Tuesday, July 11, 2006

We’re Guilty

On June 13, we entered guilty pleas, which the court rejected. By the time this post we will have attempted this again. Before you all freak-out there is a very good reason to do this. I will deliver you victory precisely because I am not boxed into the average presumptions of the public. Americans are trained by their captors to behave in the manner necessary to remain enslaved. If government is telling you to remain silent, speak. If they are telling you to plead not-guilty and even doing you the favor of entering it for you, plead guilty. I told you there would be no trial. They do not try the guilty. Many of the small minds who judge me here can use this opportunity to throw in your rhetorical “I told you they were guilty” but enjoy it for a brief moment because intelligence and history are about to overcome you. Fruit-cake who defies God by every utterance is too stupid to understand how God trains a man for this shadowy battle. This is a world were black is white and focus is blurry. God will train a man on a full spectrum of knowledge then reveal in the peak of trial that it is all a division of one truthful light. I have needed my training in contracts, trust, love, history, law, courtroom experience, prison experience and the deep spiritual truths in Christ to survive and prevail in this battle. This is not a personal boast but evidence that God always equips a man with what he needs for his trials. When God calls you trust He has done so knowing in advance you can get the job done. Let that enhance the courage it will take to overcome the masses who descending to hell on the slippery vomit of their foolish opinions ridicule you endlessly.


dgwondering said...

Well that ought to make the hearing on the 18th interesting.

mogel said...

"When God calls you-- trust He has done so knowing in advance you can get the job done."

The prophet Nephi understood that truth too when he said:

1 Nephi 3: 7

"And it came to pass that I, Nephi said unto my father: I will go and do the things which the Lord hath commanded, for I know that the Lord giveth no commandments unto the children of men, save he shall prepare a way for them that they MAY ACCOMPLISH the thing which he commandeth them."

light1rae said...

May you have sucess in all that you do in this matter. We are praying for you and yours.


down but not out said...

mogel said,

1 Nephi 3: 7

"And it came to pass that I, Nephi said unto my father: I will go and do the things which the Lord hath commanded, for I know that the Lord giveth no commandments unto the children of men, save he shall prepare a way for them that they MAY ACCOMPLISH the thing which he commandeth them."


partysecured said...

Dear Kurt,

It is hillarious reading these blogs that you post. Not that I understand them perfectly, and not that I am ridiculing them in the slightest, but because of my little amount of knowledge in these subjects makes reading these blogs tickle my fancy.
It would be great to actually see you in action as this is all happening.
Don't know how things are there on the inside but it 'tis a real mess out here.

Thanks again friend.

Too a real live ass kicker .......you are the fuckin man.

partysecured said...

By the way I just read this off of my fantasy baseball site.

Barry Bonds, LF SF

News: Sources from MLB told the New York Daily News that they believe Barry Bonds will be indicted by a grand jury for perjury and tax evasion as soon as next week.

Analysis: If the U.S. attorney in San Francisco, Kevin Ryan, gets the indictment he wants, "it will be because they believe they have enough to convict, not because they think it will give them leverage or result in a plea or something like that." His status for the rest of the season shouldn't be affected, but obviously, any type of legal issues of this magnitude would likely affect a player at the plate. Bonds will have four much-needed days to rest his ailing knee since he was not selected by the fans to the 2006 All-Star game in Pittsburgh. He is a decent start for Fantasy Week 15 (July 13-16) despite playing in just three games.

Hey Kurt.....please tell this putz Ryan to lay off Bonds I need him for the second half of the season....thanks

mogel said...

So Kurt is guilty of exercising his unalienable right and constitutional right to be free from governmental intervention in his pursuit to contract? Is this a revelation? What does the guilty plea have to do with being guilty of bank fraud, mail fraud & wire fraud?

If the Court rejected Kurt's first draft of a plea of guilty, can we assume the 2nd draft is written better to entice the Courts to accept the 2nd plea of guilty?

If the Court goes ahead with the trial after 2 sincere efforts to plead guilty, is this not more bad and illegal behaviour shown by the Courts showing tresspasses against common law freedoms and common law rights?

If Kurt has rejected the jurisdiction of the Courts and has done this repeatedly through his actions and proof and unique knowledge, why does the Court still demand to play this game of deception if a willing participant who waives their rights is needed by the Court to proceed in a trial?

Does the Court have a choice when a plea is entered by the Defendant who is of sound mind?

rollerhockey said...

That a way Kurt GET IT DONE!!! Prayers are with you and Scott.

rollerhockey said...

That's the way Kurt Get it DONE..Prayers are with you and Scott....

guiltyassin said...

how much time can you get for pleading guilty?

That type of game can go on for years, I suppose.

neodemes said...

Anyone seen the guilty pleas? Were there conditions attached that constituted a basis for the court rejecting them?

guiltyassin said...

the court did not make the guilty pleas available for public viewing on pacer

A bench trial will likely replace a jury trial.

mogel said...

A bench trial will likely replace a jury trial.
It is LIKELY constitutional freedoms will be ursurped, I agree.
This has been the history so far.
This is par for the course.
That is why whatever happens, there is always recourse, and a remedy for Kurt.

mogel said...


COMMENT: Where the Business of Snooping Gets Done.

Federal Express is famous for its overnight deliveries, and now it may have
become, overnight, the one delivery company to avoid at all costs -- if you
value your personal and financial privacy.

A front page Wall Street Journal feature article (5/26) details how
FedEx voluntarily has become a willing partner to the US federal police
establishment, turning over names, addresses, credit card information and
lists of when and where FedEx customers send and receive packages.

Mind you, this is done under the guise of 'fighting terrorism,' since FedEx
management decided soon after the 9-11 terror attacks that it would
cooperate with almost any government information request. In the past
FedEx and most other delivery companies insisted on a valid search warrant
or court order before surrendering customer information. UPS says it still
follows that traditional rule.

But FedEx has gone further, granting US Customs inspectors access to the
company's database of international shipments, including names and address
of shippers, package origin and destination, credit card information and
payment details (names of banks), all things the US government is not entitled
to outside of a criminal investigation. 'Our guys just love it,' says one senior
Customs official overseeing inspections at international courier companies.

I'll just bet they do love it -- and you can also be sure that the FBI and other
police do not confine their use of all this information to terrorism
investigations. It is well known that PATRIOT Act powers, supposedly aimed
at suspected terrorists, have been used to nab phone solicitors, nightclubs in
Las Vegas, CD-counterfeiters, even a call girl ring in New Orleans.

Now FedEx has opened a whole new universe of people for eager government

This is a replay, for much bigger stakes, of what the IRS did four years ago
with credit cards issued by offshore banks, alleged to be used to evade taxes.
Because VISA, MasterCard and AmEx processed the offshore card charges in
US facilities, the IRS got court orders to grab millions of card transactions
without the names attached. Only AmEx stood up for card holder privacy and
the others caved in to the IRS. About a thousand people out of what the IRS
claimed were millions fessed up during a phony IRS amnesty.

At least the credit card companies, however misguided, were co-operating in
investigations of a specific alleged crime. FedEx, on the hand, is laying wide
open customers for no better reason than their flag waving management wants
to do so.

What makes all this even more horrific (and illegal) is that these demands for
information often are based on nothing more than government bureaucrats
accusations, not on due process search warrants or any other judicial review.

One of the current FedEx slogans is 'Where the business of shipping gets done.'
Just change 'shipping' to 'snooping' -- and plan accordingly.

That's the way it looks from here.
Bob Bauman, Editor

WillToFight said...

Aids HIV Bayer

MSNBC | July 12 2006

This clip from Scarborough Country highlights how Bayer knowingly dumped medicine that was known to be contaminated with AIDS virus on the European market after it killed people in America.


Wake up!

WillToFight said...


I am going to post what you posted again.

I don't think everyone gets it!


Below, you'll read an exhibit from a lawsuit that will explain in some detail the answer to that question and why no attorneys ever call-in to dispute that statement. (And, yes, at least a few attorneys do listen to Freedom's Questions.)


AS PER THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT; The practice of Law CAN NOT be licensed by any state/State. ( Schware v. Board of Examiners, 353 U.S. 238, 239 )

The practice of Law is AN OCCUPATION OF COMMON RIGHT! ( Sims v. Aherns, 271 S.W. 720 (1925))





1. Like the Actors Union, Painters Union, etc.
2. No other association, EVEN DOCTORS, issue their own license. ALL ARE ISSUED BY THE STATE.

The State Bar is; An Unconstitutional Monopoly. AN ILLEGAL & CRIMINAL ENTERPRISE; Violates Article 2, Section 1, Separation of Powers clause of the Constitution. There is NO POWER OR AUTHORITY for joining of Legislative, Judicial, or Executive within a state as the BAR is attempting. BAR members have invaded all branches of government and are attempting to control de jure government as agents of a foreign entity!

It is quite simple to see that a great fraud and conspiracy has been perpetrated on the people of America. The American Bar is an offshoot from London Lawyers' Guild and was established by people with invasive monopolistic goals in mind. In 1909 they incorporated this TRAITOROUS group in the state of Illinois and had the State Legislature (which was under the control of lawyers) pass an unconstitutional law that only members of this powerful union of lawyers, called the ABA, could practice law and hold all the key positions in law enforcement and the making of laws. At that time, Illinois became an outlaw state and for all practical purposes, they seceded from the United States of America.

The BAR ASSOCIATION then sent organizers to all the other states and explained to the lawyers there how much more profitable and secure it would be for them, as lawyers, to join this union and be protected by its bylaws and cannons. They issued to the lawyers in each state a charter from the Illinois organization. California joined in 1927 and a few reluctant states and their lawyers waited until the 1930's to join when the treasonous act became DE FACTO and the Citizen's became captives. Under this system, the lawyers could guarantee prejudged decisions for the privileged class against the lower class.

This was all made possible by the AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION to favor the right and have unlawfully substituted them in place of Constitutional Laws. The Constitution was written in plain English and the Statutes passed by Congress were also in plain English, with the intent of Congress how each law should be used and not the opinions of various Judges as the codes list. Any normal person can read the Constitution and Statutes and understand them without any trouble.

The public in California was shocked to learn that the State Government has no control or jurisdiction over the Bar Association or its members. The state does not accredit the law schools or hold Bar examinations. They do not issue state licenses to LAWYERS. The Bar Association accredits all the law schools, holds their private examinations and selects the students they will accept in their organization and issues them so-called license but keeps the fees for themselves. The Bar is the only one that can punish or disbar a Lawyer. They also select the lawyers that they consider qualified for Judgeships and various other offices in the State. Only the Bar Association or their designated committees can remove any of these lawyers from public office. The State Legislature will not change this system as they are also a designated committee of the Bar.

On August 21, 1984, Rose Bird, Chief Justice of the California State Supreme Court, another of the Bar Associations Judicial Committee's, stated in essence that the Bar should determine the legality of all initiatives before they were allowed to go on the ballot. This is contrary to both State and Federal Constitutions, as well as the Laws of this Nation instituted By and For the People as a Sovereign UNITY of Independent States of We The People, not a fraudulent Corporate entity of Lawyers. This is a tremendous amount of power for a PRIVATE union that is incorporated and headquartered in Illinois to hold over the Citizens of California or any other state. The only recourse is through this initiative process and vote by the people.

After the Founding Fathers had formed the Constitution, outlining the laws as to the way our government was to be run, Thomas Jefferson said, in essence, "This proves that plain people, if given the chance, can enact laws and run a government as well as or better than royalty and the blue bloods of Europe." The American people must stop thinking that lawyers are better than they are and can do a better job than they can before the courts of America. Under the Common Law and the Laws of America, no where is it expressly given for anyone to have the power or the right to form a Corporation. Corporations are given birth because of ignorance on the part of the American people and are operating under implied consent and power which they have usurped and otherwise stolen from the people. By RIGHT AND LAW THEY HAVE NO POWER, AUTHORITY OR JURISDICTION, and must be put out of business by the good Citizens of America in their fight for FREEDOM

The U.S. Constitution GUARANTEES to every state in this union a REPUBLICAN FORM of government. Any other form of government is FORBIDDEN. No public officer or branch of government can be limited to a RULING CLASS of any kind, or the states become ARISTOCRACIES and NOT republics. Also, the lawyers have made themselves 1st Class Citizens, where many public offices and branches of government are open to lawyers only. All other people are limited to only two branches of government and to only certain offices in those two branches of government, making all people who are non-lawyers into 2nd class subject citizens.

When the courts belong to the people, as the United States Constitution REQUIRES, (Article IV, Section 4, we the people, will NEVER rule against themselves.) In these Unconstitutional courts foreign tribunals (hoodlum centers), "men" in black dresses, that are Unconstitutional ROBES OF NOBILITY. (Article 1, Section 9 and 10) dispense a perverted ideology, where the people are terrorized by members of the BLACK ROBE CULT (lawyers and lawyer judges in the courtrooms).

The legislative branch of government does NOT have the Constitutional Power to issue Court Orders or any other kind of Orders to people, as a fiction court or a court/corporation for profit and gain cannot reach parity with a lawful man. ONLY presidents and governors have the Constitutional Power to grant PARDONS, but lawyers and lawyer-judges are unconstitutionally granting PARDONS with "immunity from prosecution." Citizens are not permitted to act like people in the courts. The Citizen (2nd class) is told that he does not know how to fill out fancy lawyer forms; that he is not trained in the law; that he does not know court rules and procedures; etc. This is Unconstitutional "lawyer system," only HEARSAY SUBSTITUTES (lawyers) NOT under oath, have access to the fiction/for profit and gain courts, even though ONLY sworn testimony and evidence can be presented in court. Anything else is Bill of Attainder, NOT permitted under the U.S. Constitution (Article 1, Sections 9 and 10). The U.S. Constitution does NOT give anyone the right to a lawyer or the right to counsel, or the right to any other HEARSAY SUBSTITUTE. The 6th Amendment is very SPECIFIC, that the accused ONLY has the right to the ASSISTANCE of counsel and this ASSISTANCE of counsel CAN BE ANYONE THE ACCUSED CHOOSES WITHOUT LIMITATION.

LAWYERS and LAWYER-JUDGES: Created Unconstitutional "lawyer system" pre-trial "motions" and "Hearings" to have eternal EXTORTIONISTIC litigation’s, which is BARRATRY and also is in violation of the U.S. Constitution, and Article 1, as this places defendants in DOUBLE JEOPARDY a hundred times over. Defendants only have a right to A TRIAL, NOT TRIALS.

When a criminal is freed on a TECHNICALITY, HE IS FREED BECAUSE OF A FIX and a PAY-OFF, as a defendant can only be freed if found innocent BY A JURY NOT BY ANY "TECHNICALITY." Whenever a lawyer is involved in a case directly or indirectly, as a litigant or assisting in counsel, ALL LAWYER-JUDGES HAVE TO DISQUALIFY THEMSELVES, AS THERE CANNOT BE A CONSTITUTIONAL TRIAL and also there would be a violation of the conflict of interest laws, along with the violation of separation of powers and checks and balances, because "OFFICERS" OF THE COURT ARE ON BOTH SIDES OF THE BENCH. These same LAWYER-JUDGES are awarding or approving LAWYER FEES, directly and indirectly, amounting to BILLIONS OF DOLLARS annually, all in violation of conflict of interest laws. As long as there are lawyers, there will never be any law, constitution or justice. There will only be MOB RULE, RULE BY A MOB OF LAWYERS.


When a lawyer-judge instructs, directs, or gives orders to a jury, the lawyer-judge is TAMPERING WITH THE JURY. He also tampers with testimony when he orders the answers to be either "Yes" or "No." The lawyer-judge also tampers, fixes, and rigs the trial when he orders anything stricken from the record, or when he "rules" certain evidence and the truth to be inadmissible. This makes the trial and transcript FIXED and RIGGED, because the jury does not hear the REAL TRUTH and ALL THE FACTS. Juries are made into puppets by the lawyers and lawyer-judges. All lawyers are automatically in the judicial branch of government, as they have the Unconstitutional TITLE OF NOBILITY (Article 1, Section 9 and 10), "Officer of the court." Citizens have to be elected or hired to be in any branch of government but non-lawyer Citizens are limited to only 2 of the 3 branches of government. Lawyers as 1st class citizens, can be hired or elected to any of the three branches of government. Lawyers, "Officers of the Court," in the Judicial Branch, are Unconstitutionally in 2 branches of government AT THE SAME TIME whenever they are hired or elected to the executive or legislative branches. This is a violation of the separation of powers, checks and balances, and the conflict of interest laws.

District attorneys and State's attorneys have taken over the Grand Juries FROM the people, where the people are DENIED ACCESS to the grand juries when they attempt to present evidence of crimes committed in the courtrooms by the lawyers and lawyer-judges. The U.S. Constitution, being the Supreme Fundamental Law, is not and CANNOT be ambiguous as to be interpreted, or it would be a worthless piece of paper and we would have millions of interpretations (Unconstitutional amendments) instead of the few we have now. That is why all judges and public servants are SWORN TO SUPPORT the U.S. Constitution, NOT interpret it.

Under INTERNATIONAL ORDERS: ALL LAWYERS, whether they left law school yesterday or 50 years ago, are EXACTLY THE SAME. All lawyers have to file the same motions and follow the same procedures in using the same Unconstitutional "lawyer system". In probate, the lawyers place themselves in everyone's will and estate. When there are minor children as heirs, the lawyer-judges appoint a lawyer (a child molesting Fagin) for EACH CHILD and, at times, the lawyer fees EXCEED the total amount of the estate. An OUTRAGEOUS amount of TAX "MONEY" is directly and indirectly STOLEN BY LAWYERS. Money that is budgeted to County Boards, School Boards and other local and federal agencies eventually finds its way into the pockets of lawyers, as ALL of these agencies are "TRICKED" and "FORCED" into ETERNAL EXTORTIONISTIC LITIGATION.

Executive Producer and Host for "Freedom's Questions", heard every Wednesday from 5:30-7:00 PM PST at 90.1 FM, KZFR, Chico, California, in the Sacramento River Valley. www.KZFR.org Don't fail to visit Thomas Thornhill's extrodinary work at:

KYHOOYA said...

I was thinking, did the king tax the court jester for doing his job? or was he exempt do to being employed by the kingdom?

If I sing you a song and you then give me some change(Coin). To what sum will this "iTune" cost me?

Peanut Gallery said...

From what I have heard, Kurt stipulated that only with allocution would he make the guilty plea. Allocution is the ability to speak in detail of how you committed the crime. Doing this would mean an immediate appeal and once again Kurt would have forced the banks hand to show that all he allocuted was not so. It would have put the evidence against the banks into the record Kurt also risks going to Federal Prison for life.

Maybe some of you legal scholars can validate this allocution

WillToFight said...

Good Post

Peanut Gallery

Sounds like something Kurt would have thought of!

guiltyassin said...

PG said: "Allocution is the ability to speak in detail of how you committed the crime."

That's fine. They would ignore that too. They ignore everything they do not like. An adminstrative court is not a court of record; it keeps a record of the issue to be decided, without the detail.

WillToFight said...

After studing the word in Blacks Law 7th/4th ed.

I don't see that Kurt will or is doing this. this procedure would not allow Kurt to bring out any new evidence or implicate the Banks atal.

But Peanut where are you reading that to proceed this way would allow for an immediate appeal by kurt?

mogel said...

Peanut Gallery said: "Doing this would mean an immediate appeal"

If demanding an allocution shows the lenders are in the wrong & this allocution forces an appeal, the case is continued so to speak. If the case is continued, how does this jive with what Kurt said, "there will be no trial."
If this case is continued & the real issues not resolved, how can one also say there will be a quick financial settlement for clients too?

drhfred said...

Normally there is not much said here of consequence, however today is truly the exception, and the cream really does rise to the top. It has been worthwhile visiting here today thank you for the bright proffers. It is nice seeing the some of you perceiving that there was always a strategy to what both Kurt and Scott were doing, and now finally some of you are in comprehension. It is no longer allowing you to see an obscure picture as the truth commences to reveal the actual representation, as it ‘tis impossible to un-hear a bell once rung. As for the boy’s and I it ‘tis an answer to prayer, know that a few would see the whole of the picture even if only shown a few of the scenes.