Tuesday, November 28, 2006
This is my Default
As the end of this battle approaches I fall back onto my default settings. Scott and I both signed our plea agreements. Our settlement conference is coming soon. As a man of faith I am driven by the forever settled word of God which is not seen. Most of you see two men up against a 97% conviction machine and with the sight of your reason easily place your Las Vegas wager with the house. I have not been trained to trust my eyes or my well developed reason. I see 2 guys up against a giant who boast too much in its weakness and defies the living God. Why sign the plea agreements you ask? That is an act of faith to end the charade and get to the finish line. How many of you would take a 20 year risk to prove God true in your life? I suspect very few and that is not a good commentary on our understanding of the true God. I’ve been ridiculed by people who think $3,000 is a risk. None of them could deliver on my promise or survive what I have suffered. Don’t think for a moment because I have a champion’s heart and a victor’s voice that I don’t have a bruised heart and rivers of tears. We are at that time where fraud and fact are separated. I hope I have maintained a faithful voice in advance that God can be trusted. Mortgages, foreclosures, disappointments, pain and Dorean are all merely the vehicle to teach the greater lesson. If you have learned it you have done well and more evidence of your wisdom is arriving.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
8 comments:
"Don’t think for a moment because I have a champion’s heart and a victor’s voice that I don’t have a bruised heart and rivers of tears."
May the Holy Spirit comfort you....
Mogel, could you post your email.
"Scott and I both signed our plea agreements."
In other words you admit guilt for a lesser sentence, or is it another one of the goofy legal maneuvers?
Judge Roy Bean said...
In other words you admit guilt for a lesser sentence, or is it another one of the goofy legal maneuvers?
hmmmm, if i was forced to make a choice between the two options listed, i would say option 2.
I DON'T THINK SO! I'M NOT BUYING IT.
You people will believe anything won't you?
Come on, you want me to buy that Kurt after all this time (going on 2 years now) has at the very moment that the court's are going to be shown for their wrong doing or at the very least there is ground for a new trail based on the OUTRAGES Right's violations in regard's to one their Right to a speedy trial and due process ha sbeen completly stompted on.
Fact : You can't add defendents in the middle of someone eleses criminal case,. Even if there were a way to do that without it violating their right's , you sure in the helll can't do it when it's based on the fact that the FED's are trying to see if they will get these people from another country or not. Ha ha ha! I have to laugh cus it's just so rediculous to watch everyone out there thats is so hell bent on the own anger about all this that if there were a bunch of pitch forks laying aroud these guy's might want to run.
You all got your self's into this know one but. How do you want anyomne to see that you were a victom and some how were in great shaope before you ever heard of dorean and that after that itwasw all their fault that you lost your house'.
NOt a chance that is so outrages to even think.
You were looking for a MORTGAGE ELIMINATION PROGRAM whhen you found them how do you want someone tpo view that action as? That you mearly found your self being redirected to that page when you were on you way to the website that you make your mortgage payment on.
That's as good as the one where the guy said "Judge know really I mearly found these drug's and firearm in the cars trunk under the secret compartment and I was on my way to the police station to turn them in , you see it was all just a misunderstanding" Hahalol .
Wake up people there is no winner if these guy get fuck in this and on top of that if their rights are trampleded in the process then we all loss even more.
Let see if the neysayers get their way then the boy's the the graybar hotel for a long time
the clients get Dick (cus you don't think your going to see one dime of that money the Feds took as some great guester from the Gov't after it al said an done... Do You? Come one this is the real world not that B.S. you read and beleive everywhere and the fact are there to see what took place to have you lose your home .
Even if you did get suckered and then refied like old Dr. Jeff with the 6000. mortgage (what timing these guy's have when they post did he not hit on just about every high light inregard to the 'Poor Client but I'm noy blaming anyone type ' )
You all think what you want it's your right to do so and in this country at least for now know one is going to stop you (well that is unless you say something about old Jr. up in the whitehouse them you might want to keep an eye out cus bad thing's have happened there) but as I see it this isn't over yet.
JUst watch and see.
The feds say the banks can't lend you their credit that means if you can show that the fund's for your loan came from another place and or were not where they should have been at the time of the funding of your loan (bank acct record show this ) then it is with out any doubt FRAUD and that by any terms of any contract void's it there and then.
Go Check the facts about that one all day long and then tell me how having the records on the bank put and gone over by outside agency would cause the banks to be a little worried and would not want that to happen
the next part of that law it that if they did do this (and we no they did mostly sell you note before they funded your loan there by selling you there credit not a loan of there assets.) it falls under another little law that says
If a chartered bank or in other word a Na. bank were to be caught comiting fraud then they will lose their charter and there by be shut down . another very good resone the bank might not want to let this get out.
I read the terms on contract all the time I also have made it a point to on most credit terms as of late and the fact is very clear to me that the banks are in a hurry to get the HOLE plug that has been exposed by what ever means.
You beleive what you want.
l8r for now got to run .
NEWS UPDATE said...
You're at least getting smarter judge,it is one of those legal maneuvers. Get ready to ruin a good set of pants when you see what happens.
....we're ready, nu. all of those previous "goofy" legal maneuvers worked so well, huh? the biggest results they have netted so far was a good laugh....
Justass said:
....we're ready, nu. all of those previous "goofy" legal maneuvers worked so well, huh? the biggest results they have netted so far was a good laugh....
12:38 AM
How do you know what anything they have done has netted yet?
What .. are you some kinda crystal ball reader?
You don't know shit, yet you post on here like your some offical who has the inside track on the law that is involved in this trial. Witch by the way has yet to even be a TRIAL as far as I see it.as in there being no trial date even set yet after how long....?
You are the the perfect poster child for what is wrong in this country.
just remenber what you do today will have a lasting effect on tomorrow and even though it may not be YOU who have to pay for that chose it will be someone you know.
You can not let happen the change of the law when it has been found in it a loop hole . You mush bear any outcome from it and only then you may change it to plug that hole.
Just because a court has the mind to say that their feelings are that this is wrong that is not the right's of the law in oplace at the time it was acted upon .
You want to look at why the court won't jump in and say something about all those Class Action cases every year , that what gain a big $2.00 for the Class and the rest to the lawyers how is that getting the right thing done .
why is the judge in this so atached to it as if it was personel from the start.
how is it that justice is served when a judge won't let the defence even present their case. how is that fair. it' is the job of the judge to be of and open mind and to carry out the duties of keeping the sides following the rules in the games it's is his job Not to inject his O.P. in any matter yet this has been done now for so long you have a bunch of penis pumping bench sitting obove thelaw judges that are in place today.
I must say it was nice to see the judge get convicted for his how did he say it in .... ? ah. what dose that matter anyway I have to wonder with that case will it be o.k. for all of the cases he sat on for over a year he was doing this to bring mistrials up. or would you say that he was of clear mind when he made those life changing choses for the one in front of him
JUDGE GET"S % YEARS FOR PLAYING WITH HIS WILLY WELL SITTING ON THE BENCH pump pump you up! that how the story goes.
by
KYHOOYA said...
Fact : You can't add defendents in the middle of someone eleses criminal case,.
ky, you make a very interesting point, and if it applied to THIS case you may be correct. However, in THIS case you are WRONG.
fact: No defendant's were "added" to this case. these "co" defendants ran and are now in or about to be in custody, and now will be tried with the other defendants or cut deals, as johnson wrote about in a previous blog. so give us another fact to try and digest because to no ones surprise, you have this FACT wrong.
isn't it about time moogie takes the muzzle off for some soft spoken words?
Post a Comment