Monday, August 28, 2006

It’s More Than Money

Shortly before the hearing on recusal I sent a letter to Mr. Alsup. The work of God is the paramount claim on a man’s life. Suffering and loss are not justification for an exemption. Am I about protecting your damage claim? All the time, more than you know. It is important to me but is a subjugated claim. Our offer to the courts as agents of their master to set aside their fraudulent righteousness and follow Him had to mature. They have defied Him. Like the mighty ant screaming up to the shoe its demands God now makes His will and counter offer against its will. This work is near completion and God having found us faithful gets His chance to experience a “YIPPIE” moment (for you Karen) that arrives at the end of your faithfulness. Yippie is when He can show off His power and faithfulness to His word. The shoe falls as it were. Below is the letter. Perhaps it will help your understanding.


Dear. Mr. Alsup, 8/11/06

I’m sorry to hear of your recusal from our case. I want to thank you for your civility. I honestly suspected that you were the only one in the courtroom intelligent enough to understand my strategies. My hope for you has been and will remain that you live up to your potential. The offer Christ gave you through His agents was a rare and honorable one. To dismiss it as an ignorant philosophy of Metaphysics is not wise. Our prayer, Scott and I, is that you will be won over as a brother and discover true righteousness. What you accept now is a fraud that possesses none of the necessary elements of truth, love, and justice to form its amalgamation. Christ’s intention for you was to set you up as a light upon a hill for this generation. There are thousands of fools in your position who can sell their souls for the treasures of this world; your opportunity not to be one of them may not come again. Christ is not a beggar in need of your assistance, He is more than content to say, “To hell with you” to the masses. Narrow is the way that leads to life and few that find it. Wide is the path to destruction. As we approach our coming victory over these ridiculous accusations and criminal abuse under color of law I hope you will see the powerful hand of God in our instance and find confidence in the offer made. Christ has already designed a hero’s exit for you that will free you from all the liability you have accepted on behalf of your presumptions. Perhaps if I tell you in advance you will trust me to outline it for you. Be well and of good cheer until we see you again in the civil case. My public critique of you is not an assault on the man, which I value, but on the cancers that are destroying you. Hopefully by now you have figured out that a stupid lawyer like Thomas Spielbaurer is not a reflection of the clients. You ability to advance the banker’s fraud past his ignorance will not happen in our case. As it is true with us it is true with you, when God calls He enables.

Sincerely



***I have written a blog on recusal that will be posted soon.

30 comments:

partysecured said...

I haven't been too many places in my life or seen a whole hell of alotta different things.

I have however read alot of books and articles relating to how this world and its inhabitance have gotten themselves into such an awful mess.

Not too many however proffer up solutions even though their messages were well appreciated.

But I am proud to say that I had the opportunity to hug and shake the hand of the man that from my vantage has kicked more ass in a jail cell than the majority of "free" walkin around town complaining zombies" from my same vantage has.


Kurt I love you sooo much. I don't have any financial interest in the dorean group, but knowing that you actually exist makes me not feel alone in this matrix of lies deceit and bullshit. Thanks.

son of a prophet said...

forgive me, but i thought that this was important enuf to post again, because it was lost amngst the 100+ posts.





for those who like to pray, but dont necessarily know how or what to pray....

The following prayer is all encompassing and complete; it has been honed by the HS through many, many yers of prayer....

I say these at least twice a day....

Here it is....

START OUT WITH THE LORDs PRAYER, AS PRAYED BY YESHUA HIMSELF.

THEN ADD AS SOME BOOKS DO NOT...

"IN YESHUAs NAME I PRAY, FOR THE KINGDOM, THE POWER AND GLORY ARE YOURS, NOW AND FOREVER, AMEN.

then say.....

LORD, THANK YOU FOR BLESSING ME WITH THE HOLY SPIRIT AND KEEPING ME FROM THE EVIL ONE.

LORD, THANK YOU FOR GIVING ME THE COURAGE AND STRENGTH TO DO YOUR WILL AND THE WISDOM TO DISCERN IT.

LORD, THANK YOU FOR THE FOOD THAT I HAVE EATEN TODAY AND THE SINS THAT YOU HAVE FORGIVEN ME.

THANK YOU FOR BLESSING MY FAMILY AND FREINDS WITH THE HOLY SPIRIT AND KEEPING THEM FROM THE EVIL ONE.
(may add..."ESPECIALLY __________")


LORD, MAY THE HOLY SPIRIT COMFORT THOSE WHO ARE BEING PERSECUTED ON YOUR ACCOUNT.

LORD, MAY THE DOVE OF PEACE DESCEND UPON JERUSALEM TO BRING PEACE TO JERUSALEM.

(obeying cmmand to pray for the peace of jerusalem n the OT)

LORD, MAY THE LEADERS OF MY GOVT. SEE THE ERROR OF THEIR WAYS ON ABORTION, GENETIC ENGINEERING AND HUMAN CLONING.

LORD, MAY THE LEADERS OF MY GOVT. BE KEPT SAFE FROM HARM.

(yes, i know that the govt. is corrupt, yet conforming to yeshuas command to pray for the govt. leaders)


THERE IT IS..COMPLETE.

NOTICE ALL ARE THANKS. I ASK YESHUA ONE TIME AND THEN CONTINUALLY GIVE THANKS.

FEEL FREE TO TWEAK THIS AS YOU LIKE, HOWEVER THE FIRST THREE SHOULD BECOME A REGUALAR PART AS THEY ARE ALL ENCOMPASSING OF GODS WILL; NOT OURS. THATS WHY I DID NOT PERSONALISE IT TO MY NEEDS. GOD KNOWS MY NEEDS, I DONT NEED TO TELL HIM AND INSULT HIS INTELLIGENCE.

PEACE OF YESHUA BE WITH YOU.

10:19 AM

laughing lots said...

partsecured said:Kurt I love you sooo much. I don't have any financial interest in the dorean group, but knowing that you actually exist makes me not feel alone in this matrix of lies deceit and bullshit. Thanks

Your not alone, i opened a "Jim Jones" camp. Want some koolaid?

habakkuk said...

I just got dr. fred's latest email....Wow!! Praise the Living G-d!!!

GR82BMOI said...

Mogel: You’re wrong. I don’t think “the Doran Group is just one big conspiracy to defraud stupid clients.” I think the Dorean Group is a buncha hustlers that cleverly marketed their scam to people with the propensity to believe that Elvis is pumping gas at an Exxon station in Poughkeepsie. Big difference.

Laughing Lots & Complainers Suck: Why, suddenly, is Ferrel J. Lecompte practically being nominated for sainthood? I don’t get it. The guy is/was a cheat, a fraud, a con, and a self-affected braggart. He called people names, threatened most that disagreed with him and mocked not only clients losing their homes to foreclosure, but the FIB and the Court as well. He was Dorean’s top dog (outside of Kurt and Scott), yet ya’ll are claiming now that he was hoodwinked right along with the rest of the victims?! Gimme a break! Am I the only one that recalls his vicious, profanity-laced insults and threats that led to the shut-down of the Property Sites threads? LeFerret deserves everything he has coming and then some.

mogel said...

Great to be Me said: "Sometimes I just feel like blasting scammers like Mogel. I can’t help myself, even knowing that Mogel and his ilk are just sorry little conspiracy groupies and their continual misinformed yammering isn’t going to amount to squat."

Then you went on to say that you expected the Brokers to tell what they know about the Principals to save themselves from prosecution as if some conspiracy exists. If that doesn't amount to judging a conspiracy, then you are the one that is mistaken based upon your own words.

Combining both these statements, along with your latest posts, you are saying that the Dorean Group is just one big conspiracy to hurt weak clients they could prey on due to specialized marketing ploys. YOu demean Dorean clients by saying that they believe that Elvis is still alive, which is tantamount to saying they are stupid & that marketing was specially made to take advantage of stupid people.

After your last few posts, I think you are the one guilty of inflaming people. You are guilty of all of the accusations you throw out. How funny and hypocritical is that? How are you any better than the people you judge, inflame and criticize? Is this an example of the pig calling the hippo fat? Even you can see that.

The shut down of Property sites had nothing to do with insults and profanity. It had everything to do with Nemo threatening to sue the administrator of that site. Insults and harsh and profane words went on the Property sites for over a year & the person running the site turned a blind eye and deaf ear to all of it, and could care less, UNTIL he was personally threatened with legal action by the timely ultimatum by Neo. Rather than dealing with a perceived lawsuit, the site administrator chickened out & just caved into Nemo's time frame demands. The timing of the shut down of property sites gives you the REAL TRUTH. I remember the history of all of that very well.

YOu and your kind are always clever at putting the blame in all the wrong places. That's why you will always be wrong in your perceived accusations and outcomes.

neModemes said...

GR82BMOI said...

Laughing Lots & Complainers Suck: Why, suddenly, is Ferrel J. Lecompte practically being nominated for sainthood? I don’t get it. The guy is/was a cheat, a fraud, a con, and a self-affected braggart. He called people names, threatened most that disagreed with him and mocked not only clients losing their homes to foreclosure, but the FIB and the Court as well. He was Dorean’s top dog (outside of Kurt and Scott), yet ya’ll are claiming now that he was hoodwinked right along with the rest of the victims?! Gimme a break! Am I the only one that recalls his vicious, profanity-laced insults and threats that led to the shut-down of the Property Sites threads? LeFerret deserves everything he has coming and then some

You obviously don't have a good memory or you would be totally aware that your buddy neodemes had the Property Sites board "shut down" with his threats., so you don't know shit about what you think. Nemo had that board shut down because he couldnt control what people said about him.

~~The Swami~~~ said...

Fur - 3.14159265 - duz - knot - cell

~~The Swami~~~ said...

Mogel - duz - knot - & - sir - e - mail

~~The Swami~~~ said...

GR82BMOI said...
Laughing Lots & Complainers Suck: Why, suddenly, is Ferrel J. Lecompte practically being nominated for sainthood?




I have to tell you! That has a real ring to it! Saint LeCompte! I will refer to Farrel as Saint LeCompte from now on. Thanks Goober2BYou for the great idea! Thank You as well Saint LeCompte!

GR82BMOI said...

Riiiight…So what you’re saying is that Ferret behaved like the obnoxious bully that he is, but the consequences of that behavior are actually somebody else’s fault. Well, in my world, those who set out to harm others shouldn’t be surprised when there is fallout. You reap what you sow and I just gotta believe that ‘ol Flea is gonna be doin’ a whole lotta reapin’. Karma’s a bitch sometimes, huh?

~~The Swami~~~ said...

gr82bmoui, did you know :

Fur - 3.14159265 - duz - knot - cell

~~The Swami~~~ said...

By the way to all the government plants - I'm speaking in code. There are about seven people on here that understand what the hell I'm talking about.

Like this:

Auschlander Biergarten

or

~~S~~~

~~The Swami~~~ said...

How about this:

Brsheen, ^^5.~~L

Pauligirl said...

w said...
Pauligirl said...Please explain what you see as deception here.

pauli, please answer what did the bank put up for "consideration" in ANY contract for the 100K alleged loan if the funds were received from a place other than their vault and from funds that did not belong to the bank in the first place?

how can I enter into contract with you at "no risk" of any kind to me, but you have all the risk?
unjust enrichment.
that is like buying stock knowing that I can never lose. and using someone elses funds to buy the stock, then collect the dividends for myself, no risk, zero.

how just and fair can you really believe that is?
10:34 AM
-----------------------------------
What did the bank put up? The $100,000.00. If you got the money, the loan is not "alleged" The amount banks are allowed to lend is based on the reserve ratio, set by the Federal Reserve System. If the fed raises its reserve requirements then banks have less money on hand and thus have less to lend. Member banks borrow money from the Fed to pay out loans and other investments but they must pay a fee, the discount rate.
Most of the money for home loans comes from three major institutions:
· Fannie Mae (FNMA - Federal National Mortgage Association)
· Freddie Mac (FHLMC – Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation)
· Ginnie Mae (GNMA – Government National Mortgage Association).
Once your loan has been packaged into a pool and sold to Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, or Ginnie Mae, the lender gets additional funds so they can make more loans (to service in their portfolio) and sell to those institutions, so they can get more money, and so on....
This is the cycle that allows institutions to lend you money.
This shows pretty much how it happens:
http://www.realestateabc.com/
loanguide/mortgage.htm
Please just keep in mind it's been 30 something years since I've had an ecomonics class.

KYHOOYA said...
HEY PAULIGIRL
How about you tell me why the paid to the order stamp it not done prior to you signing in stead they do it after the fact and don't say a word about ?
-----------------------------------
Probably about 60% of the loans I see already have the stamp on the note. It's just not filled in until after the loan is closed and booked because you can't assign a note before it's a done deal. How about you tell me why you think the "Pay to the order" stamp is such a big deal? Generally, there's a notice of assignment in the loan package, telling the borrower what percentage of loans that particular lender sells.

The terms of your loan don't change. The interest rate is the same, the payments are the same. The only thing that changes is who you make the payments to and they have to give you written notice of that. What is the problem?

P

complainers suck said...

GR82BMOI said...
Riiiight…So what you’re saying is that Ferret behaved like the obnoxious bully that he is, but the consequences of that behavior are actually somebody else’s fault. Well, in my world, those who set out to harm others shouldn’t be surprised when there is fallout. You reap what you sow and I just gotta believe that ‘ol Flea is gonna be doin’ a whole lotta reapin’. Karma’s a bitch sometimes, huh?

Lets just say for arguments sake you are correct and lecompte is in fact a "bully" and "obnoxious". Does that make him or anyone else guily of a crime?

Is he anymore of a criminal than any of the other un-indicted brokers?

It seems you have your personal feelings mixed up with reality.

Gforce said...

Habakkuk---What is the GOOD NEWS!!

w said...

P, thank you for trying, but you failed to answer where the bank put up the CONSIDERATION OR RISK for a 100K alleged loan?

you only answered that the sale of your note was the source of funding we all know that one, by your own definition the bank has put up no risk in the transaction.

where is the bank's RISK?
the 100K was from the sale of your note on the market, HENCE NO CONSIDERATION AND NO RISK FROM THE BANK, WHERE is the 100K the bank gave you that was allegedly from the banks own vault and funds and not from the sale of your note? and why cant anybody answer this simple question? because there is no risk of any kind to the bank.

I'm not looking for the answer to the process, we know they sold your note to receive the funding, I am looking for how can that be a legal consideration to the bank if they have nothing to lose by selling your note to fund the alleged loan?

zero risk to the bank. all the risk to you is unjust enrichment.

oksurewhynot said...

Kurt must have a stash of crack somewhere in that cell.

The letter to Judge Alsop illustrates once again:

JUST BECAUSE SOMEONE SAYS IT, DOESN"T MAKE IT TRUE. PS I don't think you can schmooze the judge. Doubt he even saw the letter.

KYHOOYA said...

Pauligirl If you would stop all of your double talk and just answer the question that is very clear as to what it refers to. Unless that is what your intention is here, to only distract and instead of putting the facts out on the table so that all eyes can see whats real and whats not and from there make a choose base in the truth not the idea of what someone thinks it should be or want's to protect.

As you have stated here that the note is sold to recover the funds that the bank has put out in your trans action . This would be as you said to recover the money so they can relend it henes fractional banking. So with that in mind and you being the one stating this fact we should agree that the note is sold by the lender to get back the money they have given in a loan and have received the note and such at there request for said loan.

This being the facts and I beleive this to be correct as you say. My question is not when they do it my question is what you think is the resone for not being up front about doing it and the many other items and event that take place it the process of the signing and the loan from start to end (from the momment someone get that add from a broker or leander and then take the needed steps to contact the persons whom sent it to start the process of getting a loan from there EQ biult up in ther home. or whatever the case may be they find them selfs entering in to this SNAKE PIT.

Please tell me why the need for this industry that involves many different companys and people to hide many item and facts about the process that is taking place from the one it effects the most the borrower.

2 why is it that so much is let to be open to the chance of miss direction and the terms and process is set up in a way so the customer is left to find themeaning of the terms used in this witch for most would be to go back to school and get the need code book for understanding a easy prosess that could be useing wording that they could no what it taking place ?

3 Why do the people involved such as your self want to keep a process that is so easy to cheet the customer.? Insead of the process being change so that all is seen and all is up front so that if anyone would think to steel or cheat the customer they would not be able to?

Why would anyone that worked as you do in this industry who said that they are not part of the cheats not want to help to change it to be more clear and take away all the different way that are not needed to get the job done but ar eput into place for the miss directin of the customer and cause the chance of theft.
I don't understand how anone that was'nt part of the bad would not want to have the system changed so there could not be so many way as there are now to lie and steel from the customer please tell me how the thing that need to change are need to do business as I don't seee them as anything other than the driving force that promotes the ba din the industry . these are terms and hiding fact and making thing way more complecated then needed all for the theft of the customer

plz tell how ???

I know how it all work I am asking you to tell me why all the bullshit is needed to be made so that customer as keept in the side line and left so that they can be taken advantage of ?

GR82BMOI said...

Kyhooya said… “I know how it all work I am asking you to tell me why all the bullshit is needed to be made so that customer as keept in the side line and left so that they can be taken advantage of ?”

No, evidently, you don’t “know how it all work”. It might help if you simply try to comprehend what Pauligirl has written instead of applying “reasoning”. This is not rocket science, people. To describe it in as simple terms as possible: People (like you) and businesses deposit money at a bank.– into checking accounts, savings accounts and CD’s. The bank takes that deposited money and loans it to other people (like you). A bank generally doesn’t want 15- or 30-year loans sitting on its books (for business reasons that are way above your head), so after they make one of those long term loans they usually sell it to someone else. Meaning, they get the principal back that first came from their depositors. The person that borrowed the money now has to repay whomever bought the loan instead of the bank that first made the loan because whomever bought the loan has now funded the loan. We’re back to square one and the cycle starts all over again. In simple terms, that's all there is to it.

son of a prophet said...

if one cannot start a private bank and do what the banks do because they would be arrested, then why can the banks do it?

becasue the govt. allows them to do it?

but who gave the govt. permission to let the banks do this?

did you?

did you contract with the govt. to allow the banks to do what they do?

if not, they why are the banks allowed to do this?

iff UCC deosnt apply, then why did it apply when the banks use it?

thought for food?

GR82BMOI said...

Complainers suck said…”Is he anymore of a criminal than any of the other un-indicted brokers? “

Well, yes, actually he is, but I still wish they would have rounded up the whole shyster lot (starting with Mogel). But hey, some days you’re the dog and some days you’re the hydrant. They couldn’t have picked a better fall guy.

dgwondering said...

Flea's company CCR was the marketing arm and sold the web sites to the brokers. Flea doesn't know any more about mortgages than any other scammer just the same old BS Gashler SOAP and KYjelly put up here but he made more money off it than they know how to.

complainers suck said...

dgwondering said...
Flea's company CCR was the marketing arm and sold the web sites to the brokers.

This comment makes no sense at all. How can lecompte's company sell "web sites to the brokers"?

Please stop typing just to type. It obvious you have no clue about what you speak of. Its kind of funny, because i am not defending anyone, i am just questioning a few of you guys own posts for truth, and instead of proving what you claim is truth, you respond with more comments that does not make any sense at all, or avoid it and move on to more lies, like gr8 did about who actually had that property sites, taken down. We never heard anymore about that once people told this blog what really happened. Its obvious that all you guy are doing is speculating what you think, and yet it can easily be proven that you dont know anything about what you claim to know.

laughing lots said...

Why is everyone so mad at Farrel? I thought that nothing wrong was being done at dorean. If everything was soooo legit whats everyone so upset at, hmmm I wonder? It seems to me that he is the only one taking responsibility for any of this. A couple fled the country, kurt sits in jail dodging every bit of any kind of responsibility writing endless biblical dribble that makes no sense at all for any type of defense on top of that defending himself which is completely ignorant.
Does farrel know more than scott and kurt, I somehow doubt that. I think that he started off as another dreaming client if my info is correct, so I don’t think that farrel is going to be the one to put them under, they are doing that and have done that to themselves.
So if dorean was the best thing since sliced bread why is everyone so mad if farrrel say’s what he knows, if nothing fishy was going on? Maybe the guy NOW sees it was wrong, maybe he doesn’t want to sit in prison for 25+ years for people he barely even know’s..wait, no one should be mad at that, nothing wrong was being done at dorean right???
No one said he was a saint and justice will come to him in one way or another that’s a fact. You cant convict someone based on their personality or if you think they have acted like an asshole. I am just confused at all the dim duo supporters for being mad at someone who is just saying what went on in a legitimate business, no one should get in trouble for that huh!

mogel said...

Great to Be Me said: "No, evidently, you don’t “know how it all work”.

NO, IT'S OBVIOUS FROM YOUR POST, YOU DON'T KNOW HOW IT WORKS.


It might help if you simply try to comprehend what Pauligirl has written instead of applying “reasoning”.

YES, REASONING AND ASKING INTELLIGENT QUESTIONS IS ALWAYS A BAD THING TO DO. LOL


This is not rocket science, people. To describe it in as simple terms as possible: People (like you) and businesses deposit money at a bank.– into checking accounts, savings accounts and CD’s. The bank takes that deposited money and loans it to other people (like you).

NO, YOU'RE WRONG. THE BANK NEVER TAKES MY SPECIFIC MONIES I DEPOSITED IN A CHECKING ACCOUNT AWAY FROM ME TO SPECIFICALLY LEND TO SOMEONE ELSE. THE BANK CREATES NEW MONIES WHEN A LOAN IS GIVEN.

A bank generally doesn’t want 15- or 30-year loans sitting on its books (for business reasons that are way above your head), so after they make one of those long term loans they usually sell it to someone else. Meaning, they get the principal back that first came from their depositors.

MONEY THAT CAME FROM THEIR DEPOSITORS HUH? YOU MEAN THE BANK DIDN'T TAKE A RISK USING THEIR OWN ASSETS? THAT'S THE FIRST INTELLIGENT THING YOU'VE SAID. SO YOU ADMIT THAT THE LENDER DOESN'T LEND FROM THEIR OWN HARD EARNED ASSETS OR FROM THEIR OWN EQUITY OR CAPITAL?

The person that borrowed the money now has to repay whomever bought the loan instead of the bank that first made the loan because whomever bought the loan has now funded the loan.

IF THE DEPOSITORS FUNDED THE LOAN IN YOUR LAST STATEMENT, HOW CAN THE ASSIGNED LENDER FUND THE LOAN. ISN'T THAT A CONTRADICTION?


We’re back to square one and the cycle starts all over again. In simple terms, that's all there is to it.

NO, THAT'S NOT ALL THERE IS TO IT. YOUR FORGET THE PART ABOUT THE LENDER PUTTING NONE OF THEIR OWN MONEY UP TO FUND THE TRANSACTION. YOU FORGOT TO MENTION THAT THE LENDER FORGED (ALTERED) THE PROMISSORY NOTE FROM A PROMISE TO PAY TO A NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENT THAT CAN BE BANKED & SOLD FOR CASH WITH NO CONSIDERATION OR RISK ON THE LENDER'S PART TO GENERATE A LOAN. YOU FORGET TO TELL THAT THE LENDER OPENED UP AN ACCOUNT UNDER THE BORROWERS NAME WITHOUT DIVULGING THAT INFORMATION. THAT'S THE BORROWERS DEPOSIT, NOT THE LENDERS TO DO WHATEVER HE CHOOSES WITH IT. THAT'S WHERE THE FRAUD COMES INTO PLAY THAT PEOPLE LIKE YOURSELF WANT TO TALK AROUND. YOU ALSO FORGOT TO TELL HOW FRACTIONAL RESERVE BANKING WORKS. YOU ALSO FORGOT TO TELL HOW THIS PROCESS STEALS FROM EVERYONE ELSE THROUGH INFLATION AND ENRICHES THE BANKS.

mogel said...

Complainers suck said…”Is he anymore of a criminal than any of the other un-indicted brokers? “

Well, yes, actually he is, but I still wish they would have rounded up the whole shyster lot (starting with Mogel). But hey, some days you’re the dog and some days you’re the hydrant. They couldn’t have picked a better fall guy.
_________________________________

That's real intelligent of you, to say, yes actually he is and give no reason WHATSOEVER to justify your answer.

So you are saying Saint LeCompte is a dog now and I'm a fire hydrant as if someone is pissing on me? I assure you no one is pissing on me.

You're also assuming there is a fall guy here. No one has been convicted yet, or do you need to be reminded of that FACT.

mogel said...

DG Wondering said: "Flea's company CCR was the marketing arm and sold the web sites to the brokers. Flea doesn't know any more about mortgages than any other scammer just the same old BS Gashler SOAP and KYjelly put up here but he made more money off it than they know how to.
__________________________________
Would you like to put that statement above in an affidavit for all of us, have it sworn to and notarized due to your personal knowlege of the facts?

I will testify that I never bought any website from St. LeCompte. Can you show otherwise? I know you can't & I'd bet my life on it.

If not, shut the hell up if you don't know what you are talking about, or at least have the common decency and fairness to say, "I BELIEVE", instead of stating things as if they are facts. I'm sick of your blatant lies and speculation.

Then, we can use your false affidavit to show as evidence you are the lying, moron, misinformed, fool I've said you are. LOL

GR82BMOI said...

Mogel said…”NO, THAT'S NOT ALL THERE IS TO IT. YOUR FORGET THE PART ABOUT THE LENDER PUTTING NONE OF THEIR OWN MONEY UP TO FUND THE TRANSACTION. YOU FORGOT TO MENTION THAT THE LENDER FORGED (ALTERED) THE PROMISSORY NOTE FROM A PROMISE TO PAY TO A NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENT THAT CAN BE BANKED & SOLD FOR CASH WITH NO CONSIDERATION OR RISK ON THE LENDER'S PART TO GENERATE A LOAN. YOU FORGET TO TELL THAT THE LENDER OPENED UP AN ACCOUNT UNDER THE BORROWERS NAME WITHOUT DIVULGING THAT INFORMATION. THAT'S THE BORROWERS DEPOSIT, NOT THE LENDERS TO DO WHATEVER HE CHOOSES WITH IT. THAT'S WHERE THE FRAUD COMES INTO PLAY THAT PEOPLE LIKE YOURSELF WANT TO TALK AROUND. YOU ALSO FORGOT TO TELL HOW FRACTIONAL RESERVE BANKING WORKS. YOU ALSO FORGOT TO TELL HOW THIS PROCESS STEALS FROM EVERYONE ELSE THROUGH INFLATION AND ENRICHES THE BANKS.”

I’m wondering…what has a better chance of success: a) Mogel gaining even a basic comprehension of Macroeconomic concepts; or, b) my cat learning to read Braille (it is a smart cat)?