Tuesday, June 12, 2007

The mental judges (05-27-07)

There is quite a difference from wise judgment and being judgmental. One is based on truth and the other on a lie. I have shown in too many times to count that the retards commenting here are living a lie in their judgmentalism. They are not defending truth or reality but trying to make themselves relevant by being the bullheads that will push the square peg of opinion through the round hole of reality. Their vanity is known by all but themselves. Judging wisely is another matter. In my environment crimes are discussed more frequently. What is amazing is that those who believe they are sentinels of justice are constantly in a state of criminal activity. We now live in a world where retards run our learning institutions, self-righteous our spiritual, reprobates our law, and criminals our penal institutions. Everywhere you turn those living a lie are in power to call those speaking and living truth liars. The apathetic and mindless are swept away in the fraud with all their plans and assets. Those like myself who are brave enough to tell the emperor he is naked are vilified by the fraudulent court. Only those who have made this stand know how fast the bully liars turn into cowards afraid all their stolen possessions will be taken from them. Its easy to sit in judgment of all these fools because truth has never changed no matter what generation of fools repeat the folly of the lie. In the end the judgmental will migrate to those more susceptible to their lies and ignorance. They prey on the weak because they have no strength of their own. Judge for yourself, measure all these fools to the truth and they will come up lacking.

5 comments:

~~The Swami~~~ said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
sd said...

Kurt,

One of the biggest problems with all of the rants and raves from both sides of the arguement is that on one side you say: "the square peg of opinion through the round hole of reality"

On the other side: the round peg is opinion and the square hole is reality.

I wonder which is correct?

you say toe-may-toe
I say toe-ma-toe

Back to being serious once again"
I don't really understand why everyone that doesn't see things exactly the same way as you do is a "retard".
I agree with some of what you say and disagree with some of it. What does that make me?
Maybe a "tard" that hasn't been promoted yet?

Truth is not always easy to choose as an option. Especially when it is blurred with retoric.
To identify truth, one must know all information from both sides of an arguement. You make your arguement against our financial system well but your negitive demeaning and sometimes insulting spue make your credibility suspect.
You have the right to your opinion, why can't you let the others have their say without verbal insult?

Forgive me if I sound judgemental, I have not as yet been blessed with being all-knowing.

People on both sides of the issue are currently in my prayers, how about yours?

sd

sop10 said...

"To identify truth, one must know....."



+++++++++++++THE HS++++++++++++++

mogel said...

SD: You make your arguement against our financial system well but your negitive demeaning and sometimes insulting spue make your credibility suspect.
_________________________________
Speaking of spue, didn't the only perfect Being say this:

Rev. 3: 15 - 16:

"I know thy works, that thou art neither cold nor hot:

"So then because thou art LUKEWARM, and neither cold nor hot, I will SPUE THEE OUT OF MY MOUTH."

So is bench sitting allowed when a truthful issue is at stake? Is a lack of conviction or a lack of knowledge or faith something overlooked as unimportant by God of which needs to be ignored?

Was Jesus's credibility suspect when he said this:

Math. 10: 34: "Think not that I am come to send peace on earth; I came not to send peace, but a sword. For I am come to set A MAN AT VARAIANCE against his father, and the daughter against her mother, and the daughter in law against her mother in law."

Or how about Jesus's statement:

Luke 11: 44 "Woe unto you scribes & Pharisees, HYPOCRITES! FOR YE ARE AS GRAVES, which appear not, and the men that walk over them are not aware of them."

Did Jesus call them HYPOCRITES and dead to the truth & does this lessen his credibility?

Luke 11: 46: "And he said, "Woe unto you also ye lawyer! for ye lade men with burdens grevious to be borne, and ye yourselves touch not the burdens with one of your fingers."

Did Jesus call them Lazy Leeches?

Luke 11: 52 "Woe unto you lawyers, for ye have taken away the KEY OF KNOWLEDGE, ye entered not in yourselves, and them that were entering in ye, hindered.

Did Jesus call them Liars & Thieves & Manipulating Deceivers by his accusations? Does his accusations make them less true or make his message less credible?

How about this statement:

Math 23: 33: "Ye serpents, ye generation of vipers, how can ye escape the damnation of hell?"

Did Jesus call them a "snake in the grass" & pronounce the worst fate there is upon a person? Did this lessen His credibility?

Did Jesus emotionally & mentally upset them by his name calling & unflattering judgements; those that hindered his mission & philosophy? What did they do as a response to his words:

Luke 11: 53: "And as he said these things unto them, the scribes and the Pharisees began to urge him VEHEMENTLY, and to PROVOKE HIM, TO SPEAK OF MANY THINGS

Luke 11: 54: "Laying wait for him, and seeking to catch something OUT OF HIS MOUTH THAT THEY MIGHT ACCUSE HIM."

Were people pissed off by the things Jesus said? You bet they were!!!! So what? Maybe this emotion will cause them to really think or change their way of thinking!

SD, aren't you doing the same thing, judging & accusing & finding fault and at the same time being prone to being hurt by what others say?

In answer to your other question, shouldn't Kurt pray for his enemies? Have you forgotten already his blog to Judge Alsup where he prayed that Judge Alsup would do the noble thing and prayed for his welfare to follow God's will in the trial? Or his invitation to his enemies to attend the celebration party in the future? Is this your accusation that Kurt cares not about his enemies or doesn't pray for their welfare either? After all, he's saving all of his clients, even the so called "retards", even those that speak ill against him, so what more can a person do? Do you really have to ask if he prays for his enemies? Isn't it quite obvious by the many myriad of statements he has already made? Aren't you complaining more about presentment rather than material issues?

So says the "Mighty" Quin, I mean "Mighty Mouse", the insignificant one, the one that would be wrong against you MOST OF THE TIME.

mogel said...

SD said: "I don't really understand why everyone that doesn't see things exactly the same way as you do is a "retard".
_______________________________

No, I disagree with your definition. A "retard" would be those that fight the dorean cause by their unkind & untrue and unfair comments or those that believe that banks lend their own assets or those that believe and rely on "fantasy rulings" as truth.

After all, you can't see EXACTLY THE WAY SOMEONE ELSE THINKS AT ANY TIME ANYWAY. That type of understanding & empathy would require perfection.

Unlike you, I think Kurt's tolerance is one of his strong points of character.