Thursday, April 09, 2009

Tears of Lament (2-27-09)

We are brave to use a judgment not of Christ. Are we such rebels to trash His adored bride? It seems to me that if our Hope is eternal unity we might at least make steps toward that goal in this life. Perhaps this poem says it best:

Weep, weep for those
Who do the work of the Lord
With a high look
And a proud heart.
Their voice is lifted up
In the streets, and their cry is heard.
The bruised reed they break
By their great strength, and the smoking flax
They trample.

Weep not for the quenched
(For their God will hear their cry
And the Lord will come to save them)
But weep, weep for the quenchers.

For when the Day of the Lord
Is come, and the vales sing
And the hills clap their hands
And the light shines
Then their eyes shall be opened
On a waste place,
Smoldering.
The smoke of the flax bitter
In their nostrils,
Their feet pierced
By broken reed-stems…
Wood, hay, and stubble,
And no grass springing,
And all the birds flown.

Weep, weep for those
Who have made a desert
In the name of the Lord. Evangeline Paterson

Are you without tears?

5 comments:

Yetter said...

Luke 24:5-6
"He is not here;he has risen!
HALLELUJAH
Gods speed kurt,scott,big O and all others,friend or retard.

mogel007 said...

The truth finally comes out. R.A. Mitchell the person's signature on all federal tax liens filed IS A PERSON, & SHE'S WORKED FOR THE IRS FOR 30 YEARS, HOWEVER, SHE DOES NOT SIGN THOSE FRAUDULENT LIENS HERSELF. THE SIGNATURE IS NOT A STAMP AS THE OTHER IRS OFFICIAL LIED. IT IS HER SIGNATURE, ON THOSE MILLIONS OF LIENS, BUT SHE IS NOT AWARE THAT HER NAME APPEARS ON ALL THOSE LIENS AS SHE HAS NEVER MET THE LIENED PERSONS NOR DOES SHE KNOW ANYTHING ABOUT THEM. THE IRS IN ESSENCE BORROWERS HER SIGNATURE FROM A COMPUTER PROGRAM WITHOUT HER KNOWLEDGE OR CONSENT.

WHAT KIND OF NONSENSE & FRAUD IS THIS? HOW WOULD YOU LIKE IT IF SOMEONE BORROWED YOUR SIGNATURE EVERYTIME SOMEONE WITH AN AGENDA NEEDED TO PUT YOUR NAME ON A DOCUMENT YOU WERE UNAWARE OF? HOW CAN YOU ATTEST TO A DOCUMENT THAT YOU ARE UNAWARE OF THE CIRCUMSTANCES? YOU CAN'T. HENCE ALL IRS LIENS ARE FORGERIES.
_________________________________


From: Lindsey Springer [mailto:gnutella@ mindspring. com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 08, 2009 9:16 PM
To: lindsey springer
Subject: R.A. Mitchell Deposition update

Lindsey Springer here and I must first say thank you to each of you that chose to lend your support aiding my taking of several depositions of high ranking treasury officials. I also wish to thank those of you who were unable to support my endeavor financially but were otherwise supportive in your words and the letters you sent. I have read them all and remain truly blessed that there remains people who follow the truth without regard to the influence of money.I must first say that R.A. Mitchell was unaware of any of the specific information displayed upon the documents to which her signature appears. She explained that as part of her job performance she would sign her name into a computer program and this would enable her signature to appear on specific taxpayer documents that required a signature to be presumed valid. She testified she had been sued more times than she can remember but before April 2, 2009, she had never answered a single question under oath. Not one. No discovery. No trial testimony. She has worked for the IRS for over 30 years. (Hmmmm!?)

I asked her certain questions about information that was input on the Notice of Federal Tax Liens like the "assessment" dates to which she said she had no first hand personal knowledge of any assessments on any Notice of Federal Tax Liens displaying her name. I asked her if she ever spoke with certain Revenue Officers whose specific name appeared underneath or below her signature to which she stated she did not know them and had never met them before or since their names were joined upon a Notice of Federal Tax Lien with hers. I read every name I had in my possession and her answer remained the same every time. She did not know them and had never spoken to them. One thing is for certain and that is the signature of R.A. Mitchell is not a "stamp." Remember Ms. Norman gave that testimony on February 24, 2009. The word Ms. Mitchell eventually used was facsimile signature.

She testified the Internal Revenue Districts no longer exist and have not existed since at least October of 2000. She also stated there are no District Directors. She went on to say that if she had to actually sign every document needing her signature that it would be impossible for her to sign her name as the documents are in the thousands. I would add in the millions.

She testified that assessments meant form 23c and that she had never heard of the RAC 006 assessment form. I asked her how long the collection period was and she answered 6 years. I asked her was she sure it was not 10 years and she answered she was sure.

I also deposed Janice Wiedemann who had occupied her current office for a month before being introduced to the name Lindsey Springer. Ms. Wiedemann testified that Revenue Officers must go through Kentucky for Liens and Levies. She testified there was no law that requires an IRS Notice of Federal Tax Lien to be signed. I thought it interesting here that the official position of the IRS is that if there is no specific words in any specific law that said "Notice of Federal Tax Liens" must be signed, that I had heard that same type theory before coming from tax protestors. Only the issue being protested was what law required the taxpayer to sign their name under penalty of perjury and waive their Fifth Amendment Rights.

I asked her why then on the Form 668 does it have a place for a signature and she said that was not something that mattered to her. I asked her wouldn’t it matter to the taxpayer named on the Notice of Federal Tax Lien and she responded that did not matter to her because she is paid by the United States. I asked her don’t the taxpayers that are bailing out the banks, the same ones who pay her salary, need someone to protect their interest on those Notice of Federal Tax Liens? She answered "the ones who pay their taxes" but not the ones who do not.

In short, the United States is trying to act like a separate entity when it fits a certain agenda and hopes you and I think we and the United States are one and the same when it fits another type agenda. Notice of Federal Tax Liens demonstrate what is wrong with America.

They purport to be signed but they are not. They purport to be the truth of the matter but no truth is in them. They purport to represent due process has been given but no process due was ever given. Notice of Federal Tax Liens contain information the taxpayer has never seen. Our founding fathers and mothers died so you and I could have due process and the right to a jury trial involving any controversy greater than $ 20.00.

The date Notice of Federal Tax Liens are prepared means nothing to the IRS. Where they are prepared, you guessed it, meaningless. We must drive the forged Notice of Federal Tax Liens out of the Court Houses nationwide.

If IRS officials tell Congress they could not possibly read everything the law requires them to sign, let alone sign the things they may or may not have read, then and only then, will Congress stop the continuance of the IRS roaming the States seeking to devour who ever they will. Interestingly, section 7601 only allows IRS to roam the "districts" and says nothing about the States because the United States has no power to roam in and particular State.

I also took the deposition of a person in Houston that you will soon learn gave another very interesting question to qualify a question I had asked involving the words "United States." When I asked this question using this phrase he asked me a question "what do you mean by United States." I thought "exactly."

I also have taken the deposition of Kathleen Bushnell. You will run into that name if you ever have any "Certificate of Official Record" presented in any case you are in. She is the one that says here is what our records show but she actually testified she knows nothing about what ever is on those Certificates which depict her name and official title. All depositions should be ready in about two weeks.

Tomorrow I take two more depositions of one Revenue Officer and one CI Agent.

For now, Lindsey Springer

4.8.09
__._,_.___

dr. ira gilac said...

"HE IS ARISEN!!!"

judge allslop said...

SHOCKING!!!!
The Govt lie,cheat and steal while supported and abetted by our court system.Say it ain't so Bean.

mogel007 said...

Proof we are all just debt slaves traded as a commodity since birth:

http://pandorasbox
byalexchristopher.com/
china.aspx