargo et all fat,the prosthetic industry boomin and rest of us high. Here's to ten more.
Sing it country Joe.
Its 1234 what are we fightin for............

Anonymous said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Anonymous said...



Anonymous said...

if yo hurry yo can eat yo settle mints beefo han so it dun give injeston an yo haf ta take peepo bumsole

Joseph said...

Listen how the banker explains how the lending process works:


This is hilarious!!!

Joseph said...

I wonder if there is any help here for Kurt & Scott:


OMO said...

I wonder if there is any help here for Kurt & Scott

Kurt and Scott gravely underestimated their enemy, which has been admitted:

"I will admit that the power and corruption I've been subjected to far exceeded my imagination."

Lacking critical thinking skills, capitulation was their only choice.

Lacking critical thinking skills most of us merely believe, what we read, what we hear, what we imagine, etc.

The subject of Critical Thinking should be taught starting from the 6th grade.

FYI: There's an article on the web: Becoming a Critical Thinker
©2004 Robert Todd Carroll

OMO said...

Excerpt from Becoming a Critical Thinker:

One philosopher stands out as having had the greatest influence on our critical thinking standards: the Socrates
(469?–399 BCE) of Plato (470-347 BCE). "The unexamined life is not worth living," says the Socrates of Plato’s Apology. The Socrates known to us is a figure from Plato’s dialogues. For centuries, Socrates has stood as a model
of intellectual integrity and inquiry: the ideal critical thinker. It is not any particular idea that earned him this
reputation. It is his method of questioning and cross-examination of positions that is taken as an ideal for critical thinking.


Socrates defends a life of constant inquiry and examination of beliefs and actions. Finally, Socrates assures his
accusers that the death sentence handed down to him would guarantee that he would be known to history as a heroic figure, one who died for the "crime" of thinking for himself and for encouraging others to do likewise.

Socrates may have been put to death over two thousand years ago, but his spirit of critical inquiry lives on. One of Socrates’ main critical concerns was clarity. Of course, standards of clarity change. As we have become more
aware of the power and functions of language, we have become both more demanding in our quest for clarity and more understanding of the limits of language.

Simultaneously, those who would like to manipulate the thoughts
and deeds of others (advertisers, politicians, con artists, evangelists, talk show hosts, lawyers, cult recruiters, and
the like) continue to use their creative powers to persuade us to believe or do things that remain unclear to us.

Today, the study of clarity requires a companion study of the persuasive techniques of modern propagandists, especially their attempts to manipulate thought and action through the clever use and abuse of language. Chapter
Two will examine these and other issues concerning language and critical thinking."

OMO said...


Starting at approx. 14:00 (in the video above), John Lash states:

"…[t]hey knew that people needed to be taught the responsibility of reading and writing, and taught the responsibility of critical thinking."

“…when you read something, if you don’t have any critical thought, you’re likely to just believe what you read, [and] most people do.”

"Wisdom Goddess Divine Sophia, is transforming us into real human beings. We're freaks and we are deformities, because of our enslavement to the lies and deception of society, the programming of religion, parents, government, medicine, education. We've become freaks and deformities and we are so captured in the ar _?_ spell of false power that we have lost the connection to our real power." John Lash

Joseph said...

Re: United States v. Charles Dewey Tobias
Case Number 2004R01472 and Court Docket Number 05-CR-00611

Dear Sir:

The United States Dept. of Justice believes it is important to keep victims of federal crime informed of court proceedings. This notice provides information about the above-referenced criminal case.

The United States Probation Office has determined that defendant(s), Charles Dewey Tobias, has potential violated the terms of his supervised release. AS a result a hearing to revoke or modify the defendant's supervised release has been scheduled for November 1, 2011, 02:00 PM at Courtroom B, 19th Floor, 450 Golden Gate Avenue, San Francisco, CA before Judge William Alsup....

OMO said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
OMO said...

They'd better start opening up the internment camps-- prisons are getting too crowded.

Anonymous said...

November 1, 2011, 02:00 PM at Courtroom B, 19th Floor, 450 Golden Gate Avenue, San Francisco, CA before Judge William Alslap yo upside yo haid....

Anonymous said...

i tawt dat do me tobis live in flo ree duh???

ho cum in jail in frsco???

OMO said...

The United States Probation Office has determined that defendant(s), Charles Dewey Tobias, has potential (sic) violated the terms of his supervised release. AS a result a hearing to revoke or modify the defendant's supervised release has been scheduled for November 1, 2011, 02:00 PM at Courtroom B, 19th Floor, 450 Golden Gate Avenue, San Francisco, CA before Judge William Alsup....


I like how they use the word 'potentially.' Either he did or did not violate. The hearing isn't set to determine whether he did or did not violate the terms of the release. The hearing is set because they've already determined that he violated. It's not a hearing at all. The words they use don't mean what they say. The hearing is set to revoke and arrest, not set new terms.

If Tobias fails to show they will go get him.

It is not a due process hearing. It is a warrant for arrest, because if he fails to show, they will arrest him anyway. There's nothing voluntary about it.

Joseph said...

Accept the deed, AND BECOME THE OWNER:


Once you acknowledge this & record your acknowledgement, you have legal title of record. First in time, first rights. Your lien holder only has marketable title. Legal title trumps marketable title. Bye bye mortgage. This is a new process that is now being tested.

Joseph said...

The deed does not have your signature on it, thus the need to accept and acknowledge the deed through paperwork that you record is necessary TO COMPLETE THE RECORDING in order to claim title to ownership in fee simple on your property.

Bouvier's 1856

TO RECORD, the act of making a record. 2. Sometimes questions arise as to when the act of recording is complete, as in the following case. A deed of real estate was acknowledged before the register of deeds and handed to him to be recorded, and at the same instant a creditor of the grantor attached the real estate. In this case it was held THE ACT OF RECORDING WAS INCOMPLETE without a certificate of the acknowledgement, and wanting that, THE ATTACHING CREDITOR HAD THE PREFERENCE.
10 Pick Rep. 72.

Is this the missing link to successful mortgage cancellation, signing an acknowledgment of the original deed and recording it?

Joseph said...


1) Find the Deed. The Warranty Deed they talk about is called different things in different areas. It may be referred to as a Transfer of Property or Title, a Quit Claim Deed. Ours just said Deed. The main thing to know is that this document is usually the first recording in the county records for that particular property, as it is the document where the previous owner, builder, developer,(GRANTOR), granted the property to you (GRANTEE).
If you have an original wet ink signature of that document you may
go to step 3.
If you do not have a wet ink signature you have to go to the county, wherever they keep the record of deeds, and ask for a CERTIFIED Copy of that Document.

2) Prepare your Acknowledgment Certificate and have your three Witnesses sign it.
NOTE: It is very important to have 3 Witnesses. It does not matter if the court doesn’t require any Witnesses, you still get 3 Witnesses. Did I tell you You Have to have 3 Witnesses?

3) Take the paperwork to a Notary in the county of the property and recording.
NOTE: make sure your notary is a notary in the county and is registered in your county with the clerk of courts office.
Have the Notary notarize the Acknowledgment Certificate. The man/ woman making the acknowledgment has to sign in front of the Notary, so do not sign when your Witnesses are signing unless they are in front of the Notary. Do not have the notary stamp or mark anything on the Wet Ink Signature / Certified Copy of the Deed, that must stay unaltered.

4)Take the Acknowledgment Certificates and the Wet Ink Signature / Certified Copy of the Deed to the County Clerk of courts office and ask for the Deputy Clerk of Courts. Tell them you need a Certificate of Authority, or in our case an Authentication Certificate, for the Notary on the Acknowledgment Certificate and the Wet Ink Signature / Certified Copy of the Deed.
NOTE: We have a basic Authorization Certificate prepared for you. Bring 2 with you, one for the Notary verification on the Acknowledgment and the other for the Notary verification on the Deed. You may not have to use your Authorization Documents because they may be required to use their own. You are bringing them with you in the event they don’t have the document in their office, it will save you time from running around looking for and preparing one and making another trip back there. (Better to bring them and not need them, than to need them and not have them). In our case they did have their own, it was a strip of paper with the writing and the Seal on it. The DeputyClerk of Courts called their Authentication Certificate a FLAG. One got stapled to the Acknowledgment Certificate and the other to the Deed.

5) Take all of the documents to the place where the Deeds are Recorded and ask to have all the papers recorded as one document. Make sure they are being recorded as a Record of Deed Correction.

6) Ask for a Certified copy of the recording. May take a day or so to process before you can get a certified copy.

NOTE: Please be patient and courteous through the process. Make sure you have done your home work and have everything prepared ahead of time. DO NOT go there and try to put things together in their office, holding up others and creating an atmosphere of stress. DO NOT try to explain the process to anyone while you are in these offices, ANYONE. If they ask why you are doing this, tell them you are doing it for a Modification. You do not have to explain what kind of Modification. If they question your process, documents, reason, just say the people that are helping me with my Modification say we really need to do it. The folks at our County said, you do not have to acknowledge the deed as the grantee, it only needs the signature of the grantor. They said, we do thousands of these deeds and we have never had any problems, in fact you people are the first we have ever had that wanted to do this.

Joseph said...

Remember as part of the Dorean Process we filed an attachment of glossory terms to the original deed of trust, and recorded that with other paperwork to show in the recorded record to update it so there is no confusion on who the real creditor in the loan transaction really is? The lender/bank almost always comes to court as pretending to be the plaintiff/creditor, and the court just assumes the bank is the creditor, since it's assumed they loaned the borrower money, but if you have evidence otherwise, RECORDED IN THE RECORD, then, maybe the ball game is changed somewhat.

The unfortunate thing about this paperwork was that very few people filled it out properly and used it and recorded it or even understood the significance of it to use as evidence. So this paperwork was really not tested or used in any foreclosures on dorean clients as a defense. Who was really defending their foreclosures back then as prose defendants anyway, much less realizing that there were weapons at hand in all the presentment paperwork.

Seems to me using some of that old paperwork and combining an acknowledgment of the deed, and bringing all of this paperwork into court as a defense to show that the plaintiff really isn't the creditor, but a pretender, who only has marketable title ( with defects) and not legal title, might even work in getting a foreclosure overturned. Your defense: "plaintiff has no legal standing in the court". If you can show fraud on the court, you do have a chance. Every thing the bank does in the foreclosure process is committing fraud here and there since they know they come to court with unclean hands. It's your job to prove it. When you don't at least fight it, you acknowledge that what the bank does is lawful by default, and that's it's OK for them to take your home from you.

OMO said...

The only way to really OWN something, is to BUY it-- TRADE something you already have for something someone else already has. That's ownership. Filing papers in the county or court isn't going to get you ownership. The only way to OWN something is to give 'some thing for some thing.' I give you my horse if you give me your cow. Loans or agreements to make payments of any kind, do not give you ownership.

OMO said...

Loans or agreements to make time payments do not give you ownership.

If you make time payments, you do not own the property. The property is more or less on lay away until you PAY for what you agreed to make time payments on.

OMO said...

The law should not allow people occupancy until the property is fully paid for. Once moved in, most people believe they own, but they don't, because they never PAID for it- they never GAVE any THING for it.

OMO said...

A Federal Reserve Note is not a THING. Your credit is not a THING. The bank's credit is not a THING.

Some THING for some THING = ownership


OMO said...

I suppose anyone, like the county recorder or judge can be fooled by the fancy paperwork claiming ownership, and if that is the case, then so be it- they fooled you, so why not fool them.

OMO said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
OMO said...

We need to bring common sense back to America.

There will always be injustice...we will never bring the bankers to justice... unless we bring back the law of tooth and claw.. the law of Lex Telionis.

ohn Lash talks about that in one of his radio interview videos... I think it was the July 2011 video.

Suppressed emotions aren't healthy... peaceful protests do not bring justice.. and never will either.

Lex Talionis (Latin for "law of retaliation") is the principle of retributive justice expressed in the phrase "an eye for an eye," (Hebrew: עין תחת עין‎) from Exodus 21:23–27. The basis of this form of law is the principle of proportionate punishment, often expressed under the motto "Let the punishment fit the crime," which particularly applies to mirror punishments (which may or may not be proportional).

At the root of the non-biblical form of this principle is the belief that one of the purposes of the law is to provide equitable retaliation for an offended party. It defined and restricted the extent of retaliation. This early belief is reflected in the Code of Hammurabi and in the laws of the Old Testament (such as Exodus 21:23–25, Leviticus 24:18–20, and Deuteronomy 19:21). In reference to torts, the Old Testament prescription "an eye for an eye" has often been interpreted, notably in Judaism, to mean equivalent monetary compensation, even to the exclusion of mirror punishment. [Wikipedia]

OMO said...

Everyone is talking about peaceful protests and nonviolence...as the bankers look down from their windows above, while planning who or what to loot next.

As long as the peaceful protesters keep talking about peace and non violence, the bankers are safe...

OMO said...

Another oil spill.. this time in New Zealand. you'd think they'd have learned something from Gulf oil spill... but noooooooo